No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakeview Terrace Rehab And Health Care Center

110 Lodge Terrace Dr, Altoona, FL 32702 · Non profit - Corporation · 40 certified beds · (352) 669-2133 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (352) 669-2133 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 12 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
287 S Central Ave · (352) 669-3161 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
901 N Central Ave · (352) 669-1166 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
42341 SR-19 · (352) 669-5010 · Call to confirm hours
Park
42118 FL-19 · (352) 669-4561 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.9%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.4%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened51.3%9.5%16.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.6%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.6%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.1%9.1%12.0%better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.71U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.43hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.5%CMS range 64.1–81.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.5–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting85.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.5–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.86
RN hours/ resident / day
1.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
7.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.82
RN hoursweekends
27.6%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 29.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-02)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-02 · tag F0847 — widespread
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement included the required elements for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration (Residents #11, #36, and #35). Findings include:Review of Skilled Nursing Facility admission and Financial Agreement for Resident #11 entered into on 7/8/2025 between the facility and Resident #11 showed it contained a section titled 44. Dispute Resolution, which did not contain the information specifying that signing the dispute resolution was not a requirement of admission or continuing care; the resident or representative could rescind the dispute resolution within 30 days of signing; the resident was not prohibited from communicating with other entities or agencies; the arbitration would be held in a location convenient to both parties; and the resident or representative understood the dispute resolution agreement.Review of Skilled Nursing Facility admission and Financial Agreement for Resident #35 entered into on 12/11/2025 between the facility and Resident #35 showed it contained a section titled 44. Dispute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-02 · tag F0848 — widespread
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement provided for the selection of a venue convenient to both parties for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration (Residents #11, #36, and #35).Findings include:Review of Skilled Nursing Facility admission and Financial Agreement for Resident #11 entered into on 7/8/2025 between the facility and Resident #11 showed it contained a section titled 44. Dispute Resolution, which failed to specify that the arbitration would be held in a location convenient to both parties.Review of Skilled Nursing Facility admission and Financial Agreement for Resident #35 entered into on 12/11/2025 between the facility and Resident #35 showed it contained a section titled 44. Dispute Resolution, which failed to specify that the arbitration would be held in a location convenient to both parties.Review of Skilled Nursing Facility admission and Financial Agreement for Resident #36 entered into on 9/22/2025 between the facility and Resident #35 showed it contained a section titled 44. Dispute Resolution, which failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-02 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate nurse staffing data was posted on a daily basis.Findings include:During an observation on 9/29/2025 at approximately 9:50 AM, the nurse staffing report posted on the Skilled Nursing Unit documented the resident census as 39 (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 9/29/2025 at 9:51 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated that the posted staffing was not correct and the census should have been documented as 29 and it should be corrected.During an interview on 9/30/2025 at 1:43 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the expectation was the daily staffing sheet was to be completed by the 11-7 shift [11:00 PM - 7:00 AM] and that the resident census was based on the midnight census. It was not possible that the midnight census on 9/29/2025 was 39, as was documented on the staffing report.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in 2 of 2 service kitchens (Rehabilitation Unit kitchen and Skilled Nursing Unit kitchen) and failed to ensure food was prepared in a sanitary manner. Findings include:During an observation on 9/29/2025 at 9:55 AM, there were four frozen individually wrapped packages of pancakes in a clear plastic packaging with no label inside of a plastic bin with no label or date inside of a freezer located in the skilled nursing facility kitchen.During an interview on 9/29/2025 at 9:55 AM, Staff F, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), stated, We did not serve pancakes for breakfast today. We served waffles.During an observation on 9/29/2025 at 10:20 AM, there were one opened container of chocolate syrup, one opened container of mayonnaise, one opened container of hot sauce, and one opened sweet relish the Rehabilitation Unit refrigerator, which were not labeled with opened or discard by dates (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 9/29/2025 at 10:20 AM, Staff F, CDM, stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments for the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for mood and behavior (Resident #6).Findings include:Review of Resident #6's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (onset date of 3/28/2023), adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood (onset date of 1/4/2024), and primary insomnia (onset date of 4/20/2023).Review of Resident #6's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), completed on 12/16/2024, did not include major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and primary insomnia as mental illness under Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making.Review of Resident #6's psychiatry subsequent note dated 9/10/2025 read, Chief Complaint: Depression, anxiety, dementia, insomnia, mood disorder, psychosis and Parkinsonism. Diagnostic Assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate regarding medication administration and blood sugar monitoring for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #2).Findings include:Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 9/3/2025 read, Accu-check blood sugar monitoring, two times a day.Review of Resident #2's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for blood sugar monitoring two times a day (discontinued on 9/19/2025 at 2:07 PM) for September 2025 revealed the resident refused the blood sugar check on 9/6/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, 9/7/2025 at 9:00 AM, 9/8/2025 at 9:00 AM, 9/9/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, 9/10/2025 at 9:00 PM, 9/11/2025 at 9:00 PM, 9/12/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, 9/13/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, 9/14/2025 at 9:00 PM, 9/15/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, 9/16/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 AM, 9/17/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, 9/18/2025 at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM, and 9/19/2025 at 9:00 AM.Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 9/19/2025 read, Accu-check blood sugar monitoring, twice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration when required to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.Findings include:During an observation on 10/1/2025 at 10:00 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was preparing oral medications for Resident #25. Staff B touched a Ferrous Sulfate tablet with her ungloved hand. During administration, Resident #25 dropped a tablet from the medication cup into her lap. Staff B picked up the tablet with her ungloved hand and handed it to Resident #25 for oral administration.During an interview on 10/1/2025 at 10:08 AM, Staff B, LPN, stated that she usually attempted to just pour the pills out of the bulk bottle into the bottle lid and then into the cup because she knew she was not supposed to touch the medications. Staff B confirmed that she used her ungloved hand to pick up a tablet and hand it to Resident #25.During an interview on 10/2/2025 at approximately 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration for 6 of 10 medication administration observations to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable disease. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 7/10/2024 at 5:55 AM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), exited the nurses' station and went to the medication cart, removed keys from her pocket, unlocked the medication cart and prepared Resident #140's medications without performing hand hygiene. Staff E donned gloves without performing hand hygiene and locked the medication cart with her gloved hand. Staff E knocked on Resident #140's room door with her gloved hand, entered the resident's room, used the bed controls to adjust the height of the head of the bed with her gloved hands and administered Resident #140's oral medications. Staff E then pulled a syringe and alcohol swab out of her pocket with her gloved hand, cleaned Resident #140's arm with alcohol and administered medication to the resident. Staff E doffed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Residents #3 and #23. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified dementia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, and stage 3B chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 2/24/2023 read, Oxygen at 2.5 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula PRN [as needed] for O2 sats [oxygen saturation] below 90% as needed related to facial weakness following cerebral infraction. Review of Resident #3's Weights and Vitals Summary for O2 sats summary showed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed for 3 of 12 residents reviewed, Residents #2, #3, #33. Findings include: Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed for 3 of 12 residents reviewed, Residents #2, #3, and #33. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's admission record documented the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic atrial fibrillation, essential (primary) hypertension, arthritis, generalized anxiety disorder, muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #33's physician order dated 2/9/2024 read, Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 mg [milligram] (Apixaban), Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for A-fib. Review of Resident #33's care plan dated 5/16/2024 showed no focus or intervention related to anticoagulant therapy. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident #23. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified atrial fibrillation, cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, essential (primary) hypertension, cerebral aneurysm, other seizures, and anemia. Review of Resident #23's physician order dated 11/17/2023 read, Oxygen at 2 LPM [liters per minute] via nasal cannula continuously every shift. During an observation on 7/8/2024 at 9:38 AM, Resident #23 was resting in bed, being administered oxygen at 4 liters per minute via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dressing on a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line was changed every 48 hours as per professional standards of care for 1 of 1 resident with a PICC Line, Resident #36. Findings include: During an observation on 3/15/2023 at 2:30 PM, Resident #36 had a PICC line on left upper arm with gauze under transparent dressing. The dressing was dated 3/10/23 (photographic evidence obtained). Review of the admission record for Resident #36 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fusion of spine, spinal stenosis of lumbar region, and lower back pain. Review of Resident #36's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the PICC line dressing change was completed on 3/14/2023. Review of the physician orders for Resident #36 reads, Order Summary: Change PICC site dressing on admission, then once weekly and PRN [as needed] every day shift every 7 day(s) for PICC care. Order Date:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FOLK, AMBERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/16/2021
HAMRICK, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/21/2018
KOROMILAS, SHANNONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/20/2017
PAYTON, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/15/2022
SEAY, RALEIGHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/16/2021
SCHULTZ, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/16/2004
DSI MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/28/2025
FRISBIE, TAMMIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/28/2025
SCHULTZ, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
CLARK, LOWELLIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$25.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 13%Medicare 12%Other / private 75%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,270per resident / day
operating cost
$38,599per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,135per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106068. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next