Miami Shores Nursing And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 1.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and interviews, the facility failed to meet infection control standards of practice for Resident #5 during hygiene care. This is evidenced by Staff A not performing hand hygiene, changing gloves or changing washcloths during hygiene care for Resident #5. There were 91 residents residing at the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 06/24/25 at 01:13 PM, Staff A was observed not performing hand hygiene prior to the procedure. Upon the surveyor's entry into the room, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was already wearing a gown, mask, and gloves. The resident is on enhanced barrier precautions and has a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube; the PEG tube machine was noted to be turned off. The CNA removed the resident's soiled clothing, leaving the resident uncovered while filling the basin with water. Soap was added directly to the water. The CNA did not remove gloves or perform hand hygiene at any point during the procedure. The resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store controlled substances on three out of four sampled medication carts as evidenced by unreconciled medication monitoring/control record sheets. The facility had four medication carts. The findings included: On 6/24/2025 at 1:32 PM a medication administration observation was completed with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) on the west wing medication cart #1; Staff A, RN verified the physician's order, removed the controlled substance from a bingo card placed it in a medication cup; after administering the controlled substance, Staff A, RN returned to the medication cart and signed in the medication monitoring/ control record sheet to indicate the controlled substance was given. Interview on 6/24/2025 at 1:37 PM, the surveyor asked Staff A, RN about the protocol for documenting removal of a controlled substance. Staff A, RN replied, I sign the narcotic log after the resident takes the medication because if the resident refuses, I can't sign that I have given it. The surveyor asked Staff A, RN, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA)/QAPI) committee failed at demonstrating an effective plan of action to correct identified quality deficiency in problem areas as evidence by repeated deficient practice for F 880-Infection Prevention and Control and F 761- Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals. There were 91 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification conducted on March 23, 2025 through March 26, 2025, F880- Infection Prevention & Control was cited due to the facility's failure to implement infection control procedures related to trash and food observations on the floor inside The Resident's pantry room on the East side nursing station, indwelling catheter tube touching floor, staff not wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) and improper hand hygiene during wound care. F761- Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals was cited related to an unattended unlocked medication cart on the west side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow their infection control protocol in the East side soiled utility room and with Resident's #2 and #57. This is evidenced by trash and food observations on the floor inside the resident's pantry room on the East side nursing station, Resident #2 indwelling catheter tube touching floor, staff not wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering droplet precaution rooms during meal tray distribution and Improper hand hygiene during wound care. There were 96 residents residing at the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1) On 03/23/25 at 07:51 AM, Staff were observed not wearing PPE while entering a contact/droplet resident room while distributing breakfast trays. 2) On 03/25/25 at 11:02 AM, observation of Wound Care. The Wound Care Nurse gathered supplies that consist of kerlix, normal saline, collagen, tape, 4 x 4 gauze, scissors, red bag and chuck pads. The Wound Care Nurse locked the computer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide privacy for residents' information on two out of four computer screens on the East side nursing station as evidenced by an observation of an unlocked, unattended computer screen with resident information easily accessible/visible on the east side medication cart #1 and at the East side nursing station. There were 96 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1.On 03/23/25 at 7:39 AM, an observation was made of an unlocked, unattended computer screen on the East side medication cart #1 (photo obtained ). On 03/23/25 at 7:41 AM Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) returned to the medication cart and was asked by the surveyor the protocol for keeping residents' information private on computer screens and replied, I am supposed to lock the screen before I walk away. I was worried about getting the supervisor for you, so I forgot to lock the screen. 2. On 03/23/25 at 8:08, an observation was made of an unlocked, unattended computer screen at the East side nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I was completed accurately prior to admission for three Residents (#50, #83, #60) out of three residents reviewed for PASARR. There were 96 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings Included: Record review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Policy and Procedure dated 2016 documented: Policy Intent-It is the policy of the facility to assure that all residents admitted to the facility receive a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review; Procedure-1) A facility will coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program as stated under Federal Regulations. 1) Observation of Resident #50 on 3/25/25 at 11:07 AM revealed the resident sitting up in bed with the television on. Record review of the Demographic Face Sheet for Resident #50 documented the resident was admitted on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for Residents #43, #74 and #291 as evidenced by no comprehensive care plan with interventions for floor mats for one resident (#291), no implementation of a fall care plan for one resident (#74) out of 6 residents who use floor mats and no care plan for a neck brace for one (#43) out of two residents who require neck braces. There were 96 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1. On 3/23/25 at 7:54 AM Resident#291 was observed in bed with one floor mat on the resident's right side, a call light was in reach. Another observation on 03/25/25 08:53 AM revealed bilateral floor mats were in place for Resident #291. Record review of a demographic sheet for Resident #291 revealed an admission date of 3/1/25 with diagnoses that included: Syncope and Collapse, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Record review of an admission Minimum data set (MDS) reference dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent safety hazards for one resident (#2) out of 32 sampled residents as evidenced by an observation of an electrical cord plugged into an outlet suspended in the air in such a way that caused a tripping hazard in the room of Resident#2. There were 96 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 03/23/25 at 9:44 AM an observation was made of an electrical cord for the air mattress wrapped around the side table, extending and suspended in the air, which caused a tripping hazard in the room of Resident #2. Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) was present in the room at the time of the observation and was notified by the surveyor of the potential tripping hazard. Staff H, RN readjusted the plug behind the bed. On 03/25/25 at 12:18 PM the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was made aware by the surveyor about the tripping hazard observation and stated, Electrical cords should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for catheter care for one (Resident #2) out of one resident who has a suprapubic catheter as evidenced by observations of the urinary catheter tubing being kinked, and touching the floor. There were 96 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: On 03/23/25 at 9:35 AM Resident #2 was observed in bed with oxygen in progress at 2Liters per minute via a nasal cannula and no apparent distress was noted. A urinary catheter tubing was observed kinking in a circle and the urine was not properly draining (photo obtained). Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) was present in the room and was notified by the surveyor about the kinking of the tubing. Staff H, RN then straightened out the tubing to allow free flow of urine. Staff H, RN was asked by the surveyor the correct way to position the tubing and Staff H stated, I round every morning and check the catheter tubing. This morning, I found the night nurse was working with the indwelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store medications as evidenced by an observation of a box of expired Rapid Antigen (Covid-19) test kits in one medication storage room and an unlocked cart (cart #1) on the west wing unit, and an unattended medication at the bedside for resident #2. The Findings included: 1) Accompanied by Staff S, an observation of the [NAME] Wing medication storage room was conducted on 03/23/2025 at 09:50 AM. The observation revealed a box with multiple expired Covid-19 test kits inside the bottom cabinet. Each Covid-19 test kit was observed with an expiration date of 01/30/2024. Staff S, Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor confirmed the expiration date and removed a box of multiple expired Covid-19 test kits. On 03/26/2025 at 02:58 PM, Staff S stated: The nursing supervisors are the ones in charge of monitoring and checking the medication storage room each shift. The supervisor from each shift is responsible of checking the crash cart, med room, and the pantry. When we find something or medication expired, we…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL