Lake Placid Health And Rehabilitation Center
125 Tomoka Blvd S, Lake Placid, FL 33852 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (863) 465-7200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.7% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.2% | 14.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.6% | 10.5% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.8% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.7% | 9.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.71 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 219 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.6%CMS range 49.2–64.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.5%CMS range 6.2–11.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 87.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.4–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 135.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary allergies and dietary preferences were honored for four residents (#146, #37, #101, #11) out of five residents reviewed for nutritional services. These failures resulted in emotional harm to one resident (#146) resulting in a discharge against medical advice (AMA), and potential harm due to food allergies to two residents (#37, #11) when the wrong dietary trays were served on multiple occasions. Finding included: 1) During an interview on 07/21/2025 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #146 stated, “I am leaving today, I cannot do this anymore. They always bring me food that I don't eat. Saturday, I went hungry because when they brought my tray it had bacon on it. I have talked to them; my family even came down from Canada to talk to them. I am a vegetarian and don’t eat any kind of meat. I asked them to get beans, and they cannot do that. I filed a grievance, but the Unit Manager wrote it, and it was not in my own words. They make me…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident's Health Care Surrogate (HCS) of medication changes, prior to implementing the changes for one resident (#1) of three residents sampled for notification of changes.Findings included: During a telephone interview on 02/19/2026 at 10:11 AM, Resident #1's HCS, explained the facility had not facilitated prior communication of medication changes before carrying out the changes. Resident #1's HCS stated the resident had begun taking Haldol and Depakote after presenting with behaviors at the facility. Resident #1's HCS expressed being upset the medication changes were not communicated prior to implementation. During an interview on 02/19/2026 at 02:20 PM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated Resident #1 was challenging and hard to work with at times. Staff A stated Resident #1 would curse and get loud with staff. Staff A stated for residents to get on psych medication, the unit manager was supposed to notify the family. Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and assess a change in condition in a timely manner for one resident (#1) of three residents sampled.Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's admission record revealed an initial admission date of 07/01/2019 and a discharge date of 07/28/2025. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include multiple sclerosis (07/01/2019), adult failure to thrive (07/01/2019), personal history of urinary (tract) infections (07/01/2019), cystic disease of liver (11/10/2021), dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (01/17/2024), and abnormal weight loss (12/06/2023). The review showed resident #1 had a responsible Party (RP) who was also the POA (Power of Attorney) and Emergency contact #1. Review of Resident #1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed in Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 07 out of 15 meaning, severe cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG - Functional Capabilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — widespreadImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the resident and resident representative (RR) of a change in room or roommate assignment for three (#146, #172 and #173) of three residents sampled. Findings included:During an interview on 07/22/25 at 10:45 a.m. Resident #172's Resident Representative (RR) stated the facility moved Resident #172 without notification to herself or Resident #172. Review of Resident #172's admission Record revealed an admission date to the facility on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: schizophrenia; metabolic encephalopathy; cognitive communication deficit; brief psychotic disorder; bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features; anxiety disorders; major depressive disorder (MDD); hypertension; metabolic encephalopathy; influenza due to identified novel influenza a virus with other respiratory manifestations; heart failure; non-ST elevation (NSTMI) myocardial infarction; and other co-morbidities. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure grievances were being addressed for five out of six months of resident council meetings and for three (#101, #106, #172) out of three residents sampled for grievances. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 7/21/25 at 10:39 a.m. with Resident #101. The resident said she was not happy with the way staff treated her sometimes. She said there was a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) that was rude to her and told her she was tired of having to clean her up after having had an incontinent episode. The CNA mentioned that the CNAs were talking about her. The resident spoke to Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and a Unit Manager (UM) was notified about the incident. Review of admission Records showed Resident #101 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia. Review of Resident #101’s Quarter Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C, Cognitive Patterns, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0628 — widespreadProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the transfer or discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and a notice was given before the transfer or discharge for two residents (#124 and #172) out of two residents reviewed for transfer/discharge process. Findings included: During an interview on 07/22/25 at 10:45 a.m. Resident #172’s Resident Representative (RR) stated the facility only provided medication list on discharge and Resident #172 lives in a group home as resident is unable to live independently with mental diagnosis’ and did not receive any information when resident was transferred to the hospital. Review of Resident #172’s admission Record revealed an admission date to the facility on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: schizophrenia; metabolic encephalopathy; cognitive communication deficit; brief psychotic disorder; bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features; anxiety disorders; major depressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0645 — widespreadPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure level I and level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) were accurate for 12 ( #1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 35, 55, 65, 76, 83, 118, and 172) out of 14 Residents sampled. Findings Included: Review of Resident 83's admission record revealed and admission date of 08/28/2024. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Other Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified Mood [Affective] Disorder, Opioid Dependence, Uncomplicated, Bipolar Disorder, Current Episode Mixed, Moderate, And Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Review of Resident #83's PASARR dated 07/31/2024, revealed anxiety disorder was not marked. Questions 1-7 were all marked no. Section IV. PASARR Screen Completion, no diagnosis or suspicion of serious mental illness or intellectual disability indicated, Level II PASARR evaluation not required was marked. During an interview on 07/24/2025 at 10:05 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #83, has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility did not follow professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen as evidenced by: a) dietary staff were not competent in the operation of the dish machine; b) the dish machine and refrigerator temperature logs had missed entries; c) hand hygiene and proper glove use was not performed; d) dietary staff's personal items were stored inappropriately; and e) resident's food items and beverages were not labeled and dated in the nourishment rooms. Findings included:On 7/21/25 at 9:38 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). An observation of the dish machine area revealed it was in use by Staff D, Dietary Aide and Staff E, Dietary Aide. An interview with Staff E, Dietary Aide revealed it was a high temperature dish machine. The CDM corrected him and said it was a low temperature machine. An interview with Staff E, Dietary Aide revealed he did not know what type of dish machine there was. An observation of the top of the dish machine revealed a Styrofoam cup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure infection control practices were followed as evidenced by: a) hazardous chemicals accessible in resident dining areas; b) improper hand hygiene by residents and staff during dining and medication administration; and c) improper personal hygiene practices related to personal cloth. Findings included: On 7/21/25 at 11:58 a.m., an observation of the main dining room during the lunch meal service revealed staff were assisting residents who could not ambulate on their own to their tables. No hand hygiene was observed being offered to residents prior to eating. On 7/21/25, from 12:17 p.m. to 12:39 p.m., an observation of the Activities Director revealed she did not perform hand hygiene between passing trays. She was observed wiping her face with the back of her hand, and no hand hygiene was performed. The Activities Director was also observed assisting residents with opening condiment packets and touching their plates and beverages on the tables. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for residents related to 1) an unsecured steam table in the North Wing Dining Room; 2) No resident emergency call cords in two of two restrooms in the main hallway; 3) unsecured chemicals on two units (North Wing and Happy Trails); and 4) failure to provide one-to-one supervision for one resident (#65) out of one resident sampled for supervision. Findings included: On 07/21/2025 at 9:47 a.m. during the initial tour of the North Wing Dining Room both entry doors were observed to be open and unlocked. A steam table was observed with an approximately two-foot wooden swing door at one end. The swing door was open and not latched. The steam table was observed to be on and hot to the touch. Further observations occurred on 07/21/2025, 07/22/2025 and 07/23/2025 between breakfast and lunch. The steam table was observed to be on and all doors to the area open. Residents were observed entering and exiting the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed and four errors were identified for 3 (#30, #94, and #97) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 12.00% medication error rate.Findings included:1.On 7/22/25 at 4:32 p.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #30. The staff member dispensed the following medications:- Calcium carbonate 600 milligram (mg)/ Vitamin D 10 microgram (mcg) over the counter (otc) tablet- Eliquis 5 mg tablet- Metoprolol tartrate 25 mg tablet (1/2 tablet = 12.5 mg)- Vitamin C 500 mg tablet- Metformin 1000 mg tablet- Potassium chloride Extended Release (ER) 10 milliequivalents (meq) tablet- Erythromycin 5 mg/gram ophthalmic ointment- Insulin Aspart FlexPenStaff J confirmed the dispensing of 6 oral tablets then removed the ophthalmic ointment prior to entering Resident #30s room. The staff member obtained a blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility 1) failed to maintain the storage of medications in four of four sampled medication carts (West Front, [NAME] Back, 200-hall and Happy Trails) without expired, undated and loose medications, 2) failed to ensure the locked narcotic boxes were unremovable for two (East and West) of two sampled medication refrigerators, 3) failed to ensure two of two sampled rescue carts (100 & 400 halls) which contained medication for low blood sugar were locked while unattended and not in use, and 4) failed to ensure medications were not stored at bedside in two resident rooms (309 and 406) observed during survey. Findings included: On 7/23/25 at 11:59 a.m. an observation with Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was conducted of the [NAME] Front medication cart. The observation revealed: - 4 vials containing Albuterol/Ipratropium nebulizer medication was lying on top of the foil packaging and 3 vials were lying under the foil package. - One vial of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the Plan of Correction, the facility failed to ensure it had a functioning Quality Assurance Committee. The facility was actively involved in the creation, implementation, and monitoring of the plan of correction for deficient practice identified during an annual survey on 07/21/2025 to 07/24/2025 and was cited at F628. During the revisit on 09/23/2025 through 09/25/2025, the facility was recited at F628 related to discharge process. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date 08/22/2025. The facility had not comprehensively implemented the plan of correction for the identified deficiencies related to ensuring the resident's clinical discharge records were accurately documented, signed and readily available for three residents (#25, #26, #27) out of three residents reviewed for completion and accuracy of records. Findings included: On 9/25/25 at 1:33 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for residents during meals on one unit (East Wing) out of three units in the facility. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 7/21/25 on the East Wing. In the dining area there were three residents seated at a table together. At 1:07 p.m. the first resident was served their lunch tray; the second resident had her head lying on the table asleep and the third resident sat and watched the first resident eat. At 1:10 p.m. the second resident woke up and took the first resident's drink and began drinking it. No staff were in the dining room at that time. The second resident then proceeded to take the first resident's ice cream and began licking it. It was not until 1:21 p.m. that the second resident was delivered their meal tray and 1:22 p.m. the third resident was delivered their meal tray. At 3:06 p.m. the third resident that received his meal tray remained sitting pushed up to the table in the dining room with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to honor 1 (Resident #83) choice to transfer to another facility out of 5 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an interview on 07/21/2025 at 11:12 a.m., Resident #83 stated she wanted to go to a another facility. She said, I talked to them about this and nothing happens. They don't care and they act like they don't hear you. Review of Resident 83's admission record revealed an admission date of 08/28/2024. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, other bipolar disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder, opioid dependence, uncomplicated, bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, moderate, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #83's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Section C. Cognitive Patterns, revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out 15 showing moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the facility Grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not provide preparation and orientation for discharge and complete a discharge summary for one resident (#124) out of two reviewed for discharge. Findings included: Review of admission Records showed Resident #124 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, personal history of transient ischemic attack, and acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity, bilateral. Review of Resident #124's Care Plan showed a focus area of discharge plan home with home health, dated 5/25/25. Interventions included: discuss discharge plan on admission, discuss with resident/family/responsible party discharge planning, social service evaluation as needed. Review of Resident #124's progress notes showed a narrative note written by Staff DD, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated 7/16/25, showing resident d/c [discharge] with understanding all d/c summary and instructions along with medications. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s were completed for three residents (#80, #83, and #11) related to matted hair, untrimmed fingernails, haircuts, and showers out of three residents reviewed. Findings Included: During an observation on 07/21/2025 at 11:27 a.m., Resident #80 was observed lying in bed dressed in a hospital gown. Resident #80's hair was observed unkept and matted. Resident #80 stated “I would like my hair brushed; I have knot in my hair.” Resident #80's nails were observed to be yellow, overgrown with black debris underneath them. Resident #80 stated “If I had scissors, I could cut them, I don’t like them being this long. You would be a miracle worker if you could get my hair fixed.” Review of Resident #80's admission record revealed an admission date of 11/27/2023. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure medication recommendations from the pharmacy consultant were reviewed and addressed by the medical provider for one (#8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings included:A review of Resident #8's admission record revealed an original admission date of 11/12/24, and a re-admission date of 5/31/25. The admission record revealed diagnoses to include gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, unspecified, major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, mood disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified, other specified anxiety disorders, fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, unspecified fracture of the lower end of left radius, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, unspecified fracture of lower end of left ulna, subsequent encounter for closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a functioning grievance process for three (Resident #1, #2, and #9) of three residents sampled for grievance process. Findings included: On 07/22/2024 the facility was requested to provide the grievance log for 08/01/2023 through the date of survey, 07/22/2024. 1.On 07/22/2024, the facility provided the grievance log which reflected two grievances listed for Resident #1 during the reviewed period. One dated 11/15/2023 regarding hydration preference and one dated 11/15/2023 regarding room cleanliness. Both grievances were documented to have been resolved. On 07/22/2024 at 3:06 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). When asked if she had received any grievance regarding missing clothing for Resident #1, she provided a post note for review. The SSD said she had been told a concern by Resident #1's family member regarding missing clothes and she had written it down on the post note about a week ago.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to convey personal funds deposited with the facility within 30 days of discharge with a final accounting of the funds to the resident for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for personal funds of thirteen sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #2's clinical chart, the face sheet, documented an admission to the facility on [DATE], and subsequent discharge of 04/27/2024. During a phone interview conducted with (Resident #2's family member), she stated Resident #2 had a balance of $11.00 in his personal trust account that was not returned to him. On 07/22/2024, a review of the facility grievance log reflected one grievance on file for the reviewed period of 08/01/2023 through the date of survey, 07/22/2024, for Resident #2. A review of the grievance form, dated 05/01, reflected no documentation of the person making the complaint and relationship to resident, the area was blank. The grievance: Money was taken and clothes returned.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-22 · tag F0644 — widespreadCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to 1.) complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for eight (Residents #19, #12, #48, #101, #50, #47, #74, and #78); and 2.) ensure the accuracy of a PASARR Level I for two (Residents #24 and #223) of ten residents admitted with mental health diagnoses sampled for PASARR. Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], and a primary diagnosis of Diabetes according to the admission face sheet. Further review of the admission face sheet revealed subsequent diagnoses that included Bipolar disorder (as of 12/6/2013) and Major Depressive Disorder (as of 11/16/2021). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #19 revealed under Section I, diagnoses that included Depression and Bipolar Disorder; and under Section N,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to ensure the development and/or implementation of comprehensive care plans was completed for five (Resident #5, #12, #41, #81, and #82) of 44 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #41's medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur. A review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/23/2023 revealed, under Section M: Skin Conditions, Resident #41 was admitted to the facility with one unstageable pressure ulcer. A review of Resident #41's physician's orders revealed a treatment order, dated 2/14/2023, for an unstageable wound to the right heel to cleanse the wound with normal saline, apply Santyl to the wound bed, cover the wound with hydrogel, and secure with a bordered gauze every day shift. A review of Resident #41's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure three (Residents #40, #13 and #88) of six residents reviewed for vaccine administration were offered and administered Pneumococcal vaccinations. Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident #40 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] according to the admission face sheet. Review of Immunization record located in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed the resident was offered and received a Pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumococcal polysaccharide - PPSV23) on 07/24/2015. Review of a vaccination declination form dated 10/14/2022 and provided by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed a subsequent Pneumococcal vaccine was declined by the resident's family member. No additional information was available in the EHR detailing the reason for the seven-year delay between administration of the vaccine and offering the second vaccine dose. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified assistance during dining for two (Residents #11 and #72) of 44 residents sampled. Findings included: A dining observation made on 02/19/2023 at 12:00 p.m., showed staff and residents were in the dining room engaging in conservation. Staff were observed passing out food trays according to the resident's assigned tables. Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) and Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) were observed standing up over Resident # 11 and Resident #72 while assisting the residents with their lunch meal. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident # 11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Dysphagia Oropharyngeal Phase, Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance. A review of the Minimum Data Set ( MDS), dated [DATE] , Section C-Cognitive Patterns showed Resident #11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #223) of 44 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #223's medical record revealed Resident #223 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. A request was made on 2/21/2023 at 3:40 PM for Resident #223's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The assessment was not provided by the facility. A review of Resident #223's medical record revealed an open MDS admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/13/2023. The medical record also revealed Resident #223's admission MDS assessment was due on 2/20/2023. An interview was conducted on 2/21/2023 at 3:41 PM with the facility's Regional Clinical Reimbursement Nurse (RCRN), who stated Resident #223's admission MDS assessment should have been completed on 2/20/2023. The RCRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and, policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for one (Resident #59) of one resident reviewed for dialysis care and services. Findings included: During an interview on 02/19/23 at 12:46 PM, Resident #59 stated that she went to Dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. A record review of Resident #59's medical record showed diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (Primary) and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. A physician order dated 02/03/23 showed the resident was to attend a local Dialysis Center on the days of Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturdays with transportation, location and times noted in the order. The five day minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Dialysis treatment for Resident #59 in section O. The person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed with a focus of End Stage Renal Disease and Dialysis. Further record review of Resident #59's dialysis book showed blank Dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. A total of 32 medication administration opportunities were observed with 2 errors, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 6.25%. Findings included: A review of Resident #123's medical record revealed Resident #123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). A review of Resident #123's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 2/10/2023, for Humalog 100 unit/milliliter (ml) by KwikPen subcutaneous injection as per sliding scale every 4 hours at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, 8:00 PM, 12:00 AM, and 4:00 AM. An observation of medication administration for Resident #123 was conducted on 2/21/2023 at 9:17 AM with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN). Staff B, RN performed a blood glucose check on Resident #123, which resulted in a reading of 194. Staff B, RN prepared Resident #123's Humalog KwikPen to administer 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control and Prevention program by 1.) failing to ensure hand hygiene was conducted during a dressing change for an intravenous (IV) line for one (Resident #224) and during medication administration for one (Resident #123), 2.) failed to ensure proper set up of a sterile field during a dressing change for an IV line for one (Resident #224), 3.) failed to ensure proper disinfection of point-of-care devices for one (Resident #123), and 4.) failed to ensure isolation precautions were followed for one (Resident #224) of forty four sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #224's medical record revealed Resident #224 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of osteomyelitis, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. A review of Resident #224's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 2/5/2023 for Contact isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observation, and policy review the facility did not ensure a care plan was developed for wandering for one (#65) of 40 sampled residents, and the facility failed to implement the plan of care for seizure precautions for one (#49) of 40 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 6/02/21 at 8:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #7. Resident #7 reported that Resident #65 goes in everybody's rooms, takes things, puts the items in her room, and the staff get the items back. Resident #7 said he has found Resident #65 laying in his bed. The staff just let her do whatever she wants. Resident #7 had not talked to anyone in the facility about it because he didn't know who to talk to. Resident #7 stated the staff all know about it, but he thinks they don't watch Resident #65 good enough because there is not enough staff. A review of Resident #65's admission record revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly assess the activity needs to ensure an individualized and meaningful activity program was developed for two (#49, #5) of three residents sampled for activities. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's Medical Record revealed that Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and age related cognitive decline. A review of Resident #5's Physician's Orders revealed an order, dated on 09/05/2020, for activities as tolerated. A review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment revealed, under Section C - Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impact. A review of Resident #5's Care Plan revealed a problem, revised on 06/03/2021, that Resident #5 declined attending most group activities because of her condition and diagnosis. Interventions included to encourage and assist resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #195) of one resident sampled out of 12 residents in the facility receiving respiratory care and treatment. Findings included: A review of Resident #195 Medical Record revealed that Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). A review of Resident #195's Physician's Orders revealed the following orders: - An order, dated 05/06/2021 to change nebulizer tubing and external bag every Sunday on night shift. Date tubing and external bag. - An order, dated 05/06/2021 to change oxygen tubing and bag every Sunday on night shift. Label and date tubing. - An order, dated 05/12/2021 for Ipratropium-Albuterol solution 0.5-2.5 milligrams/3 milliliters, 1 dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105455. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.