No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stoddard Baptist Nursing Home

1818 Newton St. NW, Washington, DC 20010 · Non profit - Corporation · 164 certified beds · (202) 328-7400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (202) 328-7400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20244 actual-harm citations$97,426 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $97,426 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-21)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
2041 Georgia Avenue, Northwest, Howard University Hospital 1st Floor, Suite A · (202) 865-1183 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3169 Mt Pleasant St NW · (202) 387-3100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3327 18th St NW · (202) 333-3333 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2109 Park Rd NW · (202) 328-0121 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.1%20.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%6.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.5%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%1.1%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.6%16.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.5%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%7.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.8%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.7%8.0%17.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%0.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.5%73.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%18.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%8.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.611.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.910.551.80worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

75.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

75.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
15.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 15.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF75.2%CMS range 65.4–84.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.0–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge15.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge15.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge15.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.8–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.25
RN hoursweekends
47.0%
Total nursing turnover
65.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 164 beds and averages 103.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.46 to 1.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-03-20)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident had adequate assistance while being transferred from the wheelchair to the bed in the resident's room and subsequently the resident sustained injuries and was transferred to the hospital emergency room. Resident #1. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Unspecified Dementia, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and Muscle Weakness. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) DC~13527 was submitted to the State Agency on 03/14/25 at 10:41 PM, that documented the following: On March 14, 2025, around 21:45 (9:45 PM), Nursing Assistant Ms. (Employee Name) was providing care for resident (Resident Name). After she transferred (Resident Name) on bed, she noted that he had blood coming from his mouth and nose. Once the nursing assistant observed the bleeding, she notified the nurse, nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #52 received care to prevent pressure ulcer development that was first observed at a Stage 3. This deficiency resulted in actual harm to Resident #52 on 02/28/2024. The findings included: Review of the facility's Wound Care Consultant Contract dated 09/14/22 documented,The Wound Care Consultant agrees to serve as the Wound Care Consultant to coordinate medical care in the facility and provide clinical guidance and oversight regarding wound care; provide diagnosis and treatment recommendations for wounds; and sign and date all orders, such as medications. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcers, Prevention and Care policy revised on 11/10/22 documented: - Skin integrity alteration will be reported to the physician for treatment orders. - Classification of pressure ulcers: Stage 2: a partial thickness of skin is lost (epidermal layer has been lost, but dermis is at least partially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 1 residents sampled for pain management, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #243 received effective pain assessments/evaluation for a known left hip fracture. The findings included: According to National Institute of Health (NIH): - Assessment of pain is a critical step to providing good pain management. - Nurses working with patients with acute pain must select the appropriate elements of assessment for the current clinical situation. - The most critical aspect of pain assessment is that it is done on a regular basis (e.g., once a shift, every 2 hours) using a standard format. The assessment parameters should be explicitly directed. - To meet the patients' needs, pain should be reassessed after each intervention to evaluate the effect and determine whether modification is needed. The time frame for reassessment also should be directed. - Pain assessment should include intensity, location, and quality.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-11-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #26 received timely treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the physician's orders for her right foot; and facility staff failed to assess Resident #32's skin every shift per the care plan. Subsequently, the resident was observed with cellulitis of left lower limb with edema. These failures resulted in actual harm to Resident #26 when it was determined that the resident's reddened right big toe (first observed on 07/14/22) further declined and resulted in amputation on 10/26/22. The findings included: Review of the policy Documentation Criteria last reviewed on 07/22/22 directed, Clinical notes are written by a licensed nurse in the medical record. Clinical notes are randomly audited by registered nurse quarterly. Finding of audit are reported to QI (Quality Improvement) team with scheduled meeting . Clinical notes for decubitus/open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and staff interviews for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure interventions were implemented for a resident who was status post cervical laminectomy and required assistance from staff with transfers; and for a resident with a history of Dementia and Left Below the Knee Amputation (BKA) who required 2-person assistance while performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Residents' #34 and #35. The findings included: An undated facility policy titled 'Activities of Daily Living' documented in part, [Nursing home facility's name] will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) do not deteriorate and Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. 2. Transfer and ambulation. 3. Toileting and A resident who is unable to carry out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and staff interviews for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide a resident with food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, appearance, and that is palatable and attractive. Resident #35. A review of Resident #35's medical record revealed: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Laminectomy and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented: facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of '15,' indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the facility's resident lunch menu dated 11/17/25 documented: Cream of Mushroom Soup, Tuna Macaroni, Peas & Carrots, Crackers and Strawberry Yogurt. During an observation conducted on 11/17/25 at approximately 12:34 PM, Resident #35's lunch tray was noted on the bedside table untouched. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for two (2) of seven (7) sampled residents, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State agency in the required timeframe as evidenced by an incident involving a resident-to-resident altercation first documented by the facility on 02/25/25 but not reported to the State agency until 03/03/25. Resident #2 and #3. The findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention updated in 2024, documented the following: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. 'Willful' means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that he/she [NAME] have intended to inflict injury or harm. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within hearing distance, regardless of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for a resident who required a 2-person physical assist when transferring from the wheelchair to the bed. Resident #1. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Unspecified Dementia, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and Muscle Weakness. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) DC~13527 was submitted to the State Agency on 03/14/25 at 10:41 PM, that documented the following: On March 14, 2025, around 21:45 (9:45 PM), Nursing Assistant Ms. (Employee Name) was providing care for resident (Resident Name). After she transferred (Resident Name) on bed, she noted that he had blood coming from his mouth and nose. Once the nursing assistant observed the bleeding, she notified the nurse, nurses attempted to control the bleeding coming from the residents nose. Nurse (Employee name) performed a complete body and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to serve foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by hot foods temperatures that were below 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on six (6) of six (6) observations, two (2) of two (2) convection ovens, and two (2) of two (2) grease fryers that were soiled throughout, ready-to-eat (RTE), open bags of foods such as two (2) of two (2) packs of cold cuts, one (1) of two (2) bags of shredded yellow cheese, three (3) of five (5) packs of sliced yellow cheese, one (1) of one (1) bag of feta cheese, one (1) of one (1) jar of applesauce stored in the walk-in refrigerator, that were not labeled to indicate a use-by ' date, pieces of frozen chicken that were being thawed improperly, and a sanitize water solution in the 3 compartment sink that tested below the recommended 200 parts per million (PPM). The findings include: Test tray food temperatures were inadequate as puree hot foods such as chicken (106.5), spinach (104.1), potatoes (105.8), and regular hot foods such as fried chicken (134.4), spinach (114.4), and potatoes (106.6)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for four (4) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that they conducted thorough investigations. Resident #'s 192, 294, 244 and 63. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention revised 09/24/22 documented: - Investigation: Identifying and interviewing all involved persons including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator and others who might have knowledge of the allegations Review of a facility policy titled, Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention (#99-12) documented the following but not limited to: Neglect-means failure to the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Investigation of alleged Abuse and Neglect - Focusing the investigation on determining if neglect has occurred, the extent, and the cause. Providing complete and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to immediately notify the resident's primary physician or their representative when there was a change in the resident's condition that required physician intervention. Resident #52 and Resident #243. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to immediately notify Resident #52's primary physician and their representative of a facility acquired sacral pressure ulcer/wound. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Adult Failure to Thrive, History of Falling, and Weakness. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A face sheet that showed the resident had a legal guardian as her Responsible Party (RP), substitute decision maker and emergency contact #1. A Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 07, indicating severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure Resident #192 was free from neglect as evidenced by the resident leaving the facility without staff knowledge. The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Missing Resident #99M-010, documented, A resident is considered missing from the facility whenever their whereabouts cannot be ascertained. This situation is an elopement. Resident #192 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: Encephalopathy, Seizures, Muscle Weakness and Cirrhosis of the Liver. Review of the medical record revealed the following: A care plan dated 01/01/23 that documented, Problem: [Resident #192] has risk for Elopement related to wandering evidenced by trying to enter the elevator. Goal: Resident will not elope. Approach: Monitor resident's movements closely while out of bed. Encourage resident to verbalize feelings of boredom/loneliness at all times. Encourage resident to participate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and resident and staff interviews, for four (4) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its policies and procedures for reporting and investigating allegations or incidents of abuse and neglect. Resident #192, Resident #40, Resident #25 and Resident #294. The findings included: A policy titled Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention (#99-12) documented the following but not limited to: Each resident has the right to be free from neglect. Neglect- means failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Abuse reviewed on 08/23/23, documented the following: each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents and Abuse means the willful infliction of injury and resulting in physical harm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to report the results of their investigations to the State Agency within 5 (five) working days of the incident. Resident #192 and Resident #294. The findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention revised on 12/16/22 documented the following: The facility will designate an Abuse prevention Coordinator in the facility who is responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation to the state survey agency and other officials in accordance with state law and An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Written procedures for investigations include: Identifying staff responsible for the investigation, exercising caution in handling evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation (e.g. (for example) not tampering or destroying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide Resident #66's representative with written information that specified the duration of the state bed-hold policy before transfer to the hospital. The findings included: Review of the facility's Bed Hold policy, last reviewed on 04/26/23, documented that: - The admissions office will mail out the Bed Hold notification form to each resident/point of contact each time they are out of the facility. - The form will be mailed out the next business day. - The notification shall provide the number of [bed-hold] days remaining. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia. Review of the Resident #66's medical record revealed the following: It was noted that the face sheet documented Resident #66's wife as his responsible party and emergency contact. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to complete a quarterly (every 3 months) assessment for Resident #72. The findings included: Review of the facility's contracts showed that [Company name], effective on 02/12/24, was responsible for completing the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. The contract documented: - [Company Name] shall provide the facility with ongoing MDS department support, specifically, to organize, review, encode and confirm timely completion of all admission, quarterly, annual and significant change in status MDS assessments. Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 3, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Pain, and Cerebral Infarction. Review of Resident #72's MDS transmittal sheet provided to this surveyor on 03/08/24 documented: - Annual MDS assessment - dated 10/03/23 showed Accepted, indicating that it was accepted by Center for Medicare and Medicaid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence a resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed as evidenced by not coding the resident's cognitive patterns in Section C. Resident #89. The findings included: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction and Multiple Sclerosis. Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed: An Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented: Section C - Cognitive Patterns, Should Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (C0200-C0500) be conducted? 1. Yes. However, there was no documented evidence that facility staff conducted the BIMS, as evidenced by Sections C0200, C0400 and C0500 were blank. Additionally, there was no documented evidence of the resident's BIMS summary score that indicated the resident's cognitive status. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 03/07/24 at 2:07 PM, Employee #4 (Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop a care plan with goals and approaches to address a resident's use of a central intravenous (IV) line and a cholecystectomy tube and failed to implement a resident's care plan intervention for falls. Resident #66 and Resident #71. The findings included: Review of the facility's Interdisciplinary Care Plans policy, last reviewed on 11/10/22, it documented: - An individualized interdisciplinary care plan will be maintained for each resident. - Information recorded on the care plan includes date problems and/or needs first addressed, active problems and current needs of the resident. 1. Facility staff failed to develop care plans with goals and approaches for Resident #66's use of a central intravenous (IV) line and a cholecystectomy tube. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Retention of Urine, Hypertension and Dementia. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, staff interviews, and a family interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident. As a result, the resident left the facility without staff knowledge (Resident #192). The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Missing Resident #99M-010, documented, A resident is considered missing from the facility whenever their whereabouts cannot be ascertained. This situation is an elopement. Resident #192 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including: Encephalopathy, Seizures, Muscle Weakness and Cirrhosis of the Liver. Review of the medical record revealed the following: A care plan dated 01/01/23 that documented, Problem: [Resident #192] has risk for Elopement related to wandering evidenced by trying to enter the elevator. Goal: Resident will not elope. Approach: Monitor resident's movements closely while out of bed. Encourage resident to verbalize feelings of boredom/loneliness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to follow the physician's order to change Resident #66's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line dressing every Friday. The findings included: Review of the facility's PICC/Midline/CVAD (central venous access device) Dressing Change policy dated 10/05/22, it documented: - It is the policy of this facility to change PICC, midline or CVAD dressing weekly or if soiled, in a manner to decrease potential for infection. - Physician's orders will specify type of dressing and frequency of change. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Retention of Urine, Hypertension and Dementia. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed: A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 03, indicating severely impaired cognitive status. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, for two (2) of two (2) oxygen storage rooms, facility staff failed to ensure that empty oxygen tanks were not stored in the same area as full oxygen tanks intended for patient use. The findings included: According to the Joint Commission: - Storing oxygen cylinders, as per the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 99-2012, 11.6. 5.2, is about ensuring full and empty cylinders are not comingled. - Those cylinders defined as 'empty' by the organization shall be segregated from all other cylinders that are intended for patient care use. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/standard-faqs/home-care/environment-of-care-ec/000001261/#:~:text=Storing%20oxygen%20cylinders%2C%20as%20per,intended%20for%20patient%20care%20use. 1. An observation on 03/05/24 at 10:09 AM of the 2nd floor oxygen storage room, with Employee #22 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) showed, one (1) empty oxygen tank was stored in the same area with four (4) full oxygen tanks that were stored for resident use. At the time of the observation, Employee #22 stated, I'm not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of radiology results that fell outside of clinical reference range. Resident #243. The findings included: Resident #243 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Muscle Weakness, Other Abnormalities of Gait and Balance and Age-Related Physical Debility. Review of Resident #243's medical record revealed the following: An Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a BIMS summary score of 12, indicating mild cognitive impairment and had no falls since the prior assessment. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI), DC~11996, received by the State Agency on 05/29/23 at 6:30 PM documented: - At 4:40 PM, the resident got up on her seat to give another resident a hug and she missed her step and fell on her left side. - The physician was called and gave an order for an x-ray of the affected leg. - Resident RP was called and was made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to provide documented evidence that the Nurse Staffing Agency used to supplement the facility's nursing staff was operating in compliance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, as evidenced by providing services in the District of Columbia (D.C.) on an expired business license. The facility's census on the first day of the survey was 90. The findings included: A review of a letter addressed to [Nurse Staffing Agency's Name] dated [DATE] from the D.C. Department of Health documented, Enclosed is your Certificate of Licensure that covers the period [DATE], through [DATE]. A review of the Staffing Agency's business license issued by the District of Columbia revealed a license number with an expiration date of [DATE]. A review of the Service Contract between Nurse Staffing Agency and the facility, signed on [DATE] by Employee #19 (Chief Human Resources Officer) documented, Thank you for choosing [Nurse Staffing Agency's Name]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for three (3) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately document in the residents' medical record. Resident #66, The findings included: Review of the Documentation Criteria policy last reviewed on 07/22/22, documented: - The objective is to maintain clinical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized. 1. Facility staff failed to accurately document n Resident #66's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Retention of Urine, Hypertension and Dementia. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed: A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 03, indicating severely impaired cognitive status. A Health Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, for 12 out of 25 Infection Control policies and procedures, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that they were reviewed at least annually. The findings included: A review of the facility's Infection Control Policy and Procedure binder on 03/19/24 revealed that the following policies lacked review dates: admission of Residents During an Outbreak Control of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Colonization (#11-015) Control of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) Infection (#06-003) Discharge Room Cleaning (Non-Isolation/Infection Precaution Room) Handling Infectious Waste Infection Outbreak Response and Investigation Infectious Waste Material Exposure Control (#99-013) Multiple Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) (#06-002) Reporting of In-House Infection and Communicable Disease (#99-01) Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection Visitation During a Communicable Disease Outbreak. This binder also showed a policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship (#19-007) that had a review date of 07/22/22. During a face-to-face interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that the residents or their responsible party received education on Influenza vaccination. (Resident #4 and Resident #49). The findings included: Review of the Immunization of Residents for Flu (Influenza) and Pneumococcal (#10-00) Policy with a review date of 07/20/23 documented the following but not limited to, The resident or the resident's legal representative is provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effect of immunizations. 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dementia. A review of the face sheet showed that Resident #4's son was her responsible party. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 3, indicating the resident had a severely impaired cognitive status. A review of a document titled, Preventive Health Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to maintain essential equipment in safe condition as evidenced by one (1) of one (1) defective food pellet warmer, and two (2) of four (4) burners from one (1) of one (1) gas stove that did not function when tested. The findings include: During a walkthrough of dietary services on March 4, 2024, at approximately 9:00 am: One (1) of one (1) food pellet warmer was inoperative. Two (2) of four (4) burners from one (1) of two (2) gas stoves did not light up when the knob was activated. These observations were acknowledged by Employee #9 during a face-to-face interview on March 11, 2024, at approximately 3:30 PM.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for four (4) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive patient-centered care plans that included goals and approaches to meet resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Residents' #350, #32, #299, and #26. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to implement daily skin assessments per Resident #350's care plan. Resident #350 was admitted to the facility admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy Status, Lower Extremity Contracture, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. A complaint, DC00010482, received by the State Agency on 12/30/21 documented, [Hospital Social Worker ] explained that the physician asked her to file a report due to the condition of the pressure wounds .a call was placed to the niece who also wanted to file a complaint (attach). Since, both [Local Hospital] and the niece wanted to file a complaint about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective, comprehensive quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program inclusive of all systems as evidenced by failing to identify areas for improvement and to develop and implement corrective and preventive actions. The resident census during the survey was 101. The findings included: Facility staff failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies as follows: Under §483.12(b)(2), F 607 Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies Under §483.12(c)(2), F 610 Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations Under §483.21(b)(1), F 656 Develop/Implement Plan of Care Under §483.21(b)(3)(i), F 657 Plan of Care Timing and Revision Under §483.24, F 684 Quality of Care Under §483.25(b)(1) (i)(ii), F 686 Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcers On 11/08/22 at 2:16 PM, a face-to-face interview was conducted with Employees #1 (Administrator) and #12 (Director of Quality Improvement) regarding the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for four (4) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to determine whether residents had Advanced Directives (AD) and failed to provide residents or their representatives the right to formulate or refuse an AD. Residents' #55, #67, #69 and #248. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to provide documented evidence that Resident #55 had advanced directives or were given the opportunity to formulate or refuse an advanced directive. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Presence of Right Hip Artificial Joint, Pressure Ulcer of Right Heel, Hypothyroidism, and Tachycardia. A review of Resident #55's electronic record revealed: A Quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #55's physical record revealed: A green colored piece of paper read: Full Code Face sheet that listed a family member as Resident #55's emergency contact. Under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for three (3) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded to reflect of their status at the time of the assessments. Residents' #348, #69, and #68. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to code Resident #348 as being at risk for developing pressure ulcers on an admission MDS. Resident #348 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Mixed Receptive-expressive Language Disorder. A review of Resident #348's medical record revealed: Physician's orders: 08/12/22 Apply Barrier Cream To Sacral Buttocks and Peri-area Every shift. 08/12/22 Monitor for Bruising/Bleeding every shift. 08/12/22 Turn and Repositioning Q (every) 2 hours. 08/12/22 at 8:36 PM [Braden Scale for Prediction of Pressure Sore Risk] Calculate Points and Record Totals [Blank] .Interpretation of Score: 15-18 -At Risk .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for five (5) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plans with new goals and approaches for: one resident who had a urinary tract infection (UTI); two residents who sustained falls; one resident's right foot cellulitis and gangrene; and one resident's new dialysis access site. Residents' #25, #80, #26, #68 and #79. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to revise Resident #25's care plan for a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 08/11/22. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Chronic Kidney Disease, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Ventricular Tachycardia, Depression, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. Review of Resident #25 medical record showed the following: Care plan focus area initiated on 01/27/22 [Resident #25] has likelihood for altered urine pattern related to disease process manifested by: Dx (diagnosis) UTI . goal no complication within 90 days. Approach Provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to store and prepare foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by food items including one (1) of one (1) container of potato salad, five (5) of five (5) containers of mashed potatoes, one (1) of one (1) pan of vegetable mix noodles, one (1) of one (1) pack of turkey bologna, one (1) of one (1) box of American cheese, and one (1) of one (1) pack of roast beef, that were not labeled or dated in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator, two (2) of two (2) soiled convection ovens, one (1) of one (1) [NAME]-Shaam oven that was soiled on the interior and exterior, one (1) of one (1) flat top grill that was stained on both sides, and food temperatures that tested below 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on five (5) of six (6) observations. The findings included: During a walkthrough of dietary services on October 31, 2022, at approximately 9:30 AM, the following were observed: 1. Food items such as one (1) of one (1) container of potato salad, five (5) of five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure a resident's dignity and privacy as evidenced by failing to place a privacy cover over the resident's urine collection bag. Resident #298. The findings included: During a facility tour conducted on 10/31/22 at approximately 3:15 PM, Resident #298 was observed in her room with her urine collection bag uncovered, visible to visitors and other residents from hallway. Resident #298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Overactive Bladder and Change in Bowel Habit. A review of the medical record revealed the following: 10/28/22 [Nursing Progress Note] .[Resident #298] .newly admitted from [Hospital name] .Catheter was placed with improvement. Resident however failed void trial and catheter was replaced and is to be on until next follow up with urology . 10/29/22 [History and Physical] . Patient has an indwelling Foley inserted in the hospital due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its policies for conducting investigations of facility reported incidents as evidenced by failure to conduct a thorough investigation of: one resident's allegation of abuse; and one resident's unwitnessed fall, allegation of abuse, and elopement. Residents' #4 and #82. The findings included: Review of the policy entitled, Social Service Resident Abuse, Grievance and Complaints revised 09/20/21 documented, . All suspected abuse will be investigated, with a report of such investigation give in writing to the Administrator . A review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention with s revision date of 09/24/22, revealed the following, .Abuse means willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Neglect means failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation of one resident's allegation of abuse and one resident's unwitnessed fall, allegation of abuse, and elopement. Residents' #82 and #4. The findings included: Review of the policy entitled, Social Service Resident Abuse, Grievance and Complaints revised 09/20/21 documented, . All suspected abuse will be investigated, with a report of such investigation give in writing to the Administrator . A review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Resident Abuse/Abuse Prevention with s revision date of 09/24/22, revealed the following, .Abuse means willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .Neglect means failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness .Investigate different types of incidents, and Identify the staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that one resident had a physician's order for an indwelling catheter. Resident #298. The findings included: During a facility tour conducted on 10/31/22 at approximately 3:15 PM, Resident #298 was observed in her room with her urine collection bag uncovered, visible to visitors and other residents from hallway. Resident #298 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Overactive Bladder and Change in Bowel Habit. A review of the medical record revealed the following: 10/28/22 [Nursing Progress Note] . [Resident #298] .newly admitted from [Hospital name] .Catheter was placed with improvement. Resident however failed void trial and catheter was replaced and is to be on until next follow up with urology . 10/29/22 [History and Physical] . Patient has an indwelling Foley inserted in the hospital due to urinary retention . Care plan focus area Indwelling catheter .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to administer medications within the professional standards of practice. Resident #99. The findings included: According to the Long-Term Care Nursing: Medication Pass, .pre-pouring medications is unacceptable because the medications: cannot accurately be compared to the Medications Administration Record (MAR) and violates at least two of the seven rights of medication administration (right patient & right medication), dramatically increasing the probability of medication errors . https://ceufast.com/course/long-term-care-nursing-medication-pass During an observation on 11/09/22 starting at 8:42 AM, Employee #13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed retrieving a white paper cup that was located in the medication cart and contained unwrapped loose tablets to administer to Resident #99. Employee #13 was stopped by the surveyor before she could administer the unidentified, loose tablets. The employee stated I was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents received care to promote the healing of existing pressure ulcers for Resident #350. The findings included: Resident #350 was admitted to the facility admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy Status, Lower Extremity Contracture, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. A complaint, DC00010482, received by the State Agency on 12/30/21 documented, [Hospital Social Worker ] explained that the physician asked her to file a report due to the condition of the pressure wounds .a call was placed to the niece who also wanted to file a complaint (attach). Since, both [Local Hospital] and the niece wanted to file a complaint about the condition of and care that the member was receiving, our office is submitting the complaints together to your office for review and investigation as appropriate. A review of Resident #350's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 41 sampled resident, facility staff failed to identify and implement measures or approaches to reduce the risk of accidents (falls). Residents' #80 and #68. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to identify and implement measures or approaches to reduce the risk of Resident # 80 who had multiple falls having an injury of unknown origin to the left forehead. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Seizures, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Respiratory Distress. Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the following: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 14, indicating intact cognition and used a wheelchair for mobility. 03/21/22 at 4:30 PM [Nurses Progress Note] resident was seen by charge nurse and other residents suddenly slipped from her wheelchair and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: develop and implement interventions for care and monitoring of his dialysis access site; and have an emergency kit (pressure bandage) at the bedside of Resident #79. The findings included: Review of the policy Care of Residents Receiving Dialysis last reviewed on 03/22/22 directed, .residents who are dialysis dependent will receive nursing care appropriate to their individualized needs: the existence type (i.e., shunt, fistula, or graft) and location of the residents access will be noted and referenced in subsequent nursing notes . care provided to the dialysis resident will be documented in the care plan . During an observation of Resident #79 on 11/07/22 at 9:22 AM, he was noted with a right chest permacath and a dressing to his left lower arm. In a face-to-face interview conducted at the resident's bedside with Employee #18 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) at the time of the observation, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for two (2) of 41 sampled residents, the physician failed to adequately evaluate resident's condition and total program of care as evidenced by: no physician's order for an indwelling catheter for one resident and a physician progress note that inaccurately documented the physician's involvement in the assessment and care of one resident. Residents' #298 and #79. The findings included: Review of the policy Health Record Documentation last revised on 02/10/20 showed, . Each resident who is assessed by the medical, clinical and other staff at [Facility Name]] and/or who receives clinical care must have a complete and accurate medical documentation record kept at all times .Health care services should be documented while they are being provided or as soon as possible after they are completed . Review of the policy Documentation Criteria last reviewed on 07/22/22 directed, Clinical notes are written by a licensed nurse in the medical record. Clinical notes are randomly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for a resident's needs and assure resident safety when administering medications. Resident #99. The findings included: Review of the policy titled General Guidelines for Medications Administration with a revision date of October 2018, instructed, .Cleanse hands as appropriate .Read the label three times before pouring the medication .Never touch any of the medication with fingers .Identify the resident before administering any medication. Check the arm band or photograph, call resident by name, or check with other staff members if necessary. Explain to the resident the type of medication to be administered. The resident has the right to be informed of all medications that are administered .Administer medication and remain with resident while medication is swallowed .Once removed from the package or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to: properly waste a discontinued narcotic and reconcile narcotics. Resident #24. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Administration of Schedule II Medications with a revision date of October 2018, instructed .The nurse will then count or measure the remaining drug quantity in stock and enter the amount remaining onto the narcotics inventory sheet. Review of the policy titled Disposal of Controlled Substances with a revision date of October 2018, instructed .For all residents' schedule II-V medications, it is the responsibility of the facility to destroy all discontinued controlled drugs at the facility and complete the same documentation . 1. Facility staff failed to properly discard Resident #24's controlled medication after it was discontinued by the prescriber. During an observation on 11/08/22 at 9:20 AM, on the first-floor unit of medication cart A, two blister…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of 41 residents, facility staff failed to take the action of notifying the psychiatrist as ordered, in response to a monthly MRR (medication regimen review) and to have an established, consistent location for the MRR forms to facilitate communication with the State Surveyors. Resident #60. The findings included: A. Facility staff failed to take the action of notifying the psychiatrist as ordered, in response to the monthly MRR (medication regimen review) for a gradual dose reduction for Resident #60. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Insomnia, Thyroid Disorder, Tobacco Use, Anemia, Orthopedic Conditions and Thyroid Disorder, Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed the following: 10/14/21 [Physician's order] Trazadone (antidepressant) 25mg (milligram) tab (tablet) po (by mouth) qhs (every night) for insomnia . 10/13/22 at 12:41 PM [Pharmacist Note] MRR completed. Recommendation made to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, in two (2) observations, facility staff failed to: store medications in accordance with professional standards of practice; and to date and initial Insulin vials. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Labels revised in October 2018, instructed, .To decrease the potential of medication errors .properly labeling medications, all medications dispensed . will be labeled according to Federal, State, and Local laws .Containers having no label should be destroyed . A review of the facility's policy titled Returning Medications to the Pharmacy revised in October 2018, instructed, .Unused medications that are not a controlled substance nor require refrigeration may be returned to [Pharmacy name] if they are in a manufacturer's sealed container . 1. Facility staff failed to properly discard Resident #62's and #35's medications from the isolation medication cart. During an observation on 11/08/22 at 9:25 AM on the first-floor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of Resident #248's laboratory results that were outside of the clinical reference ranges. Resident #248. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Microbiology Culturing of Residents and Staff dated 09/14/11 directed, . Culture reports- attending physicians is notified when culture and sensitivity results are obtained . Review of the policy titled, Lab Results revised on 03/15/22 documented, All lab results should be reported to the physician and recorded in a timely manner .the night charge nurse is responsible for ensuring that all requested labs were drawn and results returned . Resident #248 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Sepsis, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Review of Resident #248's medical record revealed the following: 10/19/22 at 9:56 PM [Nursing Note] . newly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide a resident with the necessary diagnostic services in a timely manner, resulting in the worsening of a right foot non-pressure related ulcer/wound that extended from the right big toe to midfoot. Resident #26. The findings included: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Muscle Weakness. Review of Resident #26s medical record revealed the following: An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded: severe cognitive impairment; no behavior issues or refusal of care; no functional limitations in range of motion; at risk for pressure ulcers; and no unhealed pressure ulcers or any other skin conditions. 07/14/22 at 11:48 AM [Physician's Assistant Note] .Pt's (patient's) nurse reported that pt complained of big toe pain and redness [right toe] . Order Colchicine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately document in Resident #79's medical record. The findings included: Review of the policy Health Record Documentation last revised on 02/10/20 showed, . Each resident who is assessed by the medical, clinical and other staff at [Facility Name] and/or who receives clinical care must have a complete and accurate medical documentation record kept at all times .Health care services should be documented while they are being provided or as soon as possible after they are completed . Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Acute Kidney Failure, Pleural Effusion, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Combined Systolic (congestive) and Diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure. Review of Resident #79's medical record showed the following: A. The physician and the Therapeutic Recreation Director documented assessments in Resident #79's medical record at a time when he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, in one (1) of five (5) medication administration observations, facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices when administering medications. Resident #99. The findings included: During a medication administration observation on 11/09/22 starting at 8:42 AM, Employee #13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) with an ungloved hand picked up the medicine cup with her finger inside the cup. While picking up the cup, the Employee's finger made contact with the loose unwrapped pills. The Employee then entered the resident's room and proceeded to administer the medications to the resident without first sanitizing her hands. Employee #13 was stopped by the State Surveyor before she could give the Resident #99 the medication. In a face-to-face interview at the time of observation, Employee #13 acknowledged that she did not wash or sanitized maintain infection control and prevention practices and made no further comments. Cross reference DCMR 3217.6

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-03-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview for one (1) of three (3) sample certified nursing assistants, the facility staff failed to ensure a certified nursing assistant received Dementia Management Training in 2019. Finding included . Record review of Employee #19, CNA, personnel record on 03/11/20 at 3:00 PM showed the employee's date of hire was 02/06/17. Continued review of the record lacked documented evidence Employee #19 had Dementia Management Training in 2019. During a face-to-face interview on 03/11/20 at 3:30 PM, Employee #20, Inservice-Coordinator acknowledged the finding. The facility staff failed to ensure that Employee #19 had annual training on Dementia Management in 2019.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview for one (1) of 34 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure one (1) was free from physical restraint. (Resident #108) Findings included . The facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #108 was free from physical restraint. Observation on 03/11/20 at 10:00 AM of Resident #108's showed the resident lying in bed in supine position with head of bed elevated at 45-degree angle with both side (long) side rails up. Interview with the resident at the time of observation revealed that he was alert and oriented to name only. A second observation on 03/11/20 at 2:00 PM of Resident #108's room revealed the resident was asleep lying in bed in supine position with head of bed elevated at 45-degree angle with both side (long) side rails up. A third observation with Employee #10, Unit Manager, on 03/11/20 at 3:00 PM of Resident #108's room showed the resident lying in bed with both side (long) side rails up. Review of Resident #108's current medical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview for one (1) of 34 sampled residents, the facility's staff failed to ensure one (1) resident's Care Plan was revised. (Resident #7). Findings included . Review of Resident #7's current medical record on 03/07/20 at 11:00 AM showed that the resident was admitted [DATE]. The resident was noted to have multiple diagnoses including Right Metastatic Breast Cancer. During an interview on 03/06/20 at 10:00 AM, Resident #7 stated, I have concerns with my transportations arrangements to chemotherapy. The last time I went to my chemotherapy appointment. I had to pay for my transportation, but they [nursing home] paid me back. Further review of the Resident #7's medical record revealed a Care Plan with a last care conference date of 02/28/20. The Care Plan failed to outline who was responsible for making Resident #7's transportation arrangements to and from chemotherapy treatments. During a face-to face interview on 03/07/20 at 2:00 PM, Employee #11, Unit Manager, stated, I did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for three (3) of 34 sampled residents, facility staff failed to show evidence of monitoring one (1) resident for specific behaviors to include: confusion, anxiety, agitation and restlessness, to monitor one (1) resident's side effects with the use of a psychotropic medication, and to provide evidence that one (1) resident was monitored while receiving Antipsychotic medications. Residents' #39, #93 and #120. Findings included . 1.Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include: Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Hypothyroidism, Congestive Heart Failure, Schizophrenia, Depression and Anxiety. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 1/2/20, showed Section C-Cognitive Patterns: Brief Interview for Mental Status resident was scored as 10 which indicate cognition is moderately intact. Section D [0100] Mood was coded a 1 to indicate resident's mood interview was conducted and there were no symptoms present. Section E: Behavior [E0100.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to prepare food in accordance with professional food safety standards as evidenced by two (2) of two (2) grease fryers that were soiled with leftover fried food residue, six (6) of seven (7) soiled, six-inch deep, one-quarter pans that were stored on a clean, ready-for-use shelf, and one (1) of one (1) four-inch deep pan and one (1) of one (1) one-eight pan that were dented throughout. Findings included . 1. Two (2) of two (2) grease fryers were soiled were soiled with fried food residue. 2. Six (6) of seven (7) six-inch deep, one-quarter pans stored on a clean ready-for-use shelf were not thoroughly clean. 3. One (1) of one (1) four-inch deep pan and one (1) one-eight pan were dented throughout. These findings were acknowledged by Employee #18 on March 5, 2020, at approximately 10:30 AM.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain the call bell system in good condition as evidenced by one (1) of 30 call bell that failed to alarm as expected. Findings included . During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on March 5, 2020, the call bell in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]A did not alarm when tested, one (1) of 30 call bells tested. This deficiency could prevent or delay clinical care to a resident in an emergency. These findings were acknowledged by Employee #16 and Employee #17 on March 6, 2020, at approximately 10:00 AM.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$97,426 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $12,048 — penalty dated 2025-04-21
  • $85,378 — penalty dated 2024-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NASH, STEVEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2008
TYAGI, MAHESHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/02/2000
MILES, LESTERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2009
SAVOY, MARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/25/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-29.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 8%Other / private 5%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$478per resident / day
operating cost
$14,536per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$368per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in District of Columbia
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)*
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)*
$6,200/mo
Assisted living*

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095020. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next