St Johns Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 181 beds and averages 164.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 14% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Record review for Resident #137 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses that included: Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Morbid (Severe) Obesity, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #137 dated 08/11/23 revealed in Section C, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment; In Section G for bed mobility, the resident had a self-performance of extensive assistance with support of one person assist, for dressing the resident had a self-performance of total dependence with support of two plus persons assist, and for eating the resident had a self-performance of extensive assistance with support of one person assist. Review of the Physician's orders for Resident #137 revealed an order dated 02/16/23 for regular thin liquids, special instructions none. Review of the Physician's orders for Resident #137 revealed an order dated 02/16/23 for Hydrochlorothiazide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders regarding tube feeding for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #124. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Enteral Nutrition Products, dated 08/22/22, showed in part the following: The facility supplies residents with enteral nutrition support as ordered by the Physician. It further showed that all enteral nutrition products must be labeled with the Resident's name, date it was prepared, product name, concentration, and volume. Resident #124 was admitted to the facility initially on 06/01/23 with diagnoses to include Hyperlipidemia, Dementia, and Left Hip Fracture. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #124 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the diet order, dated 09/01/23, noted for tube feeding, Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding formulary) at 65 milliliters (ml) an hour times 15 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide food to residents in a safe and sanitary method. This had the potential to affect 154 residents. The findings included:A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 03/03/26 at 8:50 AM, accompanied by the Kitchen Supervisor upon entering the kitchen. At approximately 9:30 AM, the Kitchen Manager joined the surveyor and the Kitchen Supervisor. At approximately 10:30 AM, the Director of Food and Nutrition Services joined the surveyor, the Kitchen Supervisor, and the Kitchen Manager, on the tour of the kitchen. The following was observed: a. Upon entering the kitchen, a tall gray garbage bin close to the Vulcan stove had an open lid. The staff quickly closed the lid. Regulations mandate that the garbage should be maintained with a closed lid. During a later observation of the garbage bin with an open lid, the Director of Food and Nutrition Services was asked if the lid was left open for convenience. It was observed that there was no garbage bin close to the hand-washing area. The Director of Food and Nutrition Services said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the facility policy of documenting identified changes in the sacral skin condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident #1.The findings included:Review of facility's policy, titled, Wound Prevention, Skin Observation, with an effective date of 10/19/05, and a revision date of 11/21/17, documented that 'the nurse would evaluate and document identified changes in the weekly skin check section of the electronic medical record.' Record review documented Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a surgical operation of the right knee. The resident had history of Vancomycin induced Acute Kidney Injury, Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension. The resident was discharged to a hospital on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/26, documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating he had good cognitive function.Section M revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner for 3 of 3 sampled residents during mealtime observations, Resident #140, Resident #75, and Resident #100; and failed to provide grooming for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #139. The findings included: 1. In an observation conducted on 01/13/25 at 12:22 PM, Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was passing the lunch tray on the 2nd floor South unit. She turned to another staff member on the unit and said, She is a feeder. A few minutes later, at 12:27 PM, Staff I, CNA, asked another staff member, How many feeders do we have? 2. Continued observation on the 2nd floor South unit at 12:30 PM revealed Staff I stated to another staff member, She is a feeder as well. She then turned to the surveyor and said, I need to wait with some of the trays in the meal cart because I need to finish feeding the other residents. 3. In an observation conducted on 01/13/25 at 12:22 PM, Resident #140's roommate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' call devices were in reach for 3 of 33 sampled residents reviewed for call light accessibility, Residents #85, #153 and #51. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Call Bells-Lights, effective date 08/12/19 and reviewed date 10/16/24, included the following: Call bells will be available to facilitate care and to enhance safety for all residents. Procedure: 1.Staff will ensure that call buttons are within the reach of the resident at all times. 1. Record review for Resident #85 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses that included Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Dementia, Hypertension, History of Falling, and Diabetes Mellitus. Review of Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Section GG of the same MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to honor 1 of 22 sampled residents, Resident #130's rights for self-determination, as evidenced by the facility's infringement on Resident #130's right to refuse and discontinue nursing home care services. The findings included: On 01/13/25 at 11:44 AM, Resident #130 stated he was asked in the month of October 2024 to come to the nursing home while his assisted living facility's (ALF) apartment was being renovated. He said that they told him that he would return to the ALF in two months. Yet, he has not heard from anyone, he does not know what is going on, and it has been three months. The resident stated they have ignored all his concerns. Resident #130's electronic record documented the following diagnoses: Chronic systolic heart failure; Hypertensive Heart disease; Bacteremia; Hyperlipidemia; presence of Cardiac Pace Maker; Glaucoma bilateral unspecified and gait abnormalities. On the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) Resident #130 obtained a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, records review, and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activites of Daily Living (ADLs) for 1 of 22 sampled residents, Resident#139, related to removal of facial hair. The findings included: Review of Resident #139's facesheet and section A of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessement documented the resident's admission date to the facility to be 06/08/23.Review of on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) for Resiident #139 noted a score of 3 of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section GG of the MDS. titled Functional Abilities and goals. documented the resident required total assistance for most ADLs. Review of the resident's ADL care plan (CP) dated 02/12/24 documented the resident has self-care deficits as evidenced by her decreased balance and endurance, safety awareness strength, and required maximum assistance with upper body dressing, total assistance with lower body dressing, total assistance with toilet transfer, total assistance with toileting hygiene, due to functional decline related to ADL dysfunction muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow Physician orders for urinary care for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident # 152, reviewed for urinary care. The findings included: Review of a document, titled, Foley Catheter Care, with policy # 2032, and reviewed on 08/22/22, revealed catheter care will be provided to all residents with indwelling catheters at least daily. An additional statement revealed the purpose of catheter care is to prevent possible urinary tract infections from bacteria spreading from the perineal area and external catheter into the bladder. Record review documented Resident #152 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, Chronic Urinary Retention, Diabetes Mellitus, Thyroid Disorder, Malnutrition, Sacral Wounds, and Asthma. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, Section C, dated 01/05/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 of 15 indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify weight loss and provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 2 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #7, and Resident #140. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Nutrition Assessment and Monitoring, revised on 09/08/24, revealed the following: A systematic approach will be used to optimize a resident's nutritional status. The process includes identifying and assessing each Resident's nutritional status and risk factors, evaluating/analyzing the assessment information, developing and consistently implementing the effectiveness, monitoring pertinent approaches and interventions, and revising them as necessary. Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Weights reviewed on 10/16/24 showed the following: The Weight Team will be responsible for weighing Residents and entering weight into the EMR. Weight Fluctuations shall be re-weighed and then reported to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow physicians orders for fluid restriction for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #42, reviewed for Dialysis. The findings included: Review of the policy document provided, titled Dialysis Residents, with a policy #2008, and reviewed on 10/16/24, revealed the purpose is to ensure that all needs / services of residents on dialysis are met while at the Facility. Recor review revealed Resident #42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Anxiety Disorder, Anemia, and Hypertension. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, Section C, dated 12/11/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of physician orders dated 09/11/24 revealed to monitor intake every shift as per fluid overload prevention protocol: 24-hour fluid restriction in milliliters (ml). 1200 ml (nursing 480 ml and dietary 720 ml). The order documented: 120 ml…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to address social services responsibilities regarding missing personal items and clothing for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #223. The findings included: Review of undated facility's licensed Social Worker job description on 01/16/25 at 11:17 AM provided by the Administrator documented, Summary & Objective: The Social Worker coordinates and provides medically related Social Services to attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident . Essential Functions: Complete progress notes/assessments as required . Participates in daily management team meetings to discuss resident status, census changes, and resident complaints or concerns if applicable . Other Duties: Comply with all policies, local, state, and federal laws and regulations and Perform other duties as assigned . Review of the facility's policy and procedure, titled, Handling of Valuables,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,155 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $25,155 — penalty dated 2023-09-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in FL