Encore At Parkside
255 Possum Park Road, Newark, DE 19711 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (302) 366-0160 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,814 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 12.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 2.1% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 10.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.5% | 13.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.8% | 21.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 3.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.9% | 20.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 10.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 83.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 23.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.1% | 11.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.53 | 1.40 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 260 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 218 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.4%CMS range 54.6–67.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.7–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 6.3–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 91.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that one (R1) of three residents sampled did not receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent elopement, as R1 is a newly admitted resident identified as an elopement risk. This failure resulted in R1 eloping from the facility to a busy road between approximately 5:00 PM and 5:20 PM without supervision or intervention. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified to the facility on 6/25/26 at 10:00 AM and was determined to be past noncompliance as of 6/16/26.Findings include:Review of R1's clinical record revealed:6/12/26- R1 was admitted to the facility for short-term rehab with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (a bump or blow to the head that caused bleeding near the brain). 6/12/26- The admission elopement evaluation documented that R1 was a risk for elopement.6/12/26 10:22 PM- A progress note documented Resident noted independently ambulatory with baseline confusion. Wander risk. Reported to NP (nurse practitioner), via Team Health. Order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for R22, an independent resident who told multiple staff prior to the incident that he wanted to go home. On 11/10/25, R22 self-ambulated his wheelchair from the healthcare area to the independent living front lobby entrance and exited the building without staff knowledge. R22 continued down a main traffic road where the speed limit was 45 miles per hour for 0.3 of a mile and then called 911 where police officers responded. As a result of the inadequate supervision, R22's elopement from 4:50 AM to 5:21 AM had the potential to have a serious outcome, injury or death. An immediate jeopardy past non-compliance was called on 1/8/26 at 9:57 AM. Based on review and confirmation of the actions taken by the facility in response to this incident and no further elopements had occurred, the facility was back in substantial compliance as of 11/15/25. Findings include: Review of R22's clinical record revealed: 7/10/25 - R22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that for three (R1, R2 and R3) out of three residents reviewed for wandering and elopement the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopements. R1 eloped on two occasions 8/16/24 and 8/18/24. On 8/16/24, R1 was seen in the parking lot. On 8/18/24, R1 was seen outside of the building, near the fire lane of the facility turn-in and a busy roadway. Additionally, R2 eloped from the facility on 8/17/24 and was found outside of the building at the edge of the curb on the rounded driveway. On 7/11/24, R3 was seen exiting the facility unattended by a facility visitor who immediately reported R3's elopement to staff. The facility was made aware on 8/23/27 at 4:47 PM of immediate jeopardy. All three residents were at risk for serious adverse outcome. The immediate jeopardy was abated on 8/24/24. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Wandering and Elopements indicated, The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of four residents reviewed for pharmacy services, the facility failed to ensure R1 was free of a significant medication error. This failure resulted in a harm in which R1 seized and was transferred to the hospital on 8/7/25 with benzodiazepine withdrawal from missing four doses of lorazepam. Based on a review of the facility's corrective actions taken and completed on 8/8/25 at 11:20 PM, it was determined that this incident was past non-compliance. Findings include:8/5/25 11:59 AM - R1's [Hospital] Discharge summary documented, . Medications at discharge. lorazepam 2 mg (milligrams) oral tablet, 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day. Please contact PCP (primary care provider) for refill. 2 weeks sent to [pharmacy].8/5/25 - R1 was readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but were not limited to, diabetes and anxiety disorder.8/5/25 - C1 (DO) ordered lorazepam tablet 2 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety for 14 days. 8/5/25 10:20 PM - E6 (LPN) documented in R1's EMR, eMAR- Administration note-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it had a documented and updated facility assessment that included the conditions in the addendum. Findings include:Review of facility documents revealed:1/5/26 - A Significant Organizational Change facility assessment tool was completed by E1 (Interim NHA). 1/9/26 3:00 PM - A review of the facility assessment tool lacked evidence that the following addendums were included and attached in the assessment:- Facility - Payroll Based Journal Report- Staff Certification Requirements - Education Schedule Summary- Infection Control Risk Assessment - Inventory Listing- All Hazards Risk Assessment/Emergency Preparedness Plan- HIPAA Security Compliance Information- Authorization for Disclosure Policy & Procedure 1/12/26 9:00 AM - A request for the attachments to the addendum was made to E1 (Interim NHA). 1/12/26 2:46 PM - E1 confirmed that the facility did not have the attachments to the facility assessment addendum. 1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to handle, store, process, and transport laundry in a manner that prevents cross contamination.Findings include:1/7/26, 10:30 AM - During a laundry tour with E32 (Housekeeping Staff), the surveyor observed that a smaller auxiliary laundry room was located adjacent to the main washer/dirty room, with its only entrance/exit door opening directly into the dirty laundry area. The smaller room contained a household type washers and dryers. The door to this room was open at the time of the observation.E32 stated that personal clothing for residents is washed and dried in this smaller room, and that clean laundry is then transported out through the main washer/dirty room. E32 reported that this practice has been in place for years. A designated clean laundry room exists on the opposite side of the main washer room; however, it was not being used for the processing or transport of these personal clothing items.1/7/26 4:15 PM - The findings were reviewed with E1 (Interim NHA).
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R3, R22, R28 and R94) out of four residents reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure the care planning process facilitated the inclusion of the resident and/or resident representative in the development and implementation of each residents' person-centered care plan. Findings include: 1. Review of R22's clinical record revealed: 7/10/25 – R22 was admitted to the facility. 7/16/25 – The admission MDS assessment was completed. There was no evidence that a care plan conference was held with the resident/resident representative. 10/16/25 – The quarterly MDS assessment was completed. There was no evidence that a care plan conference was held with the resident/resident representative. 2. Review of R94's clinical record revealed: 12/13/25 – R94 was admitted to the facility. 12/19/25 – The admission MDS assessment was completed. R94 was discharged to hospital and returned on 12/24/25. 12/30/25 – The 5-day MDS assessment was completed. There was no evidence that a care plan conference was held with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevents foodborne illness to the residents, in reference to the FDA Food Code. Findings include:1/7/26 9:40 AM - During a kitchen tour with E31 (Director of Food and Beverages), the surveyor observed multiple open food items in the walk in freezer that were not dated. The undated items included one bag of potato French fries, one bag of uncooked sweet potato fries, three bags of dinner rolls, three bags of bagels (one of which contained a moldy bagel), three bags of English muffins, and seven bags of sliced wheat bread.1/7/26 4:15 PM - The findings were reviewed with E1 (Interim NHA).
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R3, R4, R39, R87) out of six reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program that obtained and documented on the monthly line listing the organism being treated by antibiotics. Findings include: 1. Review of R3's clinical record revealed:9/7/23 - R3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to multiple sclerosis and neurogenic bladder with an indwelling suprapubic catheter.12/31/25- R3's EMR Follow Up note documented, .Patient seen for follow-up status post recent emergency room visit.She [R3] was recently seen in the emergency room for UTI (urinary tract infection) and continues on antibiotics at this time.1/8/26 11:41 AM - A review of the December 2025 infection control line listing revealed documentation of R3 receiving Cefpodoxime (an antibiotic) from 12/30/25 to 1/4/26. There was no documentation of the organism being treated on the line listing.1/8/26 1:15 PM - During an interview, E10 (Infection Preventionist) confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for seven (E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E20 and E21) out of seven facility staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) training was completed. Findings include:1/12/26 1:30 PM - Review of the facility training records revealed a lack of evidence of QAPI training for the following facility staff:2/4/25 - E14's first day in the facility as RN (Registered Nurse).4/1/25 - E15's first day in the facility as RN.3/18/25 - E16's first day in the facility as CNA (Certified Nurse Aide).9/16/25 - E17's first day in the facility as CNA.6/10/25 - E18's first day in the facility as CNA.9/30/25 - E20's first day in the facility as Maintenance Tech.11/18/25 - E21's first day in the facility as Restorative Aide/CNA.1/12/26 2:00 PM - Findings were discussed with E1 (Interim NHA).1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for four (E16, E18, E20, and E21) out of four facility staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required Corporate Compliance and Ethics training was completed. Findings include:1/12/26 1:30 PM - Review of the facility training records revealed a lack of evidence of Corporate Compliance and Ethics training for the following facility staff:3/18/25 - E16's first day in the facility as CNA (Certified Nurse Aide).6/10/25 - E18's first day in the facility as CNA.9/30/25 - E20's first day in the facility as Maintenance Tech.11/18/25 - E21's first day in the facility as Restorative Aide/CNA.1/12/26 2:00 PM - Findings were discussed with E1 (Interim NHA).1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for seven (E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E20 and E21) out of seven facility staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required Behavioral Health Care Needs training was completed. Findings include:1/12/26 1:30 PM - Review of the facility training records revealed a lack of evidence of Behavioral Health Care Needs training for the following facility staff:2/4/25 - E14's first day in the facility as RN (Registered Nurse).4/1/25 - E15's first day in the facility as RN.3/18/25 - E16's first day in the facility as CNA (Certified Nurse Aide).9/16/25 - E17's first day in the facility as CNA.6/10/25 - E18's first day in the facility as CNA.9/30/25 - E20's first day in the facility as Maintenance Tech.11/18/25 - E21's first day in the facility as Restorative Aide/CNA.1/12/26 2:00 PM - Findings were discussed with E1 (Interim NHA).1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R92) out of 32 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that R92 was treated with dignity and respect. Findings include: Review of R92's clinical record revealed:10/27/25 - R92 was admitted to the facility.10/30/23 - R92's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed that R92's cognition was moderately impaired. 1/7/26 1:50 PM - During an observation, R92, whose bed was near the open door, was seen from the hallway with her legs and thighs uncovered, exposing her skin and incontinence pad. R92 had a roommate with a male visitor (unidentified) at that time of observation. 1/7/26 - Subsequent observations from 1:53 PM through 2:01 PM revealed that R92's uncovered legs, thighs and incontinence pads were visible from the hallway. R92's roommate still had the male visitor with her in the same room. 1/7/26 2:05 PM - In an interview, E12 (LPN) confirmed the finding and stated that R2 had the tendency to kick her blanket off her. E12 further stated that she will attend to R92 and will put on her pants. 1/9/26 3:00 PM -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R22, R80 and R106) out of four residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to allow these residents to exercise their right to self-determination by having their family contact representatives sign consents. Findings include: 1. Review of R22's clinical record revealed: 7/7/25 – The facility's Consent for Treatment, as part of the Resident Agreement was electronically signed by R22 that stated, You authorize Millcroft Living to provide care and treatment consistent with the terms of your Health Center admission Agreement, dated 7/10/25. You also authorize Millcroft Living to obtain all necessary clinical and/or financial information from the hospital or nursing facility from which you may be transferring. You have the right to request, refuse and/or discontinue treatment. If you are, or become, incapable of making your own medical decisions, we will follow the direction of the Delaware Consent Act. Under the Consent Act, persons shall have legal authority to make medical treatment decisions on your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R106) out of eighteen residents reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to notify family representative of the resident's 8/1/25 lab work. Findings include:Facility Consent for Treatment form stated, We will keep you informed about the routine nursing and emergency care we provide to you, and we will answer your questions about the care and service we provide you. Last reviewed 7/9/20247/24/25 - E6 (MD) ordered in R106's EMR, Labs - CMP (complete metabolic panel), CBC (complete blood count) in one week from date of admission. 7/25/25 - R106 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to pancreatic cancer.7/31/25 - R106's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed R106's BIMS (Basic Inventory of Mental Status) as 13, which was reflective of normal cognition.8/1/25 8:12 AM - R106 had labs (CMP, CBC) drawn at the facility.8/1/25 10:00 AM - F7 (R106's wife) signed R106's discharge paperwork and R106 was discharged from the facility.8/1/25 11:29 AM - R106's lab results were reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R6) out of one resident reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure that R6 had home health services arranged per the discharge plan from the facility to home on [DATE] (Friday). Findings include: Review of R6's clinical record revealed:9/26/25 - R6 was care planned for discharge with the goal to be discharged to home. Approaches included:-home health services per physician order;-physician to review discharge and admission orders, care plan and prior level of function;-therapy services per physician order.12/5/25 - An insurance appeal determination letter documented, A review of the medical records received shows that the patient [R6] was admitted to a SNF [skilled nursing facility]. Self-care tasks such as bathing, dressing, and toileting require moderate to maximum assistance. Bed mobility tasks require supervision assistance. Transfer tasks require moderate assistance. The patient can walk up to 50 feet with a wheeled walker and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R46) out of one resident reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), the facility failed to complete MDS assessments to accurately reflect changes in R46's behavior and medication status. Findings include:Review of R46's clinical record revealed:11/15/2024 - R46 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hypertension and osteoarthritis.4/29/2025 - A Behavior Note entered in R46's clinical record documented, [R46] noted agitated sitting around nurse's station.asking roommate to get off his property.[R46] yelling at everyone to vacate his property.5/26/2025 9:30 PM - A Behavior Note entered in R46's clinical record documented, [R46] continues to yell at the nursing station.5/29/25 - A quarterly MDS assessment completed for R46 indicated no behaviors of delusions or yelling at others.8/22/25 9:04 AM - A Behavior Note entered in R46's clinical record documented, Staff reported that [R46] was aggressive verbally and physically hitting his CNA in the face.aggression started when [R46]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R94) out of two residents reviewed for catheters and one (R91) out of three residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), the facility failed to ensure that a person-centered care plan was developed to address each residents' identified needs. Findings include:1. Review of R94's clinical record revealed: 12/13/25 – R94 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of a stroke. 12/15/25 – A physician's order stated to bladder scan q6 [every 6 hours]. Straight cath if PVR [post void residual] is greater than 400 ml [milli-liters]. Document output every 6 hours. Review of the R94's care plan lacked evidence of the development to address R94's urinary retention and the approaches on how the facility would meet R94's needs. 1/9/26 3:08 PM – During a combined interview with E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON), finding was reviewed and confirmed. 2. Review of R91's clinical record revealed: 12/16/25 – R91 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including severe dementia with agitation. 