Washington Ctr For Aging Svcs
2601 18th Street NE, Washington, DC 20018 · Non profit - Corporation · 259 certified beds · (202) 541-6080 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $214,785 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-11)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.0% | 20.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 6.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 1.1% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 16.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.0% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.2% | 97.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.7% | 7.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.7% | 8.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 0.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 10.9% | 73.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.1% | 18.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.7% | 8.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.49 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.62 | 0.55 | 1.80 | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 175 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.1%CMS range 35.6–49.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.3–16.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.6–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 259 beds and averages 184.4 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 75 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.09 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews for six (6) residents and one (1) of three (3) of the six (6) residents with an active diagnosis of Dysphagia, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to ensure that Resident #1 was provided with adequate monitoring during meals, had a physician order to provide close supervision while eating, ensured speech documentation contained accurate information related to diet and liquid consistency, completed speech recommendations following a Modified Barium Swallow Study that showed laryngeal aspiration and failed to implement special dietary instructions for the resident whose diagnoses include oropharyngeal dysphagia. Subsequently, these failures resulted in the resident choking on food while eating alone in his room.During this survey an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on July 2, 2025, at 2:14 PM at 42 CFR 483.25 (d)(2), F684, for Resident #1, with an active diagnosis of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, who choked on food while eating alone in his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff and resident interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that adequate supervision was provided to Resident #21, as evidenced by documentation in the residents medical records of staff observing Resident #21 smoking and possessing smoking paraphernalia while using supplemental oxygen continuously and the surveyor observing the facility staff failing to provide one to one monitoring of Resident #21 as instructed by physician orders on multiple occasions during the survey. Resident #21. Due to these failures, an immediate jeopardy situation was identified on July 9, 2024, at 4:36 PM. The facility submitted a plan of action to the survey team that was onsite at 1:12 AM on July 10, 2024, and the plan was accepted. The survey team validated the facility's plan of removal on July 12, 2024, and the immediate jeopardy was lifted on July 12, 2024, at 3:59 PM. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice remained at a potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to protect a vulnerable resident from Resident #90. This was evidenced by Resident #90 being observed by staff kissing Resident #16 who did not have the capacity to consent. As a result of these failures, an immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on August 31, 2023, at 2:33 PM. The facility provided a plan of action to address the immediate concerns on August 31, 2023, at 11:41 PM and it was accepted. On September 6, 2023, at 1:20 PM, while the survey team was onsite the plan was verified and immediacy was lifted. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice remained for the potential for more than minimal harm at a scope and severity of D. The findings include: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a history of multiple diagnoses including Alcohol Use. A review of Resident #90's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) summary score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to: 1) post the results of its most recent survey in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and resident representatives and 2) have reports from the three preceding years, including certification surveys, complaint investigations, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility available upon request for any individual to review. The findings included: During an observation on 08/03/25, upon entrance into the facility at approximately 6:00 AM, the surveyor observed a sign posted on the window at the front security desk that read: [Name of Facility] Survey Book Available Upon Request. During a telephone interview on 08/11/25 at 2:09 AM with [Name of Resident 199#s Representative/President of Family Council] stated that on 08/24/24, when she was visiting the Resident, she asked the Employee # former front desk security guard staff for the most recent survey results, she was handed a binder that contained a 2567 report from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record view, staff interview and family interview, the facility failed to implement its discharge planning process to ensure a safe discharge for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents that were discharged home. (Resident #221)The findings included:Resident #221 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] multiple diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure, Morbid Obesity, and Sleep Apnea.A policy titled, Discharge Planning with an Interdisciplinary Team review date of 01/03/24 documented, The social worker (discharge planning coordinator) will counsel resident and family about available .services. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 15 indicating the resident had an intact cognitive status. The resident was coded for using a wheelchair, requiring substantial to maximum assistance with upper body, total assistance for lower body, partial to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 1 sampled residents who had an outside speech-language pathologist consultation, the facility failed to have documented evidence that they discussed with the resident's physician: (1) they were not able to schedule a Modified Barium Swallow Study (diagnostic test) in 8 weeks, as recommended by outside speech therapist on 03/06/25 and approved the facility's nurse practitioner on 03/07/25; and (2) the resident not provided swallowing exercises, chin tucks, and effort swallow techniques as recommended by an outside speech-language pathologist on 03/06/25 and approved the facility's nurse practitioner on 03/07/25. (Resident #1)The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase), Gastrostomy, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hemiplegia.A policy titled, Communication with Physicians with a reviewed and approve date of 01/03/24 documented in part, When a resident return from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Comprehensive Assessments contained accurate information for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. (Residents #1 and #5)The findings included: 1.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase), Gastrostomy, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hemiplegia.A physician order dated 01/27/25 instructed, Regular texture, honey/moderately thick consistency, No dietary restrictions.A review of certified nursing assistants (CNAs) task sheets from 02/17/25 to 02/23/25 documented that the resident required set-up or clean up assistance with eating. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented in part that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 13 indicating that the residents had an intact cognitive status. Additionally, the resident was coded as not applicable for eating indicating that resident was not eating. A review of certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's need for staff assistance with eating. (Resident #6)Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including History of Dysphagia, Adult Failure to Thrive, and Dementia. An observation on 07/07/25 at approximately 12:50 PM showed the resident sitting in the day room sitting in a Geri-chair watching tv. The resident was alert and oriented to name. At the time of the observation, Employee #16 (CNA) holding a cup of water to the resident's mouth for the resident to drink. A review of the care plan lacked documented evidence of goals and interventions to address the resident's need for total assistance from staff with eating and drinking.During a face-to-face interview on 07/07/25 at approximately 1 PM, Employee #16 stated that the resident required total assistance from staff with eating and drinking.During a face-to-face interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that the IDT team reviewed residents care plans or held care plan conferences with the resident and/or the resident's family after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. (Residents #1 and #5)The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase), Gastrostomy, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hemiplegia.A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment submission sheet revealed that the facility completed quarterly assessments for the resident on 02/23/25 and 05/23/25.A review of the resident's record lacked documented evidence that the IDT reviewed the resident's care plan or held a care plan conference with the resident and/or his family after the MDS assessments dated 02/23/25 and 05/23/25.During a face-to-face interview on 07/08/25 at 1:26 PM, Employee #14 (Social Worker) who was responsible for scheduling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's speech-language pathology treatment notes and care plan contained accurate information. (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Dysphagia (oropharyngeal phase), Gastrostomy, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hemiplegia.A physician order dated 01/28/25 instructed, Regular diet, regular texture, honey/moderately thick consistency [liquids].1a.A review Employee #6 (Speech-Language Pathologist) treatment encounter notes dated from 02/05/25 to 03/27/25 [consisted of 32 treatments] documented the following but not limited to, Precautions.Pt (patient) is on a mech (mechanical soft) texture [diet] with nectar thick liquids.Oral intake- current drinks/liquids=thin drinks.Current Foods-Regular/Easy to chew foods.A review of the resident dietary meal ticket documented that the resident's was on a regular texture diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-16 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to have documented evidence that the residents or their representative were made aware that their accounts were above the maximum limit of $4000 for 16 of 16 sampled residents. The findings included: A review of the facility's trial balance dated 05/16/24 showed that Resident #28, #36, #25, #95, #12, #24, #67, #81, #87, #129, #94, #39, #105, #63, #90, and #32's accounts were above the $4000 limit. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 07/10/24 at 3:00 pm, Employee #24 (Resident Finance) stated that she sent letters to the residents' representatives regarding their accounts, but she did not keep track of when the letters were sent. In addition, the employee said she did not have a system for tracking correspondence with families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-16 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for six (6) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment for a resident: with a history of falls; who requires repositioning assistance; with weight loss; on prescribed psychotropic medications; with a surgical wound; and who is prescribed use of supplemental oxygen. Residents' #496, #501, #95, #45, #133, and #21. The findings included: 1.Resident #496 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Skin, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Inguinal and Lower Limb Lymph Nodes, Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate, Malignant Neoplasm of Lung, Muscle Weakness, and Difficulty Walking. A review of Resident #496's medical record revealed: An admission Summary Progress Note dated 05/21/24 at 8:13 pm documented, He can only ambulate in a wheelchair. A Nursing Progress Note dated 05/21/24 at 9:21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews for two (2) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop a care plan that addressed a resident who was visually impaired and had glaucoma and failed to implement the approaches on a resident's care plan that addressed the resident's need for follow-up with audiology, resulting in the resident obtaining an appointment nine months after staff documented hearing as a concern. Residents #112 and #162. The findings included: 1)Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Partial Amputation of Left Foot, and Chronic Angle -Closure Glaucoma, Right Eye, Stage Unspecified. A review of the Resident #112's medical record revealed: A physician's order dated 02/03/24 directed: Consult: Ophthalmology consult eval (uation) and treat as needed. A physician's order dated 04/02/24 that directed: Azopt Ophthalmic Suspension 1% (Brinzolamide) [eyedrops] Instill 1 drop in right eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to treat a resident with respect, dignity, and care, as evidenced by administering advanced life support measures to a resident who was not a Full Code. Resident #498. The findings included: Resident #498 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Malignant Neoplasm of Breast, Respiratory Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, and Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of Resident #498's medical record revealed: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented: facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of '13,' indicating the resident was cognitively intact; Functional Abilities an Goals coded as '02-Substantial/maximal assistance' with Sit to Stand position, Lower body dressing and Putting on/taking off footwear; '03-Partial/moderate assistance with Toileting hygiene, Shower/bathe self, Personal hygiene and Upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident was free from physical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, as evidenced by a siderail up at the foot of the resident's bed. Resident #105. The findings included: Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Blindness Both Eyes, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Hallucinations, Morbid Obesity and Muscle Weakness. A review of Resident #105's medical record revealed: A review of the facility's policy titled 'Restraint Usage 00 - 008' with a review and revised date of June 7, 2024, documented, Definition and Philosophy of Use: The RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) User's Manual defined restraint as Any manual method of physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom or normal access to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to implement its policies and procedures for reporting and conducting investigations into potential allegations of neglect and or abuse. Resident #128. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Incident and Accident dated revised on 01/03/24 documented the following: When actual incident occurs: Complete head to toe nursing assessment must be completed by the licensed nurse for both witnessed and unwitnessed incidents. Perform neurological assessments for all if appropriate Incident will be reviewed by the clinical team. Notification of physician and responsible party. Incident report must be sent to Department of Health (DOH) for all incidences. Investigation using the incident and accident form. Witness statement if appropriate. A review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Abuse that was undated directed Staff will complete an incident /accident form for any unusual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to show documented evidence that the facility reported the results of a follow up investigation to the State Agency within 5 working days of incidents in which Resident #128 was found unresponsive on 11/14/23, 3/5/24 and found with an injury of unknown origin and change in behavior on 4/10/24. Resident #128. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Abuse that was undated directed, Staff will complete an incident /accident form for any unusual occurrences and submit it to the director of nursing or designee All alleged violations, substantiated incidents; corrective actions depending on the results of the investigation are reported verbally within 8-72 hours and in writing within 5 working days to the State Agency A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) DC~00012281, submitted to the State Agency on 09/08/23 documented the following: Around 9:25 PM today 9/7/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for three (3) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to show documented evidence that thorough investigations were conducted for: 1) two incidents in which Resident #128 was found unresponsive on 11/14/23 and 3/5/24, and 2) one incident in which Resident #159 sustained an injury of unknown origin. The findings included: 1.A review of the facility's policy titled Incident and Accident dated revised on 01/03/24 documented the following: When actual incident occurs: Complete head to toe nursing assessment must be completed by the licensed nurse for both witnessed and unwitnessed incidents. Perform neurological assessments for all if appropriate Incident will be reviewed by the clinical team. Notification of physician and responsible party. Incident report must be sent to Department of Health (DOH) for all incidences. Investigation using the incident and accident form. Witness statement if appropriate. A review of the facility's policy titled Prohibition of Abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for two (2) of 59 sampled residents the facility staff failed to provide documented evidence of providing notification to the resident or resident guardian of the reason for the residents transfer to the hospital emergency room. Residents' #32 and # 445. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide documented evidence of providing notification to Resident #32 and thier representative of the reason for the residents transfer to the hospital. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Alzheimer's Disease, Adult Failure to Thrive, Chronic Kidney Disease and Abnormal Weight Loss. A review of Complaint #DC00012878 was submitted to the State Agency on 02/27/24 documented the following: Voicemail received on 2/27/24: My name is (Resident Representative). ( .) I wish to lodge a complaint against . (Facility Name) are located at (Facility Address). I have a I am legal Guardian of award (sp),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for two (2) of 59 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to provide documented evidence of forming a baseline care plan upon the residents readmissions to the facility. Residents #32 and #445. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide documented evidence of forming a baseline care plan upon the Resident #32's readmission to the facility on [DATE] and providing a copy of the baseline care plan summary to the resident and resident representative. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included the following: Alzheimer's Disease, Adult Failure to Thrive, Chronic Kidney Disease and Abnormal Weight Loss. A review of Complaint #DC00012878 was submitted to the State Agency on 02/27/24 documented the following: Voicemail received on 2/27/24: My name is (Resident Representative). ( .) I wish to lodge a complaint against started (Facility Name) are located at (Facility Address). I have a I am legal Guardian of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to update the comprehensive care plan with goals and approaches that address the resident's post-dialysis care for a right upper arm AVF [Arteriovenous fistula] access site and respiratory care /treatment. (Resident #249). The findings included: Resident #249 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, End-stage Renal Disease with dependence on Renal dialysis, Anemia, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Congestive Heart Failure. A. Facility staff failed to update the comprehensive care plan with goals and approaches that address Resident #249's post-dialysis care for a right upper arm AVF access site. Review of Resident #249 physician order date 04/13/2024 18:00 [6:00 pm] directed Remove pressure dressing from left AVG [AVF] 24 hours after dialysis observe for bleeding and document result in nursing notes once a day on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Resident #105. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Blindness Both Eyes, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Hallucinations, Morbid Obesity and Muscle Weakness. A review of Resident #105's medical record revealed: A Care Plan Problem dated 05/17/2023 documented, Category: ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential, Self care deficit and Evaluation Notes: 11/16/2023, Staff will continue to provide total ADL care. A Physician Note dated 05/10/2024 at 11:44 pm documented, debilitated, bedbound and dependent with all ADLs. A Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews for two (2) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide care and services for a resident newly diagnosed with cancer, as evidenced by failing to ensure that the resident had scheduled follow-up oncology appointments and had transportation to the appointments. Resident #76 The findings included: Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Unspecified Fracture of the left Femur, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Nonspecific Finding of Lung Field, and Schizoaffective Disorder. A review of Resident #76 's medical record revealed: A review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] that showed Resident #76 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition, required setup or clean assistance by staff for eating, and was dependent on staff for assistance with all other activities of daily living (toileting, personal hygiene, bathing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews for two (2) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents received the proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities as evidenced by failure to schedule an ophthalmology consult appointment for a resident with Diabetes and Glaucoma, and failure to schedule an initial audiology consult appointment for a resident with impaired hearing. Residents #112 and #162. The findings included: 1)Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia, Partial Amputation of Left Foot, and Chronic Angle -Closure Glaucoma, Right Eye, Stage Unspecified. A review of the resident's medical record revealed: A review of a physician's order dated 02/03/24 directed: Consult: Ophthalmology consult eval(uation) and treat as needed. A review of a physician's order dated 04/02/24 directed: Azopt Ophthalmic Suspension 1% (Brinzolamide) [eyedrops] Instill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record reviews and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that the resident received respiratory care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the physicians orders as evidenced by the facility's staff's failure to follow the physicians order to place a date and initials on the residents oxygen tubing once each week and the staff failed to display an oxygen in use and no smoking sign in the residents room. Resident #21 The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration-Nasal Cannula that was undated documented the following: Oxygen is administered according to physicians orders and in observance of all safety precautions. Equipment Nasal cannula, no smoking signs, portable oxygen tank, connector. Procedure: Place water in humidifier to indicated level and post the no smoking sign on the door and in the residents room-oxygen is highly combustible .Chart the time, procedure, rate of flow and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to distribute foods under sanitary condition, as evidenced by two (2) of two (2) defective temperature gauges from one (1) of one (1) food warmer, that failed to register the upper and lower internal temperatures of the food warmer. The findings include: During observations in dietary services on June 25, 2024, at approximately 10:30 AM, two (2) of two (2) temperatures gauges from one (1) of one (1) food warmer were broken and did not display the correct upper and lower internal temperatures of the food warmer. During a face-to-face interview on July 1, 2024, at approximately 2:00 PM, Employee #12 acknowledged the findings. CROSS REFERENCE:DCMR TITLE 22B Sec 3219.1
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, facility failed to correct and monitor deficiencies identified on the previous survey that involved baseline care plans and implementing care plan interventions. The census on the first day of the survey was 194. The findings included: A review of the facility's previous survey from dates 06/24/24 to 07/16/24 showed that the facility was cited for the following deficiencies: F655 - Baseline care plan F656 - Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan The aforementioned deficiencies were cited again during the Revisit Survey that was conducted from 09/17/24 to 09/18/24. Review of the Plan of Correction with a compliance date of 08/31/24, revealed that facility staff failed to continuously monitor their deficient practices from the prior survey and failed to implement the corrective actions as indicated below: Under F655 - Monitoring Corrective Actions - Monthly audit tool on readmission was developed to track all re-admission baseline care plan. Any deficiency will be corrected immediately. Under F656 - Monitoring Corrective Actions not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations on June 25, 2024, at approximately 2:30 PM, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain essential equipment in good working condition, as evidenced by three (3) of seven (7) hopper sinks, that failed to operate as intended. The findings included: Three (3) of seven (7) hopper sinks, each located in the soiled utility room on each unit, did not flush when tested. Employee #25 acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on July 1, 2024, at approximately 4:00 PM. Cross Reference- 22B DCMR Sec.3258.3
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 59 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for a resident who is totally dependent on staff, as evidenced by the resident's room filled with clutter. Resident #105. The findings included: Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Blindness Both Eyes, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Hallucinations, Morbid Obesity and Muscle Weakness. A review of Resident #105's medical record revealed: A Physician Note dated 05/14/2024 at 11:35 pm documented, The resident at baseline is debilitated, bedbound and dependent with all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). A Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of '11' indicating the resident was moderately impaired; Functional Abilities and Goals coded '01,' indicating the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by expired nutritional food items such as seven (7) of nine (9) eight-ounce containers of Jevity, 1.5 calories nutritional drinks that expired on May 2022, two (2) of nine (9) eight-ounce containers of Jevity, 1.5 calories nutritional drinks that expired on May 2023, six (6) of six (6) eight-ounce Osmolite nutritional drinks that expired on August 1, 2023, 19 of 19 eight fluid ounce containers of Jevity, 1.5 calories nutritional drinks that expired on November 1, 2021, and six (6) of six (6) eight fluid ounce containers of Nestle boost nutritional drinks that expired on August 19, 2023, that were stored on three (3) of eight (8) resident care units. During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on July 10, 2023, between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM the following were observed: In the pantry of unit 1 Orange, seven (7) of nine (9) eight-ounce containers of Jevity, 1.5 calories nutritional drinks were expired as of May…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) out of 42 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for resident #125 for dialysis, and resident #37 for a fall. The findings included: 1.Facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #125's dependent on Dialysis Resident #125 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus 2, and End-stage renal disease dependent on Dialysis. Reviewed admission progress note dated 5/19/2022 at 05:10 PM documentation showed that the resident receives dialysis treatment (M [Monday] -W [Wednesday -F [Friday]) in-house from Davita Dialysis. Review of the admission (MDS) Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded the following: In Section C (Cognitive Patterns), a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 15, indicates intact cognition. In Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) O0100 Check all of the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to develop a care plan how staff were to address Resident #90 sexual inappropriateness toward Resident #16 on 09/03/22 and failed to implement approaches to monitor and record Resident #124's complaint of pain as indicated on the comprehensive care plan. Residents #90 and #124 The findings included: 1. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a history of multiple diagnoses including Alcohol Use. A nursing note dated 09/03/22 12:31 AM [Recorded as Late Entry on 09/06/22 12:49 AM] documented the following but not limited to, At around 2:35 AM call light was on in room [ROOM NUMBER]A, when caregiver [Employee #12, Certified Nursing Assistant] went there. Care giver called the nurse [Employee #13, Licensed Practical Nurse] and reported that he saw [Resident #90] kissing [Resident #16]. By the time the nurse went there [Resident #90] was leaving the room. A unit manager's [Employee # 18] progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility's staff failed to identify and eliminate environmental hazards (nonfunctioning alarm on exit door) and maintain consistent supervision and surveillance of Resident #144, who subsequently gained access to elope through a broken patio door. The findings included: A facility policy titled 'Resident Elopement' documented, The facility is responsible for being knowledgeable of the location of all residents at all times. Resident #144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Disease, History of Fall with Fractur of Right Radius and Glaucoma. A nursing progress note dated [DATE] AT 8:53 PM documented, Upon admission, resident was observed going toward the elevator and she will not stay in her room or sit still. She was re-directed several times. A Physician order dated [DATE] documented, Elopement risk assessment on admission and Hourly rounding. An Elopement Risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to develop a narcotic count sheet that identified two (2) licensed nurses to reconcile the resident's narcotic medications. The findings included: A document titled 'Daily Narcotic count QA (quality assurance) data analysis report form' documented, Month August 2023 and Off-going no holes On-coming no holes and All narcotic count sheets must have incoming and outgoing nurse signatures every shift. A review of a document titled 'Shift Verification of Accuracy of Controlled Drug Record' documented, August 2023 with the following data: Unit One Brookland: 08/01/23, 08/04/23, 08/09/23, 08/12/23, 08/13/23, 08/14/23, 08/15/23, 08/16/23, 08/20/23, 08/21/23, 08/23/23, 08/25/23, 08/26/23, 08/27/23, 08/28/23 and 08/30/23 documented, Day shift beginning at 7 AM, Evening shift beginning at 3PM and Night shift beginning at 11 PM, the on duty nurse and off duty nurse signatures were the same for consecutive shifts indicating there was no second licensed nurse present to verify the accuracy of the resident's controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to store and distribute food under sanitary condition as evidenced by food items such as one (1) of one (1) bag of shredded carrots, approximately 50 of 50 containers of apple sauce and approximately 120 cold sandwiches of tuna, turkey and cheese, ham and cheese, and/or peanut butter that were observed undated in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator, one (1) of (1) bag of provolone cheese in reach-in refrigerator #2 that was not labeled, and two (2) of two (2) open packs of yellow cheese in the cook refrigerator that also was not labeled or dated. The findings include: During a tour of dietary services on August 20, 2023, at approximately 6:30 AM, food items including one (1) of one (1) bag of shredded carrots, approximately 50 of 50 containers of apple sauce and approximately 120 cold sandwiches of tuna, turkey and cheese, ham, and cheese, and/or peanut butter observed in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator were not labeled or dated. Employee #39 acknowledged the findings during a face-to-face interview on August 22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 42 sampled residents, facility staff failed to show documented evidence that Resident #20's Humalog insulin was administered as ordered by the physician to treat finger stick blood glucose results greater than 250mg (milligram)/dl (deciliter). The findings included: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed: A Physician order dated 10/27/22 documented, Humalog U(unit)-100 Insulin (insulin lispro) solution; 100 unit/mL (milliliter); amt (amount): 3 units; subcutaneous Special Instructions: Fingersticks AC (before meals) and HS (at bedtime), give 3 units of Humalog Insulin Subq (subcutaneous) if BS (blood sugar) > (greater than) 250 Call MD (medical doctor)/NP (nurse practitioner) if BS < (less than) or > 400 for DM (Diabetes Mellitus) Before Meals and At Bedtime; 07:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility's staff failed to ensure that the comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was implemented to correct identified deficiencies related to implementing abuse policy, reporting allegation of abuse, or thoroughly investigating abuse. The resident census on the first day of the survey was 170. The findings included: A review of the facility's complaint/facility reported incident survey that ended on 05/18/23 showed that the facility was cited for the following deficiencies: F607, F609, and F610- Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. An onsite recertification, complaint, and facility reported incident survey was conducted from 08/20/23 to 09/14/23. The onsite survey determined the facility remained out of compliance. The facility submitted a plan of correction for the complaint/facility reported incident survey dated 05/18/23 survey and alleged compliance as of 07/31/23. The facility's accepted plan of correction for F607, F609, and F610 included the following: F607 - Implement Abuse Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview for five (5) of 56 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set for one (1) resident who had episodes of anxiety; one (1) resident having impairment on one side; one (1) resident for dialysis; one (1) resident for shortness of breath, and for one (1) resident for discharge assessment. Residents' #60, #100, #134, #179 and #181. The findings include: 1. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Peripheral Vascular Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury, Chronic Pain, Contracture, Gastrostomy Status and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed: Section C (Cognition) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired. Section E (Behavior) Delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality) is documented. Review of the physician's orders revealed the following: 7/21/2020…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 56 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidence by: failure to follow the hospital discharge instructions to continue the administration of an antibiotic for two days to treat one (1) resident with a diagnosis of a urinary tract infection, and to apply the palm guard to one (1) resident's left hand in accordance with the physician's order. Residents' #29 and #100. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure that hospital discharge instructions to continue antibiotic for two days (01/13/21 and 01/14/21) was acted upon in a timely manner. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus 2, Hyperlipidemia, Hypothyroidism, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Cerebrovascular Accident, Seizure and Dementia. Review of the Hospital Discharge summary dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to: complete the residents Medication Regiment Review (MRR) assessment in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for three (3) residents, to ensure one (1) residents History and Physical was dated on completion and failed to document the correct dialysis access location for one (1) resident. Residents' #7, #60, #148, #162, and #177. The findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Consultant Pharmacist Services revealed, .Reviewing the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, complying with Federal, State, and Local mandated standards of care in addition to other applicable standards, and documenting the review and findings in consulting software . 1. Facility staff failed to complete MRR assessment in accordance with professional standards of practice. A. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Hypothyroidism, Dementia without Behaviors, Anxiety, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to maintain the call bell system in good working condition as evidenced by call bells that failed to initiate an audible or visual alarm when tested in five (5) of 46 resident's rooms. The findings include: During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on 06/15/2021, at approximately 10:00 AM, call bell in five (5) of 46 resident's rooms did not emit an audible or visual alarm when tested. (rooms #314, #353, #361, #364, #379). This breakdown could prevent or delay care to residents in an emergency. During a face-to-face interview on 06/16/2021, at approximately 10:00 AM, Employee #5 (Engineer Manager) acknowledged the findings and stated they had already been corrected.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by a loose privacy curtain bracket in one (1) of 46 resident's rooms, stained ceiling tiles in one (1) of 46 resident's rooms, and two (2) of five (5) ceiling vents that lacked a cover in the hallway of unit 2 Orange. The findings include: During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on 06/15/2021, at approximately 10:00 AM: 1. The privacy curtain holder (bracket) in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to be loose, one (1) of 46 resident's rooms. 2. Ceiling tiles were stained in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], one (1) of 46 resident's rooms. 3. Two (2) of five (5) ceiling vent covers were missing in the hallway near resident rooms #257 and #261 on unit 2 Orange. During a face-to-face interview on 06/16/2021, at approximately 10:00 AM, Employee #5 acknowledged the findings and stated they had already been corrected.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-22 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure all required documents were conveyed to the receiving health care provider for two (2) of 56 sampled residents that were transferred from the facility to the hospital. Residents' #148 and #161. The findings include: Review of, Stoddard Baptist Global Care -Documents to be included in transfer packet list the following items: History and Physical signed, Current Medications Lists (POS [physical order sheet]); face sheet, Last physician notes; labs/microbiology/cultures (3 months); Facility transfer form; Guardianship/legal documents; Transfer order; DC (District of Columbia)-DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) comfort care; Problem List; and Advance Directives. The facility has a protocol for staff to complete a checklist before transferring residents. However, the form does not list Comprehensive Care Plan Goals as a document to be sent to the receiving facilities. 1. Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-22 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide residents and residents representatives with Notice of Discharge, Transfer or Relocation and the written Notices of a Statement of Appeal for two (2) of 56 sampled residents that were transferred to the hospital. Resident's #129 and #161. The findings include: 1. Resident #129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including Wandering, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, and Chronic Kidney Failure. A review of the resident's medical record revealed: 04/27/21 at 11:51 PM [Nursing Note] documented, .This writer calls to the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]A by nursing assistants and observed resident lying on her right side on the floor at about 5:00 PM .resident noted with small swelling/small abrasion to her right temple area of the head with little bleeding noted at the site .NP(nurse practitioner) order resident to be transfer to the nearest ER (emergency room) for further evaluation .transferred resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative that explained the duration of their bed-hold for one (1) of 56 sampled residents that were transferred to the hospital. Resident #148. The findings include: Resident #148 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance, Glaucoma, Ascarasis Pneumonia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications, Hypertension, and Epilepsy. Review of the medical record revealed: Nurse progress note dated 3/16/21, .about 2:15 pm resident was observed not responding to name call and simple commands. He was leaning towards his right hand; right hand was shaking but breathing and have palpable pulse .NP (Nurse Practitioner) order given to transfer resident via 911 to the nearest ER (emergency room) for further evaluation of unresponsiveness . Physician's order dated 3/16/21, Transfer resident via 911 for further evaluation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 56 sampled residents, facility staff failed to update a resident's care plan to address one (1) resident with iron deficiency-anemia to include person-centered measurable objectives and time frames and for one (1) resident with a perm-a-cath access site for dialysis treatment. Residents' #99 and #134. The findings include: 1.Facility staff failed to update Resident #99's iron deficiency anemia care plan to include person-centered measurable objectives and time frames. