Delaware Veterans Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 63.7 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 80 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.77 to 1.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure four of nine sampled residents (Resident (R) 4, R46, R8, and R41) reviewed for abuse were free from resident-to-resident physical abuse. On 07/22/25, R8 pushed R4 to the ground. As a result, R4 sustained a closed left radius fracture, a closed, displaced, comminuted right proximal humerus fracture, and a closed, displaced right distal clavicle fracture. Findings include:. 1.Review of the facility's 5-day Follow Up Report dated 07/25/25 provided by the Administrator, revealed that at the time of the incident on 07/22/25 at 5:30 PM, staff heard someone screaming. Upon entering the hallway, staff observed R4 sitting on the floor holding his head. Staff immediately ran down the hallway to investigate. The Nursing Supervisor/Registered Nurse (NS/RN) reviewed the surveillance video and noted R8 walking down the hall into R4's room. After a few seconds, R4 was seen coming out the room with R8 behind him. R8 pushed R4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R422, R9, R35 and R41) out of four residents reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure care/treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. For R422 the facility failed to provide treatment for a urinary tract infection for four days causing a change in condition that required a transfer to the hospital. This delay in care resulted in harm to R422. For R9, the facility failed to provide treatment for a urinary tract infection for two days. For R35 and R41, the facility failed to follow a doctor's order. Findings include: Cross Refer F773 1. Review of R422's clinical record revealed: 5/23/24 - R422 was admitted to the facility with a history of a stroke affecting his right dominant side, Parkinson's disease and dementia. 6/13/24 - A nursing progress note documented that E16 (MD) was notified that R422 was getting confused, disoriented and drowsy. 6/13/24 - A physician's order was written by E16 for a urinalysis and urine culture. 6/14/24 - A nursing progress note documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried pots and pans as well as insured one of two can openers had been cleaned. This failure increased the potential risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 61 of 62 residents that received food through dietary services. One resident received nutrition through tube feeding.Findings include:During an observation on 03/09/26 at 10:30 AM, three 6x6x6 stainless steel pans and six 6x24x6 stainless steel pans were stacked together on storage rack were noted to be wet inside with some food debris remaining. During an interview on 03/09/26 at 10:50 AM, the Food Service Director (FSD) stated, The pans are wet and they shouldn't be. They should be dry before they get put away and the pans should be clean and have no food remining on them. During an observation on 03/09/26 at 11:00 AM, one of two can openers bolted to a preparation table had a black substance on the blade. During an interview at this time, the FSD stated The blade is dirty. It…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised and updated for one (Resident (R)19) out of 23 resident care plans reviewed. R19 developed two additional wounds and had protective devices added and were not updated to his comprehensive care plan. This had the potential for the resident to have unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of R19's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) and under the Admissions tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset and dementia (severe) with behavioral disturbances.Review of R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/24/25 located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of R19's Tasks located in the EMR under the Tasks List tab revealed certified nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quality for one (Resident (R)47) of one resident reviewed for physician orders in the sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to perform R47's daily weights as ordered. Failure to obtain daily weights as ordered for a resident with congestive heart failure can lead to potential worsening of the condition as well as hospitalization and decline in overall condition.Findings include:Review of R47's electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet under the admission tab indicated R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, and edema. Review of R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/31/25 in the EMR under the MDS tab documented R47 had heart failure and renal insufficiency.Review of R47's EMR Order Summary Report dated 03/12/26 found under the Orders tab in R47's EMR documented an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to prevent an accidents. Specifically, a resident fell from a Hoyer lift during a transfer for one out of three residents (Resident (R)51) reviewed for Hoyer lifts. This failure to prevent an accident which resulted in R51 experiencing actual harm of a skin tear to the resident's right elbow.Findings include:Review of R51's electronic medical record (EMR) Face sheet under the Admissions tab that R51 was admitted on [DATE]. Under the EMR section titled Medical Diagnosis tab had pertinent diagnosis including spinal stenosis, lumbosacral region, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder, pain, spinal stenosis, Review of R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Referent Date (ARD) of 08/13/25 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score could not be conducted due to resident was rarely/never understood. Review of the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess the entrapment risk of bedrails used for mobility assistance and failed to obtain consents for three of eight residents (Resident (R)19, R24, and R37) reviewed for accident hazards out of a total sample of 23 residents. Additionally, R24's first bed rail assessment indicated the resident did not need bed rails; however, bed rails were on the bed. Failure to assess and determine hazards could lead to injury, entrapment, or death. Findings include:1. Review of R19's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) and under the Admissions tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset and dementia (severe) with behavioral disturbances.Review of R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/24/25 located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (Resident (R) 5 and R13) reviewed for pneumococcal vaccines out of a total sample of 23 residents were offered an updated pneumococcal vaccine. The facility further failed to ensure their pneumococcal policy was revised to reflect updated guidance per the CDC for the administration of pneumococcal vaccines. This had the potential for the residents to have an increased risk of contracting pneumonia. Findings include:1.Review of R5's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was over [AGE] years old.Review of R5's Immunization Record located in the EMR under the Immunizations tab revealed R5 received the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV) 23 on 11/11/21. There was no evidence that the resident was offered the PCV15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R1, R11, R64 and R66) out of nineteen sampled residents, the facility failed to have input from all required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members at the residents' care plan meetings. Findings include: 1. 2/11/08 - R1 was admitted to the facility. 1/15/25 - A quarterly MDS was completed. 1/28/25 - A quarterly care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 10/16/24 - A quarterly MDS was completed. 10/29/24 - A quarterly care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 7/17/24 - An annual MDS was completed. 7/30/24 - An annual care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 2. 6/11/24 - R11 was admitted to the facility. 6/17/24 - An admission MDS was completed. 7/9/24 - A quarterly care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 9/11/24 - A quarterly MDS was completed. 9/24/24 - A quarterly care plan meeting note lacked evidence of input from the physician. 12/11/24 - A quarterly MDS was completed. 12/26/24 - A quarterly care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0626 — isolated
  Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R47) out of two residents reviewed for hospitalization, the facility lacked evidence that R47 was allowed to return timely to the facility. 11/26/24 - R47 was admitted to the facility. 12/6/24 - R47 was admitted to the hospital for altered mental status and for a psychiatric evaluation. The admission history and physical also reflected that R47 had recently been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. 12/8/24 - A hospital progress note revealed Barriers: Patient is medically cleared for discharge. VA home is not taking patient on weekends . 12/9/24 - A discharge summary revealed that His mental status has improved, he has been pleasantly confused during the hospital stay, which appears to be his baseline. He is medically stable for discharge. 12/10/24 - A daily medical progress report revealed Barriers to discharge: medically cleared. Discharge disposition: placement issues. 12/12/24 - A daily progress report revealed Disposition hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that for one (R4) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to implement the correct assistant device to transfer the resident to prevent accidents. Based on review of the facility's evidence to correct the non-compliance and the facility's substantial compliance at the time of the current survey, the deficiency was determined to be past non-compliance as of 12/20/24. Findings include: Review of R4's clinical record revealed: 7/11/23 - R4 was admitted to the facility. 11/20/23 - A new diagnoses for R4 included, but was not limited to, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, lack of coordination, generalized muscle weakness and unsteadiness on the feet. 10/16/24 - A care plan documented that R4 was high risk for falls related to impaired gait/balance. 11/15/24 - A new order documented R4 was a total assist for transfer and to be transferred with two staff using a Hoyer lift. 12/4/24 - R4's annual MDS documented a BIMS score of 15, revealing an intact cognitive state. R4 was documented with impairments on both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined, for two (R442 and R9) out of three residents sampled for laboratory services, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering medical practitioner of abnormal laboratory results. Findings include: Cross refer F684 1. Review of R422's clinical record revealed: 5/23/24 - R422 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, history of a stroke affecting the right dominent side and dementia. 6/13/24 - A physician's order was written for a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity. 6/16/24 - The results were faxed to the facility supervisor's office which revealed R422's urine culture had a positive growth of enterococcus casseliflavous (a type of bacteria) greater than 100,000 cfu/ml, indicating a urinary tract infection. 3/5/25 - A review of R422's clinical record revealed lacked evidence of the laboratory results and notification of provider. 3/5/25 10:34 AM - During an interview, E2 (DON) stated that all lab results are faxed to the nurse supervisor's office. If a lab result is positive the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$118,757 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $86,920 — penalty dated 2026-03-12
• $31,837 — penalty dated 2025-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in DE