Gulfside Health And Rehabilitation Center
1100 N Pine St, Clearwater, FL 33756 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 76 certified beds · (727) 442-7106 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $4,017 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.9% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 10.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 65.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and medical record review, the facility failedto provide one resident (#39) with meals free from ingredients the resident wasallergic to during one of six meals observed. Findings included:On 6/10/2026 at 12:00 p.m. Resident #39 received her lunch meal tray while in her room. She received her lunch meal in a plastic (Styrofoam) container. Resident #39 lifted the lid and the contents included a regular textured alternate meal with chicken, rice, sweet peas and a small dinner roll. Resident #39 stated she did not order the alternate meal and she believed it is expected the kitchen will serve the primary meal unless requested otherwise. Resident #39 stated, It seems the kitchen just cannot get it right with my food, and I did not even get a tray with food at lunch yesterday (6/9/2026). Resident #39 stated she would have eaten the meatloaf, peas and carrots and mashed potatoes that was the primary meal for lunch. Review of Resident #39's meal ticket showed her receiving chicken,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for four (#5, #6, #3, and #7) of four residents in a manner that protected them from falls resulting in injuries. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility's Incident Log, revealed Resident #5 had unwitnessed falls on 9/23/24 at 11:45 p.m. and 9/28/24 at 8:30 p.m. Review of Resident #5's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident's record included admission diagnoses not limited to unspecified severity unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, delirium due to known physiological condition, other encephalopathy, generalized muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #5's Admit/Readmit Screener, dated 9/17/24, revealed the resident was admitted due to Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Altered Mental Status (AMS), and dementia. The evaluation showed the resident was alert to person only, required supervision or touching assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin following an unwitnessed fall for one (#5) out of two residents sampled. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The resident's record included admission diagnoses not limited to unspecified severity unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, delirium due to known physiological condition, other encephalopathy, generalized muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the facility's Incident Log, revealed Resident #5 had unwitnessed falls on 9/23/24 at 11:45 p.m. and 9/28/24 at 8:30 p.m. Review of Resident #5's Situation, Background, Appearance, and Recommendation (SBAR) Change in Condition, dated 9/23/24 at 11:30 p.m. revealed the resident was observe(d) walking across the hall from her room the the [sic]) room across the hall. Resident was seen one minute then she was not seen. When staff walked around the nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provided physician ordered medications to one (Resident #2) of three residents sampled for pharmacy services. Findings included: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Wilson's Disease, autistic disorder, borderline personality disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #2 was discharged from the facility on 1/13/2024. A review of Resident #2's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 12/21/2023 for Lorazepam 1 milligram (mg) by mouth two times a day at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM for anxiety. A review of Resident #2's care plan revealed a focus area, initiated 12/21/2023, Resident #1 used anti-anxiety medications related to a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. Interventions included to administer anti-anxiety medications as ordered by the physician and monitor for side effects and effectiveness every shift. A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-18 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis and / or ensure the accuracy of a PASARR Level I for 4 (#13, #17, #46, #42) of 7 sampled residents with mental health diagnoses Findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Further review of the admission face sheet revealed diagnoses that included but were not limited to, psychosis as of 08/06/2012, recurrent major depression disorder as of 08/06/2012, cerebral vascular accident (CVA) as of 08/06/2012, anxiety as of 08/06/2012, diabetes as of 07/24/2014, vascular dementia as of 02/17/2015, mood disorder as of 08/28/2018, and dementia as of 06/12/2020. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C, Cognitive Patterns showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 (severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and review of the facility's policy titled Use and Storage of Food brought in by Family of Visitors, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one refrigerator (dining area) out of three refrigerators reviewed in the facility. Findings included: An observation on 01/16/24 at 12:12 p.m., revealed a refrigerator designated for residents located in the dining area. The resident refrigerator had a sign on it that stated, Resident Refrigerator Only This refrigerator will be checked every Tuesday any items expired or not dated will be thrown in the trash. On the inside of the resident refrigerator revealed an expired egg nog with an expiration date of 12/23/23, a container of a red substance not labeled or dated and a bag of food items that were not labeled or dated. On the outside of the resident refrigerator showed an empty sleeve with no temperature log available. (photographic evidence obtained) During an interview on 01/16/24 at 12:13 pm., Staff F, Director of Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Residents #29) of three residents sampled for Beneficiary Notice, received Beneficiary Notice when discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay and remained in the facility. Findings Included: Review of documentation provided by the facility's Director of Social Services related to Beneficiary notification for Resident #29 revealed a last covered Medicare Part A Day was 10/27/2023 and he remained in the facility. Documentation on the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form revealed a SNF ABN Form CMS -10055 (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN)) form was not provided to the resident. Continued review of the form revealed a handwritten note under Other Explain which indicated Resident payor source changed on 10/28/2023 and remained in the facility. On 01/17/24 at 11:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). The SSD said she did not really know the beneficiary notices process until the new administrator started. She confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide discharge documentation for two residents (#265, # 61) out of eight residents sampled. Findings Included 1. Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #265 was admitted [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Difficulty in Walking, not elsewhere classified, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, other specified persistent mood disorders, depression, unspecified. Review of Nursing progress note dated 12/22/2023 showed Resident #265 wanted to discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA) and had been informed of the risk. It was noted that he signed all the paperwork and was escorted to the front door with all his belongings. Further clinical record review showed no evidence of Resident #265 AMA paperwork and no physician notification related to the resident leaving the facility AMA. During an interview on 01/18/2024 at 4:21 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON). She confirmed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for one (Resident #8) of fifteen sampled residents. Findings included: During an interview on 01/16/24 at 9:56 a.m., Resident #8 stated she was not a diabetic and did not receive insulin. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #8 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Myelodyplastic Syndrome, Paraplegia, Epilepsy and Cervicalgia. A diagnoses of Diabetes was not noted in the diagnoses information. Review of all current and discontinued physician orders showed insulin was never ordered, or administered, for Resident #8. Review of Resident #8's care plan did not identify a Focus of diabetes mellitus or insulin administration. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section N0350 Insulin showed Resident #8 received seven days of insulin injections. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate upon admission for two (Resident #38 and #47) of fifteen residents sampled for PASRR review. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder and Schizophrenia. A review of Resident #47's PASRR assessment, dated 01/27/23 revealed, under the section titled A. MI (Mental Illness) or suspected MI (check all that apply), the checkbox for the selection Schizophrenia was not checked. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section I-Active Diagnoses showed Resident #42 had diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder, Depression and Schizophrenia. During an interview on 01/18/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services related to 2 of 2 sampled residents (#13 and #49). Resident #13 lacked documentation related to a new diagnoses of melanoma, biopsy, care, and documentation of the characteristics of the wound. Resident #49 lacked follow up regarding need for antibiotics with the physician and Hospice. Findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Further review of the admission face sheet revealed diagnoses that included but were not limited to, psychosis as of 08/06/2012, recurrent major depression disorder as of 08/06/2012, CVA as of 08/06/2012, anxiety as of 08/06/2012, diabetes as of 07/24/2014, vascular dementia as of 02/17/2015, mood disorder as of 08/28/2018, and dementia as of 06/12/2020. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C, Cognitive Patterns showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 (severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care related to pressure ulcer care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#17). The facility failed to document the characteristics of the pressure ulcer in the medical record. Findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Further review of the admission face sheet revealed diagnoses that included but were not limited to paraplegia due to an injury of T7-T10 as of 03/20/2014, Stage IV pressure ulcer on sacrum as of 09/30/2019, contractures of right and left feet and ankles as of 08/18/2021, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition as of 02/28/2023, hypertension as of 11/23/2020, and recurrent major depressive disorder as of 05/21/2020. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C, Cognitive Patterns showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section I, Active Diagnoses showed hypertension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (# 4) was assessed to conduct self- catheterization out of four residents sampled. Finding included: On 01/16/24 at 12:16 p.m., Resident # 4 observed laying down in bed with his call light within his reach and bedside table next to him. Resident was observed with his catheter bag stored in a trash can with two urinals placed on the side of the trash can. The room was observed little cluttered, proper lightening and home like environment. On 01/17/2024 at 3:00 p.m., Resident # 4 observed laying down in bed with his call light within his reach. 12-inch catheter products were observed on the resident nightstand. He said he took his indwelling catheter out yesterday and inserted the 12-inch catheter. His 12 inch catheter products came in that he normally uses, which is easier for him to insert himself. He wishes the facility keeps the 12-inch catheter in stock because they are easier from him to insert instead of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for three (#10, #31, #35) of 6 sampled residents who were administered medications. This resulted in 3 errors of 30 medication administration opportunities for a medication error rate of 10%. Findings included: On 01/16/2024 at 9:45 a.m. Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed performing medication administration for Resident #10. She administered -Oscal 500/200, D-3 milligrams (mg)-unit daily for supplement; -Vitamin B 12 extended release 1000 micrograms (mcg) daily for supplement; -Refresh solution 1.4-0.6%, instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for dry eyes Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed: Lysine 500 mg in the morning for a supplement was documented as given by Staff I. During an interview on 01/18/2023 at 1:45 p.m., Staff I stated that was an error, she did not have any Lysine in the medication cart or facility to give the resident. She did not receive her Lysine that day. The Director of Nursing (DON) verified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of the facility's policy titled Food: Quality and Palatability the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature for one Resident (#48) out of 15 sampled residents reviewed for food services. Findings included: During an interview on 01/16/24 at 10:43 a.m., Resident #48 stated hot food was being served cold. Resident #48 stated dinner on 01/14/24 was cold. The State Surveying Agency (SSA) requested a test tray be placed on the last tray cart leaving the kitchen for 01/17/24 lunch meal. An observation on 01/17/24 at 12:25 p.m., showed the test tray remained on the tray cart until the last resident tray was delivered. The test tray was then removed by Staff F, Food Service Director (FSD) for food temperatures. During an interview on 01/17/24 at 12:25 p.m., Staff F, FSD stated the thermometer had been calibrated and was ready to take food temperatures. Staff F, FSD stated he expected all cold food to be under 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and would expect all hot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed acceptable standards of practice related to infection control including hand hygiene, disinfecting of the glucose monitoring machines, and water testing. Findings included: On 01/16/2024 at 9:55 a.m. Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed performing medication administration for Resident #34. During the medication administration hand sanitizing was not performed. On 01/16/2024 at 10:00 a.m. Staff H, LPN was observed performing medication administration for Resident #50. No hand sanitizing was performed prior to gathering medications, before entering room and none post medication administration. On 01/16/2024 at 11:45 a.m. Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed performing a blood glucose monitoring procedure and insulin injection for Resident #35. Staff H, LPN removed blood glucose monitoring machine and placed it, the container of strips and lancet on top of the medication cart. Staff H applied gloves without hand sanitizing and removed a wipe from the purple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plan for 1 (#13) of 28 sampled residents related to a new diagnoses of Melanoma requiring a biopsy and wound care. Findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Further review of the admission face sheet revealed diagnoses that included but were not limited to, psychosis as of 08/06/2012, recurrent major depression disorder as of 08/06/2012, CVA as of 08/06/2012, anxiety as of 08/06/2012, diabetes as of 07/24/2014, vascular dementia as of 02/17/2015, mood disorder as of 08/28/2018, and dementia as of 06/12/2020. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C, Cognitive Patterns showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 (severe impairment). Section I, Active Diagnoses showed non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident/resident representative interviews, the facility failed to provide requested medical record access, and copies of medical records for one (#2) of two sampled residents. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] as per the admission face sheet. Review of the advance directives revealed resident #2 had a POA (power of attorney) for care and financial decisions, and was confirmed as a family member. Further review of the POA document, revealed it was signed and dated as of 11/11/2022 and signed by the resident, notary public and two witnesses. Further review of the medical record did not indicate any further change of POA status, leading up to Resident #2's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the 10/2/2023 8:30am - SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) note revealed; Shortness Of Breath (SOB) and seems different as usual, talks less. Recommendation to send to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident representative interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide one (#2) of two sampled residents with a Bed Hold Notice, prior to and/or after the resident was transferred to a higher level of care facility. Findings included: On 11/2/2023 during medical record review for Resident #2, the admission record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic nurse notes revealed the following: 1. SBAR (situation, background, assessment and recommendation) note dated 10/2/2023 8:30am- Shortness of Breath and seems different as usual, talks less. Recommendations to send to ED [emergency department] for evaluation. 2. Nurse progress note dated 10/2/2023 8:30am - Resident presented with Shortness of Breath RR [respiratory rate] 22, O2 [oxygen] 65@ 2L/M [liters per minute] via NC [nasal cannula], productive cough, wheezing and rales in lower bilateral lobes. Patient did not respond to verbal stimuli. BP [blood pressure] 86/50 HR [heart rate]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were taken to resolve a grievance for one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed on the facility's grievance process. Findings included: A review of the facility's Grievance Log dated June 2023 showed an entry for Resident #12 dated 06/14/23. The entry showed Resident #12's grievance was about Resident deliveries. The column on the grievance form titled,disposition of grievance was left blank. A review of Resident #12's Grievance Form dated 06/14/23 showed Resident indicted a package was delivered in February and Resident did not receive package. Order was tracked and package was shown to be delivered. This was a wrist blood pressure cuff. The grievance follow up showed, Resident re-ordered a wrist blood pressure cuff back in [DATE]. We cannot reimburse resident, however we could have re-ordered the cuff. During an interview on 08/17/23 at 9:50 a.m., Staff Q Social Service Director (SSD) stated Resident #12's grievance started…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident activities program for three (Residents #14,#15, and #16) of 21 sampled residents was directed by a qualified activities professional. An interview was conducted at 10:01 a.m. on 8/17/23, with the activities director who stated she had worked at the facility for several years as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and was promoted to activities director approximately three months ago. She confirmed she had not taken an approved training course and that the last administrator was supposed to help her sign up for the required training, but did not do so before he left. She stated she participated in resident care plan meetings and documented in the resident records. Record review of the attendance logs for the sampled Residents ( #14, #15, and #16), confirmed she directed resident group and one on one activities; and documented participation at group and one on one activities. Record review of the care plans for the sampled Residents (#14, #15,and #16) confirmed she participated in the activities care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a neurochecks assessment and accurate skin assessments for one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: An observation on 08/17/23 at 10:00 a.m., revealed Resident #12 was sitting in bed and had bruising on her right arm. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During an interview on 08/17/23 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #12 stated she fell a couple nights ago. She stated she got up to go to the bathroom and fell. She stated staff came in and helped her off the floor. Resident #12 stated no one assessed her arm after her fall. She said her bruised arm was sore but her butt where she fell hurt more than her arm. A review of the facility's fall log for [DATE] showed Resident #12 had an unwitnessed fall on 08/14/23 at 6:06 a.m. A review of Resident #12's medical record showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of native coronary artery with unstable angina…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#21 and #16) of twenty-four sampled residents were invited and accommodated with activities that met their interest, and to group activities scheduled during three of three days observed (12/27/2021, 12/28/2021 and 12/29/2021). Findings included: 1. On 12/27/2021 at 10:50 a.m. Resident #21 was observed in her room lying in bed, on top of the covers, dressed for the day and with her eyes closed. An interview on this day at 12:22 p.m. with Resident #21 while in her room revealed her seated in her wheelchair at the bedside. Resident #21 was asked if she attended any out-of-the-room activities and she shook her head side to side indicating, no. Resident #21 explained she was told by staff that she should stay in her room and not attend any group activities due to her health concerns. Resident #21 confirmed she would attend most of the group activities, if she could. Resident #21 explained several staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-10-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and photographic evidence, the facility failed to ensure that one of one walk-in freezers was maintained in a safe operating condition to ensure appropriate food storage. Findings included: On 01/06/21 at 11:08 a.m. a tour of the kitchen with Staff A, [NAME] was conducted. An observation of the facility walk-in refrigerator revealed a door to the walk-in freezer with approximately 10 inches of 1-inch thick ice buildup on the floor of the door of the freezer on the outside. When the freezer door was opened, the door seal area had an approximate 1.5-2 inches of ice buildup on the right side down the length of the door, the top of the door and the left of the door had approximately 1 inch of build up along the seal. The top of the freezer was observed to have frozen droplets of ice throughout. (Photographic Evidence Obtained). An interview was conducted on 01/06/21 at 11:45 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The CDM reviewed the freezer and stated, That must have happened last night. It was not like that yesterday. An interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to promote care in a manner that ensured resident rights were maintained for a dignified existence related to assistance after meals for two residents (#68 and #54) out of 27 sampled residents. Findings included: During a facility tour on 10/12/20 at 11:05 AM, the first observation was made of Resident #68 in bed with wet, reddish liquid on his hospital gown. When asked what was on the gown, Resident #68 reported having spilled breakfast juice on self. Breakfast service for residents started at 7:30 am. On 10/12/20 at 11:10 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), who stated that she was taking care of other residents and had not gotten around to Resident #68. Breakfast service started at 7:30 a.m. An interview was conducted on 10/12/20 at 11:10 AM with Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), who reported that Resident #68 must have spilled juice on self during breakfast. We'll get it cleaned right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#5) out of 27 residents sampled had a comprehensive plan of care developed for smoking. Findings included: On 10/12/20 at 11:49 A.M. Resident#5 was observed going to the smoking patio, he reported that he has been smoking his whole life. Resident #5 was observed smoking on the smoking patio with several other residents and a staff member. When Resident #5 returned from smoking he was asked where his cigarettes were maintained; he reported in the smoking cart and added that all smoking materials are kept in the smoking cart. On 10/12/20 at 1:01 P.M. a second observation was conducted of Resident #5 smoking. The resident was greeted in the smoking patio and was observed smoking. Staff was providing hand sanitizer for the residents. A medical record review was conducted for Resident #5 on 10/12/2020, which revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original date of admission of 4/20/2015.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to review and revise the resident centered care plan related to weight loss and assistance with eating care for one (Resident #51) of twenty-seven sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of protein calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, dementia and hypokalemia. A review of the current nutritional orders for October 2020 for Resident #51 revealed the following: Ready Care 2.0 supplement three times a day 120 milliliters for malnutrition Eldertonic Liquid 15 milliliters three times a day for decreased appetite prior to meals Floor Maintenance Program (FMP) for cueing and encouragement to eat during meals Nutritional treat daily Regular diet regular texture, thin consistency Vitamin D3 400 IU (international unit) two times a day for supplement Protonix for gastro-intestinal prophylaxis Multi-vitamin with minerals two times a day for supplement A review of the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide necessary care and services related to: 1. constipation was not identified and treated for one resident (#27), and 2. the facility did not ensure the physician's order was entered correctly in the electronic medical record, and implemented for one resident (#11) of 27 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 10/12/20 at 11:06 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #27. She said she hadn't had a BM (bowel movement) in a week. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility with a relevant diagnosis of fecal impaction, according to the face sheet in the admission record. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, Section H, Bladder and Bowel, dated 8/23/20, reflected Resident #27 was always incontinent of bowel. A review of the physician orders for October 2020 in the medical record reflected an order dated 8/25/20 for Milk of Magnesia (MOM) Suspension 1200 mg/15 ml (milligram/milliliter) give 30 ml by mouth every 24 hours as needed for constipation. A review the BM record for the last 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to discard expired food in accordance with professional standards for food service. Findings included: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 10/12/20 at 10:00 A.M. with the Registered Dietician (RD). The following was observed: A case of goldfish crackers was observed with an expiration date of 09/13/20, and 3 cans of [Brand Name] Pulled Pork with an expiration date of 12/18/18 . (Photographic Evidence Obtained) An additional tour of the kitchen was conducted on 10/12/20 at 11:46 AM, a plastic bag containing cookies was observed and had a date of 9/22/20. The cookies were in a snack bin that was to be delivered to the units for evening snacks for the residents. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) The RD threw them away. Following this observation, an interview was conducted with the RD, who confirmed that the residents should not consume expired food, and that all expired items would be removed. She added that the food policy indicated employees are to throw out the outdated food items every 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-10-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to implement an appropriate plan of action to correct an identified deficiency, F812, as evidenced by not ensuring food storage practices were implemented in accordance with professional standards; and not training the Certified Dietary Manager to implement the facility plan of correction for appropriate food storage. In addition, the facility had conflicting documentation of QA (Quality Assurance) meetings and attendance. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted on 10/12/20 to 10/15/20, the facility was cited F812, the facility failed to discard expired food in accordance with professional standards for food service. For the plan of correction, the facility included the following corrective actions: An initial audit of food shelves and refrigerators were completed on 10/12/20 and no additional issues were identified. Current dietary staff were educated on ensuring that no expired foods are on shelves, refrigerator, etc. on 10/12/20.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-12-29 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing numbers were posted to reflect the current date for one day (12/27/2021) of three days observed. Findings included: On 12/27/2021 at 8:58 a.m. upon entering the building a sheet of paper, that was hanging on the wall and behind clear plastic, revealed the nurse staffing numbers sheet. The current sheet read: [Name of Facility], date of 12/23/2021, and indicated numbers for nurses and aides for all three shifts to include 11:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m., 7:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m.-11:00 p.m. On 12/29/2021 at 12:17 p.m. an interview with the receptionist, Staff E was obtained. Staff E revealed she was unaware of what the nurse staffing numbers sheet was, but usually the Staffing Coordinator completes the sheet on the wall and posts it daily. On 12/29/2021 at 12:22 p.m. an interview with the Staff F, Staffing Coordinator revealed she was responsible for updating and posting the nurse staffing numbers sheet daily. She revealed when she was not at the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$4,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-01-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105634. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-01-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.