Citrus Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 192 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 100.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify the residents' representatives when there was a change of condition for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for changes in condition, Resident #29 and #42, resulting in the residents having to be treated by IV (intravenous) antibiotic therapy due to infection. Delay in notifying the physician of a wound, critical labs, and resident change in condition due to infection can result in the spread of the infection into the deeper tissues of the body, the infection can travel through the blood to other parts of the body and could become life threatening. Findings include: 1. Review of the admission record documented Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acute systolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medical neglect when they did not immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify the residents' representatives when there was a change of condition for 2 of 2 residents, Residents #29 and #42, resulting in a delay of care. Delay in notifying the physician of a wound, critical labs, or resident change in condition can result in the spread of infection into the deeper tissues of the body, the infection can travel through the blood to other parts of the body and could become life threatening. Findings include: 1. Review of the admission record documented Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina pectoris (chest pain), acute systolic (congestive) heart failure (a chronic condition in which the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident and to prevent medical neglect when the facility failed to notify the physician of critical laboratory results, wound culture results and wound care needs resulting in a delay in care and treatment for 2 of 2 residents, Residents #29 and #42. Delay in wound care treatment can result in the spread of infection into the deeper tissues of the body, the infection can travel through the blood to other parts of the body and could become life threatening. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Administrator with an effective date of 1/17/2022 reads, Purpose of your job position: The primary purpose of your position is to direct the day-to day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines, and regulations that govern nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assessment and Process Improvement (QAPI) process when the administrative staff failed to investigate, develop, and implement appropriate plans of correction to identify and correct quality deficiencies of the facility failing to notify the physician of critical laboratory results, wound culture results and wound care needs resulting in a delay in care and treatment for 2 of 2 residents, Residents #29 and #42. Delay in wound care treatment can result in the spread of infection into the deeper tissues of the body, the infection can travel through the blood to other parts of the body and could become life threatening. Findings Include: 1. Review of the admission record documented Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (heart disease) with angina…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in 3 of 5 units. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 5/12/2025 at 10:27 AM, Resident #55 was lying in bed. On top of the resident's nightstand, there were two clear vials of Budesonide Inhalation Suspension next to the nebulizer machine (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 5/12/2025 at 10:27 AM, Resident #55 stated, Sometimes I do not want to do the treatment and the nurse will leave it there. No one is going to drink it. The nurse that is here is not the one who left it there. Review of Resident #55's physician order dated 3/9/2025 read, Budesonide Inhalation Suspension 0.25 MG/2 ML [0.25 milligrams per 2 milliliters] (Budesonide Inhalation), 2 ml inhale orally two times a day for respiratory failure. Review of Resident #55's physician orders did not show an order for medication self-administration. During an interview on 5/12/2025 at 1:54 PM, Staff D,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #13, #65, and #69), and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident #349). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #65's physician order dated 4/16/2025 read, CCHO [Consistent Carbohydrate Diet] diet, Pureed texture, Nectar Thick consistency. Review of Resident #65's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed no mechanically alerted diet under Section K- Swallowing/Nutritional Status. During an interview on 5/15/2025 at 12:40 PM, the MDS Coordinator Registered Nurse (RN) stated, [Resident #65's name] MDS has to be corrected. [Resident #65's name] was a pureed diet, which would be a mechanically altered diet. Normally, we do not do Section K on the MDS that would be the Registered Dietician, but I need to correct it. 2) Review of Resident #69's physician order dated 12/24/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the residents' care plans to meet the current needs of the residents for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (Resident #56) and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services (Resident #15). Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #56's care plan on 5/12/2025 at 12:00 PM read, Focus: [Resident #56' name] is at risk for infection and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are indicated due to: positive COVID-19 virus. Date Initiated: 12/09/2025. During an observation on 5/12/2025 at 9:36 AM, Resident #56 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room watching television. There was no enhanced barrier precaution signage on her door. During an interview on 5/12/2025 at 12:25 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated that the care plan focus of EBP for COVID-19 was initiated on 12/9/2024. It should have been resolved after the resident was no longer contagious for the virus. Review of the facility policy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received services according to professional standar of practice for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #151). Findings include: Review of Resident #151's physician order dated 4/28/2025 read, Voltaren Arthritis Pain External Gel 1% (Diclofenac Sodium (Topical)), Apply to affected areas. The order had no dosage or specific area for application of the medication. During an interview on 5/13/2025 at 3:11 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that Voltaren order did not have dosage or area to be applied. She stated her expectation was that orders had a dosage and location of application. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Administration with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Policy: It will be the policy of this facility to administer medications in a timely manner and as prescribed by the physician, unless otherwise clinically indicated or necessitated by other circumstances such as lack of availability of medication or refusals of medication by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by physician for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents #29, and #55), and failed to ensure enteral tube dressing was changed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for enteral feeding (Resident #349). Findings include: 1) During an observation on 5/14/2025 at 2:35 PM, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), entered Resident #29's room, performed hand hygiene, and donned gloves and a gown. Staff F disconnected the IV (intravenous) tubing from Resident #29's needleless connector. Staff F used an alcohol wipe to sanitize the needleless connector and flushed the needleless connector with 5 ml (milliliters) of normal saline. Staff F removed her personal protective equipment, preformed hand hygiene, and exited the room. Staff F did not follow with 5 milliliters of Heparin solution. Review of Resident #29's physician order dated 5/7/2025 read, Normal Saline Flush Solution (Sodium Chloride Flush) use 10 cc [milliliters] intravenously two times a day for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep resident environment free of accident hazards. Findings include: During an observation on 5/12/2025 at 10:17 AM, Resident #89 was sitting in bed. There was one oxygen cylinder in the right corner of the room, which was not secured on a stand (Photographic evidence obtained). Review of Resident #89's physician order dated 4/23/2025 read, Administer oxygen 2-4 L/Min [liters per minute] via NC [nasal cannula]. Humidification PRN [as needed] as needed Every shift monitor skin behind ears, necks, and face every shift for irritation or breakdown and apply tube padding PRN. During an interview on 5/14/2025 at 3:35 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Oxygen cylinders must be secured on the cart and should not be stored loose in a resident room. There is a risk the cylinder can fall. We secure the oxygen cylinder for safety. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Standards and Guidelines: Compressed gases and Oxygen usage with the last review date of 1/20/2025 read, Guidelines: Personnel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician/prescriber documented the rationale for declining the pharmacist's recommendations for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #12 and #19). Findings include: Review of Resident #12's physician order dated 4/24/2025 read, Protonix Oral Tablet Delayed Release 40 MG (Pantoprazole Sodium), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for GERD [Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease] . Order Status: Active. Review of Resident #12's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) showed the consultant pharmacist's recommendation dated 8/6/2024 that read, This patient is currently receiving a PPI [Proton Pump Inhibitors] for > [more than] 12 weeks, Due to the updated F757, Unnecessary Medication Tag, the use of the PPI should be periodically reviewed and the necessity for continuation documented as well as monitoring done for any adverse consequences. The current order is: Protonix 40 mg [milligram] po [by mouth] Q AM [every morning] (05/24). Reduce dose to: Protonix 20 mg po Q QM. The physician's response read,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for enteral feeding (Resident #349) and 1 of 6 residents reviewed of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #29). Findings include: 1) During an observation on 5/14/2025 at 8:24 AM, Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administered medication to Resident #349 via gastric tube (G-tube). The split gauze around the gastric tube was dated 5/11/2025 and had staff initials written with black marker. During an interview on 5/14/2025 at 8:55 AM, Staff E, LPN, stated, [Resident #349's name] gauze is dated 5/11/2025. The gauze should be changed daily. Normally the wound care nurse does the dressing change. Review of Resident #349's physician order dated 4/25/2025 read, Wound Care to G-tube site: Cleanse with wound wash, pat dry and place split gauze around tube, tape to secure in place every day shift for maintenance. Review of Resident #349's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for May 2025 showed split gauze was changed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3) During an observation on 5/14/2025 at 9:19 AM, Staff C, RN, gathered wound care supplies for Resident #29. Staff C removed bandage scissors from his pants pocket and cut the wound dressing and calcium alginate. Staff C removed the dressings from Resident #29's left lower leg and foot and right lower leg, using the bandage scissors to cut away the external gauze portion of the dressings. Without removing his gloves or performing hand hygiene, Staff C then used the prescribed cleanser on three wounds on Resident #29's left lower leg and patted them dry with gauze. Staff C removed the remaining dressing from Resident #29's right lower leg, and without removing his gloves or performing hand hygiene, applied the prescribed cleanser and patted it dry with gauze. During an interview on 5/14/2025 at approximately 9:35 AM, Staff C, RN, stated that he did not believe it was necessary to remove his gloves and perform hand hygiene between removing Resident #29's dressing and applying the prescribed cleanser, because the wound was considered dirty until after he applied the cleanser. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light cords and buttons were placed within resident's reach while they were in bed for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #40). Findings include: During an interview on 5/12/2025 at approximately 10:30 AM, Resident #40 stated that she did not have a call light, and that she had been instructed just to call out (verbally) if she needed assistance. During an observation on 5/12/2025 at 2:48 PM, Resident #40's call light was on the resident's bedside table (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 5/13/2025 at 9:00 AM, Resident #40's call light was inside the drawer of the resident's bedside table (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 5/13/2025 at 1:35 PM, Resident #40's call light was clipped to the handle/drawer pull of the resident's bedside table (Photographic evidence obtained). During an interview on 5/13/2025 at 1:35 PM, Resident #40 stated, I did not put my call light on the bedside table. I am not supposed to get out of bed on my own. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL