Pines Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 44.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations record review and interview, the facility failed to safeguard and ensure privacy of residents' confidential Electronic Health Records (EHR); as evidenced by one out of two of the facility's medication carts' computer screen was left unlocked and unattended and a physical note posted on two of two medication carts revealing residents' information. There were 44 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include: On 04/27/25 at 08:51 AM during an observational of the facility, a note pertaining to Resident #23's allowed visitors and what steps to follow (Photo evidence) was observed posted on Medication Cart A and Medication Cart B computer screens. On 04/27/25 at 09:15 AM during medication administration observation the Electronic Medication Administration Records (EMAR) screen on the computer on Medication Cart A was left unlocked and unattended with a resident's EMAR information visible (Photo evidence). Interview on 04/27/25 at 09:45 AM Registered Nurse (Staff B) stated: Yes I forgot to lock the computer before going to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR)for individuals with a serious mental illness (SMI), or intellectual disability or related conditions (ID)was completed accurately prior to admission and failed to revise the screenings following admission for three (Resident #13, Resident #8 and Resident#12) out of 20 sampled residents. There were 44 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings Included: Resident #13 During observations on 04/27/25 at 08:36 AM, Resident #13 is awake in bed. On 04/28/25 at 07:39 AM Resident #13 was observed in room walking around and stated she is ok, just getting around for the day. Observation on 04/29/25 at 10:23 A; Resident #13 was her room sitting on the side of the bed, conversing with roommate and stated, today is a good day. Review of the medical records for Resident #13 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA)/QAPI) committee demonstrate effective plan of action were implemented to correct identified quality deficiency in problem areas related to repeated deficient practice for F880-Infection Prevention & Control. As evidenced by: F880 was cited during a Recertification survey ending 12/07/23 when the facility failed to implement infection control procedures. This repeated deficient practice has the potential to affect any of the 44 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification conducted on December 04, 2023, through December 07, 2023, F880- Infection Prevention & Control was cited due to the facility's failure to implement infection control procedures related to staff's not changing gloves during tracheostomy care and staff failure to adhere to proper sharps disposal related to used Blood Glucose Monitoring supplies. Review of the facility's policy and procedure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control procedures for two Residents (Resident 23 and Resident #34), out of 20 sampled residents. As evidenced by staff failed to dispose used Blood Glucose Monitoring supplies in the sharps container, failed to clean the insulin vial before extracting medications via needle syringe and failed to wear Personal protective equipment (PPE) during catheter care for one ( Resident # 34)out of one resident reviewed indwelling urinary catheter. There were 44 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings Included: During a Blood Glucose Monitoring observation on 04/27/25 at 11:08 AM for Resident #34 with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse. Staff A prepared the supplies, entered the resident's room, identified the resident, explained treatment, washed hands, donned gloves, cleaned the residents right index finger with an alcohol pad, checked the Blood Glucose (BG), the results was 326. Staff A,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident (Resident # 47) out of 23 sampled residents. Resident # 47's MDS was coded wrong for a discharge to the hospital, but the resident was discharged home. This deficiency has the potential to affect 45 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Record review of the clinical records for Resident # 47 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], and discharge on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses include, but were not limited to, Bipolar Disorder, Psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia), Schizophrenia, Rhabdomyolysis, Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Weakness, Drug induced Acute Dystonia, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease without Esophagitis. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed, Section A, Discharge status - short term, - General Hospital, Section C, Cognitive Status revealed, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was administered as prescribed and enteral feeding equipment/supplies were dated, labeled and changed daily for one (Resident #12) out of 13 residents receiving enteral tube feeding. The findings included: During an observation on 12/04/23 at 09:43 AM, Resident #12 was observed in bed, the bed was in the lowest position, and the Enteral feeding (TF) was not infusing. The TF supplement in the residents room was Fiber Source and was dated 12/04/2023, the enteral feeding syringe was dated 11/29/23, and the water for tube feeding flush did not have a label and was not dated. (Photograph obtained). On 12/05/23 at 09:34 AM, the Resident was not in the facility, the residents bed was stripped of linen, and facility staff stated the resident went to the hospital. Review of the medical records for Resident #12 revealed, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but were not limited to:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's order for oxygen therapy for one (Resident #36) out of 9 residents receiving respiratory services and to obtain a physician order for oxygen therapy for one (Resident #12) out of 9 residents receiving respiratory services. The findings included: 1. Observation on 12/04/23 at 09:56 AM, Resident #36 was in bed asleep, and the resident was receiving Oxygen (02) at 4 liters per minute (lpm) via trach collar. On 12/05/23 at 09:36 AM, Resident #36 was observed in bed asleep, and the resident was receiving 02 at 4lpm via trach collar. During a Tracheostomy care observation on 12/06/23 at 07:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (Staff C) gathered tracheostomy care supplies, entered Resident #26's room. The resident was in bed asleep, the head of bed was elevated, Staff C checked the resident's oxygen (02). Staff C reported, the resident's 02 was infusing at 5 liters per minute (lpm). Review of the medical records for Resident #36…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nine out of ten sampled nursing staff (Staff 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10) received the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility had no documentation that the staff received the orientation in-service training including Alzheimer's and Dementia, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. The findings included: Review of the facility's staff records revealed, Staff 1 was hired on 08/14/2023; Staff 2 was hired on 10/02/2023; Staff 3 was hired on 10/23/2023; Staff 4 was hired on 08/15/2023; Staff 5 was hired on 05/14/2023; Staff 6 was hired on 05/23/2023; Staff 8 was hired on 07/14/2023; Staff was 9 hired on 06/26/2023; Staff 10 was hired on 08/15/2023. Further review of the facility's staffing records relating to new hire orientation revealed, Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3, Staff 4, Staff 5, Staff 6, Staff 8, Staff 9, and Staff 10 did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures for recording daily refrigerator temperatures for the refrigerator in the Medication Storage room. There were 45 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: During the Medication Storage Room observation on 12/07/23 at 7:40 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (Staff A) the temperature log for the medication refrigerator in the medication storage room was observed to be last filled out on 12/5/23 with a recorded temperature of 37 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Interview on 12/07/23 at 07:53 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) it was reported, the 11-7pm nurses are responsible for filling out the refrigerator temperature logs. The DON was shown the temperature log posted on the refrigerator in the medication room, the DON acknowledged the refrigerator Temperature log was not filled out since 12/5/23. The DON had Staff A to check the temperature of the refrigerator and update the log for today,12/7/23. The temperature was recorded as 38 F. Review of the undated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage disposal was clean and discarded materials were properly disposed and contained on the facility grounds. The findings included: Observation on 12/04/23 at around 09:36 AM showed the outside dumpster area was noted with a large dumpster for trash and a medium dumpster for card board. The dumpster for the cardboard was observed to be overflowing, and the lid was unable to closed. On 12/07/23 at 01:46 PM, during an interview with the Administrator, he stated that he did not see or notice the dumpster on Monday. He stated, he looked at the dumpster earlier today and saw it was not full at all. He then stated that he thinks they picked up the trash this morning. On 12/07/23 at 02:35 PM, the Administrator brought the policy and procedure document and stated, You remember I told you about the dumpster. it's pretty much empty now. You can go and verify. Review of the facility's undated policy and procedures relating to Recycling/waste disposal revealed: Intent: It is the policy of the facility to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $567K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL