No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At North Florida

6700 NW 10th Place, Gainesville, FL 32605 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (352) 331-3111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse7 immediate-jeopardy citations$236,166 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $236,166 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-29)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6801 NW 9th Blvd · (352) 331-3401 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
7520 W Newberry Rd · (352) 333-7916 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7114 W University Ave
Park
5480 SW 1st Ave. · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.3%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%14.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.1%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.9%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.5%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.3%9.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.012.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.191.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.3%CMS range 34.9–69.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.1–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 4.9–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
60.5%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.8 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-05)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 reviewed licensed practical nurses (Staff H, and Staff J) had the specific competency requirements as part of their license and certification to administer IV (intravenous) medications, and 4 of 6 reviewed licensed practical nurses (Staff A, Staff B, Staff E, and Staff G) failed to follow the policy/procedure related to IV medication administration, physician notification, and obtaining stat [derived from the Latin word statim, meaning immediately] orders for medication and equipment for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous antibiotic medication (Residents #1, #3, and #4), the facility failed to ensure 4 of 6 licensed practical nurses (Staff A, Staff B, Staff J, and Staff L) failed to follow physician-ordered parameters for blood pressure medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #2). The facility failure to ensure the nursing staff had appropriate IV (intravenously) certification to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from medical neglect by failing to ensure staff implemented the policies and procedures for medication administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication administration (Resident #1). The facility failure to ensure residents were free from medical neglect by failing to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when the residents were not administered the prescribed antibiotics per the physician order and failure to ensure the nursing staff had appropriate IV (intravenously) certification to administer IV medications and follow the policy/procedure related to medication administration, physician notification, obtaining stat [derived from the Latin word statim, meaning immediately] orders for medication and equipment, resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with physician orders for Vancomycin 1500 mg IV every 8 hours intravenously for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when the facility failed to ensure residents were administered physician ordered antibiotics for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication (Resident #1). The facility failure to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when the residents were not administered the prescribed antibiotics per the physician order resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with physician orders for Vancomycin 1500 mg IV every 8 hours intravenously for infection (osteomyelitis, an infection in the bone). On 9/8/2025 at approximately 10:00 PM, Resident #1 was administered one incorrect dose of Vancomycin 1000 mg. Resident #1 was not administered any further doses of Vancomycin 1500 mg until 9/12/2025 at 12:00 AM. Resident #1 missed 8 doses of Vancomycin between 9/9/2025 and 9/12/2025. On 9/11/2025, Resident #1 began to experience a change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from medical neglect by failing to implement the policies and procedures for neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for insulin administration. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1 had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he was refusing medications until he received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00 AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood glucose or address the need for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) contacted the facility, spoke with Staff B, LPN, who instructed EMS the resident did not need help. Again at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure residents who required insulin administration received treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to notify and immediately consult with the resident's physician when a resident suffered elevated blood glucose levels. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1 had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he was refusing medications until he received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00 AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood glucose or address the need for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) contacted the facility, spoke with Staff B,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and review of policies and procedures, the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of each resident by failing to implement policy and procedures for medical neglect and resident change of condition. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1 had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he was refusing medications until he received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00 AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood glucose or address the need for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30 PM, Emergency Medical Services (EMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop, and implement an effective performance improvement plan (PIP) when investigating neglect, change of condition, notification of providers and not following physician orders for Resident #1, placing all 27 residents who were prescribed long and short acting insulin at risk. On 10/6/2024 at 6:00 AM, Resident #1 had a blood sugar value of 552 and the on-call provider was notified of the value and the resident stated he was refusing medications until he received the proper insulin. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), did not communicate to Staff B, LPN or transcribe the new orders into the medical record for the increase in insulin and the addition of sliding scale insulin coverage. Staff B, LPN, assumed care of Resident #1 at 7:00 AM on 10/6/2024 and did not follow up with the provider. Staff B, LPN, did not reassess Resident #1's blood glucose or address the need for any orders. Resident #1 called 911 at approximately 6:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe use of a mechanical lift for 2 (Resident #4 and #13) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: During an observation on 6/2/2026 at 8:42 AM Resident #4 was lying on his bed on top of a Hoyer pad. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was standing on the right side of the resident's bed with a mechanical lift. The mechanical lift hand bags were observed to be over the resident. No other staff member was in the room. During an interview on 6/2/2026 at 8:47 AM, Staff K, CNA, stated, I was weighing [Resident #4's name]. Normally for weights, it is only one person using the Hoyer lift. Review of Resident #4 care plan undated documented, Hoyer lift with 2 asst [assist]. During an interview on 6/4/2026 at 10:19 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, When using the Hoyer lift, staff know it is two people at all times. They know that. That is the policy that they need two. It has been two person assist for years and they know that. I don't know why they would say that [staff verbalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for oxygen and nebulizer treatments for 4 (Resident #29, #55, #56 and #88) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 9:41 AM Resident #56 was sitting up in bed. Oxygen was being administered via nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was dated 5/22. [photographic evidence obtained] During an observation on 6/2/2026 at 8:10 AM Resident #56 was lying in bed with eyes closed. Oxygen was being administered via nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. Tubing was dated 5/22. Review of Resident #56's physician order dated 4/2/2026 read, Respiratory: Oxygen-Continuous 4L nasal cannula. During an interview on 6/3/2026 at 11:40 AM, Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed resident was being administered oxygen and tubing was dated 5/22. During an interview on 6/3/2026 at 11:41 AM, Staff J, LPN, stated, The oxygen tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration between the facility and the dialysis provider for 2 of 3 residents [Resident #8 and Resident #82] reviewed for dialysis services. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #8's admission record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included hemiplegia, affecting left nondominant side, and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #8's physician order dated 12/14/2025 reads, Hemodialysis - Dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, & Saturday [name of dialysis provider]; Pickup time 6:00 a.m. chair time is 7:00 a.m. During an interview on 06/03/2026 at 10:24 AM, Staff H, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, We communicate with the dialysis nurses via a communication book, and we can report pertinent issues in the book. LPN provided Resident #8's dialysis communication book to the surveyor. Review of Resident #8's Hemodialysis Communication Record dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment by effectively preventing and controlling pest activity. Multiple live pests were observed on two out of four hallways and in common areas in the facility. Residents voiced complaints regarding recurring pest sightings, creating an environment with the potential to adversely affect resident health, safety, dignity, and quality of life. Findings include: During an interview on 6/01/2026 at 9:45 AM, Resident #79 stated that he often saw live roaches in his room. Even though the facility had pest control, they still had roaches. During an observation on 6/01/2026 at 9:45 AM a live small brown pest was observed on the floor next to resident #79's bed. (photographic evidence) During an observation of Resident #96's room on 6/01/2026 at approximately 9:35 AM, there were a couple of feet of loose baseboard on the wall behind his bed. (photographic evidence) During an observation on 06/01/2026 at 10:35 AM, Two live, brown insects approximately one half to one inch long, with oval shaped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately to reflect the resident's status for 4 (Resident #3, #15, #19, and #56) of 13 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled Medicare 5 Day dated 5/7/2026 Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs did not document oxygen use. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 4/28/2026 read, Oxygen As Needed PRN [as needed] 2L [liters] nasal cannula every 24 hours as needed 2L PRN. Review of Resident #3's Weights and Vital Summary for Oxygen Saturation documented on 5/7/2026 at 09:14 [9:14 AM] oxygen saturation was 97 % (oxygen via nasal cannula), on 5/7/2026 at 1:45 [1:45AM] oxygen saturation was 98% (oxygen via nasal cannula), on 5/6/2026 at 14:42 [2:42PM] oxygen saturation was 97% (oxygen via nasal cannula), on 5/5/2026 at 08:36 [8:36AM] oxygen saturation was 97% (oxygen via nasal cannula), on 5/5/2026 at 1:27 [1:27AM] oxygen saturation was 98% (oxygen via nasal cannula), on 5/4/2026 at 00:22 [12:22AM]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for oxygen and resident behaviors for 1 (Resident #113) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory services.Findings include:During an observation on 6/01/2026 at 10:23 AM Resident #113 was lying in bed. Oxygen was being administered at 3 liters via nasal cannula.During an observation on 6/02/2026 at 10:48 AM Resident #113 was lying in bed with eyes closed resting calmly. Oxygen was being administered at 3 liters via nasal cannula.Review of Resident #113's physician order dated 5/4/2026 read, Respiratory: Oxygen-3L [liters] Continuous.Review of Resident #113's physician order dated 5/5/2026 read, Respiratory: Oxygen- 3L Continuous, nasal cannula.Review of Resident #113's physician order dated 5/22/2026 read, Respiratory: Oxygen- 4L Continuous.Review of Resident #113's Baseline Care Plan and Summary dated 5/4/2026 read, Other Services/Orders: O2 [oxygen].Review of Resident #113's care plan reviewed on 6/03/2026 did not document a focus for respiratory services or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed for 1 Resident (Resident #97) out of 3 residents reviewed to ensure a dermatology appointment was scheduled resulting in a 3-month delay for a facial skin growth. Findings Include:During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 10:41 AM Resident #97 was walking with walker down the hall back to his room. Resident has a raised red growth on left side of chin midline between ear and mouth. A part of the growth is hanging from the chin and was tangled with the resident's long hair. (photographic evidence)During an interview on 6/1/2026 at 10:43 AM, Resident #97 states, I have this growth on the left side of my chin, and the nurse practitioner wants it taken off. It is benign.During an interview on 6/4/2026 at 1:00 PM, Consultant stated, [Name of Health Plan](I SNP - type of Medicare advantage) was selected by the patient. It is a program that helps to reduce costs, and they make appointments for Residents.During an interview on 6/4/2026 at 3:12 PM, Resident #97 stated, It is growing and I need to see a dermatologist. (photographic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and document weekly weights for 1 Resident (Resident #13) out of 3 Residents reviewed for food and nutrition to ensure maintenance of acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Findings include: During an interview via phone on 06/03/2026 at 2:57 PM, Staff E, Regional Registered Dietician, stated, [Resident #13's Name] came in from the hospital with tube feeding and a diet. He doesn't eat much; we tried cutting back on his tube feedings, but he lost weight. I provide a list of residents I want weekly weights done on. I am there once a week and meet with the IDT(interdisciplinary team), Administrator and the DON (director of nursing); we work as a team. I will then reassess and check it monthly to see how he is doing and talk to the staff. He has been eating a lot of snacks brought in by the family. I think that is why he has gained weight.Review of Resident #13's Physician Order dated 03/19/2026, reads, Weigh Weekly d/t (due to) significant weight change.Review of Resident #13's weights: 05/29/2026 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately document treatments ordered for 1 (Resident #112) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions.Findings include:Review of Resident #112's physician order dated 4/6/2026 read, Soak daily in Epsom salt for 14 days and apply triple antibiotic ointment to great toe.Review of Resident #112's Medication Administrator record for the month of April 2026 did not documented Soaks in Epsom salt or triple antibiotic ointment to the great toe.Review of Resident #112's Treatment Administrator record for the month of April 2026 did not documented Soaks in Epsom salt or triple antibiotic ointment to the great toe.During an interview on 6/3/2026 at 1:57 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, I know there was an order for [Resident #112's name], but it was not documented. I looked at the treatment records and was not able to find it. I did speak to staff and they say they did provide care.During an interview on 6/3/2026 at 2:00 PM, Staff L ,Licensed Practical Nurse, stated, I saw nursing providing the treatment. The Epsom salt is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative and physician of changes in condition for low blood pressures for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for changes in condition (Resident #2).Findings include: Review of Resident #2's admission record documented diagnoses to include pneumonia, unspecified organism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (an increase in the severity of an illness), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide levels in the blood), low back pain unspecified, cognitive communication deficit, other malaise, muscle weakness generalized, orthopnea (shortness of breath that occurs when lying down), dehydration, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hyperlipidemia unspecified (high cholesterol), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), and hypercalcemia (high calcium levels in the blood).Review of Resident #2's vitals documented a blood pressure (B/P) of 83/61 mmhg (millimeters of mercury) on 6/9/2025 at 2217 (10:17 PM), a B/P of 80/56 mmhg on 6/10/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure midline and central venous access device dressings and flushing were completed according to professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous therapy (Residents #3 and #4).Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's admission record documented an admission date of 9/25/2025 with diagnoses to include other acute osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone) left ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, acquired absence of left leg below knee, depression unspecified, and unspecified sequela of cerebral infarction (a stroke).Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 10/2/2025 read, May place midline [a midline catheter] for IV [intravenous] antibiotics with Lidocaine if needed.Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 10/3/2025 read, Change dressing on admission or 24 hours after insertion and weekly thereafter and PRN [as needed]. Change dressing as needed and every day shift every Tue [Tuesday] Change dressing weekly.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered parameters were followed related to hypertensive medications, resulting in the administration of unnecessary medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #2).Findings include:Review of Resident #2's admission record documented diagnoses to include pneumonia, unspecified organism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (an increase in the severity of an illness), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide levels in the blood), low back pain unspecified, cognitive communication deficit, other malaise, muscle weakness generalized, orthopnea (shortness of breath that occurs when lying down), dehydration, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hyperlipidemia unspecified (high cholesterol), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), and hypercalcemia (high calcium levels in the blood).Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 4/25/2025 read, Metoprolol Tartare Oral Tablet 25 mg [milligram] (Metoprolol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of medical records for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for intravenous therapy documentation (Residents #1, #2, and #3).Findings include:1. Review of Resident #2's admission record documented diagnoses that include pneumonia, unspecified organism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (an increase in the severity of an illness), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide levels in the blood), low back pain unspecified, cognitive communication deficit, other malaise, muscle weakness generalized, orthopnea (shortness of breath that occurs when lying down), dehydration, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hyperlipidemia unspecified (high cholesterol), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), and hypercalcemia (high calcium levels in the blood).Review of Resident #2's physician order dated 6/13/2025 read, Please insert PIV [Peripheral Intravenous] for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that adequate pain management was provided for 2 residents (Resident #2, #9) of 3 residents that were prescribed opioid pain medications.Findings include:1.Review of Residents #2's admission record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of left leg above knee, acquired absence of right leg above knee, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, chronic pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. During an interview on 8/25/2025 at 9:20 AM, Resident#2 stated he was supposed to get a scheduled medication every 4 hours, and he was not getting it because they don't wake him up for it. During an interview on 8/29/2025 at 7:20 AM Resident #2 stated he did not receive his medication last night at midnight (oxycodone); he stated it is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper repair of handrails in 2 of 2 wings of the facility, cleanliness of resident rooms and the application of protective pipes apron coverings under the sink in Resident #65's room (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1) During an observation while conducting a tour of the facility on 1/6/2025 beginning at 9:10 AM, seven handrail caps were missing off of the end of the railing in the 200 hall and four caps were missing off of the end of the railing in the 100 hall. There was exposed jagged metal at the open ends of the hall railing. During an observation on 1/7/2025 at 10:20 AM with the Maintenance Director, there were missing caps off the railings in both halls of the facility (100 and 200 wing) with jagged metal exposed. During an interview on 1/7/2025 at 10:20 AM, the Maintenance Director stated, I know all of these need to be fixed. It is not my priority. During an interview on 1/7/2025 at 11:18 AM, the Administrator stated, All those caps need to be fixed. It is a safety issue.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screen was completed for 2 of 3 residents who were diagnosed with serious mental disorder, Residents #18 and #77. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's Level I PASRR dated 12/24/2024 showed no mental illness documented in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making. Review of Resident #18's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression (onset date of 12/24/2024), anxiety disorder (onset date of 12/24/2024), and bipolar disorder (onset date of 12/24/2024). Review of Resident #18's clinical records showed no documentation that Resident #18's diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder had been included on an updated Level I PASRR. Review of Resident #77's Level I PASRR dated 4/22/2024 showed no mental illness documented in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making. Review of Resident #77's admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as ordered for 3 of 8 residents reviewed, Residents #4, #10, and #30, and failed to ensure respiratory masks were properly stored for 3 of 8 residents reviewed, Residents #17, #18 and #83 (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1) During an observation on 1/6/2025 at 9:33 AM, Resident #4 was receiving oxygen at the flow rate of 3.5 liters per minute. During an observation on 1/6/2025 at 1:15 PM, Resident #4 was receiving oxygen at the flow rate of 3.5 liters per minute. During an observation on 1/7/2025 at 9:43 AM, Resident #4 was receiving oxygen at the flow rate of 3.5 liters per minute. Review of Resident #4's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified asthma with (acute) exacerbation, and unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident #81. Findings include: Review of Resident #81's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and most recently admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included sepsis (unspecified organism), cellulitis of right lower limb, urinary tract infection, infection and inflammatory reaction due to other urinary catheter, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, resistance to vancomycin, malignant neoplasm of uterine, and diarrhea. Review of Resident #81's physician order dated 11/25//2024 showed it read, Rifaximin Oral Tablet 550 MG [milligram] (Rifaximin), Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Bowel. Review of Resident #81's MDS dated [DATE] showed the resident was not receiving antibiotics under Section N - Medications. During an interview on 1/8/2025 at 12:21 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated, I see…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received nail care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), Resident #12 (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: Review of Resident #12's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, dysarthria following cerebral infarction, speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction, and contracture of muscle, unspecified sites. During an observation on 1/6/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident #12 was lying in bed with contractures to both hands. Resident #12's nails were overgrown and curling with a brown substance under nails. Resident #12's nails were pressing inside of the palms on both hands. During an interview on 1/6/2025 at 9:40 AM with Resident #12, when asked if she wanted her nails clean and trimmed, she shook her head yes. Review of Resident #12's care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received wound care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 resident reviewed for wound care, Resident #87. Findings include: Review of Resident #87's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, cutaneous abscess of groin, type 2 diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy, and necrotizing fasciitis. Review of Resident #87's hospital discharge documentation dated 12/6/2024 showed a wound care order that read, Cleanse wound with [name of the wound cleanser] solution. Fluff gauze and moistened with [name of the wound cleanser] solution loosely pack into wound. Change dressing BID [twice a day] and PRN [as needed] if soiled. Review of Resident #87's physician order dated 12/9/2024 showed it read, Referral to [the local hospital's name] Burn Clinic, DX [diagnosis]: Wound to R [Right] groin wound. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the residents for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Residents #20 and #35. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #20's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified; and other seizures. Review of Resident #20's Medication Regimen Review for September 2024 for Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release 250 mg (milligram) (Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for mood and stability) showed the Consultant Pharmacist requested specifying the need and frequency of Depakote and Ammonia levels for the order for labs ordered on 6/18/2024. Review of Resident #20's consultation note authored by the Psychiatric Services Provider dated 6/18/2024 showed it read, HPI [History…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored in accordance with professional standards (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: 1) During an observation while conducting a tour of the kitchen on 1/6/2025 at 9:30 AM, there was a brown buildup on the floor of the Emergency Food Storage room under a food storage crate, located over a floor drain. During an interview on 1/6/2025 at 9:30 AM, the Food Services Manager stated, I don't know what that is. I have been here for 7 months, and it hasn't happened since I have been here. It may have been the sewer drain overflowed. We don't come back here very often. During an observation on 1/8/2025 at 8:35 AM, ceiling vents located in the emergency food storage room and over the food preparation area in the kitchen had a dark substance extending around the perimeter of the vents. The area around two of the vents also had areas of cracked and peeling white material. During an interview on 1/8/2025 at 8:45 AM, the Maintenance Director stated, If that [the brown buildup over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment (PPE) during medication pass for the residents on enhanced barrier precautions and failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during wound care to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 1/8/2025 at 9:52 AM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), prepared medications for Resident #500 and entered the room. There was a signage reading, Stop. Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Everyone must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities. Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, Wound Care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. The resident had a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube). Staff F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures and fully investigate allegations of medical neglect for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications, chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection), unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into the stomach through the abdominal wall. It allows for the delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the stomach),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to safeguard medical record information against unauthorized use, failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records, and failed to ensure the confidentiality of the medical record for 1 of 7 residents reviewed, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented an admission date of 10/3/2024 with diagnoses that include diabetes mellitus type 1, malignant neoplasm of oropharynx (cancer), unspecified dysphagia (unable to swallow), oropharyngeal phase, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications, chronic pulmonary embolism (a blockage in a lung artery caused by a blood clot that has traveled from elsewhere in the body), chronic kidney disease, unspecified, other acute osteomyelitis (bone infection), unspecified site, acquired absence of left leg (below knee), essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), gastrostomy status (a flexible tube that's surgically inserted into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person center care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain, Resident #198, and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen administration, Resident #53. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 08/13/23 at 10:11 AM Resident #53 was lying in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula at 2.5 liters per minute. During an observation on 08/14/23 at 8:25 AM Resident #53 was lying in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula at 2.5 liters per minute. Review of Resident #53's physician's orders documented no orders for oxygen. Review of the admission record documented Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 8:51 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, [Resident #53's name] is on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an interview on 8/13/23 at 10:30 AM Resident #248 stated, They don't take care of my colostomy like they should. It has busted because they don't empty it. During an observation on 8/13/23 at 10:30 AM Resident #248's colostomy bag contained a medium amount of liquid brown stool, was inflated, and appeared to be completely full. Review of the Department of Medicine Hospitalist Medicine History and Physical for Resident #248 dated 7/16/23 reads . s/p [status post] diverting sigmoid colostomy on 5/28/23. Review of the Admission/readmission Data Collection dated 8/8/23 reads, J. Gastrointestinal. 1. Bowel. 1) Always Continent. 2. Bowel Elimination Pattern. 2) At least one movement every three days. 6. Presence of. Colostomy not checked. Review of the care plan for Resident #248 documented no developed care plan for bowel or colostomy care. Review of the Daily Skilled Nurse's Note dated 8/10/23 for Resident #248 read, Section G. 4. no ostomy noted. Review of the Daily Skilled Nurse's Note dated 8/12/23 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation on 8/13/23 at 10:17 AM Resident #37 was lying in bed sleeping with her oxygen concentrator (O2) set on 3 Liters per minute (3 L/m), nasal cannula was in place. During an observation on 8/14/23 at 12:58 PM Resident #37 was lying in bed watching television. The oxygen concentrator was set on 3 L/m, nasal cannula was in place. Review of the admission record documented Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included embolism, and thrombosis of deep veins on left lower leg, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of Resident #37's physician's orders documented no orders for oxygen. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), Comprehensive Assessment for Resident #37 dated 7/13/23 read No for oxygen. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 1:00 PM, the DON verified Resident #37 has been on oxygen and she could not locate a physician's order. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 out of 4 hallways reviewed for unattended medication. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 8/13/23 at 10:04 AM, Resident #18's room was empty, and a bottle of eye drops was observed on top of the bed side table. Review of Resident #18's physician orders revealed no self-administration orders. Review of Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed no interventions for medication self-administration. During an interview on 8/15/23 at 8:52 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, [Resident #18's name] should not have any medication at bedside as she is unable to administer. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Storage, last reviewed on 4/27/23 reads, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and /or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-06-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis.Finding includes:During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 9:05 AM, nursing staffing information dated 6/1/2026 was posted to the right side of the main entrance next to the receptionist desk. Census was documented 103.During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 10:30 AM, nursing staffing information dated 6/1/2026 was posted to the right side of the main entrance next to the receptionist desk. Census was documented 103. [photographic evidence obtained]Review of the facility Resident Listing Report dated 6/1/2026 documented census was 102.During an observation on 6/1/2026 at 3:40 PM, nursing staffing information dated 6/2/2026 was posted to the right side of the main entrance.During an observation on 6/2/2026 at 5:02 PM, nursing staffing information dated 6/3/2026 was posted to the right side of the main entrance. [photographic evidence obtained]During an observation on 6/3/2026 at approximately 5:09 PM, nursing staffing information dated 6/4/2026 was posted at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-08-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted daily. Findings include: On 8/13/23 at 8:55 AM, upon entrance to the facility, nurse staffing hours were not posted and readily available for residents and visitors. During an interview on 8/13/23 at 11:15 AM the Administrator stated, 'The hours should be posted in the front lobby. On 8/13/23 at 11:15 AM nurse staffing hours could not be located in the lobby. During an interview on 8/13/23 at 11:20 AM the Business Office Manager stated it was the duty of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator to have staffing information posted and readily available with the correct information at the beginning of each shift. A review of the policy and procedures titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information last review on 11/17/22 read, Policy. It is the policy of the facility to make staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines. 1. The Nurse Staffing Sheet will be posted on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$236,166 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $80,640 — penalty dated 2025-08-29
  • $155,526 — penalty dated 2024-11-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$72K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 5%Other / private 25%

This home reported $72K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$334per resident / day
operating cost
$10,168per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$288per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105460. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next