Oak Hammock At The University Of Florida INC
2660 SW 53rd Ln, Gainesville, FL 32608 · Non profit - Corporation · 73 certified beds · (352) 548-1142 Medicare only — no Medicaid
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.1% | 8.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.6% | 9.5% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.6% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.7% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.43 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 501 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 296 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.7%CMS range 63.0–71.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 8.6–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.5%CMS range 3.8–7.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 68.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.16 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.39 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain the medication dosage prior to administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pain management (Resident #86).Findings include:During an observation on 6/29/2026 at 12:16 PM, Resident #86 was sitting upright in the bed with family members at the bedside. The resident was rubbing her left leg, grimacing. During an interview on 6/29/2026 at 12:16 PM, Resident #86 stated, My leg hurts all over sometimes on the top, then the pain moves to the side. Right now, it's hurting right here [points to inner calf left leg]. I want my oxycodone on time. If they bring it late, then my pain gets really bad.Review of Resident #86's physician order dated 6/23/2026 read, Diclofenac Sodium External Gel 1% (Diclofenac Sodium (Topical)). Apply to painful areas to LLE [Left Lower Extremity] topically four times a day for pain. The required dosage for application was not documented.Review of Resident #86's Medication Administration Record for June 2026 for application of diclofenac sodium topical gel showed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored according to professional standard of practice, failed to serve foods at safe temperatures, and failed to ensure staff prepared food in accordance with professional standards to prevent the possible spread of food borne illness. (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 9:15 AM with the Culinary Services Manager in the Main Dining Room, there were two packages of a food item that were not in the original packaging in the freezer with no identifying label. In refrigerator 1 there was a bag containing a white liquid with no identifying label or date. During an interview on 3/10/2025 at 9:19 AM, the Culinary Service Manager identified the food item in the bag stored in the refrigerator as yogurt and the two packages in the freezer as food molds of purred beef. The Culinary Service Manager stated, The food items should be labeled and/or dated in the refrigerator and freezer. During an observation on 3/11/2025 at 11:50 AM, there was one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide Advance Beneficiary notice of non-coverage in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification, Resident #36 and #172. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's Notice of Medicare non-coverage showed Medicare coverage of current skilled nursing services would end on 3/01/2025. Review of Resident #36's Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) was signed by Resident #36 on 3/07/2025. Review of Resident #172's Notice of Medicare non-coverage showed Medicare coverage of current skilled nursing services would end on 12/24/2024 Review of Resident #172's Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) was signed by Resident #36 on 12/30/2024. During an interview on 03/12/2025 at 10:15 AM with the Quality Improvement Manager stated, [Resident #36's name] Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) should have been given before 3/1/2025 which was her last cover day for Part A services. [Resident #36's name] ABN was given on 3/7/2025. [Resident #172's name] ABN was given on 12/30/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of minimum data set assessments for 2 of 5 residents, Residents #9 and #46. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #9's physician order with a start date of 8/30/2024 read, Risperidone oral tablet 0.5 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) titled Quarterly dated 12/8/2024 read, Section N Medication: Antipsychotic: No. Review of Resident #9's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of December 2024 documented the administration of Risperidone oral tablet daily. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 12:48 PM with the MDS Coordinator stated, [Resident #9's name] Section N has a data entry error he was on antipsychotic medication. During an interview on 3/12/2025 at 12:58 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. 2) Review of Resident #46's physician order dated 2/13/2025 read, Quetiapine Fumarate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards related to the assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis, Resident #57. Findings include: Review of Resident #57's physician order dated 2/11/2025 read, Pre/Post Dialysis Evaluation Assessment after resident returns from dialysis. Review of Resident #57's physician order dated 3/4/2025 read, Pre/Post Dialysis Evaluation Assessment after resident returns from dialysis every day shift every Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday] for Dialysis. Review of Resident #57's assessments did not contain documentation of pre or post dialysis assessments on the following dates 2/19/2025 no pre-dialysis assessment, on 2/21/2025 no post dialysis assessment, on 2/26/2025 no post dialysis assessment, on 2/28/2025 no pre or post dialysis assessment, and on 3/7/2025 no post dialysis assessment. During an interview on 3/31/2025 at 2:40 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We put in the order to tell staff what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principle for 1 of 1 resident receiving intravenous therapy, Resident #41 and 1 of 3 hallways reviewed for unattended medication. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 9:46 AM, Resident #9 was sitting in his room. On top of his bedside table there was a clear medication cup containing a white circular pill. During an interview on 3/10/2025 at 9:46 AM with Resident #9 stated, I do not know why a nurse would leave a pill on the table. I do not have any idea at what hour it was given. This should be restricted; this is no way to give a medication. It has never happened before, but I was shocked to see it on my table. Review of Resident #9 physician orders did not show documentation of medication self-administration orders. During an observation on 3/10/2025 at 10:36 AM, Resident #42's room was empty. There was a medication cup with a white powdered substance on top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #41. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's physician order dated 6/20/2024 read, Check BMP [basic metabolic panel] every other week. Review of Resident #41's laboratory results for BMP showed a BMP was drawn on 2/4/2025 and 3/6/2025. Review of Resident #41's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for February 2025 did not contain documentation of a BMP being drawn on 2/19/2025 as ordered by the physician. During an interview on 3/13/2025 at 9:37 AM, the DON (Director of Nursing) stated, I reviewed the resident's chart, and the BMP was not drawn according to the physician order. During an interview with on 3/12/2025 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Doctor #1 stated that her expectations would be that if she ordered a lab to be drawn every other week, the facility would draw the lab as ordered. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Laboratory Services last reviewed on 12/16/2024, stated: Policy: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control standards for following enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection for 1 of 3 residents for enteral nutrition, Resident #57. Findings include: During an observation 3/10/2024 at 10:24 AM, Staff B, License Practical Nurse (LPN), entered Resident #57's room without donning a gown. Resident #57's room door has an enhanced barrier sign posted outside of the room. Staff B performed hand hygiene and don gloves but did not don a gown. Staff B stopped Resident #57 feeding pump and disconnected Resident #57's J-tube/G-tube [jejunostomy/gastrojejunostomy tube] from feeding. Staff B proceeded to flush Resident #57's J-tube with water. Staff B without donning a gown emptied Resident #57's J/G - tube drainage bag. Resident #57 physician order dated 3/4/2025 it read, Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high-contact resident activities: (dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, incontinent care or assisting with toileting, medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards and included expirations dates when applicable in 2 of 4 medication carts reviewed. Findings include: During an observation of Medication Cart 1 on 11/27/2023 at 9:15 AM with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), there were one 30-milliliter medication cup with chocolate pudding and crushed pieces of medications with no label identifying the medication or any resident identifier, one opened bottle of Brimonidine/ timolol ophthalmic solution with no opened or expiration dates, and one opened Basaglar insulin pen with no opened or expiration dates. During an interview on 11/27/2023 at 9:25 AM, Staff A, LPN, stated, That cup of medications with the pudding is for a resident who refused the medications earlier and I was going to go back and check before I threw it out. I should have labeled who it was for and what medications were in it. The eye drops and insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during intravenous medication administration. Findings include: During an observation of medication administration on 11/27/2023 at 10:45 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), prepared medications for Resident #167 without performing hand hygiene, entered the resident's room and administered the medications. Staff C exited the room and went to the medication cart to prepare medications for another resident. During an observation of medication administration on 11/27/2023 at 11:00 AM, Staff C, LPN, prepared medications for Resident #52 without performing hand hygiene, entered the resident's room and administered the oral medications without performing hand hygiene. Staff C donned gloves and placed gloved hands inside the rim of the trash can and moved the trash can closer. Staff C then picked up the bag of antibiotics and intravenous tubing, removed the end cap of the intravenous tubing and attached the antibiotic bag to the intravenous line. Staff C held the uncapped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record view, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services, Resident #43. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's physician order dated 10/17/2023 reads, Apply Oxygen @ [at] 2 liters via nasal cannula for SOB [shortness of breath] or sats <90% [saturation less than 90 percent]. Review of Resident #43's Weights and Vital Summary reads, 11/21/2023 00:56 [12:56 AM] 93% (Oxygen via Nasal Cannula) . 11/17/2023 16:01 [4:01 PM] 98% (Oxygen via Nasal Cannula) . 11/06/2023 19:45 [7:45 PM] 96% (Oxygen via Nasal Cannula) . 11/04/2023 23:30 [1:30 PM] 95% (Oxygen via Nasal Cannula). Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed the resident uses oxygen while a resident. Review of Resident #43's care plan did not reveal a focus for shortness of breath or oxygen therapy. During an interview on 11/29/2023 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, Our practice is to develop care plans based on residents' needs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accepted professional standards of practice were followed for intravenous medication administration via midline catheter for 1 of 3 residents with midline catheters, Resident #52. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including sepsis, tubo-ovarian abscess (a pocket of pus due to infection of the ovary and fallopian tube), pelvic inflammatory disease, peritoneal abscess, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, iron deficiency anemia, primary osteoarthritis, and presence of artificial hip joint. Review of Resident #52's physician orders dated 11/4/2023 reads, Piperacillin Sod-Tazobactam So Solution Reconstituted 3-0.375 GM (grams), Use 3.375 gm intravenously four times a day for sepsis w/o [without] acute organ dysfunction/tubo ovarian abscess until 12/07/2023 06:59 [6:59 AM], Administer every 6 hours at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARABAS, NICOLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/10/2025 |
| BARTON, KIM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| D'ALESSIO, CHRISTINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/24/2025 |
| DORIA, NICOLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/19/2018 |
| GEAREN, PETER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2018 |
| GRAY, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2022 |
| GRIFFIN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/01/2023 |
| HORGAS, ANN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/01/2024 |
| JERRY, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| JOHNSON, DONNA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| KELLY, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2021 |
| MCGLOTHLIN, CYDNEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2025 |
| MERREY, DOUGLAS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2018 |
| MORALES, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/02/2025 |
| PORTILLO, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2024 |
| RADER, MARTHA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2021 |
| REVERE, FRANCES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| RUSSELL, JUDITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2017 |
| STOTT, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/29/2019 |
| WHITTREDGE, SONJA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/24/2023 |
| AHMADI, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/11/2021 |
| DAVEY, ANDREW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/24/2005 |
| BRANSON, ALISUN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/18/2022 |
| COVO, NADIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/19/2023 |
| HENDERSON, TRACEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2021 |
| LLOYD, MEGHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/21/2024 |
| MANN, JONATHON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/08/2015 |
| PARKER, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/16/2020 |
| PEEBLES, JOY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/23/2022 |
| REYNEK, CALVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/05/2024 |
| WILSON, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Florida Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106066. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.