Jackson Memorial Perdue Medical Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 163 beds and averages 151.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.97 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.56 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety and prevent bodily injury for one Resident (#1) out of 3 sampled residents and is determined to be at a level of harm, as evidenced by: Resident #1 sustaining first and second degree burns from hot coffee being spilled on the chest and abdominal area of his body. There were 153 residents residing at the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation on 09/09/2024; starting at 8:07 AM with the Director of Hospital Operations, Dietary Manager and Director of Nutrition of the Pantry rooms beginning with the South Station Pantry, East Station Pantry, and lastly the North Station Pantry. The coffee and hot water temperatures in the three pantries were checked using a digital thermometer. The results were: South Pantry-1 Coffee Pot, 1 Hot Water Pot Hot water-146.6 Fahrenheit (F) Hot coffee -162.6 F East Pantry-1 Coffee Pot, 1 Hot Water Pot Hot Water-123.8 F Hot Coffee-149 F North Station- 2 Coffee Pots, 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F689Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide an environment as free of accident hazards as possible for one (Resident # 45) out of two sampled residents who smoke as evidenced by observation of cigarettes and a lighter on the wheelchair in the room of Resident #45. There were 14 residents listed as smokers residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include:Observation on 04/27/2026 at 8:15 AM revealed Resident # 45 in bed with no apparent distress; there was a wheelchair positioned before Resident # 45's bed. Two boxes of cigarettes were on wheelchair's cushion and a lighter below the wheelchair's cushion.Record review of Resident # 45's clinical records the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: Muscle weakness.Record review of Resident #45's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) reference dated 04/01/2026 revealed Resident # 45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate accounting of controlled substances on one of three medication carts reviewed as evidenced by two inaccurate controlled substance records identified for the North Wing's Red Medication Cart. The facility had a total of six medication carts at the time of survey.The findings included:On 04/27/2026 at 11:00 AM, during a medication cart check and narcotic accounting review conducted with Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) on the North Wing's Red Medication Cart the following narcotic accounting discrepancies.Review of Resident #97's narcotic accounting log for Tramadol Hydrochloride (HCL) 50 milligram (mg) tablet by mouth every 12 hours for non-acute pain documented 22 tablets remaining. However, the medication bingo card had 21 pills (photo). Review of Resident #109's narcotic accounting log for balance of 52 Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 5 per 325mg tablets via gastric tube every 12 hours for nonacute pain recorded 52. However, the medication bingo card had 51 pills (photo). On 04/27/2026 at 11:13…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were wearing a beard restraint. This has the potential for hair to come in contact with food.The findings included:Record review of the Personal Appearance and Conduct Restraint Policy and Procedure (reviewed 06/11/2025) documented the following: Purpose: To establish standards for nutrition services employees that promote neat appearance that will ensure efficient, safe and sanitary operations in the preparation and service of the food consumed by all residents, staff and guests in the facility; Procedure: 1) Employees working in the Nutrition Services Department wear hairnets or coverings that cover all of the hair.Second observation of the kitchen on 04/29/2026 at 10:56 AM revealed Staff A, [NAME] with a beard and not wearing a beard guard. He was taking temperatures of food items on the lunch tray line.Interview with Staff A, [NAME] on 04/29/2026 at 11:08 AM. He confirmed that he was not wearing a beard guard and he was supposed to have one on.Observation of Staff B, Food Service…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Activities (QAPI/QAA) failed to demonstrate an effective plan of action to correct repeated deficiencies in the problem area as evidenced by repeated deficient practices for F0689-Free of Accident and Hazards/Supervision/Devices and F0867; QAPI/QAA improvement activities. There were 147 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited for F689 and F867 during the recertification and Re-licensure survey with an exit date of October 24, 2024. Review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee Meeting Sign-in Sheets dated 02/17/2026, 03/17/2026 and 04/21/2026 revealed the facility had a QAA Committee meet monthly and attendees included: Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing (DON), other department heads and staff members. During an interview on 04/30/26 at 2:45 PM with the Administrator stated, On 04/30/2026 at 2:26 PM The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F656 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans related to the facility failed to implement interventions of place bilateral floor mats by the bed for Resident # 78 and Resident #151 and F689 Free of Accidents Hazards/ Supervision/Devices related to the facility failure to ensure the safety measures were implemented for Resident #78, and Resident #151. there were 154 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated July 13, 2023. F656 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans was cited related to failure to implement care plan interventions related to bleeding precautions for two residents (Resident # 89, and Resident # 93) and the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan related to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #158) out of 31 residents reviewed for resident assessments. As evidenced by inaccurate coding of MDS section for Discharge Status for Resident #158. The facility census was 154 residents at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of Resident #158's Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section for Identification Information in subsection for Discharge Status documented that the resident was discharged to an Acute Hospital. Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for July 2024 revealed Resident #158 had orders that included but not limited to: Discharge to ALF (Assisted Living Facility), once until 07/24/2024. Review of nurses' progress notes for Resident #158 documented on 07/24/2024 timestamped 12:40: Resident d/c (discharged ) to ALF at 1240 via transport. Resident left via transport. Resident left with w/c, (wheelchair). 0900 all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #158) out of 31 residents reviewed for resident assessments. As evidenced by inaccurate coding of MDS section for Discharge Status for Resident #158. The facility census was 154 residents at the time of the survey. The findings included: Review of the medical records for Resident #158 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Atrial Fibrillation. Resident #158 was discharged on 07/24/2024. Record review of Resident #158's Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section for Identification Information in subsection for Discharge Status documented that the resident was discharged to an Acute Hospital. Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for July 2024 revealed Resident #158 had orders that included but not limited to: Discharge to ALF (Assisted Living Facility), once until 07/24/2024. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to falls for two out of four residents reviewed (Resident #78 and Resident #151). As evidenced by, during several observations Resident #78 and #151 were in bed with only one fall mat on the floor of each resident's bedside. The findings Included: 1) Observation on 10/22/24 at 10:00 AM; Resident #78 was asleep in bed, one floor mat noted on floor next to the bed's right side. Observation on 10/23/24 at 08:02 AM; Resident #78 was asleep in bed, breakfast tray on overbed table, one floor mat noted on floor next to the bed's right side. Review of Resident #78's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Essential (primary) hypertension and Unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #78's Physician Order Sheets for October 2024 revealed orders that included but not limited to: Low bed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safety measures were implemented for two vulnerable residents (Resident #78 and Resident #151) out of four residents reviewed for falls. As evidenced by, during several observations Resident #78 and Resident #151 were observed in bed with only one floor mat (fall mats) on the floor of the residents' bedside. The findings Included: 1) Observation on 10/22/24 at 10:00 AM; Resident #78 was asleep in bed, one floor mat noted on floor next to the bed's right side. Observation on 10/23/24 at 08:02 AM; Resident #78 was asleep in bed, breakfast tray on overbed table, one floor mat noted on floor next to the bed's right side. Review of Resident #78's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Essential (primary) hypertension and Unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #78's Physician Order Sheets for October 2024 revealed orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy procedure of less than 5% resulting in a of 6.25% medication error rate out of 31 opportunities; as evidenced by an observations of an inappropriate administration of a chewable form of aspirin, an omission of a magnesium 100 mg (milligram) capsule, and administration of insulin without providing privacy while another resident was in the room. There were 154 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 10/22/24 at 9:46 AM a medication administration observation was completed with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) on Medication Cart number two, in The South Wing Nursing Unit for Resident#107. Staff A, RN verified physician's orders and placed pills into one medication cup which included a chewable form of Aspirin 81 mg tablet. Staff A, RN did not place a prescribed Magnesium 100 mg capsule into medication cup and when asked the reason, Staff A, RN stated, The Magnesium 100 mg capsule was not in the medication cart and the pharmacy is aware and has not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$28,045 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-09-10
• $20,027 — penalty dated 2024-09-10
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-30 for 30 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $417K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL