Magnolia Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 987 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 361 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 223 beds and averages 201.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain an environment that enhanced resident dignity and respected resident privacy for residents in 3 of 9 hallways (300's, 400's and 700's hallways) reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: 1) During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 11:12 AM, Resident #13 stated, The staff came into my room last night around 4:00 AM, and [Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN)'s name] and another staff member took some items out of my drawer. They told me they were getting medications out of the room because state was coming in the morning. I am not sure what all they took. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 8:00 AM, Resident #89 stated, The staff came into my room and went through all of my belongings and took some of my personal items, snacks and my brush. They told me that state was coming in the morning, so they had to go through all of my belongings. I felt like it was a major violation of my privacy. During an interview on 05/04/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify resident representatives of a change in condition for weight loss for 1, Resident #7, of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition and for 1, Resident #161, of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings include: Review of Resident #7's admission record documented diagnosis that include displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, muscle weakness generalized, cognitive communication deficit, dysphasia oropharyngeal phase, encounter for other specified surgical aftercare, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypokalemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #7's physician orders dated 4/9/2026, read, Weekly Weights every day shift every Thur [Thursday] for monitoring for 4 weeks. Review of Resident #7's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately to reflect the resident's status for 4 out of 12 residents reviewed. Findings Include: 1) Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set [MDS] admission assessment dated [DATE], Section I, active diagnoses did not include glaucoma, atrial fibrillation [A-fib] and protein malnutrition. Review of Resident #17's admission record documented resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included unspecified glaucoma [onset date 04/15/2026] unspecified atrial fibrillation [onset date 04/15/2026] and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition [onset date 04/15/2026]. During an interview on 05/06/2026 at 12:41 PM, Staff C, RN [Registered Nurse] MDS Lead, stated, Section I of the MDS should have had protein malnutrition, glaucoma and A-fib for [Resident #17's Name]. 2) Review of Resident #34's MDS admission/medicare 5 day assessment dated [DATE], Section K documented weight loss of 5% in one month…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders to provide wound care for 2, Residents #38 and #199, of 2 residents, reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: During an observation on 5/4/26 at 9:51 AM, Resident #38 was sitting at bedside. Resident #38 lower leg right extremity had a 2x2 had a dressing that was not dated, and the gauze around the wound was loose. [see photographic evidence] During an interview conducted on 05/05/2026 at 9:49 AM, Resident #38 stated, My dressing does not get changed as often as it should. The last time the dressing was changed was approximately one week ago. Review of Resident #38's physician orders did not document wound care dressing change orders in place. Record review of Resident #38's wound care progress notes for dated 4/16/26 read Primary Dressing 1: Calcium Alginate and Dressing Frequency: Daily for the left foot digit 2 and left foot digit 3 wounds. Record review of Resident #38's wound care progress notes dated 4/23/26 read Primary Dressing 1: Calcium Alginate and Dressing Frequency:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain medications and follow physician orders for pain medication for 1, Resident #6, of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include:Review of Resident #6's admission record documents diagnosis that include aftercare following joint replacement surgery, klebsiella pneumonia as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, urinary tract infection, presence of right artificial knee joint, unilateral primary osteoarthritis left knee, rheumatoid arthritis unspecified. Review of Resident #6's nursing progress note dated 5/4/2026 at 1940 (7:40 PM) read, admitted from hospital. Physician notified of admission, orders reviewed and verified. Resident representative notified of admission. The resident is currently taking opioids. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 5/5/2026 read, Oxycodone HCL[Hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 15 MG (milligrams) (Oxycodone HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain scale 6-10. Review of Resident #6's physician orders dated 5/5/2026 read,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and performed hand hygiene upon entering and exiting residents rooms while providing care to residents on contact precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases for 2 residents, Resident #6 and #78, of 3 residents reviewed for transmission based precautions, for transporting soiled linens, and for urinary catheter care and maintenance for 1, Resident #99, of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. Findings include: 1) During observation on 5/5/2026 in the memory care unit at 2:02 PM, Staff D, Floor Technician/Housekeeping picked up the soiled trash behind the nurses station and held it to his body to remove the excess air out of the soiled trash bag and twisted it around 5 times then put it in a large gray bin that read soiled linen only that had the lid open, then he went into the soiled utility room and took out the soiled linen bags and held it to his body to remove the excess air out of the soiled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while performing midline care for the residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy (Resident #4). Findings include:During an observation on 11/20/2025 at 10:05 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #4's room, performed hand hygiene with hand sanitizer, and donned gloves. Staff A proceeded to turn off the IV pump and then disconnected the IV tubing from Resident #4's midline. Staff A wiped the midline port with an alcohol wipe and flushed 10 milliliters of normal saline into the midline. Staff A wiped the midline port with another alcohol wipe and applied a green cap to the midline. Staff A doffed the gloves and performed hand hygiene using hand sanitizer on her way out of the room. Staff A did not wear a gown.During an interview on 11/20/2025 at 10:07 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food products were stored properly in the main kitchen and 1 of 6 nourishment rooms, 700 Hall Nourishment Room. Findings include: During an observation while conducting the initial tour of the main kitchen with the Dietary Assistant on 12/2/2024 at 9:26 AM, there were two unlabeled and undated bags of unidentified patties with one bag being open and unsealed, and one unlabeled and undated bag of mixed vegetables in the reach-in cooler. During an interview on 12/2/2024 at 9:30 AM, the Dietary Assistant stated that the food items should be labeled, dated and the bags needed to be sealed. During an observation on 12/2/2024 at 9:40 AM, the ice machine had a brownish color, soft buildup at the lip of the inside top rim of the maker. During an interview on 12/2/2024 at 9:40 AM, the Dietary Assistant confirmed that the ice machine had a buildup. During an observation of 700 Hall Nourishment Room with the Dietary Assistant on 12/2/2024 at 10:25 AM, there were plastic wrapped burritos and one opened ice cream…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive assessments for the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 of 9 residents reviewed, Residents #41, #57, #112, and #176. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #41's admission record documented an admission date of 11/21/2024. Review of Resident #41's MDS Entry assessment dated [DATE] documented a status of accepted. There was no documentation of a completed or accepted Medicare 5-day assessment. Review of Resident #176's admission record documented an admission date of 11/19/2024. Review of Resident #176's MDS Entry assessment dated [DATE] documented a status of accepted. There was no documentation of a completed or accepted Medicare 5-day assessment. Review of Resident #112's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged home on 8/16/2024. Review of Resident #112's electronic medical records showed no discharge MDS completed. During an interview on 12/5/2024 at 10:00 AM, the Regional MDS Coordinator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for 2 of 7 residents reviewed, Residents #27, and #90. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #90's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #90's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident is receiving anticoagulant medication under Section N0415- High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication. Review of Resident #90's physician orders showed an order for Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 milligram by mouth twice daily for DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) with the start date of 9/7/2024 and end date of 10/7/2024. There was no active order for anticoagulant medication. During an interview on 12/5/2024 at 10:36 AM, the Regional Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed that Resident #90 did not have an active order for anticoagulant. 2) Review of Resident #27's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$5,678 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $5,678 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $120K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL