Hamlin Place Of Boynton Beach

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide food to residents in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 103 residents who consumed food orally at that time of the survey. The findings included:Observations during the initial tour of the kitchen occurred on 12/08/25 at approximately 9:00 AM. The surveyor was accompanied by the Director of Nutrition who was a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The following concerns were observed:1. The interior of the left Manitowoc Ice machine had areas with built-up of white residue. Standing water was observed resting on the flat area where the lid lifted up. The Manitowoc Ice machine that was located to the right of the 1st ice machine had black residue inside the ice machine along the metal and plastic hardware that was related to the opening function of the lid. The CDM agreed with this finding. 2. The rim plates (adaptive equipment) were stored face down in a plastic bin that had yellow, orange, green, and black residue on the interior bottom of the container. The CDM agreed with this finding. 3. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate care for provision of vision and hearing services for 2 of 2 Sampled residents reviewed for vision and hearing. (Resident #73 for vision and Resident #2 for hearing.)The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility initially on 04/08/18 with a re-entry date of 11/11/25. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #73 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This same MDS indicated Resident #73 had corrective lenses.Review of the active orders included an order for Mobile eye, dental services and podiatry as indicated dated 11/11/25.Review of the care plan dated 09/23/25 did not reveal a care plan related to vision loss.During an interview conducted on 12/08/25 at 10:35 AM when asked how her care was, Resident #73 stated she wished the facility would expedite her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of a critical laboratory result for 1 of 5 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to notify the physician of a critically low blood sugar level for Resident #4.The findings included:Review of the record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include diabetes. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. This MDS also documented that the resident had diabetes.Review of a laboratory report, for a blood sample collected on 08/09/25 at 5:00 AM for Resident #4, documented a blood glucose level of 35, with the normal level of 70 to 99, indicating a critically low value. This blood sample was received by the laboratory on 08/09/25 at 12:12 PM and reported to the facility on [DATE] at 1:04 PM, as per the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care for provision of dental services for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dental (Resident #73).The findings included:Review of the record revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility initially on 04/08/18 with a re-entry date of 11/11/25. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #73 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the active orders included an order for Mobile eye, dental services and podiatry as indicated, dated 11/11/25.Review of the care plan dated 09/23/25 did not reveal a care plan related to dentures.During an interview conducted on 12/08/25 at 10:35 AM when asked how her care was, Resident #73 stated she wished the facility would expedite her requests; she expressed she lost her dentures a couple of months ago when she left them on her lunch tray and never saw them again.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and a review of professional standards of protocol, the facility failed to meet the needs of 2 of 2 Sampled residents (Resident #80 & Resident #128) who were on puree diets. This had the potential to affect 11 residents who were on puree diets. The findings included:A review of the facility's policy on the Dysphagia Puree (Level 1) Diet, from the Diet Manual dated 2011, specified that puree foods must be the consistency of moist mashed potatoes or pudding. The diet is used for people who have severe chewing and/or swallowing problems. A review of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI, referenced www.iddsi.org) included an informational handout for adults on a puree diet. For safety, the IDDSI recommended avoiding foods with skins or outer shells. Peas was included on the list of foods to avoid on the pureed diet. 1) A record review revealed that Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was on Hospice Services since…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the provision of the influenza vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #17).The findings included:Review of the record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the record revealed a Consent Form for Pneumococcal, Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccines dated 11/19/25. This form signed by the resident's family member documented the desire and consent for Resident #17 to receive the influenza vaccine.Review of the Immunization Details in the electronic medical record (EMR) documented the status for Resident #17 to receive the vaccine was pending immunization with the same consent date of 11/19/25.During an interview and side-by-side record review on 12/11/25 at 11:17 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed she had received the influenza vaccine from the pharmacy for the current season and had been administering them to the residents who had consented. When asked the process and timeframe to obtain the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to inform 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #28) of her rights to receive timely specialized rehabilitation services, physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT). The finding included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Scheduling Therapy Services revised July 2013 documented, Therapy Services shall be scheduled in accordance with the resident's treatment plan; and Specialized rehabilitative services must be provided under the written order of a physician by qualified personnel. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included: Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation; Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Of Native Coronary Artery. Difficulty In Walking; Pain; Dislocation Of Right Shoulder Joint; Non-displaced Intertrochanter Fracture Right Femur; Low Back Pain; Pain In Right Shoulder; Muscle Wasting And Atrophy; Pain In Left Knee; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Pain In Right Hip; History Of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accommodations to 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #28) to attend her care plan meeting, The findings included: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included: Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation; Atherosclerotic Heart Disease Of Native Coronary Artery. Difficulty In Walking; Pain; Dislocation Of Right Shoulder Joint; Non-displaced Intertrochanter Fracture Right Femur; Low Back Pain; Pain In Right Shoulder; Muscle Wasting And Atrophy; Pain In Left Knee; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Pain In Right Hip; History Of Falling; and Primary Osteoarthritis, Right Shoulder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], section titled Brief Interview of Mental Status recorded Resident #28 had a score of 14 out of 15 on the assessment. This score identified Resident #28 as being cognitively, mentally sound to handle her personal affairs. In addition, the Face Sheet documented Resident #28 is her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care and services for a rash for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for skin issues (Resident #67). The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximal assist with activities of daily living. Resident #67 was care planned on 04/30/24 for a skin rash with an intervention to administer medication as ordered. An interview was conducted with Resident #67 on 06/10/24 at 12:30 PM. The resident complained of an itchy rash all over her body. The resident was observed with red raised bumps on her left leg, right stump, abdomen, chest, arms, and face. The resident stated she also had the rash on her back and buttocks. Resident #67 stated the facility had given her a cream, but it does not help. The resident stated she asked to see a dermatologist, but has not heard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician ordered therapeutic diet of No Concentrated Sweets/Carbohydrate Controlled Diet for 16 facility residents that included 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #8 and #70). The findings included: During the review of the approved menu for the week of 03/26/23 it was noted that an 8-ounce portion of skim milk was to be included for breakfast and dinner meals for residents with physician ordered No Concentrated Sweet/Carbohydrate Controlled diets. During the observation of the lunch tray line in the main kitchen on 03/28/23 at 7:30 AM, it was noted that an 8-ounce portion of Regular Milk was included on trays prepared to be served to No Concentrated Sweets/Carbohydrate Controlled Diets. An interview conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) at the time of the meal observation and was noted to state that she was unaware the approved menu documented skim milk for No Concentrated Sweets/Carbohydrate Controlled diets. It was also stated by the DM that the facility does not keep Skim…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL