Lisner Louise Dickson Hurthome

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.33 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.01 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.43 to 1.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, facility staff failed to report an incident of injury of unknown origin to the State Agency within 24 hours. Resident #5.The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Repeated Falls, Difficulty Walking, and Seizures.Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A Modification Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment; no functional limitations in range of motion; used a walker and wheelchair mobility devices; required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene; and no falls since the prior MDS assessment.08/05/25 at 7:10 AM Nurses Note: Resident c/o (complained of) rt (right) hip pain, resident stated, 'I can't get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, facility failed to ensure the physician signed and dated progress notes at the time of each visit. Resident #1. The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Depression, Anxiety Disorder, Sepsis, Hyperlipidemia and Intrahepatic Bile Duct Carcinoma.Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment date 07/09/25 showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15 indicating, intact cognitive status; Resident Mood Interview (PHQ-2 to 9 (C)) total severity score of 05 indicating mild depression; and received antianxiety and antidepressant medications.07/20/25 Initial Psych Consultation Note:- - Appetite decreased.- - Depression moderate.- - Gradual dose reduction: clinically contraindicated.- - Patient reports persistent feeling of low mood and lack of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 26 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to show documented evidence that an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse was reported to the state agency in the required time frame of 24 hours as evidenced by an allegation of possible sexual abuse first documented in Resident #27's medical record on 04/22/24 but not reported to the state agency until 04/24/24. Resident #27. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Policy and Procedures for Abuse Prevention Program with an effective date of June 2023 documented the following: Sexual abuse-this refers to non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. It includes but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion, inappropriate touching or sexual assault. Should an incident investigation lead to suspicion or allegation of resident abuse, the administrator, or his/her designee, will appoint an individual to investigate the incident. Resident #27 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, during a tour of the kitchen on June 16, 2025, at approximately 10:45 AM, facility staff failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions. The findings include: 1. One (1) of one (1) thirty-two-ounce container of Liquid Whole Eggs with Citric Acid stored in the walk-in refrigerator had a use-by date of April 24, 2025. 2. Three (3) of three (3) one and-one-half size pans, and four (4) of four (4) one-quarter size pans were stacked wet, on a shelf, ready for use. These findings were acknowledged by Employee #11 during a face-to-face interview on June 18, 2025, at approximately 10:00 AM.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 29 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its policies and procedures for investigating an allegation of abuse. Resident #41. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled [Facility Name] Abuse Investigation Protocol, not dated, documented, .The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum . Conduct all interviews in the presence of a witness; Make every effort to interview staff members giving direct care to the resident for two days prior to the incident . Interview any staff members or others who may have knowledge of the incident . The following guidelines will be used when conducting interviews .Witness reports will be reduced to writing. Witnesses will be required to sign and date such reports . Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Vascular Dementia, with Anxiety, Chronic Pain and Muscle Weakness. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 29 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. Resident #41. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled [Facility Name] Abuse Investigation Protocol, not dated, documented, .The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum . Conduct all interviews in the presence of a witness; Make every effort to interview staff members giving direct care to the resident for two days prior to the incident . Interview any staff members or others who may have knowledge of the incident . The following guidelines will be used when conducting interviews .Witness reports will be reduced to writing. Witnesses will be required to sign and date such reports . Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Vascular Dementia, with Anxiety, Chronic Pain and Muscle Weakness. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed: A Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 29 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code one resident's dental status in the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS). Resident #21. The findings included: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Mixed Hyperlipidemia, Vesicointestinal Fistula, and Long Term use of Anticoagulants. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed: 12/31/22 at 11:33 [Nutrition Assessment] .Oral/Dental Condition: Dentures- full upper; Dentures- full lower. A Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 11, indicating moderate impaired cognition. Section L0200 (Dental), directed check all that apply, which included, No natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous). The MDS showed facility staff documented an X at the line None of the above were present. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 04/05/23 at 2:59 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 29 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to update a resident's care plan to include goals and approaches to address one resident's Sacral pressure ulcer. Residents' #50. Findings included: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anemia, Hypertensive Heart Disease, and Major Depressive Disease. A review of the medical record revealed the following: A review of care plans showed a focus area, [Resident Name] has potential for impairment to skin integrity related to frail/fragile skin, memory impairment, impaired mobility, use of hypertensive medications, initiated on 2/23/2023. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C (Cognitive Patterns), a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicating an intact cognitive response. Under Section G (Functional Status) - Bed Mobility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 29 sampled residents, facility staff failed to account for the dispensing of a controlled medications. Residents' #6 and #23. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to account for the dispensing of Resident #6's ordered Tramadol (narcotic pain reliever). Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Polyosteoarthritis, Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy and Dementia. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed: A physician's order dated 08/25/22 that directed, Tramadol HCl (hydrochloride) Tablet 50 MG Give 0.5 tablet by mouth everyday shift for pain control . During a narcotic count conducted on 04/06/23 at 10:16 AM of the Team A medication cart with Employee #7 (Licensed Practical Nurse), it was noted that Resident #6's inventory sheet for Tramadol (narcotic pain reliever) 50 mg (milligrams) ½ (half) tablets documented 21 remaining, however, the blister packet was observed to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to distribute and serve foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by final rinse temperatures from one (1) of two (2) dishwashers that were consistently below 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in high heat disinfect mode. The findings included: During observations in dietary services on April 5, 2023, at approximately 12: 45 PM, one (1) of one (1) dishwasher in the main kitchen failed to reach a minimum of 180 degrees Fahrenheit on numerous consecutive occasions. Two (2) of two (2) trays of dishes and utensils that had been washed were rewashed in the chemical disinfect dishwasher located in the resident's small kitchen, on the Long-Term Care unit. When tested, the chemical disinfect solution from that dish machine was at 200 PPM. Employee #10 confirmed the findings on April 10, 2023, at approximately 11:00 AM. Cross Refrence: 22 DCMR sec.3219.1

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DC