Newark Manor Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 56.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of clinical record and facility documentation, it was determined that for two (R1 and R2) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to remain free of accident hazards. For R1, the facility failed to identify that R1's left bed rail was a potential hazard. R1, a dependent resident with dementia, was identified with a change of condition on 7/18/25 and diagnosed with a left upper extremity fracture. The facility's investigation documented that R1 sustained the injury as an accidental contact with the bed enabler during care. As a result, R1 was harmed. R2, a severely cognitively impaired resident and dependent resident sustained a scalp laceration, and a subtle sacral fracture from a fall when she was left in the bathroom unsupervised. Findings include: An undated facility document entitled, Falls included, . The nurse and charge nurse are to be notified immediately, and the resident is not to be moved until assessed by a nurse unless otherwise directed. 2/28/22 - R2 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R462) out of three residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that R462 was free from physical abuse by R461 resulting in harm when R462 obtained a broken nose and laceration to the bridge of nose. Due to the facility's corrective measures completed on 5/28/24, the facility was notified that R462's incident was a harm past non-compliance. Findings include: Cross refer F684 The facility's undated policy, titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Serious Injury, Misappropriation of Property, Exploitation, Injury of Unknown Origin and Crime documented, .Definitions: 1. Abuse - the infliction of injury .with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .and includes .a. Physical abuse - the unnecessary infliction of pain or injury . to a . resident . includes hitting, kicking, slapping . Review of R462's record revealed: 3/6/24 - R462 was admitted to the facility with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of clinical record, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to notify the on-call provider of R1's delayed STAT x-ray results ordered 7/18/25. Findings include:Cross refer to F689, example 1 Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 7/18/25 - A physician's order stated to obtain a STAT elbow x-ray for R1's increased pain and decreased movement of left arm. A nursing note, at 5:49 PM, documented that the x-ray was completed in the facility. 7/20/25 8:20 PM - R1's mobile STAT x-ray results were finally read and faxed to the facility revealing a left humeral neck fracture. 10/23/25 11:00 AM - During an interview, E6 (RN) stated that she called the mobile x-ray company on 7/19/25 and was told they were running behind. E6 stated that she did not notify the on-call provider. E6 stated that when she returned to work on 7/20/25 evening shift and found out the results were still not received. E6 stated R1's POA was very upset and requested R1 to be sent to the ER. E6 stated that the on-call provider…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R2) out of three residents sampled for falls, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect when R2 was left unattended in the bathroom and had a fall. Findings include: An undated facility document entitled, Falls included, . The nurse and charge nurse are to be notified immediately, and the resident is not to be moved until assessed by a nurse unless otherwise directed.2/28/22 - R2 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, left eye absolute glaucoma (permanent vision loss), and difficulty walking.1/16/24 - R2's fall care plan documented, Resident with poor safety awareness and impulse control.8/30/25 2:41 PM - R2's clinical record documented, .S/P [status post] fall hit head, has a superficial laceration to the back of the right side of head that is 0.5cm.8/30/25 7:40 PM - A facility reported incident submitted to the Division documented, Resident found on the floor in the bathroom of the third-floor day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of clinical record, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan was initiated and implemented that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet R1's medical need with respect to the resident's pacemaker. Findings include: Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 1/31/23 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included, but was not limited to, dementia, legal blindness and sick sinus syndrome. 1/31/23 2:15 PM - The Resident Assessment-Data Collection Form documented that R1 had a pacemaker on her left upper chest. 1/31/23 - R1 was care planned for a pacemaker r/t [related to] sick sinus syndrome with goals and interventions that included: Goals:-will remain free from s/sx [signs/symptoms] of pacemaker malfunction or failure through the review date.Interventions:-Monitor vital signs monthly and as needed. Notify MD (medical doctor) of significant abnormalities. Notify MD of significant abnormalities.-Monitor/document/report PRN (as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of clinical record, it was determined that for three (R1, R4 and R5) out of seven residents reviewed for bed rails, the facility failed to review and revise each resident's bed rail care plan to ensure they were person-centered to meet their medical needs and included, but were not limited to, ongoing assessment and monitoring of the bed rail usage. Findings include:1. Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 3/7/23 - R1 was care planned for left bed enabler for assistance to change position while in bed. Interventions included:- Document that the enabler is being used to help assist resident to change position in bed;-Ensure a valid consent is on chart prior to initiating enabler; and-Obtain order for enabler. R1's bed rail care plan lacked evidence of the monitoring and supervision to be provided during the use of the bed rail; ongoing assessment to make sure that the bed rail was used to meet the resident's needs; ongoing evaluation of risks; identification of the person who will determined when the bed rail will be discontinued, and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that for three (R1, R4 and R5) out of seven residents reviewed for bed rails, the facility failed to ensure that each residents' bed rail was used appropriately with ongoing monitoring. Additionally, the facility lacked evidence that preventive maintenance/safety checks were being done for bed rails being used in the facility. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Bed Enabler, last updated 10/28/23, stated, Objective: 1. To assist with bed mobility. 2. To assist with transfer from bed to chair. Procedure:1. Physical therapy will determine the potential benefit of bed enabler use for bed mobility and/or transfers.2. Obtain an order for bed enablers from the physician.3. Obtain informed consent from the resident and/or resident representative.4. The Maintenance Department will be asked to install a bed enabler on the side/sides of the bed as specified by the physician order in Point Click Care.5. Update the care plan.6. The resident will be reassessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to meet the acute medical needs of R1 with regard to obtaining the timeliness of STAT x-ray results on 7/18/25. Findings include: Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 7/18/25 - A physician's order stated, Elbow X-ray: Including the humerus, radius, and ulna, for fractures, dislocations, or deformities R/T [related to] increased pain and decreased movement. STAT for Increased pain and decreased movement of LEFT arm. 7/20/25 8:20 PM - Approximately 48 hours later, R1's mobile x-ray results were faxed to the facility and documented an acute nondisplaced fracture of the left humeral neck. 10/23/25 12:18 PM - During an interview, C2 (Representative with X-ray company) stated that STAT x-ray results are usually completed in two hours on the same day ordered. C2 confirmed that on the weekend of 7/18/25 through 7/20/25, the company had limited staff coverage for reading x-rays. C2 stated that the x-ray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R461) out of one sampled resident, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order to administer tamsulosin HCL, aripiprazole and escitalopram oxalate. Findings include: Cross refer F600 5/6/24 - R461 had a physician's order for tamsulosin HCL give 2 capsules to equal 0.8 mg in the evening for enlarged prostrate. 5/6/24 (discontinued 5/13/24) - R461 had a physician's order for aripiprazole 5 mg give 2.5 mg (1/2 tablet) in the evening for depression. 5/7/24 - R461 had a physician's order for escitalopram oxalate 10 mg 1 tablet in the morning for depression. 5/13/24 - R461 had a physisian's order for aripiprazole 5 mg 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression. 2/18/25 10:00 AM - A review of R461's May 2024 Medication Administration Record revealed the following missing medication doses: 6 pm - tamsulosin HCL 0.8 mg - one out of 12 missed dose on 5/8/24; 6 pm - aippirazole 2.5 mg - four out of seven missed doses on 5/6/24-5/9/24; 8 pm - aripiprazole 5 mg - five out of six missed doses on 5/13/24 - 5/17/24; 8 am…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of facility reported incidents (FRI), and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident (R) 2) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Serious Injury, Misappropriation of Property, Exploitation, Sexual Abuse, Injury of unknown origin and crime, dated 05/2022, revealed [name of the facility] affirms that all persons admitted to the facility shall be treated with dignity and respect. Each resident is entitled to and shall receive appropriate and quality care, free of adverse preventable risks, consistent with their assessed needs and available resources. Staff shall be assured that resident care and treatment is administered in a safe, professional, and humane manner. Any instances of suspected, alleged, or witnessed resident abuse neglect mistreatment, serious injury,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their responsible party a written transfer notice at the time the resident was transferred to the hospital; and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for two residents (Resident (R) 54, and R312) of two reviewed for hospitalizations in a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of facility's updated policy titled, Discharge to Hospital/Another Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility, revealed To assure that comprehensive information regarding a resident's plan of care is communicated between facilities. Policy: 1. Obtain transfer or discharge order from the physician. 2. Notify the family and administration. 3. Complete Interagency Form B. Place in an envelope with the resident's name and the name of the receiving facility. When a resident is being transferred to another LTC facility. Send a copy of the immunization record. 4. Arrange for transport (unless…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy to the resident and the resident's responsible party at the time of transfer or within 24 hours of the transfer for two of three residents (Resident (R) 54 and 312) reviewed for hospitalizations of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Bed Hold (BH) Policy, (admission package) undated, revealed, A. Medical Assistance/Medicaid Residents. If the resident is transferred to a hospital by the order of a physician, [name of facility] will hold resident's bed for up to seven days commencing on the first day of leave, in accordance with Medicaid bed-hold policy. If a patient or resident is transferred out of a facility to an acute care facility or other specialized treatment facility, the facility must accept the patient or resident back into the facility when the resident no longer needs acute or specialized care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in DE