Cascades Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 590 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 224 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 97.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and observations, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect when it failed to provide the required structures and processes to maintain and secure the exit doors to meet the needs of residents, for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1). The deficient practice allowed Resident #1 to leave the facility through an unlocked exit door on 09/12/24 between 4:00 AM and 5:00 AM. Resident #1 wheeled himself in his wheelchair to the facility's loading dock, where he fell and was seriously injured. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital. There were eighty-nine residents in the facility at the time of the survey. The facility's administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy and was given the Immediate Jeopardy Templates on 12/05/24 at 6:22 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed at the time of the facility exit on 12/06/24. Cross reference to F689. The findings included: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Revision date:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and observations, the facility failed to provide supervision and a secure environment to prevent 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1), from exiting the safety of the facility and subsequently experiencing a fall with serious injuries. The deficient practice occurred on 9/12/24 between 4:00 AM and 5:00 AM. While in his wheelchair, Resident #1, exited out an unlocked exit door at the end of the 400-Hallway, on the north side of the facility. Resident #1 then wheeled himself down a concrete walkway to the loading dock where there was a set of three steps. Resident #1 fell down the steps with his wheelchair where he suffered serious injuries to his cervical (neck) spine (vertebrae). Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital via ambulance. There were eighty-nine residents in the facility at the time of the survey. The facility's Administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy and was given the Immediate Jeopardy Templates on 12/05/24 at 6:22 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen as evidenced by closure by the county health department, due to uncleanliness and pest control issues. The findings included: 1). During an inspection by the Department of Health, on 12/11/25, the following were noted: *One live roach was observed in the multi-function oven.*Two egg cases were observed in the multi-function oven. 2). During a second inspection by the Department of Health, on 12/12/25, the following were noted: *Seven live roaches were observed in a floor stand mixer.*Two live roaches were observed in a Cambro unit.*Two live roaches were observed behind the reach in cooler next to the exit door of the kitchen. *One live roach was observed in the dish washing area.*Two live roaches were observed at the tilt skillet.*One live roach was observed on the wall behind the tilt skillet.*Two live roaches were observed on a 2-burner pot stove.*One dead roach was observed inside of the paper towel dispenser. 3). During a tour of the pantry on the 400 unit,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow appropriate interventions for resident at risk for elopement for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement, with the potential to affect 5 residents at risk for elopement (Resident #85).The findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Elopement and Wandering revised on 01/01/25 revealed the following: 1. A situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision, if necessary, would be considered an elopement. 2. Each incapacitated resident will be assessed for wandering and elopement upon admission, re-admission, and whenever an elopement attempt or new wandering behavior is observed or identified. Assessments are also done quarterly and annually.Record review revealed Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] to the memory care unit. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy and hypertensive urgency. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to provide appropriate Perineal Care to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) for 1 of 1 resident observed for Perineal care (Resident #2). Findings included: The facility's policy titled Perineal Care, date February 2018, included: For a female resident .it states Wash perineal area, wiping from front to back. Subitem (1) documented Separate the labia and wash area downward from front to back. Subitem (2) documented Continue to wash the perineum moving from inside outward to the thighs. Rinse perineum thoroughly in same direction, using fresh water and a clean washcloth. On 12/03/24 at 10:00 AM an observation was made of Perineal Care for Resident #2. At the time of the observation, Infection Notes documented that Resident #2 was being treated for a Urinary Tract Infection. The observation was as follows: The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provided dignity and privacy to the resident by closing the door and drawing the curtains. The CNA placed her supplies, which were in a plastic bag, on the overbed table.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for: 2 of 4 Residential Units (Gulfstream & Garden), public/staff rest rooms (2), soiled utility rooms ( 4 of 4 ), main dining room, and skilled therapy room. The findings included: 1) During the initial resident screenings conducted by the surveyors on 06/3-4/24, and the Environment Tour Conducted on 06/06/24 at 10 AM with the Maintenance Supervisor, the following were noted: * Gardens Unit: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Electrical box loose and falling out of the wall behind the resident's bed, 2 of 6 dresser drawers not closing properly, and wall mounted lamp broken and falling from wall. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Privacy curtain too short to promote resident dignity/privacy, 2 pull knobs missing from bathroom drawer, a/c door requires re-caulking, and room windows soiled and in need of cleaning. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Privacy curtain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included: 1) During the initial Kitchen/Food Service Observation Tour conducted on 06/03/24 at 9 AM and accompanied with the Corporate Food Service Director (CFSD), the following were noted: (a) The door gasket of Walk-in refrigerator #1 was noted to have a large tear. It was discussed with the CFSD that the large tear could result in an inappropriate internal temperature. (b)The entrance of walk-in refrigerator #1 noted that there was a large area (3' X 6') of peeling paint. It was discussed with the CFSD that peeling chips of paint could result in food contamination . (c) The ceiling area around the internal motor of the walk-in refrigerator #1 was noted to be covered with a thick layer of dust and dirt. it was discussed with the CFSD that the dust/dirt could result in food contamination. (d) Observation of the walk-in freezer noted that foods were not properly covered for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to a sanitary soiled utility room [ROOM NUMBER] of 4, and failed to have a designated clean area area in the laundry room. The findings included: 1. A tour of the facility's soiled utility rooms (4) was conducted on 06/06/24 at 11:00 AM with the Regional Nurse Consultant. All four soiled utility rooms contained biohazard containers that were uncovered revealing used sharp containers (used needles) and biohazard bags. [NAME] substance was observed on the walls and ceilings, and the light fixtures were soiled with dirt and debris. 2. A tour of the laundry room revealed a dirty glove on the clean folding table in direct contact of clean clothes. There was no designated clean area as the soiled laundry was sorted directly next to the washers and the soiled laundry cart was stored on the other side of the 4 commercial washers. The laundry baskets were observed dirty with debris on the inside bottom of the cart. The ceiling vents located directly above the clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately respond to allegations of sexual assault in 1 of 1 sampled resident for sexual assault (Resident #33). The findings included: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15. Resident #33 was care planned for being alert and oriented x 2 (to person and place) and impaired cognitive function/dementia, inattention, and forgetfulness. Record review revealed a progress note dated 05/28/24 at 3:57 PM that documented: Resident was visited by SW (Social Worker) today to discuss grievance with another resident. Staff member saw male resident touched her inner thigh and attempt to put hand up blouse. Resident is confused and unaware of the incident. Resident was evaluated/checked by nursing staff. SW contact family to make her aware and also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discontinue a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PICC line (Resident #67). The findings included: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Osteomyelitis (infection of the bone). A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Record review revealed an order for Intravenous (IV) antibiotics daily dated 04/19/24 to start 04/20/24 until 05/24/24. An interview was conducted with Resident #67 and his spouse on 06/03/24. Resident #67's spouse stated the resident had finished his antibiotics 10 days ago, and still had the PICC line in place. The spouse stated she had requested the IV to be discontinued a few times for fear of an infection and it had not been done. The spouse stated she again requested the IV to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment as ordered to 2 of 2 residents reviewed for assistive devices, Residents #5 and 15. The findings included: The facility's policy, 'Assistance with Meals', revised March 2022, documented: Residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. Residents who may benefit from Assistive Devices: 1. Adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) will be provided for residents who need or request them. These may include devices such as silverware with enlarged/padded handles, plate guards, and/or specialized cups. 2. Assistance will be provided to ensure than residents can use and benefit from special eating equipment and utensils. 3. Residents may choose not to use adaptive devices. 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-17 · tag F0924 — widespread
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents had access to handrails in 4 of 5 units of the facility (Garden, Poinciana, Cobblestone, & Gulfstream). The findings included: Observations conducted on 03/12/23 to 03/14/23 from 9:00 AM to 12:20 PM revealed that all handrails at the facility were removed. The facility was undergoing renovation. Further inquiries revealed that out of five units at the facility, four were residents occupied, and none of the four units had handrails affixed or secured on the walls. During an interview with the Administrator on 03/14/23 at 3:28 PM, he informed that the repairs had started on February 14, 2023. The facility's objectives were to replace the light fixtures, to repaint the walls, and replace the handrails. He said that they were currently in the process of repainting and replacing the wall papers. The painting should take about two to three weeks, he added. The light fixture upgrades were completed. He also reported that all residents were notified by mail or during the resident council…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,780 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $29,780 — penalty dated 2024-12-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL