The Terrace Of Delray Beach Nursing And Rehabilita

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 150 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for residents prescribed psychotropic medications for 4 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review affecting Residents #4, #14, #87, #129. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), with a reviewed/revised date of 02/05/25 included in part the following: A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. Prior to initiating or increasing a psychotropic medication, the resident, family, and/or resident representative must be informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives for the medication, including any black box warnings for antipsychotic medications, in advance of such initiation or increase. The resident has the right to accept or decline the initiation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to allow residents to have consistent access to a functional telephone for communication with family members or an accessible television remote control to support personal choice and self-directed activities, for 1of 2 sampled residents, Resident #12.The findings included:Review of Resident #12's medical record documented the following diagnoses: Dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Poly-osteoarthritis; Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, Drug-induced pancytopenia; Muscle wasting and atrophy, and abnormal posture.Review of Resident #12's comprehensive care plan indicated the resident was assessed as able to communicate leisure needs and preferences, preferred a balance of social and independent activities, and was expected to remain engaged in leisure activities of choice. The plan directed staff to encourage in-room leisure activities, including television viewing and telephone or video communication with family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide showers per resident request for 1of 5 sampled residents reviewed for choices, Resident #87. The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Anxiety, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) End of Prospective Payment System (PPS) Part A stay dated 01/06/26 revealed Resident #87 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 01/26/26 at 11:29 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #87, who was asked about bathing preferences. The resident stated he thought he had one shower since he had been in the facility and he would like more, but they won't give him showers.Record review revealed physician orders for a shower on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays on 3-11 (3PM - 11 PM shifts).An interview was conducted with Staff B,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow resident's preferences for incontinence care for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Resident #73. The findings included: Record review for Resident #73 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Encounter for Palliative Care, Anxiety Disorder, Hemorrhoids, Constipation, Crohn's Disease of Large Intestine without Complications, Restlessness and Agitation. Review of Resident #73's Physician's orders revealed apply barrier cream to sacrum area and to Turn and Position every 2-3 hours as indicated, every shift AND as needed. Review of Section C of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of Section GG documented Resident #73 required substantial assistance for toileting hygiene and Section H…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate and implement structured activities for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities, Resident #13.The findings included:Review of the clinical record documented Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 5, indicating cognition was severely impaired. The resident's diagnoses included Dementia and Major Depressive Disorder. On 01/26/26 at 11:10 AM, Resident #13 was observed alone in her room with a stuffed animal and two pillows positioned on either side of her body. The television was turned off. Upon interview, as the surveyor prepared to exit the room, Resident #13 made a prayer request to the surveyor. On 01/26/26 at 2:51 PM, Resident #13 was again observed alone in her room with no stimulation other than a doll. She was noted to express herself fluently in a foreign language. The bedroom door was closed, and although the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0914 — pattern
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy curtains for residents in 14 resident rooms (Rooms 121-133) for Bed A, which is closest to the door, and affecting 2 of 2 sampled Residents #40 and #77. The findings included: During an initial tour on 07/28/24 at 9:39 AM, the surveyor observed that Residents #77, residing nearest the door (Bed A), did have no privacy curtains. On 07/29/24 at 11:28 AM, the surveyor observed that Resident #40, residing by the door, did not have privacy curtains. On 07/30/24 at 12:07 PM, the surveyor observed Staff K, RN (Registered Nurse), providing tube feeding to Resident #40. The nurse stated, I'd pull the privacy curtain, but there is no privacy curtain. During an interview on 07/30/24 at 2:45 PM, the spouse of Resident #40 stated the privacy curtain has been missing for many months. The spouse explained, 'the curtain was there for about two years and then all of a sudden one day it was gone.' Another tour was completed on 07/31/24 at 11:00 AM with the Maintenance Director and Regional Maintenance Director. It was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of showers as per facility schedule for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #48. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating he had minimal cognitive impairment. Review of the record lacked any evidence of the provision of showers. A progress note dated 04/04/24 at 9:21 AM documented to please have the resident sit in his wheelchair after his shower one time a day every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. This note also documented if the resident refused to get a shower to phone the resident's significant other / power of attorney (POA), and the phone number was provided. A care plan initiated 01/11/23 documented Resident #48 did reject care, including showers, but lacked the newer intervention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff awareness and implementation of DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) status for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #70. The findings included: Review of the Policy, titled, Communication of Code Status, Implemented 05/01/24, documented, in part, it is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information. 1. The facility will follow facility policy regarding a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an Advance Directive. 2. When an order is written pertaining to a resident's presence or absence of an Advance Directive, the directions will be clearly documented in designated sections of the medical record. Examples of directions to be documented include, but are not limited to: a. Full Code b. Do Not Resuscitate c. Do Not Intubate d. Do not Hospitalize 3. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and comfortable environment for the residents as evidenced by the environment not being homelike, carts broken and wheelchairs in disrepair, on the 100 and 200 units. The finding included: 1. During an initial tour on 07/28/24 of the resident's rooms, observations revealed the following: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom has paint peeling on the wall underneath the soap dispenser. The grout around the toilet was brown and not white. b. room [ROOM NUMBER]A - the sitting chair in the room had a large stain in the middle of the seat as well as a couple of tears on the seat. c. the Linen Cart on hallway 100 was observed to be broken. 2. The following wheelchairs were observed to have torn arm rests: room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B room [ROOM NUMBER]-A room [ROOM NUMBER]-B room [ROOM NUMBER]-B room [ROOM NUMBER]-A. Photographic Evidence Obtained. 3. A secondary tour was completed on 07/31/24 at 11:30 AM with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were provided for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #54. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Restorative Nursing Programs, implemented on 05/01/24, documented, in part, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 10. A resident's Restorative Nursing Plan will include: . c. Frequency of activities d. Duration of activities . 12. Restorative aides will implement the plan for a designated length of time, performing the activities, and documenting on the Restorative Aide Documentation Form. Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility 05/23/23. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #54 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This same MDS also documented the resident received 1 day of restorative therapy services during the 7 day look…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL