Wilmington Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
700 Foulk Road, Wilmington, DE 19803 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (302) 764-0181 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (110) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $424,128 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-11)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-05, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-05 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 12.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.9% | 10.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.4% | 13.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 37.2% | 21.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.4% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 3.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.9% | 20.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.7% | 10.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.0% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.5% | 83.1% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.4% | 23.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.7% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.01 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.40 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 273 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.5%CMS range 54.5–65.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.7–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.8–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 132.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
110 citations, most serious first. The 24 most serious are shown; the remaining 86 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for injuries, the facility failed to ensure that R1 received adequate care and treatment that met professional standards. R1, a cognitively impaired and dependent resident, was observed by a staff member with a visible head injury on 4/22/26 at approximately 6:00 AM and failed to inform the nursing staff at that time. The nurses were informed of the injury on 4/22/26 at approximately 8:30 AM, but failed to appropriately assess and provide care and treatment, including neurological checks. Each of the following shifts failed to identify and assess the injury, including failing to initiate neurological checks. As a result of this delay, R1 was found unresponsive in her bed on 4/23/26 at approximately 8:30 AM, more than 26 hours later, and was sent to the hospital, where emergency surgery was performed for a massive brain bleed. Due to this failure, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called at 1:30 PM on 4/30/26. For R11, the facility failed to ensure timely physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R11) out of four residents sampled for medication administration review, the facility failed to ensure that R11 was free from significant medication errors as evidenced by failing to check and monitor R11's blood sugars before meals, failing to administer ordered insulin and heparin injections. The facility's multiple failures to administer critical medications had the potential to cause a serious adverse outcome or death to R11. Due to the failures, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called on 5/8/26 at 1:24 PM. The IJ was abated on 5/9/26 at 11:59 PM. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Medication Unavailability, effective 1/29/24, documented, . Procedure . 1. A licensed nurse will notify the provider of the unavailability of medication . 2. the licensed nurse will activate the backup pharmacy process and procedures. 3. A licensed nurse will document notification to the provider of the unavailability in the medical record . The facility's policy titled, Refusal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Post IDR [DATE] revision Based on observation, interview and review of clinical records and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for two (R1 and R2) out of four residents reviewed for follow-up appointments, the facility failed to ensure that the correct resident (R1) was sent to a cardiology appointment on [DATE]. R2, a newly admitted cognitively impaired resident, was sent with R1's medical paperwork and accompanied by a facility aide, who did not know the resident. At the appointment, R2 was slumped in a wheelchair with altered mental status and the facility aide did not know the resident's baseline. 911 was called and R2 was emergently sent to the emergency room (ER) with R1's medical paperwork. In the ER, R2 was initially registered under R1's name until it was brought to the ER's attention. The facility's failure placed R2 at risk for a serious adverse outcome or death as R2 had the potential to receive treatment based on R1's medical paperwork provided to the Cardiologist's office, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2023-08-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and reviews of clinical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient nursing staff to administer critical medications to meet the needs of the residents during the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift on Friday, 7/21/23. For three residents (R22, R51 and R630) on the Dover Unit that were ordered Humalog insulin to be administered with breakfast (scheduled at 7:35 AM), revealed the following: - R22 was never administered insulin with breakfast. - R51 was administered insulin at 10:48 AM and 10:50 AM, approximately 3.5 hours later. - R630 was administered insulin at 9:56 AM and 9:57 AM, approximately 2.5 hours later. For one resident (R631) on the Heritage Unit that was ordered Humalog insulin with breakfast revealed that R631 never received the ordered insulin. The lack of available nurses to administer medications timely had the potential to cause a serious adverse outcome or death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called at 2:50 PM on 7/21/23. The IJ was abated at 9:00 AM on 7/24/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and reviews of clinical records and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for four (R22, R51, R630 and R631) out of seven residents reviewed in three hallways, the facility failed to ensure these residents received timely administration of insulin due to no staff being available to provide the medication. The facility's failure placed the residents at risk for a serious adverse outcome, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Due to this failure, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called at 3:40 PM on 7/21/23. The IJ was abated on 7/24/23 at 9:00 AM. Additionally, R80 was not administered physician ordered insulin on 7/16/23 at 6:00 AM due to no staff being available on the night shift. Findings include: The manufacturer's instructions documented, .Humalog is a .fast-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar . for Use of Humalog insulin for subcutaneous use, last revised on 7/2023, documented, . Humalog starts acting fast, so give . injection within 15 minutes before or right after you eat a meal. According to the facility's Food Cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R23) out of three residents sampled for falls, the facility failed to ensure that readmission physician orders for two anti-seizure medications were accurately transcribed into the electronic health record for R23's immediate care of her seizure disorder. From 9/8/23 through 9/20/23, R23 did not receive 24 doses of Vimpat and was administered five (5) incorrect doses of Keppra. On 9/29/23, R23 had a seizure and fell during a therapy ambulation session and was transferred to the hospital, evaluated and treated with anti-seizure medication. Due to the facility's failure, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called at 3:20 PM on 10/26/23. The IJ was abated on 10/27/23 at 5:00 PM. Findings include: R23's clinical record revealed: 8/28/23 - R23 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but was not limited to, seizure disorder (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one out of one resident (R49) reviewed for respiratory/tracheostomy care, the facility failed to provide tracheal suctioning consistent with professional standards of practice. Findings included: The following was reviewed in R49's clinical record: 9/18/22 - R49 was admitted to the facility from an acute hospital with a diagnosis of respiratory failure. 10/29/20 - Per physician's order, trach care daily and as needed: for disposable: remove and dispose inner cannula. Replace with new inner cannula as needed for reduce risk of infection. 2/21/22 - Per physician's order, suction every shift and as needed for maintain patent airway. 10/3/22 - Per physician's order, cool air mist via trach collar at 70% humidification with O2 (oxygen) titrated in at 3 liters to maintain a pulse ox greater than 92%. Notify MD if pulse ox is equal to or less than 92%. Every shift. 7/19/23 at 10:40 AM - During observation of preparation to perform tracheal suctioning for R49, E66 (LPN) did not perform hand hygiene. After donning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of clinical and facility records, it was determined that for two (R13 and R16) out of seven residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure each resident remained free from physical and emotional abuse. On the morning of [DATE], R13 was physically and emotionally abused by a staff person, resulting in dehumanization, a psychosocial harm. On [DATE], R16 was physically abused by another resident (R17) in the locked dementia unit. Findings include: 1. Review of R13 records revealed:[DATE] - R13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease requiring renal dialysis, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputations of the left leg below knee and toes on right foot and blindness in the right eyeXXX[DATE] - R13 had two physician orders for wound treatments in the perineal region, one requiring a dressing and the other a non-sting skin barrier film to protect against moisture-associated skin damageXXX[DATE] - The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for three (R11, R13 and R26) out of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), the facility failed to provide necessary services for personal hygiene care of dependent residents. R13, who had a perineal wound, returned from dialysis incontinent of bowel and requested to be changed. As a result of R13's toileting hygiene care request being deferred by staff until after dinner, R13 sat in a soiled incontinence brief for an additional two hours, resulting in dehumanization, a psychosocial harm. R26 was left soiled for four hours after requesting staff assistance. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that R11, a dependent resident, received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. Findings include: 1. Cross refer F609 Review of R13's record revealed: 5/21/26 – R13 was admitted to the facility for short-term rehabilitation with diagnoses including, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R2) out of three residents sampled for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R2 received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents to the extent possible. Findings include:1. R2's clinical record revealed:9/26/25 - R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to right hip pain and heart failure.9/26/25 - R2's fall care plan documented, At risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, poor memory and muscle weakness.9/28/25 - R2's admission MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 00 indicating an inability to complete a cognitive assessment and required partial to moderate assistance from staff for wheelchair mobility.10/11/25 2:30 PM - R2's clinical record included, At 14:30 [2:30 PM], patient fell forward out of the wheelchair while staff member was wheeling her in the wheelchair in her room. Patient noted laceration to left eyebrow 2cm x 0.2 cm.Complained of pain to right hip.At 1535 [3:35 PM],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of clinical record and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for three (R26, R105, R228 and R533) out five residents sampled for pressure ulcer, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing. For R26, the facility failed to initiate and implement a sacral pressure ulcer care plan with appropriate interventions and hospice involvement and appropriately Stage her sacral pressure ulcer that started as MASD. As a result of multiple failures, R26 was harmed. For R105, R228 and R533, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer wound care as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to complete weekly skin audits. Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Pressure Ulcer Monitoring & Documentation (initiated 11/1/2019) included, A licensed nurse will assess patients for the presence of pressure ulcers/injuries. A facility policy entitled, Skin Assessments (initiated 11/1/2019) included, A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of clinical record and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R116) out of two residents sampled for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure that R116 was free from a significant medication error. R116 was prescribed and administered Metformin and Ibuprofen at 8:00 AM every day from 9/10/24 through 9/15/24 despite two pharmacy warnings. In the setting of poor oral intake and the facility initiating hypodermoclysis during this timeframe, R116's creatinine increased from 0.8 baseline to 4.2 and BUN increased from 23 to 87 prior to being sent emergently to the hospital, requiring treatment with intravenous fluids and the discontinuation of the Ibuprofen. R116 was harmed. Findings include: R116's clinical record revealed: 8/20/24 - The hospital records included a Nephrology consultation, dated 8/20/24 at 10:20 AM, that stated, . Acute kidney injury-due to intravascular volume depletion . creatinine has already improved from 2.5 to 1.7 . continue hydration with normal saline . baseline . creatinine 0.9 . on 6/5/24 . 8/20/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other documentation, it was determined that for three (R140, R38 and R36) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that residents at risk for pressure ulcers, or those with pressure ulcers received the care and services to promote healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from occurring. For R140, the facility lacked evidence of a turning and repositioning intervention causing harm to the resident related to avoidable new unstageable and suspected deep tissue pressure ulcer development. In addition, for R140, the facility failed to identify and treat R140's pressure ulcers. For R38 the facility lacked evidence of physician ordered wound treatments and interventions being implemented causing harm to the resident related to new avoidable pressure ulcer development. This lack of treatment also failed to promote healing of an existing pressure ulcer.For R36, the facility failed to ensure that R36 received the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and reviews of clinical records, facility and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for three (R86, R135 and R137) out of three residents sampled for hydration, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered, assisted and monitored for sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health, which resulted in harm for all three residents where they required emergent treatment. For R86, the facility's failure to encourage and monitor the resident's fluid intake to ensure adequate hydration resulted in an emergent transfer and hospitalization requiring administration of four liters of intravenous (IV) fluids and treatment for a UTI (urinary tract infection). For R135, the facility failed to ensure that she was offered and assisted with sufficient fluid intake in the setting of daily loose stools as evidenced by her abnormal lab result and a change in condition. For R137, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was monitored for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined for four (R1, R18, R27 and R28) out of five residents sampled for reporting of injuries, injuries of unknown origin, abuse and activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure that all injuries, including injuries of unknown source were reported to the State Survey Agency within the guidelines. R1, a dependent resident was observed with visible head injury on 4/22/26 at 6:00 AM and was not reported to the State Survey Agency until 4/23/26 at 8:30 AM, more than 26 hours later. For R18, R27, and R28, the facility failed to report incidents of abuse and alleged neglect and to submit a follow-up report within the required timeframe. Findings include:1. R1's clinical record revealed: 12/26/25 – R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, a stroke, deep vein thrombosis, heart failure, and dementia. 3/13/26 – R1's quarterly MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 5, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. R1 required substantial to maximum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R11 and R26) out of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were treated with dignity. For R11, the facility failed to promote respect and dignity when he was found lying in bed on top of a plastic trash bag wearing two incontinence briefs. R26 was left unchanged and soiled after requesting assistance from staff. Findings include:1. Cross refer F677 Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 9/25/19 - R11 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including stroke and dementia. 6/24/26 1:04 PM – A facility incident report submitted to the state reporting agency documented that on 6/24/26 at 11:15 AM, .During rounds at approximately 1100 (11:00 AM), [P1 Hospice RN] and [E29 CNA] were giving care to [R11]. During care, it was discovered [R11] was briefed, with another brief under him and also a plastic trash can liner was underneath a drawsheet. 7/9/26 11:08 AM – In an interview, E21 (LPN, UM) stated that she was notified by E20 regarding R11 and E21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (R10) of 31 sampled residents, was given the right to self-determination when the resident was not provided an early lunch tray or a bagged lunch prior to his afternoon neurosurgeon appointment until the surveyor intervened. Findings include: Review of R10's clinical record revealed:12/5/25 - R10 was re-admitted to the facility with diagnoses including neck fracture. 4/14/26 - R10's quarterly MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 5 indicating a severe cognition impairment, had adequate hearing and vision, usually makes self understood and understands others with clear speech. R10 ambulates with a wheelchair and is independent of eating. 4/22/26 10:23 - A nurse progress noted documented, . [R10's] appt (appointment) is 4/29/26 @ (at) 130pm 4/29/26 12:00 PM - During an observation in (unit dining room), R10, sitting on his wheelchair, was looking at the nursing staff taking out food trays from the food truck and passing the trays to the residents seated in the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R9) out of four residents reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to ensure that the physician was immediately consulted when R9's stat chest x-ray report revealed significant results. Findings include: Cross refer F684, F695 and F777Review of R9's clinical record revealed:6/5/26 - A physician note by P2 (NP) documented that per nursing report, R9 had increased congestion and, . will check stat (at once) chest x-ray .6/5/26 9:21 AM - A nurse progress note documented, . [P2] made aware (sic) she went to see [R9] . gave verbal order for STAT chest x-ray.6/5/26 3:00 PM - R9 had a physician's order for chest x-ray two views for cough and congestion.6/6/26 9:07 PM - A radiology results report documented R9's chest x-ray result was reported on this date and time revealing, moderate congestive heart failure.moderate interstitial edema, cardiomegaly and pulmonary vascular redistribution. There is peri bronchial cuffing (hazy appearance around the airways which occurs when excess fluid, mucus, or inflammation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R4 and R13) out of 27 sampled residents, the facility failed to respect each residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of personal care. Findings include: 1. 7/9/26 9:14 AM - An observation in the hallway outside of R13's room revealed a ripped piece of white paper thumbtacked on top of the enhanced barrier precaution sign with the following handwritten: NOT WET @ 5:55 AM 07/09/26. 7/9/26 9:20 AM - During an interview, E24 (RN/IC) confirmed the observation and removed the piece of ripped paper. 2. 7/9/26 9:15 AM - An observation in the hallway outside of R4's room revealed a ripped piece of white paper thumbtacked on top of the enhanced barrier precaution sign with the following handwritten: CHANGED @ 4:50 CHECKED AGAIN @ 6:03 AM NOT WET 07/09/26. 7/9/26 9:20 AM - During an interview, E24 confirmed the observation and removed the piece of ripped paper. 7/9/26 9:25 AM - During a combined interview, surveyor was present when E24 reviewed the two observations with E2 (DON) and E3 (CRN).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R26) out of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to have evidence of a thorough investigation of a neglect allegation when R26 complained to staff that she had been left incontinent of feces for four hours after requesting assistance. Findings include:Cross refer F677Review of R26's clinical record revealed:5/2/26 - R26 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including polyneuropathy.5/2/26 - A care plan documented that R26 required the assistance of one staff member for toileting, toileting hygiene and brief changes.5/8/26 - An admission MDS assessment for R26 documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating an intact cognition. The assessment also documented that R26 was frequently incontinent of bowels, was dependent for transferring to the toilet and required supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene.6/7/26 - A facility document entitled, Daily Nurse Assignment, documented that E7 (RN Supervisor) and E14 (CNA) were assigned to R26 during the 3:00 PM to 11:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that in one (R10) out of 31 sampled residents, the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan to address an identified need when R10 refused to wear his neck brace when out of bed. Findings include:Review of R10's clinical record revealed:12/5/25 - R10 was re-admitted to the facility with diagnoses including neck fracture. 4/14/26 - R10's quarterly MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 5 indicating a severe cognition impairment, had adequate hearing and vision, usually makes self understood and understands others with clear speech. R10 ambulates with a wheelchair and is independent of eating.4/21/26 - R10 had a physician's order for neck collar to be worn when out of bed every shift and for monitoring.4/25/26 10:49 AM - A nurse progress notes documented Neck collar . frequently remove.4/27/26 12:53 PM - A nurse progress notes documented, Neck collar . removes.4/28/26 2:57 PM - A nurse progress notes documented, Neck collar . removes.4/29/26 11:50 AM - R10 was observed out of bed and sitting on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation, it was determined that for one (R10) out of five residents sampled for resident records, the facility lacked evidence that oxygen therapy was administered as stated in the care plan and as ordered by the provider. Findings include:Cross refer F656Review of R10's clinical record revealed: 5/28/26 - R10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and acute respiratory failure.5/28/26 - R10's care plan documented, [R10] is at risk for respiratory complications secondary to COPD, lung cancer and respiratory failure.Interventions: administer oxygen as ordered.pulse ox [oximeter] and alert clinician per parameters.6/4/26 - A facility document entitled Order Summary Report, documented, O2 [oxygen] at 2 LPM [liters per minute] via NC [nasal cannula] every shift for COPD.monitor O2 sat [saturation] to maintain oxygen at or above 92% .6/29/26 9:43 AM - E15 (LPN) documented in R10's clinical record an O2 reading of 78% on RA (room air).6/29/26 11:58 AM - E15 documented in R10's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for three (R14, R15 and R24) out of three residents sampled for medication storage, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medications were safely stored in a secured area and under direct observation of authorized staff. Additionally, the facility failed to properly dispose of each residents' expired medications. Findings include: 1. 7/6/26 10:32 AM – An observation of an unlocked and unlabeled closet door at the end of the locked dementia unit revealed a large brown box on the bottom shelf filled with blister packs of residents' medication. 7/6/26 10:39 AM – Surveyor asked the two nurses, E10 (LPN) and E20 (LPN), in the locked dementia dining/activity room around the corner to have E21 (LPN/UM) to meet the surveyor in the hallway. 7/6/26 10:47 AM – Surveyor and E21 observed the unlocked closet and E21 stated that they do not use this closet. Further observation revealed a brown box on the bottom shelf filled with residents' blister packs of medications with the following handwritten on the top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R11) out of 31 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to R11 when lab work ordered was not followed up after a failed specimen collection. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that a stat (at once) ordered lab draw result was reported to the physician in a timely manner. Findings include: Cross refer F684 example 2Review of R11's clinical record revealed:a. 3/18/26 - R11 had a physician's order for CBC and CMP for hyponatremia.3/23/26 - A labs result report from C6 (contracted laboratory vendor) with a specimen collection date of 3/19/26 documented . albumin . please reschedule . difficult draw specimen not obtained . WBC . please reschedule . difficult draw . specimen not obtained . a handwritten note also documented, CBC, CMP difficult stick.5/4/26 2:00 PM - A review of R11's nurse progress notes lacked evidence that the physician was notified of R11's lab draw for CBC and CMP was not completed due to difficulty in drawing R11's blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 86 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R9) out of four residents reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to ensure that a stat (at once) ordered chest x-ray was completed until 31 hours after it was ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that R9's STAT chest x-ray result was reported to the physician in a timely manner. Findings include: Cross refer F580 and F684 Review of R9's clinical record revealed:6/5/26 9:21 AM - A nurse progress note documented, . [P2 NP] made aware (sic) she went to see [R9] . gave verbal order for STAT chest x-ray.6/5/26 3:00 PM - R9 had a physician's order for chest x-ray two views for cough and congestion.6/6/25 4:54 PM - A radiology results report documented R9's chest x-ray examination was done on this date and time.6/6/26 9:07 PM - A radiology results report documented R9's chest x-ray result with significant findings. 6/7/26 6:13 AM - A nurse progress note documented, .CXR (chest x-ray) results are back and MD (physician) will review them and give further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that for one (R11) out of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that meet professional standards of practice when R11's missing nutrition assessments were completed and signed by another Registered Dietitian on 5/5/26, one month after R11 was discharged from the facility on 3/26/26. Findings include:Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 1/17/26 - R11 was admitted to the facility.1/19/26 - R11's nutrition assessment was completed by C1 (contract RD/ Registered Dietitian).3/26/26 2:00 PM - A nurse progress note documented that R11 was transferred to the hospital.5/4/26 - A review of R11's electronic health record under the evaluation/assessment tab revealed only one nutrition assessment completed by C1 on 1/19/26.5/4/26 3:00 PM - In an interview, E2 (DON) confirmed that R11 was discharged from the facility on 3/26/27. E2 further stated that R11 did not return to the facility after she was transferred to the hospital on 3/26/26. 5/5/26 3:25 PM - E2 presented to the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and correct R11's significant medication errors involving blood sugar checks, heparin and insulin injections. Findings include:Cross refer 7605/8/26 3:15 PM - During QAPI interview, E1 (NHA) confirmed that the facility failed to identify and correct quality issues for R11's nutrition and hydration status requiring emergent hospitalization on 3/26/26.5/8/26 3:50 AM - In a follow up interview, E1 further confirmed that facility failed to identify and correct R11's significant medication errors involving blood sugar checks, heparin and insulin injections from 2/15/26 to 3/18/26. 5/11/26 12:30 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E4 (CRN) during the Exit Conference.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and review of records and the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined that for two (R29 and R30) out of 31 residents sampled during the survey, the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were followed. Findings include:According to the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) website, the Infection Control Guidance: Preventing Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Healthcare Facilities, dated 6/27/25, stated, . The prevention of MRSA infections is a priority for CDC . Based on the current evidence, CDC recommends the use of Contact Precautions for MRSA-colonized or infected patients . The facility's policy and procedure entitled Transmission Based Precautions, effective 2/6/2020, stated, . Transmission based precautions are designed for patients documented as suspected to be infected or colonized with highly transmissible or epidemiologically important pathogens for which additional precautions beyond standard precautions are needed to interrupt transmission . 3. Contact precautions (e.g., MRSA . C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to a dignified existence and self-determination when the facility failed to develop a system that notified residents of the daily menu. Findings include:9/18/25 8:53 AM - During resident screening R50 stated, They don't give us menus. We never know what we having until it gets here. Then, if you don't want it you have to wait cause you ordering something else. I said something to them, and they said they don't have to give us a menu. 9/18/25 9:46 AM - During resident screening, R83 stated, It's great here, only complaint I have is there's no menu or calendar of what's being served, but if you get it and don't like it, they will bring something else.9/18/25 11:40 AM - During a tour of the facility, the surveyor observed that the facility's common room for dining and activities displayed a posting of the daily menu at the entrance on both the first and second floors. 9/18/25 12:48 PM - During an interview, E36 (CNA) confirmed that residents were not provided a menu or made aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for two (R150 and R35) out of five residents reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to initiate and maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for contact with a resident with wounds and an indwelling medical device and failed to use appropriate disinfection practices. Also, the facility failed to prevent the risk of exposure to infectious and communicable diseases by not safely disposing a full sharps container. Findings include: An infection prevention and control facility policy titled, Standards of Practice dated, 2/6/20, documented, . Procedure 8 Environmental Cleaning/Disinfection: . DO NOT USE Alcohol based- disinfectants; alcohol-based disinfectants are not effective against C. difficile and should not be used to disinfect environmental surfaces. Review of R35's clinical records revealed: 9/20/25 – R35 had a physician's order for contact precautions for C-diff (bacterial overgrowth that releases toxins that attack the lining of the intestines). 9/22/25 11:00 AM - The Surveyor observed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R11 and R62) out of 38 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide dignity and respect when facility staff called R11 and R62 feeders. Findings include: 9/26/25 1:00 PM - During a dining observation inside R11's room, E5 (LPN, UM) told the Surveyor that R11 and her roommate [R62] were both feeders and that a staff should be in the room to assist and feed them.9/26/25 1:30 PM - Finding was discussed with E5.9/29/25 1:00 PM - Findings were discussed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (Corporate Nurse). 9/29/25 1:25 PM - Finding was reviewed with E1 , E2 and E3 during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R150) out of one resident reviewed for admission orders, the facility failed to ensure wound treatment orders were entered. Findings include: Review of R150's clinical records revealed:9/16/25 - R150 was readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and epilepsy.9/19/25 - A readmission Wounds Assessment Report for R150 completed by P1 (NP) documented treatment orders for four wounds, noted as present on admission.9/22/25 3:30 PM - Review of R150's clinical record revealed no current orders for wound care.9/24/25 2:15 PM - During an interview, the Surveyor asked E14 (RN) if R150 had treatment orders for wound care since he was readmitted on [DATE]. E14 stated, I don't see the orders, but I have been doing his wound care and dressing changes. 9/24/25 3:00 PM - During an interview E14 (RN) stated, Orders were put in today for dressing changes to begin tomorrow. 9/26/25 2:49 PM -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R16) out of one resident reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to accurately code R16's dental assessments for two MDS (Minimum Data Sets) review periods. Findings include:Cross refer F791Review of R16's clinical records revealed:2/11/25 - R16's quarterly MDS section L (Oral/Dental Status) revealed that R16 had no mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty chewing.3/23/25 - A Dental Report of Consultation recommended R16 . To return to restore cavities, [sic] teeth that are extensively decayed and root tips would need to be extracted in the future if symptoms or swelling begin.5/14/25 - R16's quarterly MDS section L revealed no mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty chewing.8/12/25 - R16's Annual MDS section L revealed no cavities or broken natural teeth, inflamed or bleeding gums, loose natural teeth, mouth or facial pain, or discomfort or difficulty with chewing. 9/23/25 2:45 PM - During an interview, E28 (RN MDS) stated that she was the one who coded and completed R16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R10) out of two residents reviewed for PASARR review, the facility failed to refer the resident for a PASSAR screening following a newly evident condition and qualifying medications. Findings include: The facility clinical guidelines for PASARR [undated] indicated, While admitted if a resident has a change in condition, a PASARR evaluation may be required if there is a significant change in the individual's mental or physical health status since their last evaluation, or if the facility suspects the individual may have a serious mental illness, intellectual disability or related condition not previously identified. Review of R10's clinical record revealed:6/13/25 - A PASARR Level I was completed for R10 that documented the resident had no mental health diagnoses, received no mental health medications and that no further screening was required.7/25/25 - R10 was admitted to the facility.7/27/25 - A physician's order was written for R10 to receive quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication at bedtime for psychosis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R11) out of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), the facility failed to ensure each dependent resident received the necessary services to promote adequate nutrition. Findings include:Cross refer F692Review of R11's clinical records revealed:5/8/25 - R11 was re-admitted to the facility with diagnoses including malnutrition.9/10/25 - An OT (Occupational Therapy) Evaluation documented that R11 was dependent with eating.9/10/25 - A facility nutrition assessment documented that R11 required full assistance with feeding.9/26/25 12:45 PM - A facility staff person was observed entering R11's room and placed R11's food tray on the overbed table standing against the wall. The staff left the room.9/26/25 12:46 PM - Another facility staff person, E33 (CNA), was observed entering R11's room and attempted to shut the door. This Surveyor followed the CNA and told E33 that Surveyor will do R11's lunch observation. E33 told this Surveyor that she was going to feed R11 her lunch,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R54) out of one resident reviewed for activities, the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activity program for R54, who chooses to remain in her room all day. Findings include:Review of R54's clinical record revealed: 3/9/25 - The annual MDS assessment documented that R54 had moderate difficulty of hearing (speaker has to increase volume and speak distinctly), had impaired vision (sees large print, but not regular print in newspapers/books), BIMS score of 14 (cognitively intact), had active diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia and bilateral hearing loss, and activity preferences were as follows:-to be around pets are very important;-to have books/newspapers/magazines to read and to listen to music the resident liked were somewhat important;-to do things with groups of people and to go outside for fresh air when the weather is good and to participate in religious services were not very important; and-to keep up with the news was not important at all. 3/15/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R54) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that R54's low air loss mattress device was plugged in, turned on and functioning as a preventative intervention and per an active physician order. Findings include: 6/5/25 3:15 PM - R54 had a physician's order for Alternating air loss mattress check placement and function every shift for fragile skin. 7/25/25 - The quarterly MDS assessment documented that R54 was at risk for pressure ulcers. Observations during the survey revealed: 9/22/25 9:45 AM - Observed R54 asleep in bed, laying on her left side facing the hallway, and her low air loss device was not turned on. 9/22/25 1:28 PM - Observed R54 asleep in bed, laying on her left side facing the hallway, and her low air loss device was not turned on. 9/23/25 9:27 AM - Observation with E43 (LPN) revealed that R54's low air loss mattress device was not plugged into the wall outlet located behind R54's head of the bed. Once the device was plugged into the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R149) out of nine residents reviewed for activities of daily living the facility failed to ensure documentation regarding urostomy and pelvic drain output was recorded as ordered. Findings include: Review of R149's clinical record revealed:7/22/25 - R149 was admitted to the facility with a history of bladder cancer and recent urinary tract infection, pelvic infection a urostomy and pelvic drain. 7/22/25 - A physician's order was written for R149's pelvic drains to be emptied and the drainage amounts to be recorded.7/22/25 - A care plan was created for R149's care of urostomy that included the intervention to empty the urostomy drainage bag and change it as needed and record the amount [ML's].7/23/25 - A care plan was created for R149's care of pelvic drains that included the intervention to empty the pelvic drain as ordered. 7/29/25 - A physician's order was written for R149 that directed staff to empty the urostomy drainage bag and record the amount every shift. August 2025 - Review of R149's TAR lacked evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R11 and R143) out of three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition and/or hydration. Findings include:Cross refer F677 1.Review of R11's clinical records revealed: A facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring and Tracking, dated 1/29/24, documented, Procedure.2. Patients will be weighed on admission/re-admission and weekly x 4 weeks thereafter, or until the Interdisciplinary Team determines weight is stable, then monthly thereafter 6. Weekly weights should continue greater than 4 weeks if one or more of the following criteria are met: Significant unplanned weight change, Identified trends in weight change.Patients < (less) 100 pounds.8. The team will notify the provider and responsible party of significant weight changes. A. Weight Monitoring 5/8/25 – R11 was re-admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic wounds, diabetes, dementia, acute kidney injury and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. 5/8/25 – An OT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to provide dialysis related care and services to meet the needs of the resident when pre-dialysis information was not completed on the dialysis communication form. Additionally, some dialysis communication forms were absent from the medical record. Findings include: Review of R1's clinical record revealed:9/3/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. 9/3/25 - A physician's order was written for R1 to receive dialysis three times a week. September 2025 - Review of R1's Dialysis communication forms lacked completion of pre-dialysis information for R1 including meals, medications, change of condition and a signature of the person completing the form.9/15 - Pre-dialysis communication form documentation incomplete; only R1's blood pressure and pulse were documented.9/17 - Pre-dialysis communication form documentation incomplete, only R1's blood pressure, pulse and a staff signature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R6) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review the facility failed to act upon a recommendation documented in the residents MRR. Findings include: The facility policy on MRR last updated, 8/2020, indicated Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber.Review of R6's clinical record revealed:4/24/25 - was initially admitted to the facility.5/1/24 -7/15/24 - Was discharged from the facility due to being hospitalized . 7/15/25 - R6 was re-admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms.7/15/25 - An admission MDS assessment documented that R6 was receiving antipsychotic medications. 7/15/25 - A care plan for use of antipsychotic medications was created for R6 with an intervention to monitor behaviors.7/15/25 - An MRR documented that R6's antipsychotic requires monitoring; the recommendation was signed by R6's physician on 7/18/25. 7/16/25 - A physician's order was written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R149) out of one resident reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to ensure ordered labs were completed timely. Findings include: The facility policy on laboratory and diagnostic testing last updated 1/29/24 indicated, Laboratory, radiology and other diagnostic services are provided to the center by way of written contractual agreements. The contracted service vendor is to provide services to the center that ensure safe and effective patient testing and timely delivery of results.Review of R149's clinical record revealed:7/22/25 - R149 was admitted to the facility with a urostomy tube. 7/28/25 - A physician's order was written for R149 to receive urinalysis culture and sensitivity testing for recurrent UTIs and blood in the urine. 7/28/25 8:59 pm - A progress note in R149's clinical record documented, resident noted with some reddish urine in her urostomy bag. [MD] notified new order for urinalysis culture and sensitivity to rule out UTI. 7/29/25 - Review of the facility lab tracking form documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R16) out of one resident reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to promptly provide routine and emergency dental care for R16 when he was recommended for follow up visits to restore his cavities and extract his extensively decayed root tips after his dental exam on 3/23/25. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Dental Service Needs dated 1/29/25 documented, . Procedure . 2. Nursing will collaborate with the Social Services Department to identify and secure designated and/ or centered contracted community available resources for dental services. 3. Nursing will. assist the patient in making appointments . Review of R16's clinical records revealed:Cross refer F64111/25/22 - R16 was admitted to the facility.8/26/24 - A care plan was developed for R16 related to his independence with oral care and R16's goal was to be free from dental complications through the review period. R16's interventions included to perform oral exams as needed and to refer to a dentist as indicated. 3/23/25 - A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: 9/19/24 8:45 AM - During the initial kitchen tour the following was observed: - The lack of hand drying towels at the handwashing sink. - A cooked pork roast left uncovered on a counter, with flying insects (gnats) observed in the kitchen. -Pork sausage patties in open unsecured plastic bag in walk in freezer. 9/23/24 approximately 10:00 AM - Observations revealed the following: -the walk-in freezer temperature was reading 27°F. -review of the walk-in freezer temperature logs for July revealed temperatures between -6°F and 35°F. 9/23/24 1:45 PM - During an interview, E7 (Director of Dietary Services), confirmed the findings. 9/23/24 12:30 PM - During the survey of the facility at approximately 12:30 PM, the first-floor nourishment refrigerator was observed to have spilled substances at the base of the refrigerator, the presence of unlabeled resident food items, and open juice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for six (R26, R81, R89, R103, R326 and R328) out of 46 residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident. For R81, R89, R103 and R328, the facility failed to develop care plans based on assessment to restore and maintain their bladder and bladder continence to the extent possible. For R326, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for R326 despite a high fall risk assessment. For R26, the facility failed to develop a pressure ulcer care plan. Findings include: Cross refer F690. 1. Review of R81's clinical records revealed: 1/19/23 - R81 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and difficulty walking. 9/13/24 - R81's annual MDS documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating an intact cognitive status. R81's annual urinary MDS assessment documented, Occasionally incontinent of urine . 9/13/24 - R81's toileting care plan documented, Occasional incontinent of bladder and continent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R116) out of seven residents sampled for incontinence and one (R26) out of one resident sampled for hospice, the facility failed to review and revise each residents' care plan. Findings include: 1. Cross refer F690, example 5 R116's clinical record revealed: 8/20/24 - R116 was admitted to the facility. 8/20/24 at 9:50 PM - The admission Nursing Collection Tool documented that R116 was cognitively intact upon arrival, continent of bowel and bladder with an intervention to supervise or cue to toilet as needed and required partial/moderate assistance for toileting transfer and toileting hygiene. 8/26/24 - The admission MDS assessment documented that R116's BIMS was a 9 (moderate cognitive impairment), required partial/moderate assistance for toileting transfer and toileting hygiene and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. 10/1/24 at 10:48 AM - During an interview, E47 (MDS Coordinator) stated that the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the resident's care plan. E47 confirmed that R116 was frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that for five (R81, R89, R103, R116 and R328) out of seven residents reviewed for bowel and bladder assessments, the facility failed to conduct bowel and bladder assessments to develop an individualized care plan to restore and maintain their bladder and bladder continence to extent possible. Findings include: 11/1/19 - A facility document titled, Assessment for Bowel and Urinary Toileting Program documented, Licensed nurse will perform a bowel and/or urinary assessment on admission, readmission, annually, and PRN using the RAI process .Bowel and urinary toileting approaches will be documented in the care plan .evaluation of the toileting program will be documented in the Nurses Progress Notes. 1. Review of R81's clinical records revealed: 1/19/23 - R81 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and difficulty walking. 9/13/24 - R81's annual MDS documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating an intact cognitive status. R81's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the clinical record and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R26) out of one resident reviewed for hospice, the facility failed to ensure that R26 received hospice care and services as per the written agreement with the Hospice Provider. Specifically in reference to the deficiency cited at Severity Level 3, at F686, the facility failed to notify and collaborate with the Hospice Provider on developing and implementing a sacral pressure ulcer plan of care with interventions to meet the resident's needs. In addition, the facility failed to update the Hospice Provider that R26's eight medications were discontinued in January 2024; and ensure that current Hospice documentation was present and readily accessible in R26's facility clinical record. Findings include: Cross refer to F686, example 1, F656, F657, F697 8/9/23 - The General Inpatient and Respite Care Skilled Nursing Facility Agreement stated the following: . 3.3 Designation of an Interdisciplinary Group Member. Facility will designate a member of the Facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that for four ( R533, R105, R12 and R26) out of four residents reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program using enhanced barrier precautions. R12, R105 and R533 had indwelling feeding tubes which met the criteria for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Findings include: As per CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) definition (6/28/24), Enhanced Barrier Precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). 1. Review of 533 clinical record revealed: 9/10/24 - R533 was admitted to the facility after being hospitalized ; R533 had a PEG tube inserted into his stomach for nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-02 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for four (R9, R30, R53 and R76) out of five residents sampled for Covid-19 vaccinations, the facility failed to provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of Covid-19 immunizations to each resident or the resident's representative and then offer the immunization. Findings include: 1. R9's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered an up to date Covid-19 vaccination. The last documented Covid-19 vaccination was received on 4/9/21. 2. R30's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered an up to date Covid-19 vaccination. The last documented Covid-19 vaccination was received on 11/22/23. 3. R53's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered an up to date Covid-19 vaccination. The last documented Covid-19 vaccination was received on 12/6/22. 4. R76's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered an up to date Covid-19 vaccination. The last documented Covid-19 vaccination was received on 9/10/21. 10/2/24 at 3:00 PM - Reviewed during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined for one (R118) out of the survey sample reviewed for planning and implementing care, the facility failed to provide R118 the right to be informed of and participate in her treatment. Findings include: Delaware Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (DMOST) is a form, that when completed and signed by the patient and a medical provider, documents the medical orders that indicate the level of life sustaining care a person wishes to have performed on them if they have no pulse or stop breathing. Review of R118's clinical record revealed: 8/28/24 - R118 was admitted to the facility with a physician order Do Not Resuscitate. 9/4/24 - A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that R118 had a BIMS of 15, meaning that R118 was cognitively intact. 9/20/24 2:30 PM - A review of R118's electronic medical record (EMR) contained a document titled Delaware Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (DMOST) form which was signed by R118 and E50 (Nurse Practitioner) on 9/3/24. R118's DMOST form indicated that she wished to have full treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that one (R76) out of four residents reviewed for resident rights, the facility failed to identify and facilitate the resident's self-determination through support of resident choice with respect to his scheduled shower times. Findings include: R76's clinical record revealed: 4/29/24 - The admission MDS assessment documented that R76's response to While you are in this facility, how important is it to you to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath? R76's response was very important. 10/11/24 (last revised) - R76 was care planned for requiring one staff person assist for bathing. According to the November 2024 CNA Documentation Survey Report, R76 was scheduled showers every Tuesday and Friday during day shift and as needed. However, closer review of the Report revealed that the report was setup for staff to document during day shift every Monday and Thursday and PRN (as needed). Four out of four scheduled opportunities from 11/18/24 to 11/30/24, no showers were provided to R76 nor was it documented that R76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R26) out of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to accurately reflect R26's medical status in the annual MDS assessment. Findings include: The October 2023 RAI Manual stated the following under Section M: Skin Conditions: - Moisture Associated Skin Damage defined, . superficial skin damage caused by sustained exposure to moisture such as incontinence, wound exudate, or perspiration . MASD with skin erosion has superficial/partial thickness skin loss . the tissue is blanchable and diffuse and has irregular edges. Inflammation of the skin may be present. Necrosis is not found in MASD. If pressure and moisture are both present, code the skin damage as a pressure ulcer/injury in M0300. If there is tissue damage extending into the subcutaneous tissue or deeper and/or necrosis is present, code the skin damage as a pressure ulcer in M0300 . R26's clinical record revealed: 8/13/24 - The Wound Assessment Report by C1 (WCC) revealed: -Location: sacrum -Measurements: 1 cm x 2 cm x 0.30 cm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. According to the Mayo Clinic, May 2022, Orthostatic hypotension is a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing after sitting or lying down. Orthostatic hypotension can cause dizziness or lightheadedness and possibly fainting. A care provider might review medical history, medications and symptoms and conduct a physical exam to help diagnose the condition. A provider also might recommend orthostatic blood pressure monitoring. This involves measuring blood pressure while sitting and standing. A drop of 20 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) in the top number (systolic blood pressure) within 2 to 5 minutes of standing is a sign of orthostatic hypotension. A drop of 10 mm Hg in the bottom number (diastolic blood pressure) within 2 to 5 minutes of standing also indicates orthostatic hypotension. Review of R127's clinical record revealed: 7/23/24 - R127 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including kidney disease, high blood pressure, and anemia. 7/31/24 - Physician's orders were written by E4 (Medical Director) for the following medications to be administered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that for one (R105) out of two residents reviewed for mobility, the facility failed to provide assistance to maintain or improve mobility. For R105, the facility failed to ensure the resident's therapy devices were applied per physician orders. Findings include: Review of R105's clinical record revealed: 4/30/24 - R105 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of a stroke. 7/29/24 - A care plan for R105 indicated that the resident requires assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living) related to having a previous stroke and is dependent with self-care and mobility. A care plan intervention was to apply a therapy carrot to the left hand and wear it as tolerated during the day. 8/8/24 - An additional intervention to the ADL care plan was created to apply the palm guard to the right hand and wear it as tolerated during the day. A review of R105's orders revealed a physician's order to apply palm guard to right hand and wear as tolerated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, it was determined that for one (R64) out of two residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R64 received supervision to prevent accidents. Findings include: 9/3/24 - R64 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia and muscle weakness. R64's admission assessment documented a fall score of 18, which indicated a high fall risk. 9/4/24 - R64's fall care plan included, At risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, poor balance, and muscle weakness. The interventions included, Low bed, and place items within reach of resident. 9/9/24 - R64's admission MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R64's ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) documented, Dependent for bed mobility/turning and repositioning. 9/12/24 10:30 AM - R64's clinical records documented, . Notified that resident [R64] fell out of bed while receiving care . A scrape and hematoma were located separately on the right upper forehead . Sent to the hospital for evaluation . Staff education on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that for one (R83) out of four residents reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring and Tracking, effective 1/29/24, indicated Policy: The center has a system in place to weigh, monitor, and track patient's weights. Weights are tracked, monitored, and analyzed by the Interdisciplinary Team. Procedure . 2. Patients will be weighed on admission/readmission and weekly x 4 weeks thereafter, or until the Interdisciplinary Team determines weight is stable, then monthly thereafter . 6. Weekly weights should continue greater than 4 weeks if one or more of the following criteria are met: .Patients < 100 pounds . Review of R83's clinical chart revealed: 7/19/24 - R83 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia, malnutrition, swallowing disorder, and dementia. R83's weight was 96.6 pounds (lbs). 7/23/24 - Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R105) out of four residents reviewed for tube feeding, the facility failed to ensure that the standard of care for the proper labeling and dating of tube feeding bottles was followed. A review of R105's clinical record revealed: 4/30/24 - R105 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of a stroke, and difficulty swallowing food and liquids. 9/19/24 10:40 AM - During an observation, the tube feeding bottle was being administered at R105's bedside. No date was written on the tube feeding bottle. 9/20/24 11:30 AM - During an observation, the tube feeding bottle was administered at R105's bedside. No date was written on the tube feeding bottle. 09/20/24 11:54 AM - During an interview, E24 (RN) confirmed that the tube feed bottle had no date written on it. 10/2/24 3:00 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (ADON), E46 (VPO) and a representative from the Ombudsman's Office.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R3) out of three sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure that R3 was provided respiratory care consistent with her physician orders and comprehensive person-centered care plan. Findings include: Review of R3's clinical record revealed: 4/22/24 - R3 was readmitted to the facility. 5/28/24 - R3 had a physician's order for oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula (a medical device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels). 5/28/24 11:09 PM - A nurse progress note documented that R3 had a new physician's order for oxygen therapy for SOB (shortness of breath). 6/30/24 - R3's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment revealed that R3 was receiving oxygen therapy during the review period. 7/30/24 (created 5/12/21) - R3 was care planned for cardiac disease related to .and SOB. R3's interventions including but not limited to administering oxygen as ordered. During multiple random observations, R3's oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R26) out of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure R26's pain management during wound care was consistent with her care plan and professional standards of practice. Findings include: According to the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Edition, Chapter 2 entitled, Standards of Care and Ethical and Legal Issues . Nonmaleficence. 1. The principle of nonmaleficence . obligates the professional nurse not to harm the patient directly . it is common for the nurse to cause pain or expose the patient to risk of harm when such actions are justified by the benefits of the procedures or treatments . Cross refer to F686, example 1 R26's clinical record revealed: 4/11/24 revised - R26 was care planned for at risk for pain related to advanced age, osteoarthritis pain in right shoulder, right leg, back, neck, buttocks, knee pain, left foot, being more sedentary/bedbound related to poor prognosis. The approaches included, but were not limited to, observe for physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the required federal staffing information in a conspicuous area that was readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings include: 1. 10/2/24 9:27 AM - An observation in the facility's main lobby revealed a state agency staffing worksheet encased in an acrylic sign holder. The sign holder was placed on top of the small round table at the lobby's corner near facility entrance door. The staffing worksheet had information of the facility's average daily census, care hours per resident and staffing ratios by daily shift with a date range from 9/22/24 through 9/28/24. There was a lack of federal staffing posting in the lobby with the daily (10/2/24) census, correct date and licensed RNs/LPNs and CNA worked hours per shift. 10/2/24 9:28 AM - During interview, E29 (HR Director) stated that the staffing worksheet displayed in the lobby was the facility's staff posting. 2. 10/2/24 - Observations of the four units: Arcadia, New Castle, Heritage and Dover from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R116) out of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to monitor and hold R116's blood pressure medication based on physician ordered parameters. Findings include: 1a. R116's clinical record revealed: 8/20/24 - R116 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of high blood pressure among other medical conditions. 8/22/24 - A physician's order stated, Norvasc oral tablet 5 MG . Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day . hold if sbp (systolic blood pressure) less than 110. Review of R116's eMARs and nurse's notes for August 2024 and September 2024 lacked evidence that R116's blood pressures were taken prior to administration of her daily blood pressure medication for: -four out of nine opportunities from 8/23/24 through 8/31/24; and -three out of five opportunities from 9/1/24 through 9/5/24. 1b. R116's clinical record revealed: 8/20/24 - R116 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of high blood pressure among other medical conditions. 8/22/24 - A physician's order stated, Norvasc oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R116) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to order and provide an Ensure drink based on the admission nutrition assessment and resident preference. Findings include: R116's clinical record revealed: 8/20/24 - R116 was admitted to the facility. 8/22/24 at 5:10 PM - A nutrition note by E13 (Dietician) documented, . Her oral intake varies between 26-100%, and she eats independently without any issues with chewing or swallowing. No supplements are currently ordered, and food preferences were obtained through a conversation with her [family member, F1]. [F1] reports that resident enjoys drinking Ensure and would like for her to receive one in between meals. Will recommend to add Ensure once daily . 9/13/24 - A physician's order stated to give Ensure two times a day for optimal PO (oral) intake . 9/30/24 at 4:00 PM - During an interview, F1 (R116's family member) stated that during the care conference on 8/26/24, the request for Ensure drink was brought up again. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R9, R53 and R76) out of five residents sampled for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, the facility failed to provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of either/both influenza and pneumococcal immunizations to each resident or the resident's representative and then offer the immunization. Findings include: 1. R9's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered an up to date pneumococcal vaccination. R9 received the PCSV23 on 9/23/22. 2. R53's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered an influenza vaccination during year 2023. 3. R76's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident was offered a pneumococcal vaccination. 10/2/24 at 3:00 PM - Discussed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (ADON), E46 (VPO) and a representative with the Ombudsman's Office.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, environment for residents, staff and the public. Findings include: 9/23/24 1:30 PM - An observation of three trash dumpsters located were located next to the facility. Two of the dumpsters contained full clear trash bags, and the third dumpster was full of ripped up boxes. The two dumpsters with the clear bags revealed the following: -Both dumpsters had opened lids, with clear bags of facility trash hanging over sides of dumpsters. -Both dumpsters had open bags of trash with the contents of the bags, including contaminated feces soiled resident briefs and used PPE gloves on the ground surrounding the dumpsters. 9/23/24 1:40 PM - During an interview, E1 (NHA) confirmed the above findings. 9/23/24 4:00 PM - An observation of the trash dumpsters revealed that the two dumpsters with resident trash had been emptied, but that the soiled resident briefs and used PPE gloves on the ground remained. 9/23/24 4:30 PM - During an interview, E1 confirmed the 4:00 PM findings. 9/24/24 8:00 AM - An observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the clinical record and additional documentation as indicated, the facility failed to notify and update C5 (Optum NP) of changes to R3 after her fall on 4/5/24 to determine if further interventions were needed. Findings include: Cross refer to F684, example 2b 4/8/24 at 6:08 PM - C5's medical note documented, . seen and evaluated s/p (status post) fall on 4/5/24. Nursing called provider after hours and reported fall from bed with minor injury- skin tear to left elbow and bruising to face. No bleeding noted and neurochecks were WNL (within normal limits). Today, resident noted with multiple bruising to face - right eye orbit bruised, right forehead, bruise to left (sic) chin and hematoma to left forehead . does not appear to be in pain . 4/8/24 at 9:30 PM - An order note documented, New orders received to hold ASA (aspirin) x 5 days, start Acetaminophen 650mg . BID (twice a day) and to apply cool compress to right eye TID (three times a day) . 4/10/24 at 10:49 AM - During an interview, C5 (Optum NP) stated that she was contacted by the facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F686 - Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that for one (R10) out of one resident reviewed for the treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures, the facility failed to initiate treatment and monitoring when R10 was readmitted on [DATE] with a sacral pressure ulcer. Findings include: A facility policy dated 1/29/24, and titled, Wounds/Skin Impairments, documented, .The skin observation tool will be completed by a licensed nurse at least every seven (7) days, detailing any wound/skin impairments. Notify provider with updates and/or changes to the skin impairments, obtain new orders as necessary, provide treatments as ordered . Review of R10's clinical records revealed: 4/13/24 2:16 PM - R10 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with past medical diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease affecting the left dominant side and muscle weakness. R10's readmission skin assessment documented, .Open area to sacrum (large triangular bone at base of spine). 6/3/24 10:00 AM -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the clinical record and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R2) out of one resident reviewed for physician ordered bladder scanning, the facility failed to ensure that the resident, who was incontinent of bladder, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent an urinary tract infection. Findings include: According to the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Edition, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is enlargement of the prostate that constricts the urethra, causing urinary symptoms . Clinical Manifestations: . 2. Obstructive symptoms - . sensation of incomplete emptying of the bladder, urinary retention . Diagnostic Evaluation: . 6. Optional diagnostic studies for further evaluation: . b. Measurement of postvoid residual volume; by ultrasound or catherization . According to the Cleveland Clinic website, last reviewed on 2/9/24, . A post-void residual (PVR) test measures the amount of pee left in your bladder after you urinate. High PVR levels mean you have urinary retention, which could be caused by an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility assessment, emails and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update the facility assessment to include all personnel classifications which provide services to facility residents. Findings include: 4/8/24 - A review of the facility employee list revealed two employees with the job classification of Non-Certified Nursing Assistant. 4/18/24 - A review of the Facility Assessment - [NAME] Nursing and Rehab, updated 1/26/24, section 3.2 Staffing Plan, Position: In addition to nursing staff, other staff needed for behavioral healthcare and services (list other staff positions/roles) revealed the lack of a job position for a Non-Certified Nursing Assistant. 4/9/24 3:48 PM - A review of an email from E1 regarding the job duties of a non-certified nursing assistant revealed the following response: They don't provide care for the residents. They are used primarily for 1:1 and making beds. If we are doing any events in the building they help with activities. 4/10/24 3:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The following were observed during the initial kitchen tour on 7/13/23 from 8:45 AM through 10:00 AM. - The kitchen lights covers were in disrepair in the dry storage, food prep, and dish washing area; - The walls in the areas near the entrance, and dish washing room in were disrepair; - There were water pooling on the floor in the walk-in. Findings were reviewed and confirmed by E77 (FSD) on 7/13/23 at approximately 10:00 AM. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E4 (Corporate Nurse), and E18 (Vice President of Operations) on 7/31/23, at approximately 2:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review of the facility's Infection Surveillance Monthly Report, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases and infections. Findings include: Review of the following months of surveillance data for residents treated for urinary tract infections revealed: February 2023 - for three residents signs and symptoms were lacking; for seven residents the facility lacked data on name of organism, and culture dates and results were not provided. March 2023 - for three residents signs and symptoms were lacking, for five residents the facility lacked data on name of organism, for four residents culture dates and results were not provided; and for one resident reference was made to a laboratory report but organism name, culture dates or results were not provided. April 2023 - for three residents organism name, culture dates and results were not provided. May 2023 - for one resident signs and symptoms were lacking; for ten residents organism name and culture dates and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain required kitchen equipment to prepare food for residents were in safe working order. Findings include: The following were observed during the initial kitchen tour on 7/13/23 from 8:45 AM through 10:00 AM: - The dishwasher food grinders were out of service and unable to dispose of food waste; - The ovens in the food preparation area are not functional. Findings were reviewed and confirmed by E77 (FSD) on 7/13/23 at approximately 10:00AM. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E4 (Corporate Nurse), and E18 (Vice President of Operations) on 7/31/23, at approximately 2:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two (R75 and R579) out of 30 residents in the investigative sample were offered the opportunity to formulate an advance directive. Findings include: The facility's admission Packet [undated], included a Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Centers Patient Information Handbook, n.d. stated, Advance Directives: You have the right to make decisions about your own health .should you be unable to communicate your wishes. You have the right to make an advance directive, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care .If you would like more information about advance directives, please contact our Social Services Department. 1. Review of R75's clinical record revealed: 6/9/23 - R75 was admitted to the facility. 6/15/23 - R75's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed resident to have a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15. (Scores of 13-15 mean cognitively intact). 6/21/23 - R75 started Hospice services. 7/13/23 - During an interview, R75 was unaware of what an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation of four out of four units toured, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment. Findings include: 1. 7/19/23 11:04 AM - During an observation of the Heritage unit, room [ROOM NUMBER]A was observed with ant traps around the room brought in by the resident's family, also the room had wallpaper peeling off the wall. It was observed that room [ROOM NUMBER]A also had wallpaper peeling from the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER]A had dirty floors and one area of the floor had what appeared to be dried, crusted liquid that was white in color, stuck to floor. room [ROOM NUMBER]A's bathroom floor was filthy with brown grime and dirt on the floor tiles around the bottom of the toilet. Also, the walls in the room had peeled wallpaper and the bed had been made with dirty linen with holes. Furthermore, the carpet in the Heritage unit's hallway was dirty, dingy in color and sticky in some areas. 2. 7/19/23 11:17 AM - During an observation of the Dover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R129's clinical record revealed: 8/18/21 - R129 was admitted to the facility. 11/29/21 - A review of facility grievance log revealed that R129's responsible party filed a grievance related to R129's care. 7/27/23 - A review of R129's concern form from the grievance (11/29/21) revealed the facility lacked evidence of a response to the concern. An interview with E4 (Corporate Consultant) confirmed the facility lacked evidence of a response to the grievance. 7/27/23 2:45 PM - Findings reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E4 (RCD). 7/31/23 at 2:00 PM - Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1, E2 (DON), E4 and E18 (VPO). Based on observations, interviews, and reviews of a clinical record and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that information on how to file a grievance/concern was available to the residents/resident representatives on two out of two resident floors. Additionally for R129, the facility failed to ensure that concerns received by the facility included prompt efforts to resolve the resident's problems. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from physical abuse for one (R26) out of 14 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. R26 physically abused seven (7) (R480, R35, R481, R41, R117, R95 and R116) residents over a fifteen month period. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure titled Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation/Crime Administrative reference Guide, dated 1/23/20, stated, .Physical Abuse - a. Striking the patient with a part of the body or with an object .shoving, pushing .b. Physical contact intentionally or through recklessness that results in .physical injury, pain . Review of R26's clinical record and the facility's incident report documentation revealed: 9/9/20 - R26 was first admitted to the facility. 9/9/20 (revised 9/22/22) - A care plan was developed for R26's risk for behavior symptoms related to depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, constantly pacing up and down the hallways stating he can't stop walking .attempting to push other residents and staff to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R65, R71 and R141) out of five residents reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to review and revise their care plans to reflect individual identified needs. For R65 and R71 the facility failed to facilitate an interdisciplinary care plan. For R141, the facility failed to have the required interdisciplinary team members at the care plan conference, Findings include: The facility's policy on Care Planning dated 11/01/2019 documented, . Each patient's care plan will be discussed at the care plan conference by the IDT [interdisciplinary team] under the leadership of a licensed nurse . Notes will be kept for each patient's care plan discussed at the conference. A designated staff member attending the conference will include an electronic progress note summarizing the conference and stating all who attended, including the patient and any family members who were present. 1. Review of R141's clinical record revealed: 6/21/23 - R141 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of 133's clinical record revealed: 4/8/21 - R133 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including heart failure. 4/15/21- A Physician's order was written for R133 to be weighed daily and to notify the physician if R133 had a weight gain of 3 pounds (lbs.) in 24 hours or 5 lbs. in 1 week. R133's weights: 4/19/21 - 199.8 lbs. 4/26/21 - 219.0 lbs. Weights were not obtained on R133 for five (5) consecutive days, from 4/20/21 thru 4/25/21. R133 experienced a twenty-pound (20) weight gain during the week of 4/19/21 - 4/26/21. 6. Review of 138's clinical record revealed: 5/31/21 - R138 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cardiac disease and high blood pressure. 5/31/21 - R138's care plan for heart disease had an intervention that stated to call the physician if R138's heart rate was less than 50. 6/1/21 - A Physician's order was written for Metoprolol 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for high blood pressure. 6/3/21 - A Physician's order was written to take a temperature and an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R86) out ___ resident reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to ensure that R86 received the care and services necessary to restore or maintain bladder function. Findings include: 11/1/19 - The facility's nursing policies and procedures titled Assessment for Bowel & Urinary Toileting Program included but not limited to: 1. A licensed nurse will perform bowel and/or urinary assessment on admission, readmission, annually and PRN (as needed) using the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) process. 2. A licensed nurse will initiate, and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) will implement toileting approaches and encourage the patient to participate. Document Data Collection Trial for Bowel and Urinary Toileting Training Program. The following was reviewed in R86's clinical records: 10/24/22 - R86 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease, Acute Kidney Failure, and weakness/paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R134's clinical record revealed: 8/4/21 - R134 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of chronic pain. 8/4/21 - R134 was ordered oxycodone (a pain medication). 8/4/21 - R134's admission assessment documented that she had frequent pain, and at the time of the assessment R138 expressed that her pain level was an eight out of ten. Review of R 134's medication administration record revealed: 8/4/21 8:30 PM - R134 was administered pain medication for a pain level of nine out of ten. The post pain medication assessment was documented as E (effective) and did not include a numerical score. 8/5/21 - R134 was administered pain medication at 1:25 AM for a pain level of six out of ten, 10:10 AM for a pain level of five out of ten and only documented as effective. In addition, R134 was administered pain medication at 5:55 PM for a pain level of seven out of ten and only documented as U ineffective. R134 was then transferred to the hospital. 7/26/23 1:09 PM - During an interview E4 (Regional Clinical Director) confirmed R134's medication administration record lacked evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Review of R101's clinical record revealed: Cross refer F758 8/3/22 - R101 was admitted to the facility. 9/8/22 9:34 AM - A review of the MRR revealed a recommendation to consider a dose reduction or discontinue to Risperidone 0.75mg by mouth at bedtime. 7/27/23 11:00 AM - A review of the Physicians order sheet for R101 revealed that the above recommendation for Risperidone had not been acknowledged. 4. Review of R129's clinical record revealed: 8/18/21 - R129 was admitted to the facility. 4/6/22 - A review of the MRR revealed a recommendation to reevaluate the use of triple antidepressant therapy and consider dose reduction or discontinue one of the medications: Sertaline 50 mg, Trazadone 25 mg, and Remeron 7.5 mg. The MRR was not signed by the Physician. 5. Review of R179's clinical record revealed: 2/18/21 - R179 was admitted to the facility. 7/27/23 11:30 AM - A review of R179's MRR revealed the facility lacked evidence that the MRR's were completed for the following months: March 2023, April 2023, May 2023, and June 2023. 7/27/23 12:30 PM - An interview with E4 (Corporate)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting of the required minimum members. Findings include: 8/31/22 - Quarter 3 2022 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee Meeting Attendance record documented that the Director of Nursing (DON) was not present at the meeting. 5/25/23 - Quarter 2 2023 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee Meeting Attendance record documented that the Director of Nursing (DON) was not present at the meeting. Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E4 (RCD) and E18 (VPO) at the Exit Conference on 7/31/23 at 2:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide required in-service training (12 hours per year) for five out of five CNAs reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure E15, E74, and E76 had training on dementia management, care of the cognitively impaired, abuse and neglect. Findings include: The facility was provided a list of five names selected at random and instructed to provide documentation of the required 12 hours per year of in-service training. 7/28/23 3:00 PM - During a brief interview E16 (HRD) revealed, she thought continuing education units submitted for CNA renewal (Certified Nursing Assistant) met the required 12 hours per year of in-service training. 7/31/23 8:30 AM - Review of facility documentation submitted for staff training had not met the required in-service training's for E15, E54, E74, E75 and E76. The facility failed to provide 12 hours of annual in-service training's as required for five out of five staff CNA's. 7/31/23 at 2:00 PM - Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, it was determined that for three (R4, R22 and R43) out of 43 residents sampled and general observations on one of four units, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity. Findings included: 1. An observation in the Arcadia locked dementia unit's dining room on 10/25/23 at 1:24 PM revealed that R4, R22, R22's family member, and R43 were sitting at a table in the dining room after finishing their lunch and the table was cleared. R4's one-to-one (1:1) assigned staff person, E27 (Non-Certified Nursing Assistant), returned from lunch break with food in a disposable container. E27 sat down next to R4 at the table and placed her food on the table in front of three residents and a family member. E27 was observed opening the food container and eating from it while seated at the table with the residents. 10/25/23 at 2:12 PM - During a combined interview with E2 (DON) and E3 (RCD), the Surveyor's observation was reviewed. Surveyor was informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0562 — isolatedProvide immediate access to any resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and reviews of the clinical record and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R131) out of nine residents reviewed for change of condition, the facility failed to provide immediate access to R131 during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift on 3/8/23 when 911 was called and both BLS (Basic Life Support) and ALS (Advanced Life Support) crews had difficulty entering the facility in order to provide emergent aid to R131. Findings include: Review of R131's clinical record revealed: 9/23/22 - R131 was admitted to the facility. 3/8/23 at 1:29 AM - E49 (RN) documented, On call NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified of change in mental status with elevated vitals; 173/116 (blood pressure), 136 (heart rate); 30 (respirations); 101.9 (temperature); 94% RA (pulse ox on room air). Increased respiration with periods of shallow breathing noted. Pt. (Patient) unable to respond to verbal commands. Nurse received order from NP to transfer pt to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation. 911 called. Patient transferred to (name) hospital. Message left for family to call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R113) out of one resident reviewed for notification of change in condition the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician in a timely manner. Findings include: A policy and procedure titled Significant Change of Condition documented .All staff members shall communicate any information about patient status change to appropriate licensed personnel immediately upon observation .3. This assessment shall be reported to primary physician or designated alternate .4. Responsible party will also be notiifed of a change of condition. Review of R113's clinical record revealed: 1/6/23 - R113 was admitted with a diagnosis of Dementia and Osteoarthritis. 2/11/23 11:53 AM - A progress note documented .noted bruise light/blue/purple and swelling to the right upper arm.Complained of pain, as needed Tylenol given, (E3 MD) made aware, new order for X-ray two views to arm (E64 RP) present and aware of bruise/swelling and new order. 2/11/23 11:17 PM - A progress note documented .X-ray provider called and stated, they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two (R45 and R41) out of 14 sampled for abuse were free from involuntary seclusion. R41 and R45's room door had been secured closed with an elastic stocking on the night shift. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Patient Protection effective date 1/23/20 documented, There is a zero tolerance for mistreatment, abuse, misappropriation of property, or any crime against a patient of the Health and Rehabilitation Center. 1. Patients of the Center have the legal right to be free from . involuntary seclusion . except in an emergency and/or authorized in writing by a physician. 1. R45's clinical record revealed: 3/29/19 - R45 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Stroke, Anxiety, and Vascular Dementia. 4/4/19 - Review of R45's care plan for Place self on floor off chair, while ambulating refuses to wear socks or shoes related to cognitive impairment, and poor safety awareness documented 1. Keep busy with desirable activities such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R179) out of 14 residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to have evidence of thorough investigation. Findings include: 1. Review of R179's clinical record revealed: 2/18/21- R179 was admitted to the facility 7/24/23 11:28 AM - Interview with FM1 (daughter) revealed an allegation of abuse from R179 during his stay at the facility. R179 alleged he was beaten all the time by staff during care. 7/24/23 12:00 PM - An allegation of abuse was reported to E1(NHA) and E4 (Corporate Consultant) by the surveyor as revealed by FM1. 7/24/23 1:38 PM - An allegation of abuse was submitted to State Agency. 7/26/23 - Investigation of the allegation of abuse was received by the State agency. The investigation included the incident report and interviews from the following staff: social worker, unit manager and the DON. The investigation lacked interviews with direct care staff. The facility lacked evidence of a thorough investigation related to abuse. 7/27/23 2:45 PM -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R3 and R179) out of four residents reviewed for PASARR, the facility failed ensure that a referral for a PASARR screening was completed following a new diagnosis of psychotic disorder which was not listed on the previous PASARR. Findings include: 1. Review of R179's clinical record revealed: 2/18/21- R179 was admitted to the facility. 10/26/19 - An admission PASARR was completed for R179. 1/19/23 - A progress note from E19 (Psychiatrist) revealed a new diagnosis of Schizophrenia. 7/24/23 10:26 AM - An interview with E9 (SW) and E20 (SW) confirmed a PASARR was not completed when the new diagnosis of Schizophrenia was identified. 7/24/23 10:30 AM - An interview with E21 (RN-MDS coordinator) confirmed the new diagnosis of Schizophrenia was not added to the medical record at the time of diagnosis. The facility failed to ensure that a referral for a PASARR screening was completed following a new diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. 7/27/23 2:45 PM - Findings reviewed with E1 (NHA) and E4 (Corporate consultant). 2. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for four (R87, R129, R281 and R101) out of twenty-seven residents in the investigative sample, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan. Findings include: The facility's policy on Care Planning dated 11/01/2019 documented, A licensed nurse, in coordination with the interdisciplinary team, develops and implements an individualized care plan for each patient in order to provide effective, person-centered care, and the mental, and psychosocial well-being of the patient. 1. Review of R129's clinical record revealed: 8/18/21 - R129 was admitted to the facility. 8/19/21 - A care plan for pain related to arthritis. 8/24/21 - A review of an admission MDS revealed R129 was receiving a routine pain medication. 5/10/22 - A review of facility incident report revealed R129 had an injury of unknown origin noted. The report revealed R129 had a bruise to the right hip and was limping when ambulating. Area was slightly edematous and tender to touch. 5/10/22 - A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R79's clinical record revealed: 1/21/23 - R79 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Dementia and Chronic kidney disease. 1/23/23 - Review of R79's care plan for ADL self-care deficit related to cognitive deficits and impaired mobility revised on 6/29/23 documented: 1. Will receive assistance necessary to meet ADL (Activity of Daily Living) needs. 2. Will be clean, well dressed, and well-groomed daily to promote dignity and psychosocial wellbeing. 3. Assist with daily hygiene, grooming, oral care and eating as needed. 4/29/23 - A quarterly MDS Assessment documented, that R79 was severly cognitively impaired and required extensive assist with one-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. 6/8/23 - Review of R79's care plan for risk for falls revised 6/29/23 documented the use of non-skid socks while out of bed. 7/17/23 10:32 AM - A random observation revealed R79's nails were long and had dark thickened debris underneath all fingernails on the right and left hand. 7/17/23 12:46 PM - An interview with E28 (LPN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R65's clinical record revealed: 11/29/20 - R65 was admitted to the facility. 3/30/23 - Due to a complaint of a decrease in hearing, R65 completed a hearing assessment that recommended a follow-up with an ENT (Ears, Nose, and Throat Doctor). 5/22/23 - During R65's ENT follow-up, R65 was found to have cerumen (earwax) accumulation in the left ear with instructions for treatment stating, debridement and treatment of ear drops Acetasol HC both ears 3 drops BID (twice a day) x 14 days. 6/9/23 - R65's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment evaluated the resident to have adequate hearing. 7/13/23 11:05 AM - An interview with R65 and FM2 revealed that the M.D. (Medical Director) recommended a hearing evaluation for R65 who is hard of hearing. FM2 said I have to speak loudly and clearly to [my] mom because she can hardly hear . she turns the TV volume up because she can hardly hear . They were supposed to have a hearing evaluation done because she may need hearing aids . 7/17/23 - During record review, it was determined the facility lacked evidence of following up with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that for two (R16 and R36) of three residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM), the facility failed to ensure that residents received the care and/or treatment to maintain or improve ROM. Findings include: 1. R36's clinical record revealed: 7/10/23 - R36 was admitted the facility with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain) which caused paralysis to his left side, and muscle weakness. 7/11/23 - R36's occupational therapy record documented, . left upper extremity strength to shoulder, elbow and forearm impaired . No functional limitations present due to contracture. The clinical records lacked evidence of contracture measurements. 7/25/23 - R36's MDS documented, . No active or passive range of motion exercises . (exercises that the resident participates with staff to straighten arms/legs). A review of R36's record lacked evidence of a care plan for the management of current contractures, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for two (R26 and R91) out of fifteen(15) residents sampled for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R26 and R91received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent an accidents. Findings include: 1. Cross refer to F725, example 5 Review of R26's clinical records revealed: 9/15/20 - R26 was admitted to the facility. 9/9/20 (revised 6/13/23) - R26's care plan was developed for falls and risk for falls with the goal to minimize risk for injury related to falls. R26's interventions included but not limited to: activity assessment, administer medication per physician's order, encouraging rest periods when tired during ambulation/wandering episodes, encourage to use wheelchair when tired, frequent safety checks during wandering episodes, head helmet on at all times as tolerated . 6/28/21 (revised 3/31/23) - A care plan was developed for R26's disruptive/compulsive, verbal/physical agitation/aggressive, can be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, it was determined that for one (R49) out of one resident sampled for tube feeding, the facility failed to ensure that the tube feeding formula and water flush were labeled with the name, date, time, and rate of infusion on 10/22/23. Findings include: The facility policy, dated 11/1/19, and titled, Care of Patient with Feeding Tubes - general principles related to feeding tubes, documented . Properly label . with the individual's name, room number, date, type of feeding, rate and start time . 3/8/21 - R49 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including a stroke. 10/20/20 - R49's MAR (Medication Administration Records) documented, Continuous Enteral Feeding - Glucerna 1.5 at 40 ml per hour . run until 640 ml is infused via PEG Tube (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - a tube is passed into the stomach through the abdominal wall, used to provide feeding when oral intake is not adequate), and 75 ml of water infusing while tube feeding is running.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R3) out of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to monitor side effects of a psychoactive medication. Findings include: 1. Review of R3's clinical record revealed: 5/12/21 - R3 was admitted to the facility. 9/2/22 - R3 had an active physician's order for seroquel 50 mg (milligrams) by mouth three times a day for restlessness and agitation and unspecified psychosis. 5/12/23 - A Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations to Nursing Staff documented an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) completed on 4/24/23 showing a score of 7, with abnormal movements identified in many categories. R3 did not have a prior assessment in the electronic health record. The recommendation was to compare this AIMS assessment to the prior assessment and if there has been an increase in abnormal movement, to let medical (physician) know so they can reassess her Seroquel therapy. 5/16/23 - A facility response from the nursing staff documented, Repeat AIMS. 7/28/23 2:00 PM - Further review of R3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that for two (R8 and R21) out of two residents reviewed for menus, the facility failed to follow the menu items listed on the menu. Findings include: 1. R8's clinical record revealed: 10/11/23 - R8 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including end stage renal disease. R8 was ordered a renal diet, which is a diet that balances fluids and foods to align with diseased kidney function needs. 10/24/23 8:30 AM - An observation of R8's breakfast tray revealed that R8 was served orange juice. Orange juice is a restricted item on a renal diet, and R8 said that she knew that she was not supposed to drink the orange juice. Further observation revealed that R8's standard meal tray dietary ticket was not present on the tray. Upon interview, R8 stated that her meal trays come with a piece of paper that is a copy of the menu selection that she had made for that meal. R8 stated that she has not had a typewritten meal tray ticket on her dining trays since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R100) out of one residents sampled for preferences, the facility failed to provide the resident's food preference for breakfast. Findings include: 7/24/23 at 8:50 AM - During an interview at the centralized nurse's station on the second floor, R100 stated to the Surveyor, in the presence of E56 (Dietician), that he did not receive eggs for breakfast this morning and it was listed on his meal ticket. E56 asked R100 if he still wanted eggs and R100 replied no too late. The Surveyor observed R100's meal tray and meal ticket, which stated scrambled eggs . Tray Notes: . LIKES EGGS . R100 stated that other residents on the Dover hallway were served eggs. 7/31/23 at 2:00 PM - Finding was reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E4 (RCD) and E18 (VPO).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interview, it was determined that for three (R1, R30 and R36) out of three residents reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure that resident fall assessments accurately documented the resident's status. Findings include: 1. Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 9/29/23 - R1's admission fall assessment was completed using the facility's Fall Assessment Scoring Tool and the score was 17. According to the facility Fall Risk Scoring Tool, a score greater that or equal to 12 indicates a high risk for falling. 10/2/23- A physician progress note was written in the Emr that R1 was considered a fall risk because she had previous falls in the year prior to her admission to the facility. 10/3/23 7:00 PM - A nursing progress note was written in the Emr that R1 fell while walking in the hallway earlier in the day. R1 hit her head during the fall and was sent to the hospital emergency room for evaluation and treatment. 10/3/23 - A post fall risk assessment was completed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's IPCP (Infection Prevention and Control Program) that had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control prior to assuming the role of the IP. Findings include: The facility's policy on, Infection Preventionist, last revised November 17, 2020, reads, .The IP must: Possess knowledge of infection surveillance, prevention and control of infections and has completed specialized education on infection prevention and control . 6/12/23 - E24 (former ADON/IP) provided the facility with a formal notification of resignation from the position. 7/13/23 - In response to documentation requests during the Survey's Entrance Conference, the facility provided evidence of specialized infection prevention and control training of E24 as the facility's IP. 7/21/23 - E24's last day as ADON/IP at the facility. 7/26/23 11:52 AM - During an interview, E40 (RN/Staff Development) stated that she took over the IP role…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0923 — isolatedHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate outside ventilation by means of windows, or mechanical ventilation, or a combination of the two in the Arcadia unit. Findings include: 7/21/23 3:00 PM - EHS (Environmental Health Specialist) toured the Arcadia unit. 7/21/23 3:45 PM - During an interview with E39 (Director of Maintenance), it was stated that Arcadia's hall AC unit was out of service and the facility was waiting on a back ordered part to have replaced. 7/21/23 3:50 PM - E39 confirmed poor ventilation on the Arcadia unit. Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E4 (RCD) and E18 (VPO) at the Exit Conference on 7/31/23 at 2:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required training for new and existing staff was completed for one (E53) out of five staff for the Facility Assessment. Findings include: 2/22/23 - (E53) was hired for the housekeeping position. 8/9/23 - The facility was provided a list of five randomly selected staff members for facility assessment training and instructed to provide documentation of the required training requirement for new and existing staff. 8/9/23 3:45 PM - During an interview with E16 (HRD) revealed E53 (CNA) had not completed all required trainings. A copy of E53's orientation check list was requested during the interview. Additionally, E16 said, the general orientation check list would be different for the housekeeper position. Further review of documentation revealed a general orientation check off list for E53 had not been provided. 8/11/23 12:12 PM - E2 (DON) documented in an email correspondence E53 had not been due for other educational items until 8/31/23. The facility failed to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required training for Resident Rights was completed for one (R53) out of five staff. Findings include: 2/22/23 - (E53) was hired for the housekeeping position. 8/9/23 - The facility was provided a list of five randomly selected staff members for Resident Rights training and instructed to provide documentation of the required training. 8/9/23 3:45 PM - During an interview with E16 (HRD) revealed E53 (CNA) had not completed all required trainings. A copy of E53's orientation check list was requested during the interview. Additionally, E16 said, the general orientation check list would be different for the housekeeper position. Further review of facility documentation revealed, Residents Right training for E53 had not been provided. 8/11/23 12:12 PM - E2 (DON) documented in an email correspondence that E53 had not been due for other educational items until 8/31/23. The facility failed to provide training for Resident Rights which is required for all direct and indirect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required training on abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property was completed for three (E32, E53 and E54) out of 11 randomly sampled staff members. Findings include: 1. Review of E32 (LPN) personnel records revealed: 2/20/18 - The date of E32's most recent abuse and neglect training. 12/9/22 - E32's last date of employment at the facility. 7/24/23 11:00 AM - A verbal confirmation from E16 (HR) was provided that E32's most recent abuse training was 2/20/18. 2. Review of Review of E53 (Housekeeping) personnel records revealed: 2/22/23 - E53's date of facility hire. 7/24/23 - E53's personnel file did not have evidence of abuse and neglect training. 7/24/23 11:10 AM - E16 provided verbal confirmation that E53 did not have abuse training and neglect training upon hire. 3. Review of Review of E54 (CNA) personnel records revealed: 2/20/18 - The date of E54's most recent abuse and neglect training. 7/24/23 11:15 AM - A verbal confirmation from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required training for QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) was completed for one (R53) out of five staff. Findings include: 2/22/23 - (E53) was hired for the housekeeping position. 8/9/23 - The facility was provided a list of five randomly selected staff members for QAPI training and instructed to provide documentation of the required training. 8/9/23 3:45 PM - During a brief interview with E16 (HRD) revealed E53 (CNA) had not completed all required trainings. A copy of E53's orientation check list was requested during the interview. Additionally, E16 said, the general orientation check list would be different for the housekeeper position. Further review of facility documentation revealed QAPI training for E53 had not been provided. 8/11/23 12:12 PM - E2 (DON) documented in an email correspondence E53 had not been due for other educational items until 8/31/23. The facility failed to provide training for QAPI which is required for all direct and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0946 — isolatedProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required training for Compliance and Ethics was completed for one (R53) out of five staff. Findings include: 2/22/23 - (E53) was hired for the housekeeping position. 8/9/23 - The facility was provided a list of five randomly selected staff members for Compliance and Ethics training and instructed to provide documentation of the required training. 8/9/23 4:00 PM - During a brief interview with E16 (HRD) revealed E53 (CNA) had not completed all required trainings. A copy of E53's orientation check list was requested during the interview. Additionally, E16 said, the general orientation check list would be different for the housekeeper position. Further review of facility documentation revealed Compliance and Ethics training for E53 had not been provided. 8/11/23 12:12 PM - E2 (DON) documented in an email correspondence E53 had not been due for other educational items until 8/31/23. The facility failed to provide training for Compliance and Ethics which is required for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolatedProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required training for Behavioral Health Training was completed for one (R53) out of five staff. Findings include: 2/22/23 - (E53) was hired for the housekeeping position. 8/9/23 - The facility was provided a list of five randomly selected staff members for Behavioral Health training and instructed to provide documentation of the required training. 8/9/23 3:45 PM - During a brief interview with E16 (HRD) revealed E53 (CNA) had not completed all required trainings. A copy of E53's orientation check list was requested during the interview. Additionally, E16 said, the general orientation check list would be different for the housekeeper position. Further review of facility documentation revealed Behavioral Health training for E53 had not been provided. 8/11/23 12:12 PM - E2 (DON) documented in an email correspondence E53 had not been due for other educational items until 8/31/23. The facility failed to provide training for Behavioral Health which is required for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-04 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that information informing residents of how to formally complain to the State Agency was displayed. Findings include: 9/24/25 1:45 PM - During a resident council meeting all residents in attendance denied knowledge of how to make a formal complaint to the state of Delaware. 9/24/25 2:08 PM - During a tour of the facility for compliance with required posting, the first-floor bulletin case that displayed information for residents/visitors lacked a display of information regarding how to make a complaint to the state agency. 9/24/25 2:27 PM - E1 (NHA) confirmed the finding.9/29/25 1:25 PM - Finding was reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (Corporate Nurse) during the exit conference.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. Review of R6's clinical record revealed the following: A facility policy titled Fall Management Program effective 1/29/24 documented, .A fall is defined .unintentional change in elevation coming to rest on the ground or onto the next lower surface .Procedure .Prevention 1. A Fall Risk Scoring Tool will be completed .and as needed for change in condition . 8/6/24 11:55 AM - A nurse progress note documented that R6 was noted on the floor on her knees, and her head was over the bath tub in her bathroom. 8/7/24 - A facility Fall Risk Scoring Tool for R6 with a score of 7 (low risk) was completed by E28 (LPN). 8/11/24 3:51 AM - The same Fall Risk Scoring Tool for R6 was struck out for the reason: data entry error. 9/30/24 10:30 AM - In an interview, E2 (DON) stated that the Fall Risk Scoring Tool for [R6] completed by [E28] on 8/7/24 was not accurate. E2 further confirmed that R6's Fall Risk Scoring Tool after the 8/6/24 fall incident was not updated and not corrected. 10/2/24 at 3:00 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (ADON), E46 (VPO)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-10 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update the facility Governing Body documents to remove the name of a governing body member who was no longer employed by the facility . Findings include: 4/8/24 - A review of the Vita Healthcare Governing Body Resolution document, updated 8/1/23, revealed that F1 (Registered Nurse, Director of Clinical Services, former employee) was listed as being appointed by the governing body as a person legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility. 4/10/24 3:1 5PM - During an interview, E1 confirmed that F1's name was still present on the Vita Healthcare Governing Body Resolution document provided to the surveyor. 4/10/23 4:30 PM Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (RN RDCS) during the exit conference.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$424,128 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $191,981 — penalty dated 2026-05-11
- $212,076 — penalty dated 2024-10-02
- $20,071 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-08 for 38 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-14 for 43 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMINGTON SNF OPERATOR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/01/2023 |
| GLEN HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| HIGHLAND DE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| J & R FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| JK 2022 FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| LANDAU FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| MIMI HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| PANTHER DE PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| VH WPC SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| WPC SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/01/2023 |
| BOYER, RENEE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/01/2023 |
| RAJCHENBACH, MOSHE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/01/2023 |
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $269K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085028. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.