Luxe At Jupiter Rehabilitation Center (the)
674 Pioneer Road, Jupiter, FL 33458 · For profit - Partnership · 129 certified beds · (718) 852-7000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $201,434 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-23)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.1% | 9.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.6% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 10.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.9% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 9.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.40 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 380 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 28.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.2%CMS range 61.8–69.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 7.4–11.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 28.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 27.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.0%CMS range 3.0–7.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 116.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to prevent an elopement, which resulted in two vulnerable residents who were able to leave the facility and travel along a busy roadway with a likelihood of being hurt, killed or lost, for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for an elopement risk (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Due to the likelihood that serious injury, harm and death could've occurred with Resident #1 and #2, a finding of Immediate Jeopardy was identified. The Immediate Jeopardy noncompliance started on 11/07/24 and is determined to be ongoing. The facility's Administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy and given the Immediate Jeopardy Template on 11/21/24 at 11:20 AM. The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Depression, and Dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #1 with a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infection of existing pressure wounds. The failure affected 2 of 6 sampled residents, Resident #2, who arrived at the hospital with maggots in the wound and Resident #6 who did not receive the prescribed treatment for tissue granulation and autolytic debridement. The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia and Heart Failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set with reference date of 12/31/24 documented the resident was assessed as moderately impaired for skills of daily decision making, had a urinary catheter, was incontinent of bowel and had an unstageable pressure wound, present on admission. Review of care plan dated 11/08/24 documented the resident has a pressure ulcer to the right hip. The goal documented the resident's pressure ulcer will show signs of healing as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure daily wound care for 1 of 4 sampled residents with surgical incisions (Resident #2). The lack of daily wound care for Resident #2 resulted in maceration of the surgical skin flap resulting in exposure to the bone with need for additional surgery; and the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 1 of 2 sampled residents with an IV (intravenous) line (Resident #1). The lack of timely response to needed care for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line dislodgement for Resident #1 on 09/04/24 resulted in psychological harm as evidenced by staff and family report that the resident was irate and hysterical. The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and send to the hospital directly from a surgical post-operative office visit on 09/03/24. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 1 of 2 sampled residents with an IV (intravenous) line (Resident #1). The lack of timely response to needed care for a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line dislodgement for Resident #1 on 09/04/24 resulted in psychological harm as evidenced by staff and family report that the resident was irate and hysterical. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred out the the hospital on [DATE], after dislodgement of the resident's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC/intravenous access through a vein in the arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the IV antibiotic Invance 1 gram was started at 5:33 PM by Staff C, RN, who was the assigned direct care nurse for Resident #1 on 09/04/24 during the day shift. Review of the PPD Detail Report (a report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for 1 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by sending Resident #2, who was severely cognitively impaired, to a physician's appointment wearing two hospital gowns. He was left unattended for 45 minutes in the main waiting area of the physician's office, where 42 people entered during that time.The findings included:Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS also documented the resident had bilateral lower extremity impairment, needed the total assistance from staff for transfers, toileting, and lower body needs, while needing substantial to maximum assistance from staff for upper body needs.During a phone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care to ensure 2 of 3 sampled cognitively impaired residents, were appropriately accompanied and or able to be seen at scheduled appointments. Resident #2 had a scheduled new patient cardiology appointment and the facility failed to inform the resident representative of the appointment, failed to ensure needed pre-authorization as per his insurance, failed to send the resident appropriately clothed to ensure comfort, and failed to accompany the resident to the appointment. Resident #4, who was also cognitively impaired, was sent unaccompanied to a medical appointment at the Veteran Affairs (VA) Medical Center.The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, on a 0 to 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during activities of daily living (ADLs) care and failed to provide care upon request for 7 of 33 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents #254, 251, 256, 55, 83, 250, and # 23). The findings included: 1) The clinical record indicated that Resident #254 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included depression. The admission assessment, dated 03/09/25, included a brief interview with a mental status score of 14, which indicated that Resident #254 was cognitively intact. The assessment noted mood symptoms such as feeling down, depressed, or hopeless but recorded no behavioral symptoms. On 03/31/25, at 9:41 AM, during an interview with Resident #254, she stated that the staff had spoken foreign languages in her room during care, which made her uncomfortable as she did not understand what they were saying or doing. 2) The clinical record revealed that Resident #251 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to follow their policy for loss of hot water and ensure sufficient hot water was available to the residents in their rooms and showers for 8 of 34 sampled residents (Residents #29, #27, #13, #301, #302, #303, #68, #23). The findings included: 1) Review of a policy titled, Water Temperatures Safety Checks documented that the facility will make every effort to provide water tempeatures between 105 and 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Water temperatures are checked every morning at different locations in the facility and documented. There is no date or policy number for this policy. Review of a policy titled, Loss of Hot Water revised 01/25 documented the facility is committed to maintaining a safe and comfortable environment for all residents. In the event of a hot water loss, prompt actions will be taken to ensure resident needs are met ad compliance with Florida regulations is maintained. Procedure: 1. Immediate response; Assessment: Upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide timely and appropriate care and services as evidenced by verbal complaints from residents, family, and staff, which resulted in dignity concerns, the lack of call light response, wound care and activity of daily living (ADLs) care concerns. This concerned multiple residents, including Residents #256, #250, #72, #10, #23, #254, #11, #46, #62, #29, #27, #55, #73, #68, #45, #75, #83, #23, #251, #10, #50, and #85. The findings included: 1) The clinical record for Resident #256 indicated admission to the facility on [DATE]. The care plan initiated on 03/21/25 noted that Resident #256 had the potential for an ADL self-care deficit due to varying participation, fatigue, and chronic medical conditions. On 03/31/25, at 11:16 AM, Resident #256 was observed at the nursing station alongside two family members. He was noted to have facial hair that needed to be shaved, and he appeared confused. An interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at acceptable food temperatures for 9 residents (Residents #75, #83, #23, #251, #10, #29, #50, #27, and #85) out of 10 residents investigated for food concerns. This had the potential to affect 111 out of 112 residents on PO (by mouth) diets. The findings included: 1) A record review revealed that Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Sjogren syndrome with Lung Involvement, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease. Her diet order dated 03/31/25 was for a Regular diet. This resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, per Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was 15. This indicated that Resident #23 was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident #23 on 04/02/25 at 12:30 PM, when asked how her lunch was today, Resident # 23 said that the food was good today for a change.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services for 5 of 34 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to implement the bowel program for Resident #44, failure to follow blood pressure parameters for Resident #10 and #23, failure to ensure the provision of a urology appointment for Resident #62, and failure to notify the physician of blood sugar levels as per physician order for Resident #303. The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the current care plan initiated on 08/26/24 revealed Resident #44 was at risk for bowel irregularity related to decreased mobility, and potential side effects of medications. The documented goal was that the resident would have a bowel movement at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure supervision and staff training for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #19), reviewed for falls. The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Falls - Managing, Preventing, and Documentation revised 01/2024, documented, in part, Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk: 1. The staff will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. Documentation: . 2. The resident's care plan should be updated timely with the new interventions determined by the interdisciplinary team. Review of the record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the current care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for the administration of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #31), reviewed for enteral feeding. The findings included: A record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, Unspecified Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia, and Muscle Wasting in Multiple Sites with Atrophy. This resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, per Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was 4. This indicated that Resident #31 had severe cognitive impairment. A record review revealed Resident #31's most recent weight on 03/09/25 was 93.8 pounds. Her Body Mass Index (BMI) was 18.3. This indicated that Resident #31 was underweight. She lost 8 pounds in six months from 101.8 pounds on 09/02/24 to 93.8 pounds. The MDS quarterly assessment completed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely IV (intravenous) dressing changes for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #29. The findings included: Review of the policy titled, IV Dressing Change revised 11/2024 documented in part, Standard: This purpose of this procedure is to minimize catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened, or soiled catheter-site dressings. Procedure: 1. Dressing changes to be completed if it becomes damp, loosened or visibly soiled and at least every 7 days. Review of the record revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current orders revealed a midline IV catheter was ordered on 03/20/25 for the resident to receive IV medications. These orders also contained instructions to flush the IV before and after two current antibiotics that were being administered via the IV line, to include daptomycin and meropenem. These orders lacked any instructions for the nursing staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly administer oxygen therapy for 2 of 2 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to ensure proper physician orders for oxygen use for Resident #302, and that the prescribed physician order for oxygen was followed for Resident #54. The findings included: Review of the Policy titled, Standards and Guidelines for Oxygen Administration revised 12/2023, documented, in part, Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, cannula or other device per physicians' orders with the appropriate flow of oxygen. 1) Observations of Resident #302 from 03/31/25 to 04/03/25 revealed that the resident is on oxygen by nasal cannula. The setting of his oxygen is set at 4.5 LPM (liters per minute). A review of Resident #302's records revealed Resident #302 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) with Acute Exacerbation, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an assessment and an order for side rails for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for side rails (Resident #302). The findings included: Observations were made from 03/31/25 to 04/02/25 of Resident #302's bed. He has 2 metal side rails up on the right side and 1 metal side rail up on the left side. On 04/02/25-04/04/25 observations were made of a larger bed in Resident #302's room with 1 side rail up on each side of the bed by the head of the bed. A review of Resident #302's records revealed Resident #302 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Visual Loss, Hypertension, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Unspecified Delirium, and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). A review of the admission Assessment for bed rails dated 03/18/25 documents that side rails are not needed. There was no Physician Orders or documentation on further assessing the resident for side rails. During an interview on 04/04/25 at 4:40 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to obtain an ordered laboratory result for a medication (Depakote) for 1 of 1 sampled Resident (Resident #61). The findings included: The facility policy titled, Standards and Guidelines: Physician's Orders, revised on 01/2024 documented in part: Physician orders should be followed as prescribed, and if not followed, this should be recorded in the resident's medical record during that shift. The physician should be notified and the responsible party if indicated. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include in part Hypertension, Major depressive disorder, Congestive heart failure, Atrial fibrillation, Anemia, Protein calorie malnutrition and a brief psychotic disorder. On 11/27/24 Resident #61 was ordered 750 mg Depakote Sprinkles by mouth two times a day for mood disorder. The order was changed on 02/13/25 to read Depakote 500 mg 1 tablet two times a day for mood disorder. The facility has a pharmacist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences for 5 of 10 sampled residents, Residents #27, #29, #44, #50, and #85, who had food complaints, as evidenced by the failure to follow the meal ticket and menu. The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, on a 0 to 15 scale. Review of a dietary progress note dated 02/04/25, documented in part, Resident #27 would like to update her food preferences, to include a chef garden salad with ranch dressing as an entree every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A subsequent progress note dated 02/18/25 documented the resident was happy with the updated food preferences. Review of a dietary assessment by the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 02/27/25 revealed the resident now had wounds and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and the prevention of foodborne illnesses. This had the potential to affect 111 of 112 residents on PO (by mouth) diets. The findings included: A. During the initial tour of the Main Kitchen on 03/31/25 at 9:15 AM, accompanied by the Kitchen Manager and the Regional Manager of Dietary, the following was observed: 1. The [NAME] microwave had light and dark brown debris on all sides of the interior of the microwave. The kitchen managers agreed with this finding and said they will clean it up right away. 2. To the right of the coffee station, 2 recessed circular insets were dirty. One had brown liquid on the bottom. The Kitchen Manager wiped it out. The plastic utensil holder close to the round insets had brown residue on the top and spots of black powdery residue. 3. The 2 [NAME] double-door ovens had black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out their activities of daily living to maintain personal hygiene, grooming, mobility are provided the necessary care and services in a timely manner. The facility also failed to maintain accurate documentation of the care and services that are provided. This failure affected 3 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1, #5 and a confidential random resident). The findings included: 1) Review of the clinical record for Resident #5 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Dysphasia following Cerebral Infarction, Pneumonitis following ingestion of other solids and liquids, Acute Respiratory Failure, Sepsis, Cardiac Arrest due to other underlying conditions, Gastrostomy, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the 03/04/25 plan of care revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of neglect for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for neglect (Resident #2). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI) revised on 01/2024 documented the following: Standard: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation, and mistreatment. Reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property and mistreatment, collectively known and referred to as ANEMMI and hereafter defined, will not be tolerated by anyone, including staff, residents, volunteers, family members, legal guardians, resident representatives, friends or any other individuals. The Health Center Administrator is responsible for assuring that Residents' Rights of personal privacy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the nursing staff failed to implement the facility policy for the storage of nebulizer equipment. The failure affected 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: Record review revealed the facility's policy titled, Respiratory Treatment Administration, last revised 12/2023 documented Nebulizers are administered per physician's orders and nebulizer tubing is stored in a hygienic manner (i.e. labeling bag with date tubing was change). Additional guidelines: Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Observation of care conducted on 01/22/25 starting at 9:10 AM revealed Resident #1 was lying in her bed. A nebulizer machine was observed on the nightstand, the nebulizer mask was dirty, stained with yellow substance, and it was inside a plastic bag from a grocery store with a bread label. The mask was connected to the nebulizer machine. The resident's spouse informed the surveyor that the staff does not change the mask and that he put it inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify 1 of 8 sampled resident representatives of a change in condition and treatment (Resident #5). The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the profile page revealed the specified family member of Resident #5 was the resident's first emergency contact. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, on a 0 to 15, indicating the resident was cognitively impaired. Further review of the record revealed a documented change in condition as of 09/09/24 of malaise (a vague feeling of discomfort) and poor appetite, with orders for laboratory work to include a urinalysis. The area on this change in condition form where the resident representative was to be notified was left blank. Review of the progress notes lacked any notification to the resident representative. Review of the urinalysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and functional environment as evidenced by the failure to maintain 4 of 6 Soiled Utility/Holding (biohazard) rooms secured (1E, 1W, 3E and 3W); failure to maintain 1 of 6 housekeeping areas secured (1W); failure to ensure 1 of 6 (2W) emergency exits of the residential areas secured; failure to ensure 2 of 2 observed oxygen tanks were secured; and failure to provide documented evidence of timely repairs for 4 of 4 resident toilets. The findings included: Review of the policy Oxygen Storage revised 12/2023 documented, General Guidelines: . 3. Oxygen Tanks should no be left free standing, as per facility protocol. 1) During a facility tour on 09/30/24 beginning at 10:47 PM, the following was observed with photographic evidence obtained: a) At 11:00 PM the housekeeping door on 1W was propped open with a crushed water bottle. Inside the room was a mop bucket full of dark brown/black water and a gallon jar of cleaning solution labeled Danger Peligro. b) At 11:14 PM the Soiled Utility/Holding door on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, incident review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation for 1 of 2 sampled residents with an allegation of neglect, as evidenced by a lack of written statements from all staff involved in the incident and contradictions during staff interviews regarding the incident with Resident #1 on 09/04/24. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred out to the hospital on [DATE], after dislodgement of the resident's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC/intravenous access through a vein in the arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart). A change in condition form and progress note, both dated 09/04/24 at 7:15 PM but created eight days after the event on 09/12/24 by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), simply documented the PICC line was noted on the floor with a small quantity of blood on the floor, sheets and adjacent to the IV site on the resident's right arm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, incident review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing, as evidenced by the lack of timely response to needed PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) line dislodgment care for 1 of 2 sampled residents with an IV (intravenous) line (Resident #1); and as evidenced by numerous verbal and written complaints. The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred out the hospital on [DATE], after dislodgement of the resident's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC/intravenous access through a vein in the arm and threaded into a large vein near the heart). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the IV antibiotic Invance 1 gram was started at 5:33 PM by Staff C, RN, who was the assigned direct care nurse for Resident #1 on 09/04/24 during the day shift. Review of the PPD Detail Report, that documented when staff clock in and out, revealed Staff C had clocked out at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure food preferences for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #7 and #8). The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on 10/02/24 at 11:09 AM, the resident stated some of the food is just about inedible and unable to recognize. When asked if she could get an alternate meal upon request, the resident stated, I eat the PB&J (peanut butter and jelly) and tuna sandwiches, but they haven't had any tuna now for the past couple of weeks. When asked how she knows what is on the menu for that day, Resident #7 stated I have to look at the menu on the wall. During an observation and interview on 10/02/24 at about 2:00 PM, when asked if there has been an issue providing tuna sandwiches over the past two weeks, the Kitchen Manager stated he had plenty of tuna and showed the surveyor a partial case of restaurant sized can tuna. When told Resident #7 was informed by direct care staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program as evidenced by the failure to initiate and maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1, #6, #7 and #8) The findings included: Review of the policy titled,Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 05/28/24 documented, Procedure: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are used for resident with any of the following: . b. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be colonized with MDRO (multidrug-resistant organisms). 9. Appropriate PPE for EBP would include: a. Gown. b. Gloves. 10. Employees should wear appropriate PPE when performing the following duties for residents requiring EBP: a. Dressing b. Bathing/Showering c. Transferring d. Providing hygiene e. Changing soiled linens f. Providing pericare such as changing briefs g. Toileting h. Device care i. Wound care 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse involving 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Grievances, last revised 06/2023, documented The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies depending on the nature of the allegations. all alleged violations of neglect, abuse and or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse and neglect, as per state law. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment and Injury of Unknown Origin (ANEMMI), last revised 10/2022 documented the following: Reporting and Response: All allegations of possible ANEMMI will be immediately reported to the abuse hotline by the Administrator or Designee and will be evaluated to determine the direction of the investigation Alleged violations are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter was secured to prevent excessive tension of the tubing; failed to provide catheter care following infection control practices to minimize complications; and failed to provide a privacy bag to promote the resident's privacy. The failure affected 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. (Resident #4) The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care dated 01/2024 documented, The facility will maintain infection control guidelines related to catheter care use and catheter care to minimize catheter associated infections. Routine hygiene and care of the peri area is appropriate when providing incontinence care and bathing. Center of Disease Control (CDC) recommends maintenance and catheter care essentials: · Use appropriate hand hygiene and gloves · Properly secure catheters to prevent movement and urethral traction · Maintain a sterile closed drainage system · Maintain good hygiene at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined, the clinical staff failed to complete an assessment after a resident sustained an injury; failed to obtain and report all pertinent information to the provider to ascertain the best course of treatment; failed to complete an incident report after the injury was reported by the resident; and failed to complete an investigation to determine if the resulting injury, a fractured wrist, met the criteria for an adverse event. These failures affected 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation services on 02/10/24. Review of the Fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed at high risk with a score of 12 (a score greater than 10 deems the individual as high risk). Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with reference date 02/13/24 documented the resident was assessed as independent for skills of daily decision making;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy related to: 1) Medication concerns for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #28); and 2) Food concerns for 17 out of 29 sampled residents (Resident #21, #289, #287, #31, #4, #67, #285, #59, #292, #186, #290, #69, #291, #294, #44, #15, and #11). The findings included: The facility's Grievances/Complaint, Filing Policy (2001 Med-Pass, Inc., Revised April 2017) states: Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g. the State Ombudsman). The Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 3. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for notification of change. The notification of change was related to Resident #28's change in medications. The findings included: Per Residents Rights [42 CFR 483.10], the facility must treat the decisions of a resident representative as the decisions of the resident to the extent required by the court or delegated by the resident, in accordance with applicable law. The resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including: The right to be informed, in advance, of changes to the plan of care. Record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, Major Depressive Disorder, and Dementia. According to Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 09/29/23, Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Because of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the Facility failed to ensure the Power of Attorney for 1 of 11 sampled residents' was notified of and included in the Resident's Care Plan Meetings (Resident #28). The findings included: Per Residents Rights [42 CFR 483.10], the facility must treat the decisions of a resident representative as the decisions of the resident to the extent required by the court or delegated by the resident, in accordance with applicable law. The resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including: The right to be informed, in advance, of changes to the plan of care. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's, Major Depressive Disorder, and Dementia. According to Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 09/29/23, Resident #28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Because of Resident #28's cognitive issues, she was not able to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide wound care dressing changes for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for wound care, Resident #33. The findings included: The facility policy, titled, Steps for Clean Dressing Change, and undated, documented, in part: addresses step by step how to perform a dressing change. The final step is 19 which reads, 'document in chart as needed.' Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Charcot's joint left ankle and foot, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Ankylosis left ankle, Hypertensive Heart Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, presence of other orthopedic joint implants and Cardiac Pacemaker. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of 08/22/3 documented the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating cognition was intact. Review of the care plans documented the resident had cellulitis of left foot and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, it was determined, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to minimize complications for a resident with a gastronomy tube during medication administration. The failure affected 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #141). The findings included: Medication administration observation conducted on 12/05/23 starting at 10:22 AM revealed Staff A, a Registered Nurse, preparing medications for Resident #141. Staff A prepared two medications, Pepcid and Vimpat, crushed the medications separately and entered the room. The resident was sitting up in a chair and the tube feeding was off. Staff A then explained she needed to check for Gastronomy Tube (G Tube) placement and grabbed her stethoscope, listen to the resident's bowel sounds, then with her hands pressed down on the resident's abdomen. The staff then attached the syringe to the G Tube and poured thirty millimeters of tap water, then proceeded to administer the medications and flushed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competency related to the acquisition and provision of medication administration. The failure affected 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #27). The findings included: Facility policy titled Medication Shortages/Unavailable Medications, not dated documents the following: When medications are not received or are unavailable for the customers, the licensed nurse will urgently initiate action in cooperation with the attending physician and the pharmacy provider. PROCEDURE If a medication shortage is noted at the time of medication administration (Med-pass), the licensed nurse or certified medication assistant must immediately initiate action to obtain the medication and not wait until the med pass is completed. B. If a medication shortage is noted during normal pharmacy hours: 1. A licensed nurse notifies the pharmacy and speaks to a registered pharmacist to determine the status of the order.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure antibiotic prescribing criteria includes clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory reports and appropriate monitoring to protect residents from harm caused by unnecessary antibiotic use, and to combat antibiotic resistance. The failure affected 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #27). The findings included: Clinical record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Leukemia and Malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set, admission assessment with reference date of 11/18/23 documented the resident was assessed as moderately impaired for skills of daily decision making; exhibited no behaviors, has an urinary catheter and is receiving oxygen therapy. Review of the Care Plan dated 11/17/23, titled revealed, The resident has a risk for injury/infection related to the presence of supra pubic catheter secondary to a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder, obstructive uropathy and prostate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medication removal and administration between the medication administration records (MARs) and the medication monitoring control record for 3 of 4 residents Residents #196, #200 & #147. The findings included: On 08/11/22 at 11:38 AM during the medication storage review process on the second floor, two residents were selected for narcotic medication reconciliation. The August 2022 MARs were compared against the medication monitoring control record for Resident #196. There were discrepancies between the records. It was revealed Resident #196 was on Alprazolam 0.50 mg once daily as needed. The medication monitoring control record documented for the removal of the medication on 8/1 at 9:47 PM, but this removal was not documented in the August 2022 MARs. Furthermore, the August 2022 MARs documented the administration of this medication on 8/2 at 12 AM, but the medication monitoring control record was not documented to reflect this removal. In addition, the medication monitoring control record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff J, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to ensure hand hygiene between residents, during the lunch meal tray delivery on 08/08/22 for 1 of 4 units (second floor west), affecting Residents #22, #198, #199, #91, #150, #92, #151, and #152. Staff K, a CNA, failed to don a gown and or ensure hand hygiene during COVID-19 testing for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #196 and Resident #149, also affecting Resident #22). The record lacked evidence of the prompt provision of Transmission Based Precautions (TBPs) and prompt monitoring for signs and symptoms of worsening COVID-19 for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed with the Sars-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus (Resident #144). Staff L, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) failed to maintain infection prevention and control processes for 1 of 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and manufacturer's instructions, Staff K, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to follow instructions for the COVID-19 antigen tests for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #196, #149, #22, and #199). The findings included: Review of the [NAME] BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Procedure Card documented after obtaining the nasal sample and placing the swab in the test card, Close and securely seal the card. Read result in the window 15 minutes after closing the card. IN order to ensure proper test performance, it important to read the result promptly at 15 minutes, and not before. An observation of resident COVID-19 testing of residents was made on 08/10/22 beginning at 8:55 AM. Staff K, a CNA, obtained a nasal sample from Resident #196, placed the swab in the testing card, and at 9:04 AM she read the results as negative and threw away the sample in the red bag. On 08/10/22 at 9:04 AM, Staff K obtained a nasal sample from Resident #149. At 9:06 AM the CNA put the swab into the card and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident choices are honored for 2 of 4 sampled residents. Resident #93 was not transferred back into bed in a timely manner, per her request, on two different occasions (08/06/22 and 08/10/22). Resident #93 was not offered and did not receive showers as per the facility schedule or as per her choice. Resident #94 was placed on contact precautions unnecessarily. The findings included: 1) During an interview on 08/09/22 at 9:26 AM, Resident #93 and her adult daughter explained Resident #93 was recently paralyzed from the waist down because of blood clots that were found on her spine. They explained the resident was at the facility for therapy and then long-term placement as she can no longer care for herself. They explained the resident could no longer walk and that the staff had to use a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device requiring two persons to safely lift a resident from one surface to another) for transfers. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure dressing changes for non-pressure ulcers were done as per physician order for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin condition (Resident #142). The findings included: During an interview on 08/08/22 at 2:55 PM, with Resident #142, she stated that no one has changed her bandage on her left leg since 08/04/22, it is weeping through the bandage. She stated that she told someone last week and they said the wound care person was coming in. I saw him across the hall, but he did not stop to see me and change it. The date of the bandage is 08/04/22. (Pphotographic evidence obtained.) Record review for Resident #142 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include cellulitis of left lower limb. Her MDS (Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of a 15, which means her cognition is intact. Further review of the MDS documents under skin condition applications of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper Foley catheter (indwelling urinary drainage device) care and services for 2 of 3 sampled residents. Staff failed to ensure proper catheter care for Resident #93. The tubing for the urinary catheters for both Residents #93 and #98 lacked anchoring, used to prevent urinary infections. The findings included: Review of the policy Catheter Care, Urinary dated January 2022 documented, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Changing Catheters: . 2. Ensure that the catheter remains secured with a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. (Note: Catheter tubing should be strapped to the resident's inner thigh.) This policy further describes the steps in providing catheter care to include cleaning of the resident with soap and water, then using a clean washcloth with warm water and soap to cleanse and rinse the catheter from the insertion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper respiratory care and services for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #91 and #96). The nurse failed to stay with and monitor Resident #91 during a respiratory treatment via nebulizer, then failed to properly clean the nebulizer equipment after use. The oxygen tubing for the concentrator and nebulizer for Resident #96 was not changed for two weeks as per physician order. The findings included: Review of the policy Administering Medication through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer, revised January 2022 documented, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. Steps in the Procedure: . (after setting up of the medication) . 15. Remain with the resident for the treatment. 16. Monitor for medication side effects, including rapid pulse, restlessness and nervousness throughout the treatment. 17. Encourage the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. The findings included: During a kitchen tour on 08/08/22 at 7:55 AM, with the Dietary Manager, it was observed around the outside of the cardboard dumpster, boxes, dirty masks, plastic containers, wood strip, plastic strip, and debris on side of dumpster. By the second dumpster, a dirty glove was observed laying in the street by the sidewalk. On 08/11/22 at 6:50 AM, a secondary tour of the dumpster was completed with the Regional Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), two dirty gloves observed laying on the ground by the dumpster. Photographic evidence obtained.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation related to self/family administration of medications for Resident #31, 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medications. The findings included: During an interview on 08/08/22 at 10:50 AM, with the spouse of Resident #31, she stated she had concerns that the facility was not giving her husband his medications in a timely manner and because of that she is having to administer them herself. A review of Resident #31's electronic records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission from hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Parkinson's Disease, Orthostatic Hypotension, Spondylosis, Spinal Stenosis, Respiratory Failure, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Nonrheumatic Aortic Stenosis, Muscle Weakness and Difficulty Walking. Review of his MDS dated [DATE] reveals he has a BIMS of 15, which means he is cognitively intact. A review of his Care Plans dated 08/08/22 reveals that he has a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-04 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of the client's Arbitration agreements, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement is explained to the resident or representative in a manner they understand (Resident #306), and had a signature from the resident or representative if they agree to the arbitration agreement (Residents #87, #306, and #307). This is for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration. The findings included: During the entrance conference on 03/31/25 at 9:47 AM, the surveyor requested a list of residents that currently reside in the facility since 09/16/19 that entered into a binding arbitration agreement. On 04/02/25 the Surveyor was given a list of residents that had a zero, 1 or 2 next to their name. Further review of the arbitration agreement revealed zero meant that the residents did not sign the arbitration agreement, the #1 they agreed to the arbitration agreement and signed the document one time and the #2 meant they have 2 or more arbitration agreements that they have signed. There are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-08-11 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a completed baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 4 of 20 sampled residents. A baseline care plan is used by facility staff to guide the basic care needs of a resident until the comprehensive care plans are developed. The baseline care plans are to be kept up to date until the initiation of the comprehensive care plans. A baseline care plan was not developed for Resident #93. The baseline care plans for Residents #92, #96, and #98 lacked care and services and or essential equipment. The findings included: 1) During an interview on 08/09/22 at 9:26 AM, Resident #93 and her adult daughter explained the resident was recently admitted after hospitalization and identification of blood clots on her spine that left her paralyzed from the waist down. Resident #93 needed total assistance for transferring via a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device requiring two persons to safely lift a resident from one surface to another) and had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-08-11 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post nurse staffing hours information timely for 4 of 4 days. The findings included: On 08/08/22 at 7:32 AM upon entering the facility, the staffing information posted at the front lobby was dated 08/06/22. On 08/09/22 at 8:21 AM upon entering the facility, the staffing information posted at the front lobby was dated 08/08/22. On 08/10/22 at 8:32 AM upon entering the facility, the staffing information posted at the front lobby was dated for 08/09/22. On 08/11/22 at 8:35 AM an interview was held with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), regarding posting of staffing hours information. The NHA revealed staffing hours information are posted at the beginning of the business day, or whenever the staffing coordinator arrived at the facility which was usually between 8 or 9 AM. When asked at what time does the shift begin, she stated at 7 AM. She was made aware of staffing hours information were not being posted per regulation (at the beginning of the shift). Informed the NHA of days of concern, she acknowledged the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to safely store medications on 1 of 4 treatment carts (first floor east), and on 1 of 4 medication carts (first floor east). The findings included: Review of the policy Storage of Medications revised January 2022 documented, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 8. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. 9. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. 1) The survey team entered the facility on 08/08/22 at 7:30 AM. During an observation of the first floor east nursing station on 08/08/22 at 7:53 AM, the treatment cart was noted unlocked and unattended (photographic evidence obtained). Observation in the nurses' station, and up and down the hall lacked any staff within sight. This treatment cart contained medications to include at minimum seven ointments in the top drawer, three ointments in the second drawer, and hydrogen peroxide and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$201,434 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $12,948 — penalty dated 2025-01-23
- $17,518 — penalty dated 2025-01-23
- $163,404 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
- $3,782 — penalty dated 2023-12-07
- $3,782 — penalty dated 2023-12-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-26 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUPITER REHAB HOLDINGS PARTNERS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 05/21/2021 |
| SCHUSTER, RACHEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| BALDO, ADELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/04/2026 |
| BROWN, PAULETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/06/2025 |
| LOPEZ MONTANEZ, EDUARDO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2025 |
| PIERRE, BERRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/24/2025 |
| ASTON HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2022 |
| LUXE CONSULTING GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106148. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.