12/17/25 – R91 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R80) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan. Findings include: 8/28/23 - R80 was admitted to the facility.9/25/25 - R80 was re-admitted to the facility after hospitalization for COVID pneumonia with acute respiratory failure and hypoxia (low oxygen saturation).9/25/25- E6 (MD) ordered in R80's EMR, Change mask/cannula and tubing and clean oxygen concentrator filter every night shift every Thursday.10/1/25 - R80's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment documented that R80 was using supplemental oxygen.1/8/26 12:30 PM - A review of R80's care plan lacked evidence of the addition of R80's supplemental oxygen intervention, goals and tasks.1/8/26 1:11 PM - During an interview, E7 (RNAC) stated, I don't see any mention of oxygen therapy in [R80]'s care plan. I will add it.The facility failed to revise R80's care plan to include his supplemental oxygen requirement after the 10/1/25 MDS assessment.1/12/25 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R80) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards as the supplemental oxygen tubing was out-of-date. Findings include:8/28/23 - R80 was admitted to the facility.9/25/25 - R80 was re-admitted to the facility after hospitalization for COVID pneumonia with acute respiratory failure and hypoxia (low oxygen saturation).9/25/25- E6 (MD) ordered in R80's EMR, Change mask/cannula and tubing and clean oxygen concentrator filter every night shift every Thursday.9/25/25 10:51 PM - R80's alert charting note documented, Resident arrived at facility via stretcher on oxygen 2L (liters) via nasal cannula.1/5/26 (Monday) 2:15 PM - An observation of R80's supplemental oxygen tubing revealed that it was marked as having been changed on 12/26/25 (11 days prior).1/8/26 (Thursday) 1:11 PM - An observation of R80's supplemental oxygen tubing revealed that it was marked as having been changed on 12/26/25 (14 days prior).1/9/26 1:37 PM - An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R22) out of four residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R22 received medically-related social services, when it was determined that the resident lacked capacity for medical decision making in F6's (MD) progress note dated 11/10/25. Findings include: The facility's job description of Social Worker, updated July 2015, included, but were not limited to the following job duties:- . 2. Assists with the coordination of Health Center admissions. 9. Maintains regular and on-going relationship with family to discuss needs or concerns, mediates issues that may arise between resident/family/staff. Cross refer to F553 example #1 and F561 example #1 Review of R22's record revealed: 9/21/25 - A typewritten letter from F5 (R22's POA/friend) to R22 stated, September 21, 2025. [R22's name] As you have informed me, in a few days you'll be returning to your home. You've asked me for keys and I am enclosing the set you gave me some time ago . I am reminding you I will no longer be available for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R3) out of two residents reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside resource, R3's routine dental services. Findings include:Cross refer F553 and F656Review of R3's clinical record revealed:12/15/25 - R3's quarterly MDS assessment revealed that R3 had a BIMS score of 15 and an intact cognition.1/5/26 1:35 PM - In an interview, R3 stated that it has been a long time since she was last seen by the dentist. R3 stated, I did not know that I can be seen by a dentist here in the facility.1/9/26 11:10 AM - Further review of R3's clinical records lacked evidence of dental consults and appointments for 2025.1/9/26 11:30 AM - In a telephone interview, F3 (Family Member and POA) stated that she and R3 prefer to set up the appointments and transportation services for R3's outside facility consultations and that included an unsuccessful dental clinic visit. When asked if R3 was seen by the dentist lately, F3 stated that R3 was all set up for the dental visit one time but the dentist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0843 — isolatedHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it had a written transfer agreement in effect with one or more hospitals approved for participation in Medicare/Medicaid programs. Findings include:Review of facility documents revealed:12/15/25 - A [NAME] of Sale between O1(former facility owner) and O2 (new facility owner) was made and entered into. 1/12/26 9:00 AM - A request for the facility's written transfer agreement was made to E1 (Interim NHA). 1/12/26 2:46 PM - E1 confirmed that the facility did not have a written transfer agreement. 1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0844 — isolatedFollow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it has complied with the disclosure of ownership requirements. Findings include:Review of facility documents revealed:12/15/25 - A [NAME] of Sale between O1(former facility owner) and O2 (new facility owner) was made and entered into. 1/12/26 9:00 AM - A request for the facility's written notice to the State Agency responsible for licensing with disclosure requirements at the time of change was made to E1 (Interim NHA). 1/12/26 2:46 PM - E1 confirmed that the facility did not have the document with the facility disclosure of ownership requirements. 1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R94) out of four residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure R94's bilateral bed rails were being included in a routine maintenance safety check. Findings include: Review 94's clinical record revealed: 1/5/26 2:11 PM - Observation of bilateral bed rails positioned up on R94's bed. 1/9/26 9:49 AM - Observation of R94 in bed revealed bilateral bed rails positioned up and no gap. R94 confirmed that he used them during therapy sessions. 1/9/26 10:13 AM - During an interview, E30 (Maintenance Director) was asked if there are routine maintenance/safety inspections of bed rails being performed in the facility. He stated no, but he would start doing this. E30 stated that maintenance staff would apply resident bed rails when the request was submitted through the maintenance work order system. He also stated that therapy would remove bed rails if they were no longer necessary. 1/12/26 3:30 PM - Finding was reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (Interim NHA) and E2 (DON).
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for seven (E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E19, and E21) out of seven facility staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required Communications training was completed. Findings include:1/12/26 1:30 PM - Review of the facility training records revealed a lack of evidence of Communications training for the following facility staff:2/4/25 - E14's first day in the facility as RN (Registered Nurse).4/1/25 - E15's first day in the facility as RN.3/18/25 - E16's first day in the facility as CNA (Certified Nurse Aide).9/16/25 - E17's first day in the facility as CNA.6/10/25 - E18's first day in the facility as CNA.10/8/24 - E19's first day in the facility as LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse).11/18/25 - E21's first day in the facility as Restorative Aide/CNA.1/12/26 2:00 PM - Findings were discussed with E1 (Interim NHA).1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · E2025-10-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R1, R2, R3, R4) out of four residents reviewed for admission, the facility failed to provide services that meet the professional standard of quality as defined by the Delaware State Code regarding RN (registered nurse), LPN (licensed practical nurse) and NA (nurse aide)/ UA (unlicensed assistant) Duties for admission assessments. Findings include: Delaware State Board of Nursing - RN, LPN and NA/UAP Duties 2024 .admission Assessments *. RN (registered nurse) . *Once a care plan is established, the LPN may do assessments. Updated 10/11/24Facility admission Assessment and Follow Up: Role of the Nurse policy included a document that listed all the evaluations in the facility EMR that were considered admission Evaluations. The list included: N Adv- Clinical Admission, N Adv- Skin Check, N Adv- Braden scale- for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk Evaluation, N Adv- Lift/Transfer Evaluation, N Adv -Fall Risk Evaluation, N Adv -Dehydration Risk Evaluation, N Adv- Elopement Evaluation, Hot Liquids Safety Data Collection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of four residents reviewed for Pharmacy services, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that included acquiring and receiving a medication (lorazepam) to meet R1's needs during her 8/5/25 admission. Findings include:Facility Pharmacy Information document stated, Pharmacy Order Timeline - New Orders, admission Orders or Refills ordered by 11 AM have a delivery window of 9 PM to 11 PM. Controlled Substances Orders - Controlled substances can only be sent upon valid script from a prescriber or a verbal order from a prescriber or an agent of the prescriber. (Note Agents of the prescriber may NOT order CII, only CII, CIV and CV.) Issued Jan-2024The U.S Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) listed lorazepam as a Schedule VI medication. Drugs, substances, and certain chemicals used to make drugs are classified into five (5) distinct categories or schedules depending upon the drug's acceptable medical use and the drug's abuse or dependency potential. 15-Oct-2025Review of R1's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions and failed to ensure the kitchen was kept in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and the potential for development of foodborne illnesses. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 89 of 91 residents who received meals and beverages prepared in and served from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 11/24/24 at 8:54 AM, upon entrance to the kitchen through the dishwasher area, observation of the floor, the floor underneath the dishwasher, freezer, cooler, and shelf revealed trash, food debris, dust/dirt, and a greasy blackish-brown substance. The substance was found throughout the kitchen on the floors, legs/feet of equipment, and underneath freestanding coolers and freezers, as well as the range, ovens, prep tables, and shelving. The greasy substance stained the baseboards and walls. Observation of the commercial juice machine revealed the water lines were stained with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 25 sampled residents (Resident(R) 18) was afforded the opportunity to be included in all aspects of person-centered care planning. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan, Comprehensive, Person-Centered Care, revised March 2022, read in pertinent part, 1. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident . The resident is informed of his or her right to participate in his or her treatment and provided advance notice of care plan conferences. Review of R18's Face Sheet, located in electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed an admission date of 06/02/22 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, sarcoidosis, and erythema intertrigo. Review of the Care Plan Conference Summary Form, provided by the facility, revealed no documented evidence that the resident attended the care plan meeting held on 06/05/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the personal privacy of one resident (R3) during medication administration from a sample of 25 residents. This failure had the potential to cause embarrassment to the resident. Findings include: Review of R3's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical records (EMR) section titled Profile, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sarcopenia (muscle loss) and osteoarthritis. Review of R3's Physicians Orders for November, located in the resident's EMR section titled Orders, revealed that the resident was to receive a Lidocaine 4% pain patch every morning. Observation during medication administration on 11/26/24 at 9:05 am revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 administering a Lidocaine pain patch to R3's left shoulder. R3 was seated in her wheelchair at the nurses' station. LPN1 pulled the resident's shirt over the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to the resident and responsible party (RP) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 287) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 25. The failure had the potential to affect the residents planning on returning to the facility. Findings include: Review of R287's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R287 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with acute respiratory failure and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On 10/30/23 R287 was diagnosed with COVID-19 and discharged to a hospital on [DATE]. Review of R287's Health Status Note, dated 11/10/23 at 9:34 AM and located in the EMR under the Progress Note tab, revealed, . Resident sent out to the ER [emergency room] for further evaluation. Spouse notified and she also requested bed hold until issue is resolved . Review of the Misc (miscellaneous), Prog (progress) Notes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 22 out of 25 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This had the potential to cause the resident to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual, dated 10/01/19, indicated, . It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT completing the assessment. Review of R22's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) section titled Profile, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and shortness of breath. Review of R22's Physician Orders, dated 09/23/24 and located in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to revise care plans for three of 25 sampled residents (R22, R65, and R70). The care plan for R22 was not revised to reflect his oxygen therapy. The care plan for R65 was not revised to reflect an incident of wandering into a female resident's room. R70's care plan was not revised to reflect the resident's urinary catheter. This failure had the potential to affect care provided to the residents. Findings include: 1. Review of R22's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) section titled Profile, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and shortness of breath. Review of R22's Physician Orders, dated 09/23/24 and located in the resident's EMR section titled Orders, revealed the resident was to receive continuous oxygen therapy at two liters via nasal cannula. A review of R22's Care Plan, located in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to increase the frequency of assessments when a resident was diagnosed with COVID-19 for one of three residents (Resident (R) 287) reviewed for COVID-19 infection out of a total sample of 25. The lack of assessment could result in the facility not noticing symptoms which warranted further treatment and intervention. Findings include: Review of R287's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R287 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with acute respiratory failure and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of R287's Order Summary Report, located in the EMR under the Orders tab, revealed an order dated 07/26/23 which read, Monitor the following at least daily. Vital Signs - Temp, Pulse, Respirations, Pulse OX [oxygen saturation level], B/P [blood pressure], for COVID-19 symptoms of Fever, Chills, Cough, Shortness of Breath . if symptoms occur, place resident in transmission-based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide supervision for one of five residents (Resident (R) 65) reviewed for supervision out of a total sample of 25. The failure had the potential to cause harm to R65 due to his behavior of wandering. Findings include: Review of R65's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) section titled Profile, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication, dementia, anxiety disorders, and altered mental status. Review of R65's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/21/24 and located in the resident's EMR section titled MDS, revealed the resident was assessed to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. It was recorded that the resident did not exhibit any wandering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for urinary catheters for one of three residents (Resident (R) 70) reviewed for urinary catheters out of a total sample of 25. The facility failed to have physician orders for the use of a urinary catheter and failed to ensure the drainage bag and tubing were not placed directly on the floor, inhibiting the proper flow of urine. The failure had the potential for the resident to develop reoccurring urinary tract infections (UTIs). Findings include: Review of R70's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) section titled Profile, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (UTI), hydronephrosis, urinary retention, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the R70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of ARD of 10/13/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the physician prescribed dose for two of five residents (Residents (R) 9 and 22) reviewed for respiratory care out of a total sample of 25. This had the potential to cause the residents respiratory distress. Findings include: 1. Review of R9's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record, (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic respiratory failure. Review of R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/26/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R9's Physician Orders, located in the EMR under the Physician Orders tab, revealed an order dated 10/16/24 for oxygen for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to document an end date for an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for one of six residents (Resident (R) 294) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 25. The failure had the potential for residents to receive psychotropic medications without ongoing assessment by a physician or practitioner for continued appropriateness. Findings include: Review of R294's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R294 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R294 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of R294's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/28/24 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R294 scored 14 out of 15 on her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of R294's Encounter, dated 09/20/24 at 1:00 AM and located in the EMR under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policy, the facility failed to secure one of three (Second floor medication cart) medication carts on one of two nursing units. The facility failed to dispose of expired supplies in one of two (Second floor medication storage room) medication storage rooms. These failures had the potential to result in residents being subject to unsafe or ineffective treatment or adverse effects leading to more serious illnesses and could permit unauthorized access to residents' medications. Findings include: 1. Observation on [DATE] at 6:34 PM revealed the second-floor medication cart was unlocked and was located between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], approximately six steps away from the nurses' station. The cart remained unlocked for nine minutes and fifty-eight seconds. The top drawer contained insulin pens and over-the-counter medications. The second drawer contains residents' medications and a locked narcotic box. No staff were present, and the cart was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for three (R1, R2 and R3) out of three residents reviewed for elopements the facility failed to recognize the elopements as allegation's of neglect. This resulted in the failure to report them to the State Agency. Findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating last updated, September 2022 indicated,If resident abuse neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other official according to state law. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the state agency . 1. 7/11/24 - R3 eloped from the facility. 2. 8/16/24 and 8/18/24 - R1 eloped from the facility. 3. 8/17/24 - R2 eloped from the facility. 8/22/24 - Review of the State Agency's Incident Referral Center revealed the facility's last reported elopement was on 11/30/22. During an interview on 8/23/24 at 12:50 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for seven (E8, E12, E15, E16, E21, E27 and E28) out of ten staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required Behavioral Health training was completed. Findings include: 8/27/24 - Review of the employee training records revealed a lack of evidence of Behavioral Health training of the following staff: 11/18/21- E8 (receptionist) and E12 (RN) were hired by the facility. 1/20/22 - E28 (CNA) was hired by the facility. 3/7/23 - E15 (LPN) was hired by the facility. 7/25/23 - E16 (CNA) was hired by the facility. 8/8/23 - E21 (H) was hired by the facility. 10/3/23 - E27 (CNA) was hired by the facility. During an interview on 8/28/24 at 11:15 AM, E1 (ED) confirmed the above staff did not receive their required training. Findings were reviewed during the exit conference on 8/28/24 at 1:06 PM with E1 (ED), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON).
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R3) out of three residents reviewed for elopement the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect. Findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating last updated, September 2022 indicated, All investigations will be thoroughly investigated. 7/11/24 2:40 PM - A progress note in R3's clinical record documented the resident eloped from the facility. 8/23/24 9:15 AM - The Surveyor requested the investigative documents for R3's elopement. 8/23/24 2:12 PM - E2 (DON) confirmed there were no investigative documents for R3's 7/11/24 elopement. Findings were reviewed during the exit conference on 8/28/24 at 1:06 PM with E1 (ED), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON).
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to store foods in a sanitary manner. Findings include: The following were found during the initial kitchen tour on 10/16/23 from approximately 8:45AM through 9:45AM: - The walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen had moldy strawberries and peppers; - The shelves in the walk-in were moldy. Findings were reviewed and confirmed by Dietary Manager (DM) on 10/16/23 at approxmately 10:00AM:
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility investigation, the facility failed to notify the physician of an elevated anticoagulant lab value in a timely manner for one resident (Resident (R) 14) reviewed for a significant medication error out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of R14's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of heart failure and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). Review of R14's Care Plan, located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab and revised on 06/02/21, included usage of anti-coagulant therapy to manage the medical condition of atrial fibrillation and history of cerebral vascular accident (stroke). Review of R14's Order Summary Report, located in the EMR and dated 02/24/22, included Coumadin 4mg tablet by mouth at bedtime due to permanent atrial fibrillation. Review of R14's Order Summary Report, located in the EMR and dated 07/07/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of one residents (Resident (R) 50) reviewed for prevention of skin breakdown out of a total sample of 26 residents received padding to the skin as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Observation on 10/16/23 at 10:42 AM revealed the padding on R50's hip was dated 10/06/23. During interview on 10/16/23 at 1:35 PM, R50's family member (F)1 stated that she also noted the date of the padding was 10/06/23. Review of R50's admission Record, provided by the facility, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MD) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/07/23 revealed R50 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers but had no pressure ulcers or skin breakdown. Observation on 10/16/23 at 2:17 PM revealed the left hip patch was dated 10/06/23. Further observation on 10/16/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nursing services as ordered for one of three residents (Resident (R) 36) reviewed for application of splints out of a total sample of 26 residents. This failure had the potential to decrease physical functioning, quality of life, and independence. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, revised 07/2017, stated in part . 2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM [range of motion]. 3. Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable . Review of R36's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Comorbidities included muscle wasting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to clean respiratory equipment for one of one resident (Residents (R) 65) reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of R65's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included pneumonia, acute respiratory failure hypoxia, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/23, located under the RAI tab, indicated R65 was extensive assist of one staff member for bed mobility, dressing, and toileting; transfers only happened once or twice. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R65 was cognitively intact. Review of R65's EMR under the Orders tab revealed the following physician's orders: Continuous oxygen 2 Liter/minute via NC (nasal cannula).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Nursing Aid (CNA) was registered with the state of Delaware for one of five personnel records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the personnel record of CNA1, indicated CNA1 was employed at the facility as a CNA on 03/29/22. Further review of CNA1's personnel file indicated CNA1 had obtained a Certificate of Completion as a Temporary Nurse Aide on 06/12/21. CNA1's CNA Registry for the State of Delaware could not be located in the personnel file. During an interview on 10/19/23 at 1:14 PM with the Administrator, the Administrator confirmed CNA1 was not a registered CNA in the state of Delaware. The Administrator explained CNA1 had received temporary status during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID - 19) epidemic but had not obtained an actual/active registry since the COVID-19 waiver had been lifted. The Administrator stated CNA1 worked in the building as recently as yesterday but will not be returning as an employee of the facility at this time.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 received a yearly performance evaluation for one of five personnel records reviewed. Findings include: Review of the personnel record for CNA1, indicated CNA1 completed the Temporary Nurse Aide online course on 06/12/21. The personnel record indicated CNA1 had been employed as a CNA at the facility since 03/29/22. During an interview on 10/19/23 at 1:14 PM with the Administrator, the Administrator confirmed CNA1 had not received a yearly performance evaluation (due March of 2023). The Administrator explained CNA1 was an employee of the assisted living side and had moved over to the long-term care side. The Administrator explained it was an oversight of the Human Resource Departments of the Long-Term Care and the Assisted Living areas of the facility that the performance evaluation was not completed.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate dosage of antibiotics upon admission for one of six residents (Resident (R) 176) reviewed for medication administration out of 26 sample residents. Findings include: Review of R176's admission Record, found in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) right ankle and foot. The resident was discharged on 08/23/23. Review of R176's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment located in the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/19/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment with a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. R176 required limited assistance from one staff with bed mobility, transfer, walk in room, dressing, and toileting. R176 also had impairment on one side lower extremity. He had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, facility record reviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident (R) 14) out of a total sample of 26 residents was free from significant medication errors. Specifically, R14 was erroneously administered Coumadin (anticoagulant medication) four mg (milligrams). This failure had the potential to increase the risk for bleeding, bruising, and death. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication and Treatment Orders, revised 07/2016, stated in part Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing .Orders for anti-coagulants will be prescribed only with appropriate clinical and laboratory monitoring . Review of the facility's policy titled, Anticoagulation- Clinical Protocol, revised 11/2018, stated in part .the nurse shall assess and document/ report the following: a. current anticoagulation therapy, including drug and current dosage; b. recent labs, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-12 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it has an active governing body that is responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management of the facility. Findings include:Review of facility documents revealed:12/15/25 - A [NAME] of Sale between O1(former facility owner) and O2 (new facility owner) was made and entered into. 1/12/26 9:00 AM - A request for the names and contact information of the members of the governing body was made to E1 (Interim NHA). 1/12/26 2:46 PM - E1 confirmed that the facility did not have the names and contact information of the members of the governing body.1/12/26 3:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 and E2 (DON) during the Exit Conference.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for six (E12, E15, E16, E21, E27 and E28) out of ten staff reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the required QAPI (Quality Assurance And Performance Improvement) training was completed. Findings include: 8/27/24 - Review of the employee training records revealed a lack of evidence of QAPI training of the following staff: 11/18/21- E12 (RN) was hired by the facility. 1/20/22 - E28 (CNA) was hired by the facility. 3/7/23 - E15 (LPN) was hired by the facility. 7/25/23 - E16 (CNA) was hired by the facility. 8/8/23 - E21 (H) was hired by the facility. 10/3/23 - E27 (CNA) was hired by the facility. During an interview on 8/28/24 at 11:15 AM, E1 (ED) confirmed the above staff did not receive their required training. Findings were reviewed during the exit conference on 8/28/24 at 1:06 PM with E1 (ED), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON).
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,814 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $16,355 — penalty dated 2026-06-25
- $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-01-12
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-10-29
- $16,448 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- BLACKROCK INC — investment firm · 18.79% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- STATE STREET CORPORATION — investment firm · 5.84% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- VANGUARD GROUP INC — investment firm · 16.19% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085021. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.