Royal Care Of Avon Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 204 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 125 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 77.2 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify a new area of skin impairment, until it was an advanced stage pressure ulcer for one resident (#58) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in actual harm because a facility-acquired unstageable pressure ulcer, which is an advanced stage of skin breakdown that is full-thickness tissue loss is difficult to heal, at increased risk for infection, and disfiguring. The findings included: On 5/7/24 at 10:45 AM, Resident #58 was cycling in the therapy gym. He said that he got a Stage 4 pressure ulcer on his back because the facility didn't do anything after they discovered the pressure ulcer. When they first discovered a wound, they just told him to lie on his side. He said the facility didn't give him any treatment, and then the wound became a stage 4. They sent a photo to the doctor and he immediately sent him to the hospital because the wound had an infection. Now the wound still…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent resident to resident abuse for two (#2 and #3) of eight sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #2's clinical chart, the admission record, documented an admission of 06/13/2024, readmission [DATE]. The diagnoses list included but not limited to: abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness, need or assistance with personal care, and type 2 diabetes mellites without complications. A review of a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) assessment, dated 02/10/2026, documented a score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. An observation conducted on 02/19/2026 at 9:38 a.m. of Resident #2, in the resident's room. Resident #2 was observed in bed, her eyes closed, sheet up to her shoulders, sleeping. A second observation was conducted at 11:45 a.m. of Resident #2, in bed sleeping. Her roommate stated the resident has been in and out sleeping, she still is not feeling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) practice that demonstrated identification, monitoring and implementation of an effective action plan to correct citations related to failing to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. A total of forty-three medication administration opportunities were observed with twenty-two errors for three (#5, #10, and #12) of five residents observed (F759). This resulted in a medication administration error rate of 51.16% during the revisit survey conducted 7/17/2024. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed the following orders: - An order, dated 6/10/2024, for allopurinol 100 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (PO) once a day at 8:00 AM. - An order, dated 6/10/2024, for calcitrol 0.5 micrograms (mcg) one capsule PO once a day at 8:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment, in that the facility was not free from offensive odors. This involved the front lobby area, the area in front of the [NAME] nurses' station, and four resident rooms (Rm103, Rm107, Rm109 and Rm110) out of 18 resident rooms on the [NAME] unit. Findings included: On 5/6/24 at 9:00 a.m. the lobby smelled of old urine when the survey team entered the facility. At 11:10 a.m. the area in front of the [NAME] nurses' station smelled of old urine. On 5/6/24 at 2:31 p.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a very offensive odor in the room, that was not urine. On 5/7/24 at 10:03 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an offensive odor that was not urine. On 5/7/24 at 10:38 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom had a strong urine odor in it. On 5/8/24 at 7:43 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a strong odor of urine. On 5/8/24 at 8:21 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] room had a strange offensive odor that was not urine, but it was improved from the day before. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurate for four residents (#15, #26, #28, #38) of 17 residents sampled for PASARR review. Findings included: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia severe, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Level I PASARR, dated 7/31/23, showed qualifying diagnoses were not checked or indicated, and that no Level II PASARR was required. Review of the EMR revealed Resident #26 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Level I PASARR, dated 7/28/20, showed qualifying diagnoses of depressive disorder and anxiety were checked, bipolar disorder was not checked and that no Level II…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide wound care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for four (#67, #328, #177, and #36) of five residents sampled for skin conditions, and failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for application of splints for one (#41) of one resident sampled for range of motion. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #67's medical record revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis and arthroscopic surgical procedure converted to open procedure. An interview was conducted on 5/7/2024 at 12:07 PM with Resident #67 in the resident's room. Resident #67 stated he had a procedure done on his right knee prior to his admission at the facility, which resulted in a wound infection to the area and required dressing changes to the wound. An observation of Resident #67's wound dressing to the upper right leg revealed no documented date on the wound dressing. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of drugs and biologicals related to 1.) failing to ensure treatment carts remained locked and secured when not in use on one (South) of three units of the facility on two of four days during the survey and 2.) failing to ensure medications were stored in facility medication carts and not inside of resident rooms for one (#26) of five residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: During a tour of the South unit on 5/7/2024 at 9:29 AM, a treatment cart was observed unlocked in the unit hallway without staff present at the treatment cart. Staff U, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed conducting medication administration in the unit hallway. Staff U, RN stated she just unlocked the treatment cart because items from pharmacy were delivered that morning, which she put in the treatment cart. Staff U, RN addressed she left the treatment cart unlocked and stated she was going to lock the cart. Staff U, RN was observed locking the treatment cart before continuing with medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain food safety standards, such as maintaining clean floors and walls; not store ready-to-eat refrigerated Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food too long; thawing frozen TCS food (meat) properly under cold running water; and maintaining equipment in good condition. These findings have the potential to cause foodborne illness for 74 out of 76 residents who consume the facility's food. Findings included: During the initial brief tour of the kitchen on 5/06/24 at 9:29 a.m., the perimeter of the floor in the walk-in refrigerator had black soil. In addition, at 9:46 a.m., the perimeter of the floor in the walk-in freezer had black soil. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Also, during the kitchen tour at 9:51 a.m. there was a quart container of egg salad in the [vendor name] double door reach-in refrigerator in the food preparation area. The container of egg salad had a label with a date that was written use by 5/4/24. The egg salad was made on the premises. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) The Kitchen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to control the spread of infection by 1.) failing to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before entering the rooms of residents under transmission based precautions for four residents (#326, #64, #328, and #67) of seven residents with COVID-19 infection in the facility, 2.) failed to ensure staff doffed PPE before exiting the rooms of residents under transmission based precautions for two residents (#328 and #67) of seven residents with COVID-19 infection in the facility, 3.) failed to ensure residents were assisted with hand hygiene before meals during observation of meal service, and 4.) failed to ensure urinary catheters were stored in a sanitary manner for one resident (#30) of one resident sampled for urinary catheter use. Findings included: During a tour of the South unit on 5/6/2024 at 11:30 AM, a call light was observed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0924 — pattern
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to equip corridors with securely affixed handrails on 2 of 3 units of the facility (West and South). Findings included: During a tour conducted on 5/6/2024 at 9:48 AM on the facility's [NAME] unit, a handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed to be loose and not firmly secured to the wall. A tour conducted on 5/6/2024 at 10:59 AM on the facility's South unit revealed the following: - A handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed to be loose and not firmly secured to the wall. - A handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed to be loose and not firmly secured to the wall. - A handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed to be loose and not firmly secured to the wall. An interview was conducted on 5/6/2024 at 11:11 AM with Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on the facility's South unit. Staff I, LPN stated if a maintenance concern was identified on the unit, she would communicate the concern to the Unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain dignity and a homelike dining experience in one (West) of two dining/common areas related to staff not removing dinnerware from trays when serving residents. Findings included: On 5/6/24 at 12:38 p.m. the noon meal service was observed on the [NAME] unit. The observation revealed two tables in the dining/common area with two residents sitting at one table and three residents sitting at the second table, one female resident was sitting in front of the television with an overbed table next to her and one male resident was sitting nearby with an overbed table next to him. The observation revealed one out of three residents at one table was served and the female resident sitting in front of the television was served. The observation revealed on 5/6/24 at 12:40 p.m., the second of the three residents sitting at the table was served and at 12:41 p.m., the male resident sitting in front of the television was served. The continued observation, at 12:42 p.m. showed the third resident was served with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,342 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
• $13,325 — penalty dated 2024-05-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL