Sibley Mem Hosp Renaissance

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 335 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 14.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 204 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 2.90 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 30.6 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 4.41 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.80 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 4.73 to 3.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-06 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide the necessary social and health care services to attain, maintain, or support the behavioral health (emotional and mental well-being) needs of Resident #1. Due to these failures, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-J) was identified on February 5, 2024 at 12:07 PM. During this survey, Immediate Jeopardy was identified at 42 CFR §483.40, Behavioral Health (F740), on February 5, 2024 at 12:07 PM. The facility's Administrator submitted a corrective action plan to the Survey Team that was accepted on February 5, 2024 at 7:52 PM. The Survey Team verified implementation of the corrective plan while onsite and the Immediate Jeopardy was lifted on February 6, 2024 at 2:15 PM. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice remained at a potential for harm at the scope and severity level of G. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] to room [ROOM NUMBER] with multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #20, who was admitted to the facility with a bruise to the left heel received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent a deep tissue injury from developing for approximately 14 days, for one (1) of 17 sampled residents. The findings included . Deep Tissue Pressure Injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, or purple discoloration - Intact or non-intact skin with localized area or persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration or epidermal separation revealing a dark wound bed or blood-filled blister. Pain and temperature changes often preceded skin color changes. Discoloration may appear differently in darkly pigmented skin. This injury results from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone muscle interface. The wound may evolve rapidly to reveal the actual extent of tissue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #123 Abuse 08/13/24 09:20 AM #123 [NAME] DOB [DATE] DOA [DATE] Discharge [DATE] DX: - Rupture of Quadriplegic tendon - Lumbar Dengerative Disc Disease - Status Fall F610 The facility failed to ensure an alleged perpetrator did not have access to a resident who made an allegation of rough handling. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct a through investigation. As evidence by not having documented evidence of interview with the companion who was in the room on the night if the alleged incident of rough handling. OBSERVATION Unable to conduct observations, resident was discharged on [DATE] RECORD REVIEW MDS ADD Info see hard copy Care Plan- see hard copy 04/27/24 and 04/28/24 flow sheeted did not document any concerns or complaints from the resident. 04/28/24 at 8:37 AM [[NAME]'s (alleged perpetrator) Nursing Note] Pt. slept well .companion with patient from mid-night resident remains stable with no new complaints/concerns. 05/08/24 Facility Investigation- included statements from all staff who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #17 Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review 08/12/24 09:58 AM #17 [NAME] DOB - [DATE] DOA - [DATE] DX: - Gram positive Bacteria -Anemia -Endocarditis -DVT -Thrombophilia -Insomnia [DATE] admission MDS C-11 I - Insomnia 483.45 Pharmacy (F756) - The physician failed to documented response to pharmacist recommendations. 08/12/24 10:01 AM OBSERVATION During an observation on 08/08/24 at 11:00 AM, the resident was observed lying in bed. A, OX 3, no bruising noted. RECORD REVIEW 07/16/23 - MMR Please monitor patient for additive CNS depressant effect and QTC prolongation due to DDI between Quetiapane and Mirtazine. The physcian failed to documented hi response. [DATE]- admission MDS C-11 I - Insomnia N- antipsychotics, anticoags. o 07/29/24 - Eliquis (anticoagulant) 5mg po BID for VTE Tx. no monthly labs need for this mediation o 07/29/24 -Trazadone (psychotropic) 25mg (1/2 tab) prn nightly X1 for sleep. It should be noted the resident has not received this medication since start date.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Facility staff failed to ensure that their infection control policies were reviewed annually. During a review of the facility's infection control policies on 08/09/24 revealed a policy titled Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policy - Policy Number ADMIN033 that documented Effective Date 11/10/2022 and Supersedes Date 09/23/2022. A face-to-face interview conducted on 08/09/24 at 12:50 PM, Employee #2 (Director of Nursing/DON) acknowledged the findings and stated, We adopt our policies from the hospital. We need to show that the policies are being reviewed annually and the review date should be reflected on the policy. Cross Reference: 22B DCMR Sec. 3206.3 Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 18 sampled residents, facility staff failed to follow the facility's policy of acceptable Infection Control Standards and Practices while changing a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line dressing; and failed to ensure that their infection control policies were reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, the facility's staff (Employee #5) failed to provide appropriate medically-related social services to meet Resident #1's needs, as evidenced by the employee's failure to conduct a follow-up assessment on 01/29/24 after the resident expressed that he wanted to die. The findings included: A review of Employee #5's job description signed on 05/11/22, revealed the following Job title Social Worker II (Department Case Coordination) .Provides expeditious patient assessments and collaborates with medical providers in determining the appropriate disposition and treatment for behavioral health patients and other vulnerable patient populations .Conducts behavioral health assessments using standardized assessment and screening tools in conjunction with the department of psychiatry policies and procedures. Communicates psychiatric crisis intake assessments and clinical information to psychiatric medical provider and develops disposition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete medical record for Resident #1. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Records and Record Keeping with an effective date 03/24/23, documented .Staff are responsible for maintaining current and accurate documentation of interventions on behalf of the patient utilizing the charting system adopted by (Facility Name) . Entries on the patients electronic medical record should be responsive to physician direction and facilitate communication among all staff members involved in the patient's care . Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] to room [ROOM NUMBER] with multiple diagnoses that included: Orthostatic Hypotension, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Parkinson's Disease, and Coronary Artery Disease. A review of the medical record revealed the following: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of nine (9) nasal cannulas (delivers oxygen via the nose), facility staff failed to maintain respiratory/oxygen care equipment in accordance with the professional standards of practice. The findings included: During an observation of the Respiratory Equipment Cart on [DATE] at 12:14 PM, nine (9) of nine (9) Vyaire (manufacturer) nasal cannula tubing with expiration dates of 2022-10-08 ([DATE]) were stored for resident use, approximately three (3) months after the expiration date. During a face-to-face interview conducted on [DATE] at 12:59 PM, Employee #12 (Respiratory Therapy Manager) stated, There's no daily or weekly inventory check of the respiratory equipment cart. If supplies are needed, they [the nurses] call us and we bring the supplies. The employee was shown the expired nasal cannula tubing's and stated, Oh wow! I will get rid of these and get new ones. Employee #12 further stated that the nasal cannulas come from central supply. During a face-to-face interview on [DATE] at 2:13…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 16 sampled residents, facility staff failed to offer a resident or their representative the right to formulate or refuse an Advanced Directive (AD). Resident #79. The findings included: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Right Hip Pain, and Obesity. Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed the following: Review of the Resident's Face Sheet revealed that the resident had a legal guardian. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed facility staff coded the resident as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #79's electronic medical record documented, Advance Directives - Living Will - Patient has [an] advance directive. Copy in [physical] Chart. Review of Resident #79's physical chart showed that there were no documents filed under the Advance Directive tab. During a face-to-face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by soiled bathroom vents in four (4) of eight (8) resident's rooms, and walls marred with peeling paint in three (3) of eight (8) resident's rooms. The findings include: During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on January 4, 2023, at approximately 3:15 PM, the following were observed: 1. Bathroom vents were soiled on the inside and outside in four (4) of eight (8) resident's rooms including rooms #322, #327, #328, and #330. 2. Paint was peeling from the walls in three (3) of eight (8) resident's rooms (#322, #327, #330). These findings were acknowledged by Employee #8 on January 4, 2023, at approximately 4:00 PM.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for three (3) of 16 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its policies and procedures for reporting and investigating incidents involving abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin. Residents' #81, #80 and #85. The findings included: Review of the Abuse and Neglect Policy with an effective date of 12/23/21, documented, .The Director of Nursing (DON) shall be notified in order to assist in appropriately implementing the notification requirements . incidents of abuse .shall be reported to the DC (District of Columbia) Metropolitan Police, the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and Adult Protective Services: within 2 hours after the allegation has been made if the event(s) that caused the allegation involve(s) abuse .Investigation . All reports of alleged abuse, misappropriation of property, and injuries of unknown origin are investigated promptly in a systematic and thorough manner . The facility shall report the results of all investigations to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records, reported incidents, policies, and staff interview for four (4) of 16 sampled residents, facility staff failed to report the following incidents to the state agency in the required timeframes for one (1) resident who had a witnessed fall with staff that resulted in injury, one (1) residents with injuries of unknown origin, and one (1) resident with an allegation of abuse. (Residents' #81, #80, and #85) The findings included: A facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy (Formerly 01-28-01), effective 12/23/2021, documented: .Procedure .E. The Director of Nursing shall be notified to assist in appropriately implementing the notification requirements . incidents of abuse .shall be reported to the DC Metropolitan Police, the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and Adult Protective Services: within 2 hours after the allegation has been made if the event(s) that caused the allegation involve abuse .Investigation: a. All reports of alleged abuse, misappropriation of property, and injuries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 79 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in DC