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Anemia, Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency, Viral Hepatitis C, Diabetes Mellitus, Depression and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the physician's orders revealed the following: 06/02/21 Ferrous sulfate tablet, delayed release 325 mg (milligram) . administer 1 tablet by mouth daily for anemia . 6/7/21 CBC [complete blood count] on Mondays . 06/09/2021 Head to toe skin observation for any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards as evidenced by surge protectors that were observed in use, on the floor of two (2) of 46 resident's rooms and an extension cord that was observed in one (1) of 46 resident's rooms. The findings include: 1. Surge protectors were observed in use, on the floor of resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] and #320, two (2) of 46 resident's rooms. 2. An extension cord was observed in use, in one (1) of 46 resident's rooms resident room. (#377). During a face-to-face interview on 06/16/2021, at approximately 10:00 AM, Employee #5 (Engineer Manager) acknowledged the findings and stated they had already been corrected.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 56 sampled residents, facility staff failed to conduct a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) at least monthly. Residents' #60, #162 and #177. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Consultant Pharmacist Services revealed, . Reviewing the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, complying with Federal, State, and Local mandated standards of care in addition to other applicable standards, and documenting the review and findings in consulting software . 1. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Peripheral Vascular Disease, Traumatic Brain Injury, Chronic Pain, Contracture, Gastrostomy Status and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Review of Resident #60's record revealed that there was no MRR done for the month of May 2021. During a telephone interview conducted on 06/16/2021, at 1:06 PM, Employee #10 (Pharmacist) stated, I am not sure if I have a MRR for this resident for May. I do a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-22 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 56 sampled residents, facility staff failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results that fall outside of a clinical reference range in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification. Residents' #7 and #99. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Documentation Requirements, item #12 Laboratory, X-rays, and other tests, revealed, Results of laboratory and x-ray studies are documented in the record. It is documented by a licensed nurse that the attending physician was notified of the abnormal results. Review of the facility's policy entitled, Lab Results, revealed, . Once the physician has been notified, a notation must be made on the lab slip regarding date, time, signature of reporting person and a brief description of orders, if any; followed by documentation in the clinical record . 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses, including Hypothyroidism,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, on three (3) of three (3) observations, facility staff failed to maintain infection control and prevention practices in accordance with standards of practice to minimize the potential spread of infections. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy entitled, Occupied Resident Isolation Room Cleaning- Contact, Strict Contact and Droplet Isolations revealed, Reline all trash liners. During a tour of room [ROOM NUMBER] on unit 2 Orange on 06/14/2021, at 2:30 PM, a red trash can was observed with no trash bag, with used discarded personal protective equipment inside. It should be noted that room [ROOM NUMBER] is on the COVID-19 observation unit where strict contact and droplet transmission-based precautions were in place. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 06/14/2021, at 2:35 PM, Employee #11 (Registered Nurse) stated, I am not sure who put the items in the trash can. They shouldn't have put any trash inside without a trash bag. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide a facility-wide assessment that included the physical environment and space used for the resident's outdoor activities. The findings included: A review of the facility's assessment with a review date of 03/18/24 did not show documented evidence of the facility's (2) two outdoor patios currently being utilized for the 13 resident's who smoke at the facility. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 07/16/24 at 3:00 pm, Employee #1 (Administrator) acknowledged the findings and stated, We have never included the smoking patios in our facility assessment.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$214,785 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $107,234 — penalty dated 2025-07-11
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-16
- $90,750 — penalty dated 2023-09-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-14 for 37 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| NASH, STEVE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/21/2010 |
| TYAGI, MAHESH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/21/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095014. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.