The Hsc Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility
1731 Bunker Hill Road NE, Washington, DC 20017 · Non profit - Corporation · 16 certified beds · (202) 832-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.7% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 1.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 6.1% | 0.5% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 64.5% | 12.4% | 18.9% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.5% | 7.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Facility staff failed to implement its written policies and procedures for abuse that included staff training after an alleged incident of staff-to-resident sexual abuse for one (1) resident. ([NAME]) Based on observation record review and staff interviews, for one of eleven (11) sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its written policies and procedures for abuse that included staff training after an incident of alleged staff-to-resident sexual abuse for one (1) resident. Resident #2The findings included:A facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property (effective date 02/06/2020) .Prevention. 1. Procedures must be in place to provide the resident with a safe, protected environment during the investigation. 2. Other measures as deemed appropriate and by existing safety policies and procedures.i. Education will be provided as needed to all parties involved.Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Lesch Nyhan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included new interventions for one (1) resident following an alleged incident of injury of unknown origin and an alleged incident of staff-to-resident sexual abuse. Based on observation record review and staff interviews, for one of eleven (11) sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for a resident following: 1) an incident of injury of unknown origin and 2) an alleged incident of sexual abuse by facility staff. Resident #2The findings included:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Expressive Language Disorder, Self-Injurious Behavior, Aggressive Behaviors, and Global Developmental Delay.A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the following:A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which documented that the resident: had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure: (1) food was not stored past its expiration date for seven (7) of 7 packages of green beans (baby food); and (2) sanitizer solution concentration for cleaning the service line area meet professional standards for one (1) of 1 sanitizer solution buckets.Based on an observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure: (1) food was not stored past its expiration date for seven (7) of 7 packages of green beans (baby food); and (2) sanitizer solution concentration for cleaning the service line area meet professional standards for one (1) of 1 sanitizer solution buckets. The findings included: An observation of the kitchen's dry storage area on 07/23/25 starting at 10:01AM revealed one (1) of 1 package of green beans (baby food) with an expiration date 05/31/25 and six (6) of 6 packages of green beans (baby food) with expiration dates 06/30/25. During a face-to-face interview on 07/23/25 at 10:05 AM, Employee #5 (Director of Nutrition) stated that the porters check the dry storage area daily for expired food. The employee said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility staff failed to maintain one (1) of 1 walk-in freezer and one (1) of 1 ice making machine in safe operating conditions. Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain one (1) of 1 walk-in freezer and one (1) of 1 ice making machine in safe operating conditions. The findings included: An observation on 07/23/25 starting at approximately 8:15 AM showed the following: 1.A walk-in freezer with ice built-up from a leaking condensation pipe. Also, noted was sheet pans placed on top shelf under air condenser from a leaking condensate pipe. 2. An ice-making machine with leaking water onto a soiled blanket lying on the floor under the machine. Also, noted was duct tape on the edges of ice machine to stop the water leak for one (1) of 1. At the time of the observations, Employee #5 (Director of Nutrition) acknowledged the findings. During a face-to-face interview on 07/23/25 at approximately 11:00 AM, Employee #7 (Facility Operation Manager) stated that the walk-in freezer and ice machine were old, and they require frequent maintenance. Cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that it remains free of pests (mice).Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that it remains free of pests and rodents. The findings includedAn observation of the kitchen floor at cookline and dry storage areas on 07/23/25 starting at 8:15 AM revealed rodent droppings and dead two dead mice on glue boards. A review of a Pest Elimination Service Report dated 07/03/25 revealed that the Kitchen Area-Interior.Cafeteria-Interior was treated to exterminate for pests (mice) with glue boards. A review of a Pest Elimination Service Report dated 07/18/25 revealed that the exterior area was treated to exterminate for pests (mice) with bait stations.During a face-to-face interview on 07/23/25 at approximately 10:00 AM, Employee #5 (Director of Nutrition) stated that the facility receives scheduled and as needed pest extermination services from a professional pest exterminating company
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to send notification of discharge to the resident's representative (RP) and a copy of the notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Resident #65. The findings included: Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included the following: Chronic Lung Disease, Krabee Disease, Global Development Delay, and Spastic Tetraplegia. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded that the resident was in a persistent vegetative state/no discernable consciousness. A Physician's Note dated 07/07/23 documented, [Resident #65] was in his usual state of health at [Facility Name] on June 2, 2023, when he was transported to his routine neurology follow-up appointment at [Clinic Name]. Received a notification from the clinic physician around 5 pm that he was having a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and staff interview, for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to code the Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) for his use of bed rails. The findings included: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Self-Injurious Behavior, [NAME]- [NAME] Syndrome, Developmental Delay, and Nephrocalcinosis. Review of Resident #10's medical record showed the following: A physician's order note dated 06/07/24 at 4:36 PM documented, Bed rails to be up when resident is not directly supervised due to medical and/ or developed safety concerns. The number and position of side rails to be used are specified. An admission MDS dated [DATE], showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 08, indicating moderate cognitive impairment; in Section P (Restraints and Alarm), under Physical Restraints, bed rails was coded 0 - not used. During an observation on 08/05/24, 08/06/24, and 08/07/24, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for four (4) of nine (9) sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop comprehensive resident-centered care plans. The findings included: Review of the facility's Care Planning dated [DATE] documented: - [Facility Name] Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. - The care plan is based on resident's comprehensive assessment and is developed by a Care Planning/Interdisciplinary team. 1. Facility staff failed to develop a care plan with goals and interventions to address to address Resident #9's use of peripheral intravenous device (IV); use of an IV antibiotic medication; and that he was on transmission-based precautions (E. Coli in urine). Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Bilateral Hydronephrosis, and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that expired medication syringes were not stored for use. The findings included: During an observation on [DATE] at 12:35 PM of the unit's clean storage/supply, the following was noted: - Thirteen (13) [NAME]-[NAME] (BD), Luer-Lok Tip, 10 ML (milliliters) syringes stored for use that had an expiration date of [DATE]. During a face-to-face interview on [DATE] at 12:39 PM, Employee #2 (Director of Nursing/DON) acknowledged the findings and stated, I will remove them. Cross Reference 22B DCMR Sec. 3226.3
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's Administrator failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment annually to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during the day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The facility's census on the first day of the survey was 14. The findings included: Review of the facility's SNF (skilled nursing facility)-Administrative - 009 policy last reviewed in January 2020, documented in part: - A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update SNF's capacity to meet the needs of and completely care for our residents during day-to-day operations. Determining our capacity to meet the needs of and care for our residents during emergencies is included in this assessment. It is the responsibility of the Administrator to lead this assessment with a multidisciplinary team. Policy /Procedures #1. Once a year and as needed, a designated team conducts a facility-wide assessment to ensure that resources are available to meet the specific needs of our…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0562 — isolatedProvide immediate access to any resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the State Survey Agency with immediate access to medical records. While this was evident for all medical records of the facility, it delayed the State Agencies ability to review medical records for the three of 13 residents selected for sampling during this survey. (Residents #1, #2, and #3) The findings included: According to a Survey and Certification (S&C) memo from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services dated 8/14/09, During the entrance conference, surveyors will verify with the facility the process they will follow in order to have unrestricted access to the medical record. During an entrance conference on 12/11/23 for investigation of a facility reported incident (DC~12475) starting at approximately 9:00 AM, Employee #1 (Administration) was made aware that the State Survey Agency needed access to residents' electronic medical records (EMRs). The Administrator stated that a month ago they started using a new EMR, and she would inform the IT department of the need for access. Also, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility's staff failed to provide continuous pulse-oximeter monitoring, as ordered for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Developmental Delays. A physician order dated [DATE] instructed, Monitor Pulse Oximetry Continuous per parameters HR (heart rate) 60-120 (beats per minute), POX (pulse-ox) 90-100 (saturation rate). A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 05 indicating the resident had a severely impaired cognitive status. In addition, the resident was coded for impaired bilateral lower extremities, always incontinent of bladder and bowel, dependent of staff for all Activities of Daily Living, and using a wheelchair. A nurses note dated [DATE] at 11:53 PM documented, Patient Care Overview: Safety check on resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a record review and an interview, at the time of survey, the facility failed to have documented evidenced that a thorough investigation had been conducted after the death of a resident for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. (Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Developmental Delays. A State Survey Agency Facility Reported Incident form # DC~12475 documented, Bedside RN [Employee #4] went in to provide care for [Resident #1] and noticed discoloration in the lips and resident was unresponsive. Rapid Response called and [Resident #1] coded for over an hour but pronounced deceased . SNF Administrator and DON notified, and Medical Examiner called and 911 notified and detectives came out to the facility. Parents notified. A nurses note dated [DATE] at 11:53 PM documented, Patient Care Overview: Safety check on resident done at 1930 (7:30 PM). Resident in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to develop Baseline Care Plans within 48 hours of admission for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents. (Residents #1 and #2). The findings include: 1.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Developmental Delays. A review of the resident's care plan revealed that the care plan was initiatied on 07/20/23. An admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents the resident's admission date as 07/06/23. This resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 05, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Also, the resident was coded as dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living, always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and wheelchair dependent. 2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Global…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident's use of a pulse-ox monitor for three (3) of 3 sampled residents. (Resident #1) The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Developmental Delays. A physician order dated 11/01/23 instructed, Monitor Pulse Oximetry Continuous per parameters HR (heart Rate) 60-120 (beats per minute). POX (pulse-ox) 90-100 (saturation rate). A review of the resident's care plan with a review date of 11/21/23 lacked documented evidence that the facility's staff developed a care plan with goals and interventions for his use of a continuous pulse-oximeter monitoring. During our telephone interview on 12/13/23 at 11:00 AM, Employee #5 (MDS Coordinator) said that the facility was improving their process of developing and reviewing care plans.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 3 residents, the facility failed to ensure residents care plans were reviewed by the Inter-disciplinary Team; and for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents, the resident's care plan was not reviewed by the Inter-disciplinary Team after each quarterly Minimum Data Set. (Residents #1, #2, and #3). 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, and #3 care plans were reviewed by the Inter-disciplinary Team. 1a. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Developmental Delays. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 05 , indicating severe cognitive impairment. Also, the resident was coded as dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living, always incontinent of bladder and bowel, and wheelchair dependent. A review of the resident's care plan revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility's staff failed to provide continuous pulse-oximeter monitoring, as ordered for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Lesch Nyhan Syndrome, Nephrocalcinosis, Self-Injurious Behavior, and Developmental Delays. A physician order dated [DATE] instructed, Monitor Pulse Oximetry Continuous per parameters HR (heart rate) 60-120 (beats per minute), POX (pulse-ox) 90-100 (saturation rate). A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented, the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 05 indicating the resident had a severely impaired cognitive status. In addition, the resident was coded for impaired bilateral lower extremities, always incontinent of bladder and bowel, dependent of staff for all Activities of Daily Living, and using a wheelchair. A nurses note dated [DATE] at 11:53 PM documented, Patient Care Overview: Safety check on resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by privacy curtains that were hanging loose, detached from the curtain tracks in five (5) of eight (8) resident's rooms, and wall clocks in eight (8) of eight (8) resident's rooms that did not display the correct time. The findings included: 1. Privacy curtains in residents' rooms #1077, #1078, #1079, # 1080, and #1082 were hanging loose, detached from curtain hooks and ceiling tracks. 2. Wall clocks in eight (8) of eight (8) resident's rooms did not display actual time. Employee #1 acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on February 8, 2023, at approximately 10:00 AM.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for three (3) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to implement its written policies and procedures to investigate any potential allegations of neglect as evidenced by the facility's staff failure to investigate two incidents involving residents with a dislodged g (gastrostomy)-tube and one incident involving a resident's decannulation of the tracheostomy tube. (Residents' #1, #8 and #4). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a reviewed date of 01/2020, instructs .If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown source is reported, the Administrator will investigate or assign the investigation to an appropriate individual . 1. Facility staff failed to follow its policies to investigate potential neglect by failing to investigate Resident #1's dislodged G-tube. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for three (3) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to conduct thorough investigations as evidenced by there being no evidence that the facility investigated an incident involving one (1) resident's decannulation of the tracheostomy, and for two resident's incidents in which their G (Gastrostomy)-tube dislodged. (Resident's #1, #8, and #4. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting with a reviewed date of 01/2020, instructs .If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of an unknown source is reported, the Administrator will investigate or assign the investigation to an appropriate individual .The individual conducting the investigation will as a minimum .Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; Interview persons reporting the incident . 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to show documentation that the attending physician reviewed, accepted, acted upon or rejected any identified recommendations made by the pharmacists in the resident's medical record. Residents #9, #7 and #8. The findings included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Bilateral Hydronephrosis, Seizure, and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of Resident #9's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) from June 2022 to December 2022 showed the following: Antibiotic usage: yes; Nitrofurantoin PPX (prophylactic) UTI (urinary tract infection) . Nitrofurantoin 50mg (milligrams) [via] GT (gastrostomy tube) [every] p.m. (evening) . Recommendations: Monitor Kidney function. Usage not recommended for Crcl (creatinine clearance/urine test) < (less than) 30ml (milliliters) [per] minute Review of Resident #9's medical record from June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to treat Resident #9 with dignity as evidenced by failure to have a privacy bag to cover his indwelling catheter drainage bag. The findings included: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Bilateral Hydronephrosis and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] where facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 13, indicating intact cognition and that the resident had an indwelling catheter. During a tour of unit 1 North on 02/06/23 at 9:45 AM, Resident #9 was observed lying in bed, his indwelling Foley catheter bag could be seen from the hallway with yellow colored urine. It should be noted that there were multiple building engineers walking around on the unit conducting a test of the unit's electrical system. During a face-to-face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of (13) sampled residents, facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman and the State Agency in writing of the reason for a resident's transfer/discharge to the hospital. Resident #3. The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy Present, Spastic Paraplegia, Scoliosis Deformity of the Spine, and Chromosomal Disorder. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that facility staff documented the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating that the Resident had intact cognition, required suctioning, tracheostomy care, mechanical ventilation, had a gastrostomy tube, had bilateral lower extremity impairment, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and required limited assistance for in most ADLs (activities of daily living) except toileting (required total assistance). A Social Work Progress Note dated 01/20/23 at 2:03 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for two (2) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to notify residents' representatives of its bed hold policy in writing when residents were discharged from the facility and transferred to a local hospital. Residents' #13 and #3. The findings included: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified with Hypoxia, Trach and Vent (tracheostomy and ventilator) Dependent, Congenital Myopathy, and Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed a face sheet that showed Resident #13's father listed as the emergency contact and the Resident's mother as the responsible party. A Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that facility staff documented the Resident required oxygen therapy, suctioning, tracheostomy care, and mechanical ventilation and was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and eating. A Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #9's Seizure diagnoses and pressure ulcer on his Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS). The findings included: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Seizure, Bilateral Hydronephrosis, Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a progress note from the Nurse Practitioner dated 10/03/22 at 4:07 PM documenting, Asked to see [Resident #9] by his nurse due to breakdown to the site of chronic skin breakdown due to persistent rubbing on the left side of his head against a pillow. Superior aspect of the left ear helix and now going into the flat adjacent antihelix is open with yellow mucoid drainage . will begin bacitracin . A physician progress note dated 10/03/22 at 4:08 PM documented, Assessed patient at bedside due to skin breakdown on his L (left) ear. Noted area on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan after a resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3. The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy Present, Spastic Paraplegia, and Scoliosis Deformity of the Spine. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed: An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showing that facility staff documented the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 15, indicating that the Resident had intact cognition, required suctioning, tracheostomy care, mechanical ventilation, had a gastrostomy tube, had bilateral lower extremity impairment, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and required limited assistance for in most ADLs (activities of daily living) except toileting (required total assistance). Review of a Physician's Discharge Summary on 01/27/23 documented:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff for two (2) of (13) sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans to address a resident's infection in the third digit of the left hand and for a resident's use of an indwelling catheter. (Resident #7 and #9) The findings included: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Mild Persistent Asthma, Seizure Disorder, and Global Developmental Delay. A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the following an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showing that the facility staff coded a brief interview for mental status should not be conducted because the resident is rarely/never understood. Patient care notes documented the following: -12/8/22 at 7:22 AM [Patient Care Note] .Dr .at bedside to assess resident's middle finger on left hand. Mainly involving the last knuckle .Tylenol (analgesic and antipyretic) given this morning with good effect.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of (13) sampled residents, facility staff failed to revise and update Resident #8's care plan to reflect the resident's decannulation episode that resulted in oxygen desaturation of 87%. The findings included: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including the following: Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness, Seizure Disorder, Chronic Respiratory Failure, and Dependence on Ventilator. Review of a Facility-Reported Incident (FRI) DC00010811, submitted to the State Agency on 06/15/22, documented .Resident decannulated while CNA(Certified Nurse Aide) (was providing care on 6/13/2022. RN (Registered Nurse) re-inserted trach immediately following decannulation. Resident remained stable. Resident's mother was informed via email. A review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the following: Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed that the facility staff coded the resident as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to document the dislodgement of a resident's tracheostomy completely and accurately in the resident's medical record. Resident #13. The findings included: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified with Hypoxia, Trach, and Vent (tracheostomy and ventilator) Dependent, Congenital Myopathy, and Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy. Physician orders dated 06/15/21 at 3:57 PM directed the following: -Trach care BID (twice a day). -Change trach weekly . - .Monitor pulse oximetry per protocol. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed that facility staff documented the Resident required oxygen therapy, suctioning, tracheostomy care, and mechanical ventilation and was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and eating. Nursing Care Flow Sheet dated 07/05/22 at 8:15 AM documented: .Was respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews in one (1) of two (2) meal observations facility staff failed to ensure that infection control policies and procedures were implemented as evidenced by staff being observed improperly wearing a face mask below the chin and not performing hand hygiene before reaching in the food cart for a residents tray when delivering meals to the unit, and facility staff failed to provide documented evidence of annually reviewing and updating the facility's infection control policies. The findings included: A review of the policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 01/01/19, documented the following .[Facility Name] has established an infection prevention and control program which it: .Provides standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent the spread of infections; .Conducts an annual review of its infection Prevention and Control program and update the program as indicated .Infection Control program components critical to the operations of the healthcare facility may include .Implementing policies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 13 sampled residents, facility staff failed to show documented evidence in the resident's medical record of information/education provided regarding the benefits and risks of the influenza vaccine for a resident whose representative declined to give consent for the vaccine. (Resident #7) The findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Influenza Vaccine dated 01/01/2019, documented, .Prior to vaccination the resident and /or residents' representatives will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine .Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's electronic medical records . Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Cerebral Palsy, Asthma, and Seizure Disorder. A review of the medical record revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealing the facility staff coded that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for two (2) of 13 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to show documented evidence of providing the resident representative with education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. (Residents #12 and #7). The findings included: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Autistic Disorder, Klinefelter Syndrome, and Severe Malnutrition. A review of the resident's vaccination record in the paper chart revealed that the resident's parent refused consent for the COVID-19 vaccination and the resident was unvaccinated. A review of the medical record lacked documented evidence that education was provided to the resident's representative about the COVID-19 vaccine. 2. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Cerebral Palsy, Asthma, and Seizure Disorder. A review of the resident's vaccination record in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/02/2025 |
| NELSON, PHILLICIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/01/2024 |
| HOLSON, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/01/2015 |
| RILEY-BROWN, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2023 |
| EPPS, DONNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/06/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in DC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095040. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.