Jupiter Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
17781 Thelma Ave, Jupiter, FL 33458 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (561) 746-2998 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.7% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.7% | 4.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 2.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.9% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.5% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.1% | 9.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.68 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.5%CMS range 34.7–54.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 8.2–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.2–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 86.9 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
*Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that was prepared, stored and served in a sanitary manner in accordance with standards for food safety professionals. The findings included: The facility's policy 'Hand Hygiene' (no reference date) documented: Policy:All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility.Policy Explanation and guidelines:6. Additional considerations:a. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, and immediately removing gloves. 1. During the initial kitchen tour, on 07/07/25 at 9:11 AM, accompanied by the Food Service Director/Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following were noted:a. In the walk in cooler, a box containing raw shell eggs were stored directly over a box containing liquid pasteurized eggs.b. Cleaned and sanitized utensils were not stored inverted At the conclusion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services and linens in a manner to provide a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. The findings included:A. During an observation in the Main Dining Room, on 07/07/25, at the conclusion of the initial kitchen tour, at approximately 9:40 AM, there was a plastic folded table stored between a snack vending machine and the wall that had an accumulation of food residue and debris. The Food Services Director/Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) had the table removed by staff. B. During the initial pool process, beginning on 07/07/25 at approximately 9:45 AM, the following were noted: a. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a soiled gown that was left in the shower b. In room [ROOM NUMBER] there was an accumulation of debris on the floor at the hand washing sink, under the resident’s bed and on the fall mat for Resident #61’s bed (window bed). 3. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was an accumulation of debris on the floor at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to file a grievance in a timely manner, for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for grievances. As evidenced by failure of staff to respond to Resident #46's grievance regarding her missing blankets for almost 2 weeks.The findings included:The facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances documented in part Grievances can be voiced in the following forums: a. Verbal complaint to a staff member or grievance official.Record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating mild cognitive impairment.During an interview on 07/07/25 at 11:24 AM, Resident #46 stated, I'm missing my two blankets, The blue one my grandson got for me. I've been missing them for over 1 week. I have told several staff, but they do nothing. I even went out to the nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #39, related to antipsychotic use, and for 1 of 10 sampled residents, Resident #37, related to weights.The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was taking an antipsychotic medication, and that a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for the antipsychotic was both attempted on 01/14/25 and was contraindicated on 01/14/25.Further review of the record revealed Resident #39 was ordered Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication, since 08/11/22, and that the dose of the medication had not been changed. Further review of the psychiatric progress noted dated 01/14/25 documented the dosing of the Risperdal should be done by neurology as the medication was ordered for a neurological condition, Huntington's disease. This progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan to address Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Behavior, Resident #61; The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #63. The findings included: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident’s most recent complete assessment, an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 05/31/25, Resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment documented that the resident was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #61’s diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Non-Alzheimer's dementia, Anxiety disorder, Psychotic disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). A review of Resident #61’s medical records revealed that there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for 2 of 28 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to ensure that the diet orders were care planned for Resident #50 and failure to ensure the antianxiety medication care plan for Resident #63 was updated.The findings included: 1) Record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted, because the resident was rarely or never understood. Review of a physician order's dated 06/02/25 for Resident #50, indicated that the resident was prescribed a diet of regular, pureed (pudding like) texture, and nectar thickened fluid consistency. Review of the revised care dated 06/12/25, indicated that Resident #50 was on a regular, mechanically altered ground texture, and nectar thickened liquids consistency diet. 2) A review of the clinical records indicated that Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin rash received further treatment as evidenced by Resident #35 remained symptomatic after the initial treatment for a skin rash.The findings included:Record review revealed that Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status score of 07 on a 0-15 scale, indicating severe cognitive impairment.During an interview on 07/07/25 at 9:45 AM with Resident #35, she was observed scratching the left side of her face. A rash was noted to her left cheek area. When asked are the staff putting any medication on your face for the itching, she stated, I don't think so. Review of a physician progress note dated 07/05/25, revealed that the attending nurse practitioner (NP) visited Resident #35 on 07/04/25 due to a skin rash and the resident was noted to have a mild to moderate skin rash. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for treatment of a facility acquired pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, as evidenced by not changing the dressing, as ordered for Resident #13 pressure ulcer.The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, on a 0-15 scale, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of a pressure injury investigation audit form dated 06/30/25, indicated that Resident #13 had a new left heel pressure ulcer (caused by unrelieved pressure). Review of a physician order dated 07/03/25 for Resident #13, instructed staff to cleanse the right achilles (heel) pressure wound with normal saline (salt solution), apply skin prep to the necrotic area and cover with a foam dressing every day shift (7 AM to 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services, and supervision to prevent falls, for 1 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by Resident #39 having had eight falls since 05/01/25, with six being from her chair. The three most recent falls occurred while Resident #39 was in her Broda chair, the newest of intervention as of 06/19/25. The facility also failed to ensure the provision of two neurology consults for increased involuntary movements related to Huntington's Disease, which was care planned as part of the resident's risk for falls.The findings included:Review of the policy Fall Prevention Program (not dated), documented in part, Policy: Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. 4. Risk Protocols: . g. Provide interventions that address unique risk factors: medications, psychological, cognitive status, or recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of foods to address nutritional concerns for 2 of 10 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to include fortified foods as ordered for Resident #37 and Resident #50 , and failure to provide ordered meals for Resident #63. All three sampled residents had weight loss concerns or were underweight.The findings included:Review of the policy Fortified Foods (not dated) documented, in part, Policy: . The purpose of utilizing fortified foods is to add additional calories/protein to the oral diet in efforts to address weight loss, skin status, nutritional concerns, etc. 1) The fortified foods are to be added to the resident's diet includes but not limited to fortified cereal and fortified potatoes. 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication errors for 3 of 7 sampled residents, as evidenced by a medication error rate of 15.6% with 32 opportunities due to failure to ensure that Resident #7 received medications ordered and was available for him, failure to ensure Resident #5 received medications that are prescribed to him, failure to notify the physician prior to holding blood pressure medications for Resident #27.The finding Included:The facility policy titled Medication Administration documented in part Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medications for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. 12. Compare medication source (bubble pack, rectal, etc.) with medication administration record (MAR) to verify resident name, medication name, form, dose, route, and time. (photographic evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a laboratory test for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for laboratory testing. (Resident #8). The findings included: A review of the clinical record for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Psychotic Disorder. A physician's order on the same day specified that Divalproex Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 125 mg should be administered orally twice daily for mood disorder. Additionally, the physician ordered a valproic acid level to be measured on 06/01/2025. However, the records lacked documented evidence of the valproic acid test result.On 07/10/2025 at 12:29 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), during which a side-by-side review of Resident #8's records occurred. The DON acknowledged the absence of the valproic acid result and promptly contacted the Unit Manager, requesting a follow-up with the laboratory service regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for 3 of 30 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to abide by Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) guidelines, Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP guidelines, and failure to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during direct care, for Resident #75, #288 and #71.The findings include:Review of the polices titled, Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions (TBP) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) showed that the TBP policy documented, in part, 1. Facility staff will apply TBP….to residents who are known or suspected to be infected….3. (b). The provision of a private room as available/appropriate. 4. Residents… should remain in their rooms except for medically necessary care. The EBP policy documented, in part, targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. 2.b. An order for EBP will be obtained for residents with any of the following (b)…. wounds,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program. The findings included: During the initial kitchen tour, on 07/07/25 at 9:11 AM with the Food Service Director/Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following were noted: 1. In the hot holding area of the kitchen, two live and mature roaches were observed on a table by the conveyor toaster.2. In the food service area (where staff collect the plates from the cooks and place in the carts to take to the units and the Main Dining Room) live roaches, in all stages of life and too numerous to count were observed behind a cart containing a stack of trays and single service items (sugar packets, condiments, tea bags etc.) At the time of the observation, the CDM instructed staff to remove the cart, dispose of the single service items, clean and sanitized the cart and the trays that were stacked in the cart. On 07/10/25 at 12:35 PM, the Surveyor attempted to contact the pest control company that provided services to the facility and a voice message was left. There was no response from the pest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the nursing staff failed to follow prescribed parameters including blood sugar and blood pressure results for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5). The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Diabetes. The Minimum Data Set assessment with reference date of 12/27/24 revealed the resident was assessed as moderately impaired for skills of daily decision making and is receiving insulin and hypoglycemic medications. A review of a Care plan dated 12/21/24, documented Resident #5 has Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia. The interventions included: Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor and monitor and document for side effects and effectiveness. Review of Physician's order dated 01/23/25, documented Insulin Lispro subcutaneous solution pen injector, 100 units per milliliter, Inject 2 units subcutaneously before meals for Hyperglycemia. Hold for glucose less than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate medication administration times with dialysis services for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #6). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the completion of dialysis communication records to validate continuity of care for Resident #1. The findings included: 1a) Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation services. Resident #1's pertinent diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Diabetes. Medication Administration Records (MAR) dated 05/2024 and 06/2024 indicated Resident #1 did not receive the following medications as prescribed. The explanation documented by the nursing staff noted, Resident in Dialysis: On 06/08/24 Calcium Acetate 667 mg, Ipratropium Nebulizer and Zinc 220 mg. On 06/04/24 Megestrol Acetate Suspension 40 MG/ML, give 5 ml by mouth one time a day for poor appetite for 3 Days. On 05/25/24 Calcium Acetate (Phos Binder)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competency related to following physician's orders for medication administration and documentation for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: Facility policy titled, Administering Medications, last revised April 2019 documents as follows: Policy Statement Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 2. The director of nursing services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions. 3. Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 5. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: a. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication; b. preventing potential medication or food interactions; and c.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4) A medication pass observation with a random resident, who asked to remain confidential, was made on 03/27/24. Upon entering the room, the surveyor introduced herself and explained she was observing the nurse. The resident stated, The nurses are great, but you need to check up on the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). On 03/27/24 in the afternoon, when asked what was meant by check up on the CNAs, the random resident stated, Some are great, but some have such attitudes. They don't care. I treat them with respect and expect the same from them, but don't always get it. The resident stated, Some act as if they don't want to be here. I know it's a tough job, but it is their job. And they don't let us know they are the CNA for the shift. The resident explained that the nurses come around at the beginning of each shift and let them know they will be the nurse for the shift. Review of the record revealed the resident was cognitively intact, as per a recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident council group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of the group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility for 9 of 9 sampled residents interviewed during the Resident Council meeting (Resident #47, #45, #8, #10, #58, #63, #33, #70, and #7). This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as the resident council represents all residents. The findings included: On 03/27/24 at 11:01 AM, interviews were conducted with 9 active, alert and oriented members of the Resident Council (Resident # 47, #45, #8, #10, #58, #63, #33, #70, and #7). The 9 resident council members were asked about the facility's response to grievances voiced by members of the Resident Council during their monthly meetings. All of the resident council members agreed that several grievances were voiced during the monthly Resident Council meetings, but none of these grievances had been resolved by the facility's administration. Three of the council members who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 3 of 4 units (100 Unit, 300 Unit and 400 Unit). The findings included: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the room smelled of urine. It was difficult to tell from which bed the urine smell was coming from. The urine smell was strong around each of the 3 beds in the room. The floor appeared to be dirty and there was debris observed underneath bed B. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the vinyl on the arms of the resident's wheelchair in bed B was cracked and partially missing. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the surface of the foot board of bed A was worn in a manner that the material under the surface was exposed. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the surfaces of the headboard, foot board and nightstand to the resident's right side of the bed was worn in a manner that the material under the surface was exposed. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the surface of the over bed table for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure that all voiced grievances made by residents to staff are put in writing on a grievance form and submitted to the appropriate person for resolution for 9 of 9 resident council members interviewed; 2) Ensure all written grievances include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued for 9 of 9 resident council members interviewed; 3) Ensure prompt efforts are made to resolve grievances voiced by 1 of 1 resident who had concerns regarding the roommate's television being on all day and night (Resident #13). The findings included: The facility's Policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve foods in a sanitary manner, in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The findings included: 1). During the initial kitchen tour, on 03/25/24 at 8:44 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager, the following were noted. a. The blade of the can opener was noted to have food residue and the surface of the blade was peeling. b. Staff were observed using a damp cloth to wipe the lid of Cambro containers. c. There was an accumulation of ice on the cooling unit and on top of boxes of products that were stored directly under the cooling unit in the walk in freezer. d. The handles of knives were damaged to a point that made them uncleanable non-food contact surfaces. e. Raw shell eggs were stored over pasteurized shell eggs in walk-in refridgerator. f. Staff H, Dietary Aide, was observed rinsing towels in the only hand washing sink in the food service area and leaving food residue in the basin. g. Staff I,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor preferences for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #159, #161 and #74). The facility failed to respond to a verbal request for side rails to assist with bed mobility for Resident #159. Shower preferences and schedules were not followed for Resident #161 and #74. The findings included: 1) During an interview on 03/25/24 at 12:19 PM, Resident #159 stated she had been asking for a bed side rail since she was admitted to the facility. The resident stated she wanted it to assist her with turning in bed and that she had been asking everyone for it. Observation of the bed at that time lacked any type of side rail or mobility device. During a supplemental interview on 03/27/24 at 3:28 PM with the resident and her family, they all confirmed the resident had been asking for a bed side rail since day one. Review of the record revealed Resident #159 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Admission/readmission Evaluation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to update care plans related to nutrition interventions for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #60), and Hospice status for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #43). The findings included: 1) Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent full assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #60 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that Resident #60 required 'Supervision or touching assistance' for eating. Resident #60's diagnoses at the time of the MDS included: Anemia, Quadriplegia, Traumatic Brain Injury, Malnutrition, Cognitive Communication Deficit, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Dysphagia, and History of Healed Traumatic Fracture. Resident #60's dietary Orders included: Regular diet, Mechanically Altered Ground texture, Nectar Thickened Liquids consistency - Fortified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #13) reviewed for falls. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was transferred to her current room on 02/17/24. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This same MDS documented Resident #13 had a history of a fall with a fracture prior to her admission, and that she needed partial to moderate assist for both toileting and walking. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was at moderate risk for falls. Review of the current care plan initiated 01/29/24 documented the resident was at risk for falls and staff were to provide toileting assistance as per the resident's needs and therapy recommendations.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter bags remained off the floor for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #61, #83, and #50); and failed to ensure staff documented the monitoring of input and output of fluids, as per physician orders, for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #50). The findings included: Review of the policy Urinary Catheter Care revised August 2022 documented, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. Care: . 4. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had an indwelling catheter and had an urinary tract infection in the past 30 days. Current orders documented staff were to empty, record and monitor the nephrostomy tubes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper care and services for a peripheral intravenous (IV) line for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #61). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current orders lacked any order for an intravenous line, although discontinued orders revealed the resident received an IV medication for three days as of 03/22/24. Review of current care plans lacked any evidence, related to an IV line. During an attempted interview and observation on 03/25/24 at 3:18 PM, Resident #61 was unable to answer any questions. A peripheral IV line was noted to his right forearm dated 03/17/24 (Photographic Evidence Obtained). A supplemental observation on 03/26/24 at 3:37 PM revealed the same IV line dated 03/17/24. The Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware of the peripheral IV line for Resident #61. When asked the process for the peripheral lines, the DON stated they should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct respiratory assessment with nebulizer treatment per facility policy for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory concerns (Resident #29) The findings included: Policy review titled, administering medications through a small volume (handheld) nebulizer. Dated October 2010. The policy revealed the purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. Steps in the procedure included: #6. Obtain baseline pulse, respiratory rate and lungs sounds. #15. Instruct the resident to take deep breath, pause briefly and then exhale normally. #26 obtain post-treatment pulse, respiratory rate and lungs sounds. #27 rinse and disinfect the nebulizer equipment according to facility protocol, or wash pieces with warm, soapy water, rinse with hot water. Record review revealed Resident #29 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of blood sugars as evidenced by the failure to notify the physician of blood sugar levels greater than 250, as per physician order, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #13). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current orders revealed as of 01/31/24 staff were to obtain and record the blood sugar level for Resident #13 twice daily before breakfast and dinner, and notify the physician if the blood sugar reading was less than 70 or greater than 250, for diabetic monitoring. Review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and corresponding progress notes revealed the following blood sugar levels that were greater than 250, and the physician was not notified: On 03/01/24 at 4:30 PM the blood sugar reading was 260. On 03/02/24 at 4:30 PM the blood sugar reading was 317. On 03/03/24 at 4:30 PM the blood sugar reading was 346. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident's food preference for 1 of 10 sampled residents reviewed for food concerns (Resident #25). The findings included: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. On 03/25/24 at 10:20 AM, Resident #25 stated that all he gets for breakfast is sausage, sausage, sausage! He stated he would really like some bacon and ham sometimes, not always sausage. On 03/25/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, the Registered Dietitian was informed of Resident #25's request for more variety in choice of breakfast meats. She stated she would speak with the Resident to try to accommodate his request. A review of a Dietary Note dated 03/25/24 at 1:33 PM documents: Met with resident. He is requesting bacon at breakfast time. Explained bacon in relation to therapeutic diet and diet consistency. Resident verbalized understanding and requested to receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4) Review of the record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating he was cognitively intact. This MDS also revealed Resident #32 needed extensive to total assistance of one to two persons for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). During an interview on 12/13/22 at 11:33 AM, Resident #32 was asked about the food at the facility and explained he had been asking for cold cereal for breakfast and the nurses said it's too far away (for them to get it). During this continued interview at 11:38 AM, when asked if he was treated with respect and dignity, Resident #32 stated, The CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) are lazy. When asked why he said that, the resident explained when you ask for something like assistance they say, you can do it. When asked how that makes you feel, Resident #32 stated, like there is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide hot water for showers for 3 Residents (#82, #84 and #52); failed to maintain resident room doors for 3 Residents (#71, #19, and #52); and failed to ensure a clean and comfortable environment on 3 of 4 resident units (unit 200, unit 300 and unit 400). The findings included: Facility Policy titled TELS Policy on How to Submit a Work Order dated 08/01/2022 documents, It is the policy of [NAME] Rehab and Healthcare that in the event that a repair or routine maintenance needs to be made in the facility, staff members should fill out a work order in the TELS system for the Maintenance department to follow up with the repair. 1) On 12/12/2022 at 12:21 PM Resident #82 stated she wanted a shower, but the shower does not get warm. She stated it is ice cold and she cannot take a shower that way. On 12/13/2022 at 10:40 AM and 12/14/2022 at 1:00 PM Resident #82 stated they still do not have hot water in the shower, and they have not had hot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the MDS assessment for 3 of 5 sampled residents. This concern involved Resident #98, #21, and #52. The findings included: 1) Record review revealed Resident #21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a re-admission on [DATE]. The 5-day minimum data set (MDS) assessment, reference date 12/05/22, indicated a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 14, indicated Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Additional review of the MDS was conducted under section N for medication, subsection H for Opioid usage, it was revealed that the MDS was coded in error, the MDS coded 5, as an indication the Opioid was administered 5 times on the 7 days look back period. Review of the November and December medication administration records (MARs) showed the medication was administered 6 times on the 7 days look back period from 11/29-12/05/22. On 12/15/22 at 9:21 AM a side-by-side review of Resident #21's records and an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality of care for 6 of 29 sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to investigate conflicting medication orders on admission for Resident #92, failed to obtain stool for occult blood for Resident #82, failed to obtain consults in a timely manner for Resident #84 and #20, failed to maintain and utilize an indwelling blood sugar monitoring device as ordered for Resident #71, and failed to ensure diabetic ulcer wound care for Resident #93. The findings included: Facility policy, titled, admission Criteria dated 11/30/22 documented, Our facility admits only residents who's medical and nursing care needs can be met. Prior to or at the time of admission, the resident's attending physician provides the facility with information needed for the immediate care of the resident, including orders covering at least: medication orders, including (as necessary) a medical condition or problem associated with each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the family of a significant change of 1 of 1 sampled residents, Resident #75. The findings included: During a telephone interview on 12/13/22 at 8:09 AM with Resident #75's daughter, she stated that she was very upset because she was never notified that her mother had declined and that they put a foley catheter and pic line in her. Record review for Resident #75 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Dementia, Hypertension, Acute Kidney Failure, Heart Failure, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Dysphagia, Cardiomegaly, Metabolic Encephalopathy and Cirrhosis of the Liver. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) documents she has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of a 1 which means her cognition is severely impaired. Her Power of Attorney is her daughter. A review of the progress notes documents the following and does not mention notifying the daughter of change in condition: On 11/06/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided, failed to ensure an accurate activity care plan was completed, which the resident's may have benefited from one-on-one activities for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities (Resident #55 and Resident #75). The findings included: 1) During observations throughout the recertification survey from 12/12/22 through 12/15/22 Resident #55 and Resident #75 were never seen out of bed. There were no activities ever observed to be done with these residents. 1) Record review of Resident #55 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and in November 2022 was placed on hospice services. His diagnoses to include Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety Disorder, Rhabdomyolysis, Cerebral Infarction, and Dysphagia. His most current MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for Significant Change for hospice services on 11/09/22 documented he has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of a 4, which means his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the provision of podiatry services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #52). The findings included: During an interview and observation on 12/12/22 at 3:45 PM, Resident #52 stated she had not seen the podiatrist in a few months. The resident stated she was a diabetic and needed her nails trimmed. With permission of the resident, an observation was made and all the resident's toenails were elongated and needed to be trimmed. Review of the record revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include diabetes with neuropathy. Further review of the record revealed the last podiatry visit for Resident #52 was on 05/27/22. The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS also revealed the resident was a diabetic. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional service (supplements and weight monitoring), as ordered by the physician and as recommended by the Registered Dietitian for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed. This involved Resident #97 and #16. The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #97's record revealed, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, and Malnutrition. The modification 5 day minimum data set (MDS) assessment, reference date 11/08/22, recorded a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) score of 04, indicating Resident #97 was cognitively impaired. This MDS showed documented evidence that Resident #97 had received Parenteral/IV feeding (IV fluids) while in the facility for low sodium level. The MDS recorded Resident #97 required extensive assistance with eating. Review of physician order dated 10/24/22 indicated to monitor weekly weight times 4, every Monday for 4 Weeks. Review of Resident #97's records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105555. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.