Groves Center
512 S 11th St, Lake Wales, FL 33853 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (863) 676-8502 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $291,478 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-29)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-12, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-12 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.1% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.8% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.2% | 14.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.6% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 2.13 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 1.15 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 23.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.4%CMS range 31.6–58.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 7.5–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 23.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 28.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 65.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.0–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of the facility's abuse log revealed Resident #164 made an allegation of abuse on 9/19/23. During an interview on 01/10/24 at 12:16 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed an allegation of abuse was made by Resident #164 on 09/19/23 and a federal report was completed. The resident reported his Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Staff R poisoned his coffee. The resident stated he witnessed the CNA remove his coffee and put an unknown substance in his coffee. An investigation was initiated. The NHA stated she could not find the statements she obtained from the CNA. She stated she spoke to the nurse who worked that day as well but could not find that statement either. A follow-up interview with the NHA on 01/10/24 at 12:38 p.m., revealed she misplaced the entire file related to Resident #164's abuse investigation to include witness statements. The NHA said Staff R, CNA was suspended for 5 days and education was conducted for all staff on Abuse and Neglect but no documentation of the training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews with residents, facility staff, resident representatives, the Clinical Manager of a dialysis facility, and the Medical Director, and review of policy and procedures, clinical records, training records and incident logs, it was determined the facility failed to identify, investigate, prevent, and take corrective action for the neglect of two (#308 and #106) of 12 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure wound care orders were implemented for Resident #308 and #106 resulting in the worsening of the wounds, and failed to investigate the cause of a fracture of unknown origin for one (#12) of 12 residents. The facility failed to ensure six (#6, #32, #36, #90, #100, and #164) residents with allegations of physical, verbal, psychological, psychosocial and sexual abuse out of 12 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect had investigations initiated, thorough investigations conducted, documentation of a thorough investigation maintained, protective measures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-01-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record reviews personnel record reviews and training records, the facility failed to have competent staff to identify abuse, protect residents during abuse investigations and investigate abuse allegations to prevent reoccurring abuse; the facility failed to have competent staff to accurately assess residents' medical conditions and to provide care and treatment to prevent worsening of conditions, for pressure ulcers, and significant change in condition after a fall. The facility failed to provide ongoing staff training and monitoring to ensure nursing skills and competencies to provide safe and adequate care for the residents to achieve their highest practicable level of well-being for 10 residents (#164, #207 #90, #100, #32, #12, #308, #6, #36, and #106) of 112 residents in the facility census. These failures created situations that resulted in worsened conditions and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to residents (#164, #207 #90, #100, #32, #12,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-01-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and review of job descriptions, the facility's administration failed to utilize resources to ensure adequate supervision to effectively implement a systematic process to carry out the facility's abuse policy for seven residents (#32, #90, #100, #6, #36, #12, #164), failed to ensure the facility staff provided care and services to prevent the worsening of wounds for two residents (#308 and #106), failed to ensure hot water temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level for residents on one hallway (Hall 100), and failed to ensure oversight of nurse competency training with the potential to affect a total census of 112 residents. These systemic failures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy which began on 09/19/23 and was ongoing at the time of survey exit on 01/12/2024. Findings included: Cross reference to F584, F600, F610, F686, F726 and F867. During a survey conducted on 01/08/24 to 01/12/24 non-compliance was found for abuse and neglect for incidents/allegations to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2024-01-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop, and implement an effective Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to ensure the facility was free from abuse and neglect. During a survey conducted on 01/08/24 to 01/12/24 non-compliance was found for 9 of 12 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The incidents/allegations included resident to resident physical/sexual abuse (#32, #90, #100), staff to resident physical abuse (#6, #164), staff to resident verbal abuse (#36), and neglect resulting in worsening of wounds (#308, #106), and failure to investigate a fracture of unknown origin (#12). Review of records, interview with facility staff, family members, and the Medical Director revealed concerns with facility's reporting, investigation, protection, and implementation of safety/corrective processes to prevent further and future abuse and neglect from occurring. The facility placed all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) from developing or worsening by 1.) Failing to follow physician's orders for a silver coated foley catheter, failed to order labs, and change the foley catheter per orders for one resident (#2) out of four residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #2 developing a urinary tract infection that progressed to Fournier's gangrene and sepsis. 2.) Failed to give antibiotics for UTI as ordered for one resident (#13) out of four residents reviewed with catheters. This failure placed Resident #13 at risk for worsening infection or delayed recovery.Findings included: 1.) Review of the admission records showed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but are not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, muscle wasting and atrophy, need for assistance with personal care, sepsis, unspecified organism,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1.) necessary care and services were to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) from developing or worsening by, failing to follow physician's orders for a silver coated foley catheter, failed to order labs, and change the foley catheter per orders for one resident (#2) out of four residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #2 developing a urinary tract infection that progressed to Fournier's gangrene and sepsis. Failed to give antibiotics for UTI as ordered for one resident (#13) out of four residents reviewed with catheters. This failure placed Resident #13 at risk for worsening infection or delayed recovery. 2.) The facility did not ensure providers were notified of abnormal lab results for two residents (#1 and #4) out of three residents reviewed for labs and 3.) failed to ensure pain was managed for one resident (#12) out of three residents sampled.Findings included: 1.) Review of the admission records showed Resident #2 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to prevent worsening of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 residents sampled for pressure ulcers (Resident #308). Findings included: A review of Resident #308's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction, pneumonia, septicemia, wound infection, diabetes mellitus, aphasia, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), epilepsy, respiratory failure, and two unhealed stage 4 pressure sores upon admission. A review of the weekly wound notes for November 2023, just prior to the 11/29/23 hospital transfer revealed: On 11/7/23 Resident #308 was observed to have several wounds including a stage 4 pressure injury to her sacrum that measured 4.5cm (centimeters) x (by) 6.5 cm x 5 cm. Wound edges were slightly macerated and slightly rolled. Wound bed appears red/granulation tissue noted, draining moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program to mitigate and prevent the spread of infection related to: 1) not ensuring staff were donning appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering a resident room under transmission based precautions, 2) not ensure residents were offered handy hygiene prior to meal service for one of four halls observed and 3) did not ensure the laundry area was kept in a manner to prevent the spread of infection.Findings included: An observation was made on 2/2/26 at 12:52 p.m. of staff delivering meal trays to residents on the 400-hall. The observations showed: At 1:02 p.m. Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed delivering tray to room [ROOM NUMBER], A-bed. The staff member did not offer hand hygiene to the resident. At 1:03 p.m. Staff E delivered tray to room [ROOM NUMBER], A-bed. The staff member did not offer hand hygiene to the resident. At 1:05 p.m. Staff M,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing antibiotic stewardship program for 11 of 12 months reviewed.Findings include: An interview was conducted with Staff A, Infection Preventionist (IP) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/4/26 at 10:37 a.m. Staff A, IP said she did not have the infection control logs prior to December 2025. The DON said she had not been able to locate the logs. Staff A, IP said the facility had one resident that was positive for influenza and that resident was being treated with an antibiotic. The DON stated, an antibiotic is not appropriate for a viral infection but that is what the resident was admitted with. The DON said the resident should have been treated with an antiviral medication. Staff A, IP said she does not know if the pharmacist reviews the medications to ensure appropriateness of medications. Staff A, IP said she follows McGeer's Criteria {a standardized surveillance used in long-term care facilities to identify and track infections to prevent the overuse of medications}. Staff A, IP said she had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an assessment of self-administration of medications for one resident (#16) of one resident reviewed.Findings included: During an observation on 02/02/2026 at 10:10 a.m., Resident #16 was observed sitting in a wheelchair near the side of a bed, holding a clear mask with white fog coming from the mask from the nebulizer treatment. The resident stated the nurse brings in the medication for me, and I turn the machine off once I am done. Review of Resident #16's admission record revealed an admission date of 08/04/2025. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, other asthma, respiratory failure, unspecified, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia, and other pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS), section C. Cognitive Patterns revealed a brief mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 showing intact cognition. Review of Resident #16's care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to obtain a blood test to monitor the therapeutic level of a medication used as a psychotropic, for one (#118) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: On 2/2/26 at 10:25 a.m. Resident #118 was observed lying curled up in bed, covered with a blanket. During random tours of the facility on 2/2 through 2/4/26 the resident was seen sitting in wheelchair in hallway and on covered porch leading to smoking area. Review of Resident #118's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), unspecified recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), unspecified mood (affective) disorder, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #118's active physician orders included but not limited to the following physician orders: Depakote Oral Tablet Delayed Release 125 milligram (mg) (Divalproex Sodium) - Give 3 tablet(s) by mouth two times a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a serious mental disorder(s)/diagnoses were referred to the State's Mental Health authority for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) review for two residents (#9 and #10) out of five residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #10's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified schizophrenia, unspecified depression, unspecified anxiety disorder, and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Section N- Medications revealed antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant usage.Review of Resident #10s Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) dated 1/28/26 revealed anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, schizophrenia, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, and unspecified insomnia marked in Section A. These findings were based on documented history,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screenings were completed accurately at the time of admission for two (#42 and #118) of six residents sampled for the accuracy of PASRRs.Findings included: Review of Resident #42's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to cognitive communication deficit, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with anxiety, moderate recurrent major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and unspecified Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #42's PASRR level I located in the paper chart, on 2/2/26 at 3:05 p.m. revealed a screening dated 11/11/25 showing the resident did not have any mental illness, suspected mental illness, and/or intellectual disability based on documented history. The screening showed the resident had no indication of a disorder resulting in functional limitations in major life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to update and revise the person-centered comprehensive care plan for one resident (#50) of six residents sampled.Findings included: A review of the admission record for Resident #50 showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to needing assistance with personal care and type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer. A review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section C, dated 1/05/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating cognitively intact. A review of Resident #50's evaluations revealed skin checks completed within the last two months revealed no skin impairments. A review of Resident #50's care plan revealed she is care planned for an actual wound on her left heel. The goal was to minimize additional wound from developing. The interventions included treatment as ordered; and observe that dressing is covered and adhering. An interview on 2/4/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide one resident (#42) of two residents an environment that was free from avoidable accidents and hazards related to implementation of adequate non-slip material under moveable floor mats.Findings included: An observation was made on 2/2/26 at 10:55 a.m. of Resident #42 lying on floor in between a low bed (pushed against wall) and an oversized floor mat (approximately same height as bed). The air mattress on bed was uneven full of distinct lumps, bumps and irregular surface. The resident was fidgeting on the floor and appeared to be trying to raise up. The resident grasped back of head and said ouch. Staff J, Traveling Social Service Director (SSD) was walking by room and notified of the resident being on the floor. Review of Resident #42's Situation, Background, Appearance, and Recommendation (SBAR) dated 2/2/26 at 11:15 a.m. showed the nurse was notified that the resident had rolled from the mattress onto the floor. The resident was immediately removed from the floor using a Hoyer lift. Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations for one resident (#118) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications.Findings included: On 2/2/26 at 10:25 a.m. an observation was made of Resident #118 lying in bed tucked into blanket with eyes closed. Other random observations showed the resident propelling self in wheelchair in hallway and on covered porch leading to the smoking area. Review of Resident #118's pharmacy recommendations showed the Consultant Pharmacist had recommended on 10/20/25 to Please add to Medication Administration Record (MAR) monitoring for signs and symptoms of bleeding due to orders for aspirin and clopidogrel. The recommendation showed an unknown person had written Added on the recommendation. Review of Resident #118's Order Summary Report with active physician orders showed an order had been added instructing staff to Monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding and thromboembolism during each nursing shift. Notify prescriber If resident experiences any of the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5.00%. Thirty-nine medication administration opportunities were observed, and four errors were identified for one resident (#31) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 10.26% medication error rate.Findings included: On 2/3/26 at 9:03 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Unit Manager (UM)) was conducted with Resident #31. The staff member dispensed the following medications into separate medication cups: Amiodarone 100 milligram (mg) tablet Vitamin C 500 mg tablet 2 - Depakote Delayed Release 125 mg sprinkles capsules Eliquis 5 mg tablet Metoprolol Tartrate 50 mg tablet Sodium Bicarbonate 650 tabletDuring the continued obnservation,Staff I, LPN, confirmed 7 oral tablets as the multi-vitamin tablet could not be crushed and stated the order would need to be changed to liquid. Staff I crushed each medication placing it back into the medication cup before stacking them together alternating an empty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure two residents (#36 and #11) of five observed residents received medications within the scheduled time frame and failed to ensure the physician was notified prior to the administration of late medications.Findings included: Review of the facility Medication Administration Times schedule showed daily medications were scheduled at 9:00 a.m., twice daily was scheduled for 9:00 a.m. and 5 p.m., and three times a day was scheduled for 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 5 p.m. The time schedule revealed with meals medications were scheduled for 8:00 a.m. and 6 p.m. On 2/3/26 at 11:52 a.m. Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed in the hallway standing at the medication cart. The observation revealed Resident #36's medication profile was colored red, indicative of late medications. Staff B, RN was observed dispensing the following medications: Eliquis 2.5 milligram (mg) tablet Gabapentin 400 mg capsule Metoprolol tartrate half tablet of 25 mg's = 12.5 mg Potassium extended release 10 milliequivalents (meq)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a grievance was filed and investigated and resolved for one resident (#9) of seven sampled residents.Findings included: Review of Resident #9's admission record revealed an admission date of 08/18/2025. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include muscle wasting and atrophy, need for assistance with personal care, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, and osteomyelitis.During an interview on 10/28/2025 at 12:03 p.m., Resident #9 stated, I am not happy because I have a blanket and a couple of blouses missing. The resident reported a family member came to the facility on [DATE] and the facility let them look in the laundry room for the missing items. The family member did not find the items.During an interview on 10/28/2025 at 2:15 p.m. the Social Services Director (SSD) reviewed the grievance log and stated there were no current open grievances for Resident #9. The SSD stated staff should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility did not ensure reporting of an allegation of neglect for one resident (#1) out of three residents reviewed. Findings Included: A facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, reviewed September 2025, showed: Policy: - The facility has designated and implemented processes, which strive to reduce the risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident's property.These policies guide the identification, management, and reporting of suspected, or alleged, abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and exploitation. It is expected that these policies will assist the facility with reducing the risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident's property through education of staff and residents, as well as early identification of staff bum out, or resident behavior which may increase the likelihood of such events.Definitions: Neglect -Failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide good and services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect, by failing to conduct interviews with all relevant staff related to a reportable event for one resident (#2) of five sampled residents. Findings included: On 10/29/25 at 2:47 p.m., a meeting was held to discuss a sample of State Agency reportable cases. The staff attendees included the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), Director of Risk Management Consultant (DRMC), and the Senior Regional Nurse Consultant (SRNC). The NHA stated he became aware of the allegation for Resident #2 when the Department of Children and Families (DCF) agent arrived at the facility on 9/2/25. He stated DCF told him the allegation was from Resident #2's family. He was told the family said that the facility did not replace the resident's foley catheter and didn't provide catheter care. The NHA stated he was told the family believed this caused infection. The NHA stated not knowing the name of the family member. He stated he did not contact the family after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper catheter care was provided to include securing and changing catheter bags per physician orders, for four residents ( #15, #16, #4 and #2) of four residents sampled for catheter care. Findings included: On 10/27/25 at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). He stated Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and nurses cleaned the catheters. Staff A stated the staff must assess if the catheter is intact and draining and observe for urine color. Staff A said, If the line is cloudy, the nurses change it. Staff A stated if he suspected an infection, he would, call the doctor to ask for a culture.On 10/27/25 at 4:18 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #15 with a cloudy catheter drainage line.On 10/29/25 at 9:25 a.m., observed Resident #15 lying in bed, alert, with their feet raised on a pillow. The catheter drainage bag was labeled with the date 10/14/25. Observed Resident #15's catheter line was still cloudy. During the observation and interview, Staff A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain was managed for one resident (#12), out of three residents sampled.Findings included: On 10/28/2025 at 10:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #12. Resident #12 stated it took a couple days to get pain medication upon admission to the facility. The resident stated the staff was not ordering the medication. On 10/28/2025 at 2:51 p.m., a follow-up interview was conducted with Resident #12. The resident explained being upset about the pain and stated there was no reason she had to wait was so long to get pain medication. The resident stated the pain increased during the time she was without pain medication. Resident #12 stated when the colostomy bag breaks, the skin becomes very raw like a diaper rash. Resident #12 stated because she sat for long periods, her skin was bad. Resident #12 stated not wanting to sit on feces when left unchanged as it breaks her skin. The resident said it was upsetting and stated it felt like the skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility did not ensure providers were notified of abnormal lab results for two residents (#1 and #4) out of three residents reviewed for labs.Findings included:1.) An interview was conducted on 10/28/25 at 10:10 a.m. with a Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #1. The RR said on 9/27/25 he was at the facility with Resident #1, and she was not herself. He said she was very lethargic, wanted to sleep and was in pain. I let the nurse and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) know my concern. He said at one point he nor the staff could find Resident #1's assigned nurse, Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for over an hour. The RR said he was trying to find the nurse because the resident's medications were late, and she was in pain. He said a CNA he talked to didn't know where the nurse was nor did the other nurse working. He said at one point the staff called Staff H to find her. He said when Staff H finally returned to the unit, she was very short and asked what he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate isolation precautions were initiated for two residents ( #10 and #9 ) of three residents sampled and failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was supplied for residents on isolation precautions for five rooms (101,409, 413, 408 and 305) out of twenty rooms observed. On 5/27/2025 at 8:32 a.m., an observation was made in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] with a blue sign outside the door and Contact Precautions was indicated for resident in bed A. There was no PPE observed outside the door. An interview was conducted with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff B, LPN stated the resident in bed B was on Contact Isolation for having a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line. Staff B stated the PPE was located behind the door inside the residents' room. Staff B stated any resident with wounds, catheters, central lines, dialysis and catheters are placed on Contact Isolation. The Contact Isolation sign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure their pest control program was effective during two (05/27/2025 and 05/28/2025) of two days of survey. Findings included: During multiple facility tours on 05/27/2025 and 05/28/2025, observations were made of live insects in the dining hall/activity's area in 400 and 100 halls as follows: On 05/27/2025 at 06:30 a.m., a live insect was observed in the 400-hall, near the conference room. The insect was live and crawling across the floor. On 05/27/2025, at 06:48 a.m. live insects were observed in the dining hall/activity area. The insects were small flying insects observed landing on surfaces around the dining area. During this observation residents were observed in the area. On 05/28/2025 at 09:25 a.m. a live insect was observed near the 100-hall of the facility. The insect was observed crawling. There were various levels of staff near the area at the time. On 05/28/2025 at 02:29 p. m. an interview was conducted with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were promptly addressed and resolved to ensure complainant's satisfaction for one (#7) of seven residents reviewed. Findings included: Review of the facility's Grievance/Concern Logs for March and April 2025 revealed a grievance was filed by Resident #7's family member on 3/28/25. The log showed the concern was resolved on 3/30/25. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Risk Management Consultant (RMC) on 5/27/25 at 2:17 p.m. revealed, Resident's bottom dentures are missing. Reviewing the grievance, the NHA stated the concern was described as Concerns because [Resident #7's] bottom dentures are missing. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) states that they were on side table this morning when she fed him. The facility did not designate an individual or department to handle this grievance/concern, writing looking for dentures. Staff spoke to staff (crossed out) stated they placed them in a paper towel.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have pain medication available per physician orders for one resident (#5) out of three residents sampled. Findings Included: On 5/27/2025 at 1:49 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #5 with Staff A, Registered Dietician, for interpretation. Resident #5 stated getting her pain medication was an issue the last month and stated she went without getting her pain medication. A record review of Resident #5's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of April 2025 showed a missed dose of Oxycodone HCL oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for non- acute pain on 4/26/2025. A record review of Resident #5's admission Record showed an original admit date of 02/14/2024 with a readmission date of 5/01/2025 with diagnoses included but not limited to spinal stenosis cervical region, neuralgia and neuritis unspecified, monoarthritis not elsewhere classified unspecified site and pain unspecified. A record review of Resident #5's Controlled Drug Declining Inventory Sheet with a 4/16/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for four ( #4, #5 #8 and #11) out of four residents sampled. Findings Included: During an interview on 05/27/2025 at 12:46 p.m., Resident #4 stated a few months ago she put her call light on, and a male staff member came into her room told her that he was not her aide and that he was going to get her aide. She stated he turned off her light and no one ever came back. She stated she had to wait for the next shift to come in and change her wet brief. She spoke with the facility at the time of the incident and told them that staff do not come into her room at night and they do not offer to change her. She reported she was told that this would change, and staff would come and check on her during the night. Resident #4 stated this has not happened. Staff still do not come into the room during the night and offer or check to see if she needs incontinent care. She stated she waits for the morning shift to be changed out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide privacy and confidentiality for three (#1, #4, #7) of seven sampled residents related to placing items in the trash can with resident identifiable information and leaving the medication cart unattended with resident information present and accessible in paper and electronic format. Findings included: On 10/01/2024 beginning at 9:42 a.m., Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) entered Resident #1's room and detached the feeding tube from the (gastrostomy) g-tube site. She placed the used tube feeding bottle with resident information into the unsecured, publicly accessible trash can. Staff A, RN then went over to Resident #1's roommate, Resident #7, detached the feeding tube from the g-tube site and placed Resident #7's used tube feeding bottle with resident information into the unsecured, publicly accessible trash can. Staff A, RN left the room and opened the computer on the medication cart. Staff A, RN went to the supply room and left the computer open with Resident #4's information on the screen and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference F695 and F880 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (#1 and #6) of three sampled residents with tracheostomies. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's admission record showed an admission date of 06/26/2024 and readmission date of 08/21/2024. The admission record showed diagnoses to include anoxic brain damage, respiratory disorders, acute and chronic respiratory failure, bell's palsy, metabolic encephalopathy, muscle wasting and atrophy, acute kidney failure, myocardial infarction, acute and subacute hepatic failure, hypokalemia, obstructive and reflux uropathy, protein-calorie malnutrition, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/09/2024, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident was rarely or never understood, was dependent on staff for bathing and toileting, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Cross reference F656 and F880 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide tracheostomy (trach) and suctioning care consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (#1). Findings included: On 10/01/2024 beginning at 9:42 a.m., Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) entered Resident #1's room without a gown on and put on gloves. Resident #1 was lying in bed, had a trach with humidifier mask in place, and oxygen attached. Staff A, RN detached the feeding tube from the (gastrostomy) g-tube site for Resident #1 Staff A, RN removed her gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. She applied new gloves and went to Resident #1's roommate (Resident #7) and detached Resident #7's feeding tube from the g-tube site. She removed her gloves, did not perform hand hygiene, and exited the room. Staff A, RN went to the medication cart and started to open it. Staff A, RN then stopped and went into the resident room across from Resident #1 and #7 and washed her hands. Staff A then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference F656 and F695 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow standard and enhanced barrier precautions when performing resident care for one (#1, #7) of seven sampled residents. Findings included: On 10/01/2024 beginning at 9:42 a.m., Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) entered Resident #1's room without a gown on and put on gloves. Resident #1 was lying in bed, had a trach with humidifier mask in place, and oxygen attached. Staff A, RN detached the feeding tube from the (gastrostomy) g-tube site for Resident #1 Staff A, RN removed her gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. She applied new gloves and went to Resident #1's roommate (Resident #7) and detached Resident #7's feeding tube from the g-tube site. She removed her gloves, did not perform hand hygiene, and exited the room. Staff A, RN went to the medication cart and started to open it. Staff A, RN then stopped and went into the resident room across from Resident #1 and #7 and washed her hands. Staff A then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and facility records review, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures were maintained at comfortable levels in one hall (Hall 100) of four halls for four days (1/8/24, 1/9/24, 1/10/24 and 1/11/24) of a five day survey. Findings included: On 01/08/24 at 10:17 a.m., the residents in Rooms 101, 103, 105 and 106 reported Hall 100 has had water issues for an unknown period of time. They reported the water was cold and this had been going on for a long time. A resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated it had been probably three to six months. The residents stated the CNAs (certified nursing assistants) knew of the problem. The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated a grievance was filed during a Resident Council meeting. The resident stated the CNAs complained about cold water when giving residents showers. Review of the Grievance Logs August 2023 to January 8, 2024 revealed no grievances were filed from Resident Council meetings. Review of a facility documentation titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand splints were applied and range of motion (ROM) was provided for one resident (#8) of two residents sampled for limited range of motion. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #8 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include contracture of right wrist, contracture of left wrist, contracture of left and right elbow, stiffness of shoulder and quadriplegia. Review of Resident #8's care plan showed a focus of ADL (activities of daily living): The Resident has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit, initiated 5/25/22. Goals showed as PT (physical therapy) is ordered and goals are established per the PT plan of care (see PT POC), OT (occupational therapy) is ordered and goals are established per the OT plan of care (see OT POC) and ST (speech therapy) is ordered and goals are established per the ST plan of care (see ST POC) all with a target date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility nursing staff failed to accurately conduct assessments from 1/1/24 to 1/11/24 following a fall, identify a change in condition of a swollen right shoulder and provide treatment and care in accordance with standards of practice for one resident (#207) of forty two residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the admission Record for Resident #207 revealed an original admission date of 12/4/23 and a readmission date on 12/26/23 with diagnoses to include repeated falls, pain in right arm, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified lack of coordination, difficulty in walking, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of The Falls Management Program: A Quality Improvement Initiative for Nursing Facilities (https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/long-term-care/resource/injuries/fallspx/man2.html#:~:text=1.-,Evaluate%20and%20Monitor%20Resident%20for%2072%20Hours%20After%20the%20Fall,provide%20immediate%20treatment%20if%20necessary) showed: Chapter 2. Fall Response…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure post dialysis care was completed per physician orders for one resident (#12) of five dialysis residents sampled. Findings included: On 01/08/24 at 9:52 a.m. Resident #12 was observed in her room. Resident #12 was noted with an undated dressing on her left arm. The dressing around the left upper arm area was observed with blood. Resident #12 stated she did not know she had been bleeding and did not know the cause. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #12 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease and legal blindness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating intact mental cognition. Review of Resident #12's physician orders, dated 01/12/24, showed: *Resident to have dialysis on days: [dialysis center name], Chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide ongoing monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments for 2 (Resident #92 and Resident #35) of 2 resident sampled for dialysis care. Findings included: A review of Resident #92's Medical Record revealed that Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). A review of Resident #92's Physician's Orders revealed an order, dated 04/19/2020, for Dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday with a chair time of 04:30 AM. A review of Resident #92's Care Plan revealed a problem, revised on 01/06/2020, that Resident #92 had actual risk for impaired renal function related to end-stage renal failure. Interventions included dialysis treatment on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, observe dialysis catheter site for signs and symptoms of bleeding, and protect shunt site from injury. A review of Resident #92's Dialysis Communication Forms for the dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately in three of four medication carts and one of two medication preparation rooms. Findings included: On 1/26/22 at 11:14 a.m., an observation of the 100-hall medication cart was unlocked and left unattended. Staff Member L, Registered Nurse (RN) came out of room [ROOM NUMBER], on 1/26/22 at 11:17 a.m., and confirmed that the cart was unlocked and should have been locked. Photographic evidence was obtained. On 1/27/21 at 10:39 a.m. an observation of the 400-hall medication cart was conducted with Staff Member U, Registered Nurse (RN). The observation revealed an unopened bottle of Novolog, which the label indicated had been delivered on 1/24/22. The staff member stated the bottle was ok to be in the cart, then stated. no that it should be in the refrigerator. On 1/27/21 at 10:45 a.m., an observation of the 100-hall medication cart was conducted with Staff Member T, RN. The observation revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — patternPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct ongoing COVID-19 outbreak testing in accordance with testing frequency parameters for four (Resident #68, Resident #30, Resident #13, and Resident #79) of five residents sampled for COVID-19 testing requirements. Findings included: A request was made on 01/26/2022 at 04:30 PM to review the last COVID-19 testing results for Resident #68, Resident #30, Resident #13, and Resident #79 to the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). A review of Resident #68's COVID-19 test results revealed the last testing conducted on 01/17/2022 with a negative result. A review of Resident #30's COVID-19 test results revealed the last testing conducted on 01/17/2022 with a negative result. A review of Resident #13's COVID-19 test results revealed the last testing conducted on 01/17/2022 with a negative result. A review of Resident #79's COVID-19 test results revealed the last testing conducted on 01/17/2022 with a negative result. An interview was conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#63) out of thirty-seven sampled residents had the right to be treated with dignity and respect related to staff restricting the residents' ability to self-propel in a wheelchair. Findings include An observation on 1/24/22 at 10:36 a.m., revealed Resident #63 sitting in a wheelchair at the end of the 100-hallway. The resident attempted to self-propel the wheelchair into room [ROOM NUMBER], which was not where the resident resided. Staff Member A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) directed the resident back into the hallway and locked both wheels of the chair as it was parked between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] at the end of the hallway. During an interview, at 10:40 a.m. on 1/24/22, Staff A confirmed locking both wheels of Resident #63's wheelchair. The CNA stated she does that because the resident attempts to stand up. On 1/24/22 at 10:44 a.m., Staff Member E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated that staff does lock Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide written notification of Transfer/Discharge to Resident Representatives and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a resident transfer for two (Resident #56 and Resident #200) of four residents sampled for hospitalizations. Findings included: A review of Resident #56's Medical Record revealed that Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right heel and midfoot with necrosis of muscle. A review of Resident #56's Medical Record also revealed that Resident #56 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/27/2021 during a visit with the wound care physician due to wound infections. A review of Resident #56's Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice dated on 11/29/2021 revealed a reason for discharge/transfer listed as needs cannot be met in this facility. The Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide written notification of the Bed Hold Policy to Resident Representatives for for one (Resident #56) of four residents sampled for hospitalizations. Findings included: A review of Resident #56's Medical Record revealed that Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right heel and midfoot with necrosis of muscle. A review of Resident #56's Medical Record also revealed that Resident #56 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 12/27/2021 during a visit with the wound care physician due to wound infections. A request for documents was made on 01/26/2022 at 04:30 PM for Resident #56's Bed Hold and In-House Transfer Policy for the hospital admissions on 11/29/2021 and 12/27/2021 to the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). A review of Resident #56's Bed Hold and In-House Transfer Policy on 01/27/2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to maintain and store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner for one (#57) out of 7 residents who utilized a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Findings included: Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the resident's Order Listing Report included an order, dated 1/20/22, Empty and Rinse CPAP humidifier chamber every a.m. (QAM) and allow to dry every day shift. Every day shift for Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia. An observation was conducted, on 1/25/22 at 9:02 a.m., of Resident #57's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine in the bottom drawer of the bedside dresser. The observation revealed the tubing from the machine was lying out of the drawer, on the floor then looped back into the drawer with the uncovered mask lying on the other items in the drawer. The resident reported taking the mask off, the aides put it the drawer, and that staff fill it (humidifer) with water. On 1/26/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to act upon a pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner for one (Resident #59) of six residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of Resident #59's Medical Record revealed that Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. A review of Resident #59's Physician's Orders revealed an order, dated 01/19/2022, for Fludrocortisone Acetate 0.1 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for orthostatic hypotension. A review of Resident #59's Medication Regimen Review, dated 11/05/2021, revealed a recommendation from the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) to Resident #59's Attending Physician to indicate a diagnosis to be added to the Medication Administration Record for fludrocortisone. No response was recorded by Resident #59's Attending Physician for the recommendation. A review of Resident #59's Medication Regimen Review, dated 01/10/2022, revealed a recommendation from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring for psychotropic medication use was consistently implemented for two (Resident #59 and Resident #68) of six residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of Resident #59's Medical Record revealed that Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. A review of Resident #59's Physician's Orders revealed the following orders: - An order dated 01/15/2022 for Olanzapine 2.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time daily and 5 mg by mouth at bedtime for mood disorder. - An order dated 01/04/2022 for behavioral monitoring of antipsychotic medication use every shift. - An order dated 01/04/2022 for side effect monitoring of antipsychotic medication use every shift. A review of Resident #59's Care Plan revealed a problem revised on 01/04/2022 that Resident #59 used psychotropic medications. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered, observe/document for side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed, and three errors were identified for two (#74 and #15) of four residents observed. These errors constituted a 12.00% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 1/25/22 at 8:20 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff Member T, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted with Resident #74. Staff T was observed dispensing the following medications: - Enteric coated Aspirin 81 milligram (mg) tablet orally - Calcium Carbonate 2 tablets orally - Vitamin D 25 microgram (mcg) tablet orally - Metformin 1000 mg tablet orally - Repaglinde 2 mg tablet orally - Memantine 5 mg tablet orally - Losartan 50 mg tablet orally - Celecoxib 400 mg tablet orally - Levemir 10 units subcutaneously - Sertraline 50 mg tablet orally During dispensing of the medication, Staff Member T stated she had previously checked for Resident #74's Levemir in the refrigerator in the medication room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the call light was functioning properly for Resident's #17 and #89 during 4 of 4 days of survey. Findings included: Resident #89's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of muscle wasting atrophy. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Section G: Functional Status, dated 01/11/22, indicated that the resident had extensive limitation and required the assistance of at minimum one person for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). A review of the Care Plan with a revision date of 08/05/21, revealed that Resident #89 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to the following: weakness, incontinence, impaired mobility, balance and cognition. Interventions included call bell within reach while in room/bathroom/ shower room and remind to use. Resident #17's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of encephalopathy. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$291,478 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $128,925 — penalty dated 2025-10-29
- $162,553 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEARTHSTONE SENIOR COMMUNITIES, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2009 |
| GARNER, ALVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2009 |
| JAFFE, HOWARD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2009 |
| ROMBOLD, LORI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2009 |
| WYATT, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2009 |
| CONSULTING SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| FACILITY SUPPORT COMPANY, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| KANE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| THEMIS HEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/24/2025 |
| LEBRON, ARLEEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/16/2021 |
| SPADOLA, CARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/19/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105269. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.