No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waterford Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

8333 W Okeechobee Road, Hialeah Gardens, FL 33016 · For profit - Corporation · 214 certified beds · (305) 556-9900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (305) 556-9900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 13 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
2369 W 52nd St · (305) 825-0587 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2399 W 52nd St · (305) 424-9144 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Jhonykent0.4 mi
10049 NW 89th Ave
Park
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.8%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.7%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%8.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.1%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.972.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.231.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.57U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 142 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.4%CMS range 26.3–52.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.1%CMS range 10.7–19.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.1–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.461.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.20
RN hours/ resident / day
0.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.02
RN hoursweekends
29.3%
Total nursing turnover
29.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 214 beds and averages 204.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.20 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 1.02 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed keep residents' medical information confidential on four (second-floor medication cart #1 and cart # 2, third-floor medication cart #1 and cart #2) out of eight medication carts; at one (first floor nursing station) out of four nursing stations and failed to provide privacy for one (Resident #116) out of three sampled residents during medication administration. Observations of unattended open computer screens on the second-floor medication cart # 2 and third-floor medication cart #1; unsecured paperwork left at the first-floor nursing station, on the second-floor medication cart #1 and on the third-floor medication cart #1 and cart #2 with resident's information visible. There were 206 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included.1) Observation on 03/02/2026 at 9:20 AM on the facility's second floor revealed unattended medication cart # 2's computer screen was open with residents' information visible.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews facility failed to keep residents' environment free of accident hazards on one (third-floor) out of four Soiled Utility Rooms that contained Biohazardous materials, on two (first and third floor) Clean Utility Rooms which locked from the inside and did not contain a call light, the Sprinkler Room which locked from the inside and contained hazardous materials and for one (Resident #142) out of three sampled residents during medication administration as evidenced by:1) Observation of an unlocked Soiled Utility Room on the third floor2) Observation of an unlocked Clean Utility Room on the first and third floor3) Observation of an unlocked Sprinkler Room on the first floor4) Observation of facility's staff leaving a lancet on top of the third-floor medication cart #1 and unattended at Resident #142's bedside.There were 206 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included.On 03/02/2026 at 9:16 AM observational tour on the third floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed the facility did not honor resident's right to a dignified experience for one (Resident #77) out of two sampled residents with Percutaneous Enteral Gastronomy (PEG) feeding pumps. Resident #77's PEG pump was overtly visible while the resident received enteral feeding in common areas. there were nine residents residing in the facility with PEG tube feeding pumps at the time of the survey. The findings include. On 03/02/2026 at 11:48 AM Resident #77 was observed in the hallway seated in a wheelchair with enteral feeding in progress via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) with the system uncovered (photo evidence). Observation on 03/03/2026 at 1:45 PM revealed Resident #77 in the dining area seated in wheelchair during activities amongst other residents and the enteral feeding was in progress via PEG and not covered (photo evidence).Record review of Resident #77's clinical records documented the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, facility failed to properly store and label medications on two (first-floor medication cart #1 and the second-floor medication cart #1) out of eight medication carts as evidenced by: 1) Staff left a normal saline syringe on top of the first-floor medication cart #1 during medication administration. 2)An illegible label of a stock medication on the first-floor medication cart #1. 3) Second-floor medication cart #1 left unlocked. There were 206 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included.During a medication administration observation on 03/05/2026 at 8:07 AM Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) removed a pill from a bottle to administer to a resident, however the expiration date and open date were not legible (photo). Staff H, RN was unable to read the expiration date. The 1st floor supervisor RN was made aware and took a new bottle to cart. Staff H, RN entered the resident's room with medication, leaving a syringe with normal saline on top of the first-floor medication cart #1 (photo).Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to identify quality concerns to implement effective plans of action related to failed to properly store and label medications during medication administration; failed to prevent accident hazards and failed to protect resident's privacy resulting in repeated deficient practice. The facility was cited for Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals, Personal Privacy/Confidentiality of Records and Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices in 2024. This repeated deficiency practice has the potential to affect any of the 206 residents residing in the facility. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Policy and Procedure (issued June 2021) documented the following: Policy-It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2) The QAA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer was working properly. The curtains in the walk-in freezer contained ice. This has the potential to affect one hundred and ninety-eight out of two-hundred and six residents who eat orally residing in the facility at the time of the survey.The findings included: Record review of the Physical Environment Policy and Procedure (issued 3/2020); Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide a safe environment in accordance to State and Federal regulations; Procedure: 2) The facility will maintain all essential mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition.Review of the Freezer Defrost and Maintenance Policy and Procedure (no written date); Policy-All freezer units are equipped with an automatic defrost cycles as designed by the manufacturer. The defrost cycle operates automatically during scheduled off-peak hours to maintain normal freezer function. Dietary and Maintenance departments are to ensure proper freezer operation and sanitation; Procedure: Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety for one out of nine sampled residents as evidenced by 1) Resident #54, a vulnerable resident with orders for bilateral floor mats was observed in bed with one floor mat 2) failed to ensure three out of four soiled utility rooms were locked. There were 201 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: During initial observation on 08/12/24 at 08:20 AM Resident #54 was observed there in bed, there was mat on the floor to the right side of Resident #54's bed. On 08/13/24 at 09:24 AM Resident # 54 was asleep in bed and bilateral floor mats observed in place. On 08/14/24 at 07:47 AM Resident # 54 was in bed being fed breakfast and one floor mat was against the wall and one on the floor at the right side of the bed. During an interview on 08/14/24 at 09:30 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (Staff C) stated: The resident is supposed to have two floor mats, if during rounds I see any of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide privacy for residents on one out of eight medications carts as evidenced an observation of residents' personal health information visible on an electronic medication administration screen left unattended. There were 201 residents residing the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 8/12/24 at 9:52 AM observation on the third floor unattended medication cart #2 revealed residents' personal health information visible on the electronic medication administration screen. Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) exited a resident's room and was approached by the surveyor. When asked why the computer screen was left open, Staff E, RN replied, I left the computer screen open because I went into the room quickly. I am supposed to close the screen when away from the medication cart. Record review of the facility's Policy: HIPAA. Date implemented: 11/27/2019. Policy: It is the policy of the facility to apply sanctions against employees who fail to comply with all policies and procedures regarding the protection of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident number 199) out of three residents reviewed for hospital discharges. Resident number 199 was coded as being discharged to the hospital but the resident was discharged home. There were 201 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment Completion and Accuracy Policy and Procedure (issued 9/2020) documented: Policy: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to the following procedures related to the proper documentation and utilization of a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) to ensure a comprehensive and accurate assessment of residents will be completed in the format and in accordance with time frames. This assessment system will provide a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacities and assist staff to identify health problems for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely for one out of nine sampled residents (Resident #51). As evidenced by two ointments, one medicated powder and one cream were observed on the overbed table in Resident #51's room. The findings include: During initial observation on 08/12/24 at 07:58 AM Resident# 51 was in bed asleep, medications (creams, ointments, medicated powder) were observed on overbed table (Photo available). On 08/13/24 at 09:11 AM Resident #51 was observed in geriatric chair asleep in the room. On 08/14/24 at 08:56 AM the resident in room receiving care from Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) (Staff B). Review of the medical records for Resident #51 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Cerebral Infarction due to embolism of left posterior cerebral artery. Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for August 2024 revealed Resident #51 had orders that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dignity during dining for one (Resident #90) out of 40 residents who are dependent on assistance with eating. As evidenced by one facility staff standing while feeding the resident. The findings include: In an observation on 04/10/23 at 09:12 AM, Resident #90 is dressed and in the wheelchair with eyes closed. In an observation on 04/11/23 at 08:47 AM, Staff C, a Diet Technician was observed standing while feeding resident #90 breakfast. Staff C stated, There is no chair in the room for me to sit down in and feed the resident. This resident eats pureed food and needs assistance with eating. In an observation on 04/13/23 at 08:02 AM, Resident #90 was in the wheelchair. Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pulled a chair to resident #90. Staff D washed hands in the restroom. Prepared tray to serve the resident. Staff D sat in the chair to feed the resident. The meal was pureed and thickened liquids. Resident #90's left hand arm is observed to be contracted, the resident holds it to chest & the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy as prescribed for one (Resident #118) out of 3 residents sampled. The Findings Included: During observation on 04/10/2023 at 08:56 AM, Resident #118 was observed sitting in the wheelchair in the room, the oxygen (02) was running at 3 liters per minute (LPM), via nasal cannula, the 02 tubing observed was not dated, no dated supplies were observed around the 02 concentrator. On 04/11/23 at 08:46 AM, Resident #118 was observed in the room in the wheelchair watching television, there was no 02 running, stated today is a great day, 02 tubing observed in a plastic bag dated 4/10/23. On 4/12/23 at 10:30AM, Resident #118 was observed in the Activities room fixing puzzles with other residents, no distress was noted. Review of the medical records for Resident #118 revealed, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but were not limited to: Chronic respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to identify quality concerns as evidenced by not implementing an effective plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies in problem-prone areas, related to respiratory/tracheostomy care and suctioning as evidenced by repeated deficient practice during consecutive annual surveys. Cross reference F695 Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning. The facility had deficient practice during the last recertification survey conducted in 2022. The facility had a census of 191 residents at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during the annual survey exit dated 01/03/2022, deficient practice was cited related to F 695- Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning. F 695 was also cited during the current annual recertification survey exit dated 04/13/2023. Review of the facility's plan of correction for the last annual survey with an exit date 01/03/2022 related to F 695 Respiratory/ Tracheostomy Care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WATERFORD HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/28/2022
BENGIO, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
PARITZKY, JEREMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
REYES, EDUARDOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
SEBASTIAN, DESIREEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
PHILIPSON, BENTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2026
PHILIPSON, GABRIELLEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2026
PHILIPSON, RAQUELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2026
AGRP 2011 TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/2022
DEBORAH PHILIPSON 2011 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/2022
PHILIPSON FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
RICHARDS MITCHELL & CROSS PAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
VENTURA SERVICES - FLORIDA, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
KRAUS, ABRAHAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
SCHAFFER, DANIELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
TESSLER, NAOMIIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$7.0M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 17%Other / private 16%

This home reported $7.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,112per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105554. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next