Wedgewood Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1.) provide adequate supervision to related to falls with an injury for one (#49) of two sampled residents and 2.) ensure the mattresses fit the beds properly for one (#63) of eight affected residents for a facility with a census of 116 residents. Findings included: 1. An interview on 10/18/22 at 2:18 p.m. with Resident #49 revealed he had fallen out of bed last Friday, 10/14/22. He was turned on his left side, his lower extremities, knees, and lower legs were hanging off the bed. The resident was in a semi-fetal position. He stated he fell out of bed after the aide left him too close to the right side of the bed and he slid off the bed. He stated the aide was changing his brief and she said he was bleeding. She left to go get the nurse and he slid off. He fell on the floor and hit his head and left shoulder. He stated the bandage on his left forehead was from the fall. The bed was in a normal position and no floor mats were beside the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to accommodate mobility needs related to personal access to a motorized wheelchair for one resident (#4) out of three residents sampled for accessibility.Findings included: During an interview on 05/26/2026 at 1:27 p.m., Resident #4 voiced their unhappiness with their current living situation at the facility. Resident #4 stated they wanted to get up and be out of bed more but given their condition of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) they know it is a process for the staff to get him up and expressed concern for not having his powerchair (also known as motorized wheelchair). Resident #4 stated when he was still living independently in a home they would use the powerchair to get around, visit friends, as well as go to the grocery store. Resident #4 stated when he came to the facility with their powerchair on the day of admission, the facility took the chair to be evaluated and was told the chair was not in good enough condition to bring into the facility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and visitors were provided with an updated/current Daily Staffing Census posting during one of four days observed. Findings included: On 12/16/2024 at 9:00 a.m., the building was entered and met with Staff B, the front desk receptionist. While in the lobby and at the front desk, the Daily Census Staffing Form was observed placed in a clear plastic envelope and placed where residents and visitors could view it. Review of the Daily Census Staffing Form revealed it was dated 12/15/2024, which was the previous day from this observation. It was determined the front lobby desk did not have the up- to- date Daily Census Staffing form for review. Interview with Staff B revealed she was not sure who was responsible for updating the form, but she knew the form was usually updated every day to reflect accurate nursing numbers for each shift. Staff B confirmed the form was not reflective of the current date. On 12/19/2024 at 7:37 a.m., an interview with Staff G, Staffing Coordinator revealed she was the staff member who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all resident room bathrooms were provided and maintained with a fully operational call light system in one of six hall//units, to include the 600 hall/unit. Findings included: On 12/16/2024 at 9:30 a.m., 2:00 p.m., 12/17/2024 at 8:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 12/18/2024 at 2:00 p.m., and 12/19/2024 at 7:28 a.m. the following resident rooms were observed in the 600 secured/dementia unit: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom metal hand rail had a white fabric call cord wrapped and tied to the wall hand rail. It was tied and wrapped in a manner that prevented it to appropriately actuate the call system if pulled below the hand rail. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom wall mounted call system was missing a cord to pull and actuate the alarm. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom hand rail had a white fabric call cord wrapped and tied to the wall hand rail. It was tied and wrapped in a manner that prevented it to appropriately actuate the call system if pulled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor and maintain resident dignity related to staff not knocking or announcing prior to entering occupied rooms for three (#94, #9, and #22) of thirty-eight sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 12/16/2024 at 9:55 a.m., Resident #94 was observed in her room and seated in her wheelchair next to her bed. Resident #94 was noted dressed for the day and well groomed. She was observed to reside in the secured/dementia unit, and was residing in a room by herself. She had no initial concerns other than staff just coming in her room without knocking. She revealed this happened during the day and night and she got especially startled when she was in bed and sleeping and staff came in her room without her knowing. Resident #94 revealed there were times when staff yelled out to her while at the side of her bed and she knew they did not knock before coming in the room. She revealed she had spoken to a nurse about it but things had not changed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident centered care plan was developed for two (#73 and #109) out of 24 residents sampled. Findings Included: 1. During an observation on 12/16/2024 at 9:32 a.m., Resident #73 was observed in his room dressed for the day with one shoe on and the other shoe off. Resident #72 was observed sitting next to his bed in a wheelchair with a blanket over his head. Attempted to interview Resident #73 and he did not respond to any questions. During an observation on 12/18/2024 at 11:30 a.m., Resident #73 was observed sitting in a wheelchair dressed for the day, in the 800 hall. Review of Resident #73 admission record revealed an admission date of 01/03/2022. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses not limited to Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations, Mood disorder due to known psychological condition with depressive features, Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, and Post…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for three (#90, #58, and #80) of thirty-eight sampled residents related to 1. Staff did not identify and treat a skin tear on Resident #90's right arm; 2. Lack of insulin monitoring for Resident #58; and 3. Lack of monitoring for blood thinners for Resident #80. Findings included: 1. On 12/16/2024 at 10:45 a.m. and 2:30 a.m., Resident #90 was observed seated in a chair in the activities/lounge area with other residents seated next to her. Staff were in the same room either interacting with Resident #90 or interacting with other residents in this room. Resident #90 was pleasant and was able to answer simple yes and no questions. Further observations revealed Resident #90 had several wounds on her right arm. She was observed rubbing her right arm with her left hand. Her right arm had four very small scabbed over lesions as well as one open wound/skin tear that was approximately one inch by one inch in size. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility and the Dialysis Center for one (#22) out of 24 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an interview on 12/16/2024 at 9:50 a.m., Resident #22, stated he had concerns about not receiving medications on time. He stated that he had had a cough for a few weeks and what they were giving him was not working. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #22, stated he reminded staff to check his vitals when he got back from dialysis. He stated they did not check his AV (Arteriovenous) fistula when he returned from dialysis. During an observation on 12/18/2024 at 10:00 a.m., a red binder was observed on Resident #22's bedside table. Inside the binder was a Communication Sheet, dated 12/16/2024, with Resident #22's name, room number, and vitals pre-dialysis and post dialysis on it. There was no other writing on the sheet. Review of Resident #22's admission record revealed an admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to respond to dietary grievances in a timely and appropriate manner for three residents (#210, #103, and #308) out of the sampled thirty-seven residents. Findings included: 1. A review of the Monthly Grievance Log for October 2022 revealed a grievance filed by Resident #210 related to dietary concerns dated 10/12(2022). The form indicated the person assigned to the grievance was the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The resolution was noted as food preferences updated and monitor trays. The Complaint/Grievance Report dated 10/12/22 revealed the grievance was communicated to the CDM. The concern was breakfast was cold. The results of action taken indicated the CDM spoke with resident about her breakfast tray. CDM will continue to monitor breakfast tray, the form also indicated the grievance was resolved and the complainant was satisfied. On 10/19/22 at 2:30 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) reported she writes the grievances on the log and reports…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to present the baseline care plan to the resident and responsible party for one resident (#107) of 37 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #107 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but were not limited to chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, weakness, depression, DM (diabetes mellitus), HTN (hypertension), and anemia. Record review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C - Cognitive Patterns showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #107 was noted as totally dependent for bed mobility and transfers and required two people to assist. An interview with Resident #107 on 10/17/22 at 11:00 a.m. revealed no one had reviewed his care plan with him since he had been at the facility. On 10/19/22 at 12:55 p.m. Staff A Registered Nurse (RN) MDS stated the admission nurse performs the baseline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility did not implement the plan of care for activities for one resident (#38) and failed to develop and implement a nutritional plan of care for one resident (#3) related to weight loss for a sample of 37 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. A medical record review was conducted for Resident #38 on 10/17/2022 which revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses but not limited to dementia, cognitive communication deficit and history of falling. On 10/17/22 at 10:00 a.m. the resident was observed in a low bed, hospital gown, and call light within reach. Resident #38 was unable to have a conversation due to her cognitive decline. On 10/17/22 at 2:23 p.m. Resident #38 was observed still in bed. Resident #38 lays in a scooped mattress, low bed, air mattress. The resident was asked if she had eaten, she couldn't remember, her roommate (#79) stated that she is fed, and she did have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $187K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL