Lafayette Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 63% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to encode and transmit the resident discharge assessment for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for minimum data set [MDS] completion. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's physicians order dated 3/19/2026 read, [Resident #1's name] will discharge to [Facility's Name] in [Town's and State Name] on 3/19/26.Review of Resident #1's Discharge summary dated [DATE] read, Transferring to [Name of Facility]. Mode of Transportation: Transportation provided by facility. Date: 3/19/2026. Time: 11:00.Review of Resident #1's progress note dated 3/20/2026 read, [Resident #1's name] discharged to [Name of Facility] 3/19/2026 in [Town's and State's Name]. [Resident #1's name] is to follow up with PCP [primary care provider] at [Facility's name].Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set did not document a discharge assessment. During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 3:20 PM, Staff E, Minimum Date Set Coordinator, Registered Nurse, stated, I verified with my regional and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the resident's active diagnoses for 1 (Resident #20) of 6 residents reviewed for weight and nutrition, by failing to code a thyroid disorder in Section I, resulting in inaccurate clinical data used for care planning, quality measures, and reimbursement. Findings include:Review of Resident #20's active medical diagnosis include thyrotoxicosis, also known as hyperthyroidism.Review of Resident #20's physician's order dated 1/25/2025 read, Methimazole tablet 10 milligrams (MG), give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hyperthyroidism.Review of Resident #20's Annual MDS dated [DATE] section I, subsection I3400 Thyroid disorder was coded as No.During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 1:16 PM, the Regional MDS Nurse stated, I reviewed the MDS concerns and identified that the resident was coded incorrectly in section I for not being documented for having the active diagnosis of thyroid disease.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 (Resident #31 and Resident #61) of 6 residents reviewed for nutritional concerns.Findings include: 1.) Review of Resident #61's clinical record under Vital Signs documented the following weights: 4/1/2026: 122.3 lbs (pounds); 3/25/2026: 122.7 lbs; 3/22/2026: 124.9 lbs; 3/11/2026: 127.3 lbs; 3/8/2026: 133.9 lbs; 3/7/2026: 134.3 lbs; 3/6/2026: 133.2 lbs; 3/5/2026: 133.9 lbs. On 3/05/2026, Resident #61 weighed 133.9 lbs and on 4/01/2026, Resident #61 weighed 122.3 lbs which calculated to a -8.66% Loss. Review of Resident #61's Nutritional Risk Screen assessment dated [DATE] read, 80YOF ([AGE] year-old female) admitted with dx (diagnosis) of fx (fracture), CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), dysphagia [difficulty with swallowing], T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), hypothyroidism, HTN (Hypertension). Allergy: food dye. Ht (height) 64in, wt (weight) 122.7#, BMI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate milliliter per hour of auto flushes via feeding tube for 1 (Resident #8) of 2 reviewed for enteral feedings.Findings include: During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 1:30 PM with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed Resident #8's automatic water flushes were running at 50 ml [milliliters] per hour. During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 1:38 PM, Staff C, LPN, stated, [Resident #8's name] auto flushes should be running at 60 ml per hour. The night shift nurse is the one to hang the feedings. I will need to go back and adjust the flushes. During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 1:43 PM with Staff D, Unit Manager LPN confirmed Resident #8's auto water flushes were running at 50 ml per hour. Review of Resident #8's physician's order dated 2/16/2026 read, Osmolite 1.5 give @ 65 ml/hr [at 65 milliliters per hour] and flush rate of 60 ml/hr via g-tube [gastric] x [times] 20 hrs, one time a day for Nutrition up x 20 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to document accurately skin assessments for 1 (Resident #56) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions.Findings include:During an observation on 4/06/2026 at 10:23 AM, Resident #56 was sitting up in bed. Resident #56's right forearm had a small 2x2 white dressing. The dressing had no date. During an interview on 4/06/2026 at 10:23 AM, Resident #56 stated, On Saturday I bumped myself and got a skin tear. The nurse insisted on putting a dressing on it. Normally, if I was home I would just put Neosporin and that's all. They change the dressing every day. During an observation on 4/7/2026 at 12:10 PM, Resident #56 was sitting up in bed. There was a dressing on his right forearm dated 4/6/2026.Review of Resident #56's physician's orders documented no orders for a skin tear on right arm.Review of Resident #56's progress notes did not document any incident regarding right arm skin tear or provider documentation.Review of Resident #56's medical records did not document a skin assessment for the right arm skin tear.During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 (Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for enhance barrier precautions, failed to perform hand hygiene for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed for enteral nutrition, and failed to provide weekly changes for nebulizer equipment for 1 (Resident #48) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 04/08/2026 at 1:30 PM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared medication for Resident #8. Staff C entered Resident #8's room and performed hand hygiene. Staff donned gloves but did not don a gown. Staff C checked Resident #8's gastric tube placement and administered Resident #8's medication enterally. During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 1:38 PM, Staff C, LPN, stated, [Resident #8's name] is on enhanced barrier precautions, I should have donned a gown. Review of Resident #8's physician's orders dated 1/8/2026, read, Enhanced Barrier Precautions for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #38. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's Medicare admission 5-day MDS dated [DATE] showed the resident was receiving anticoagulant medication under Section N- Medications. Review of Resident #38's physician orders revealed no current or previous orders for anticoagulant medication. During an interview on 10/24/2024 at 8:15 AM regarding Resident #38's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS Coordinator stated, I reviewed it and it is inaccurate. During an interview on 10/24/2024 at 8:30 AM regarding MDS accuracy, the Administrator stated, I expect them to be accurate. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment revised on 1/4/2024 showed it read, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 3. The appropriate, qualified health professional will correctly document the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received intravenous therapy (IV) in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident, who was receiving intravenous medications, Resident #55. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's admission record showed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses to include encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, disruption of internal operation (surgical) wound, and infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation device. Review of Resident #55's physician order dated 10/21/2024 read, Cefepime HCl Injection Solution Reconstituted 1 GM [gram], Use 1 gram intravenously one time a day for Toxic Metabolic Encephalopathy until 10/24/2024 23:59 [11:59 PM]. Review of Resident #55's care plan dated 9/20/2024 read, [Resident #55's name] is on IV medications r/t [related to] toxic metabolic encephalopathy . Interventions . Administer medications as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received oxygen as prescribed by physician for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Residents #5, #31, and #44. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 10/21/2024 at 9:59 AM, Resident #31 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 L/M [liters per minute]. During an observation on 10/21/2024 at 1:58 PM, Resident #31 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 liters per minute. During an observation on 10/22/2024 at 7:40 AM, Resident #31 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 5 liters per minute. Review of Resident #31's physician order dated 4/10/2023 read, Oxygen PRN [as needed]- O2 [oxygen] at 2 L/M via nasal cannula as needed for O2 sats [saturation] < [less than] 90%. Review of Resident #31's care plan dated 3/14/20244 read, Focus: [Resident #31's name] has COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease] . Interventions/Tasks . Give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician. During an interview on 10/22/2024 at 11:20 AM, Resident #31 stated, My oxygen is supposed to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings include: During an observation of the tray line for breakfast meal service on 10/23/2024 at 7:40 AM, after one hall's trays were prepared, sausage patty temperature was at 130 degrees Fahrenheit on the steamtable and 4-ounce strawberry yogurt was at 47.8 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on 10/23/2024 at 7:40 AM, the Dietary Manager confirmed the temperatures recorded and stated that the temperature for the sausage should have been above 135 degrees and the temperature of the yogurt should have been below 41 degrees. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Food Holding and Service dated 10/1/2018 and last reviewed on 12/31/2023 showed it read, Policy: To ensure that all food served by the facility is of good quality and safe for consumption, all food will be held and served according to the state and US Food Codes and HACCP [Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point] guidelines. Procedure: 1. Serve all hot foods at a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAXIMUS HEALTHCARE GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL