Terrace Of Kissimmee, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 110 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by failing to honor the resident's wishes for life saving measures, by failing to follow physician's order for Full Code and failing to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#2). On [DATE] at approximately 10:05 PM, resident #2 was found not breathing by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D. The CNA notified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C who evaluated the resident with no vital signs. LPN C did not check the resident's code status nor provide CPR but instead informed the Weekend Supervisor Registered Nurse (RN) E of the situation at approximately 10:08 PM. RN E found resident #2 without any vital signs and failed to initiate CPR although he knew the resident had a physician order for Full Code. Both nurses failed to provide CPR, failed to call a code overhead for additional support, failed to call 911…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's/family's wishes and failed to follow the physician's order to provide basic life support (BLS) and initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#2). On [DATE] at approximately 10:05 PM, resident #2 was found unresponsive in bed, not breathing by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D. The CNA notified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C who evaluated the resident had no vital signs. LPN C did not verify the resident's code status, or initiate CPR and instead asked Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor E at approximately 10:08 PM to come to the resident's room. RN E evaluated resident #2 with no vital signs, disregarded the physician order for Full Code or Full Resuscitation status and did not initiate CPR. The facility's failure to ensure staff followed the resident/family's wishes and physician's order to initiate CPR resulted in Immediate Jeopardy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected health conditions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 12 residents, (#2).Findings: Review of resident #2's medical record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included seizures, disorders of bone density and structure, anxiety, muscle weakness, and dementia with mood disturbance. Review of resident #2's medical record revealed an Event Report dated 11/18/25 that documented a fall that resulted in bleeding from the nose and a skin tear above the right eyebrow. Review of the Observation Detail List Report dated 11/18/25 revealed resident #2 was transferred to the hospital due to the fall. Review of Section J - Health Conditions of resident #2's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/18/25 revealed she had one fall with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to communicate with the hospice provider when a change in condition was identified to ensure collaboration on the provision of necessary care and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice services, of a total sample of 12 residents, (#2).Findings: Review of resident #2's medical record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included seizures, disorders of bone density and structure, anxiety, muscle weakness, and dementia with mood disturbance. Review of resident #2's Progress Notes revealed a nursing note dated 8/15/25 and a Social Services note dated 8/17/25, detailing the resident returned to the facility from the hospital on hospice services. Review of resident #2's comprehensive care plan revealed a hospice care plan initiated on 8/18/25 and revised on 11/24/25. The care plan included an approach that directed nursing staff to observe the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to label, date, and discard food after an acceptable time period and by failing to air-dry glasses, cups, and trays prior to their use in meal service, in one of one walk-in refrigerator/freezer, one of one dry storage room and one of one kitchen. Findings: On 4/14/25 at 9:45 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with the Consultant Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) S, there were multiple leftover/previously opened food items found unlabeled and undated in the walk-in refrigerator as listed: four packages of wrapped American Cheese slices, two packages of shredded cheese, a half-pan of what appeared to be chicken breasts floating in water, a 1/3 steamtable pan of rice, a 1/6 pan of what appeared to be egg salad, a 1/3 pan of what appeared to be au gratin potatoes, a 1/2 pan of jello and a deep pan of some kind of ground, cooked meat. In addition, there was a number of leftover food items, undated as to when they were prepared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure implementation of policies to the extent of including thorough monitoring of previously identified areas of concern and adequately tracking performance to ensure prior improvement measures were realized and sustained for two of ten concerns identified during the survey, (F554, and F880). Findings: Review of the facility's undated policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, revealed the purpose of the QAPI Program was to establish data driven, facility wide processes to improve the quality of care, quality of life and clinical outcomes of their residents. The policy included Action Steps to support and enhance the QAPI Program. The document included, Gathering and using QAPI data in an organized and meaningful way. Areas that may be appropriate to monitor and evaluate include: . State surveys and deficiencies . The facility had concerns related to infection control and self-administration/improper administration of medications which led to deficiencies at F880 in the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper administration of medications for one of one resident assessed for self administration of medications, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#94). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #94 a [AGE] year-old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, peripheral neuropathy, mixed anxiety disorders, neuralgia. On 4/14/25 at 1:44 PM, resident #94's spouse was observed assisting the resident with his lunch in his room. On the overbed table next to the lunch tray were two 30 milliliter (ml) medication cups with multiple pills inside the cups. The resident's spouse stated the medications included eight pills including Tylenol, Parkinson's medication, antihistamine medication, neuropathy medication, stool softener, and laxative. Resident #94's spouse stated, the nurse always left the medications with her to give to the resident with the meal. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected resident's tobacco use for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (#511); reflected oxygen (O2) therapy for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care, (#511); and accurately reflected active diagnoses for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for psychiatric diagnoses, (#93), of a total sample of 44 residents. Findings: 1. Review of resident #511's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic respiratory failure, and dependence on supplemental O2. Review of resident #511's medical record revealed an admission Observation Report form dated 3/24/25 which indicated he used O2 via nasal cannula (NC). Review of resident #511's physician orders revealed an order dated 4/10/24 for O2 at 3 liters per minute (LPM) via NC. On 4/16/25 at 1:37 PM, resident #511 was observed lying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability (ID), or other related disorders had accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) completed upon admission and/or updated as needed to receive appropriate care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARRs, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#4 and #98). Findings: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of hypertension, bipolar disease type II, depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Resident #4's medication orders included medications for the diagnoses of bipolar disorder, and anxiety. Review of the Level I PASARR dated 6/29/22 performed pre-admission to the facility did not include the admitting diagnoses such as anxiety, depression, and bipolar disease type II. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's order for the care and treatment of catheter dressings for 1 of 5 residents sampled for skin conditions, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#412). Findings: Review of resident #412's medical record revealed an admission date of 4/10/25. His diagnoses included iron deficiency anemia secondary to blood loss, end stage renal disease, and need for assistance with personal care. On 4/11/25 his Brief Interview for Mental Status was assessed to be a 13/15, indicating intact cognitive function. Review of resident #412's weekly skin audit dated 4/10/25 noted in the new skin problems section that resident #412 had a surgical wound from a right chest Permacath and a chemoport on the left upper clavicle. A Permacath is a special catheter used for short term dialysis treatment that is tunneled under the skin and leads to a blood vessel going to the heart, (retrieved on 4/28/25 from www.drugs.com). A chemotherapy port is a small implantable device that attaches to a vein usually in the upper chest that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and follow-up for removal of an indwelling urinary catheter including a urology referral, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#95). Findings: Resident #95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute urinary tract infection. In the hospital discharge paperwork it noted resident #95 had a urinary catheter placed on 3/16/25 related to urinary retention. The discharge paperwork noted the catheter needed to be changed every 30 days and the resident needed a follow-up appointment with a urology specialist. There was no documentation in resident #95's medical record that a urology follow-up had been scheduled by the facility. On 4/16/25 at 5:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) H, had told her he did not want resident #95 to have the indwelling urinary catheter removed until he had a urology…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a triggered excessive weight loss for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for food and nutrition, of a total sample of 44 residents, (#26). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia (language disorder) following cerebral infarction, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set Quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 3/30/25 revealed resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15 which indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment showed the resident exhibited weight loss although he was not on a physician-prescribed weight loss prevention regimen. Review of resident #26's weights revealed on 1/10/25, the resident weighed 111.2 lbs. On 3/07/25 resident #26 weighed 109.8 lbs. and on 3/14/25 he weighed 100.4 lbs., an 8% loss in one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,724 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $38,724 — penalty dated 2024-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $447K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL