Riverside Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.22 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.20 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.16 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.40 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #92 was cared for with dignity and respect as evidenced by Resident#92 was observed in the hallway next to the shower room on a shower chair with the left posterior and anterior upper extremity exposed. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included:Observation on 06/08/2026 at 9:05 AM Resident #92 was sitting in the hallway, unattended, wearing a gown, next to the shower room on a shower chair with the left posterior and anterior upper extremity exposed. Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), revealed Resident #92 is waiting her turn to use the shower room. On 06/09/2026 at 9:51 AM, Staff C, CNA, interviewed via Spanish Translator revealed residents that are showered in the shower room waited in front of the shower room with their assigned CNAs, fully covered in their gowns and a clean sheet for privacy. Review of the medical records for Resident # 92 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect privacy and confidentiality of resident's medical records as evidenced by one observation of a computer in the 2nd floor new wing hallway being left open and unattended with a resident's information visible. Photo evidence taken. There were 116 resident's residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include:Observation on 06/09/2026 at 8:59 AM revealed an Electronic Health Record (EHR) was left open and unattended with a resident's visible information on the 2nd floor new wing computer in hallway. Photo evidence provided. Interview on 06/09/2026 at 10:04 AM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated: The computers that are located on the walls in the hallways are used by the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) to chart and document on their residents. The CNAs are also educated to not leave them open with resident information visible.Interview on 06/10/2026 at 2:49 PM; the Director of Nursing (DON) stated: CNAs receive frequent education on resident privacy, especially since many…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation records reviewed and interviews, the facility's failed to ensure a safe environment free of potential accidents and hazards for one out of four sampled residents, as evidenced by during observation two knives were observed in Resident # 88's room in a plastic container on the overbed table. One razor was observed on the sink in an open unattended shower room on the second-floor unit. There were 116 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: During observation on 06/08/2026 at 8:53 AM Two knives were observed on the overbed table stored in plastic container in Resident #88's room. On 06/09/2026 at 9:38 AM Resident #88 was in bed awake, no distress noted and refused to be interviewed by the surveyor. On 06/10/2026 at 9:29 AM Resident #88 in the hallway sitting on a rolling walker, no distress noted. 06/10/2026 at 8:35 AM the surveyor showed the Director of Nursing (DON) photo evidence of the knives observed in a resident room and the DON acknowledged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I for mental disorder (MD), or Intellectual Disability (ID) was accurately completed for one resident ( Resident #17) out of six residents sampled, as evidenced by Resident #17 Level I PASRR dated 09/15/2023 was not updated to reflect a diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder. The findings included: On 03/03/2025 at 09:22 AM Resident #17 was observed sitting in bed speaking to staff member. Appeared slightly anxious while talking about her current living situation. Record review of Resident #17's admission and clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses include but not limited to: Major depressive disorder Anxiety disorder Unspecified and insomnia. Review of Resident #17's PASRR Level I dated 09/15/2023 revealed identification of only two mental diagnoses of Depressive Disorder and Insufficient Sleep Syndrome under 1A. Section 1B…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain management interventions were followed for one (Resident # 20) out of six sampled residents with the potential for alteration in comfort/pain related to wound care treatments. As evidenced by Resident # 20's order to be medicated 30 minutes before wound care treatment was not followed as ordered, resulting in discomfort during wound care treatment and inadequate assessment interventions to adequately respond to Resident # 20's pain management. The findings included: On 03/05/2025 at 09:10 AM, during observation of Resident # 20's wound treatment care being performed by Staff C, Wound Care Nurse, it was noted that Resident #20 was moaning and yelling it hurts. when Staff C touched the wound. Staff C did not stop to further assess the resident's pain level nor offered any additional pain medication. On 03/05/2025 at 09:39 AM Staff C, Wound Care Nurse for the second floor stated: I call the doctor when there are any wound changes or changes in skin condition. The doctor comes once a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to accurately document a nutritional care plan for one resident (Resident #31) out of 12 residents receiving tube feeding, as evidenced by intervention different from the current physician's order for tube feeding formula. The findings included: During an observation on 03/05/25 at 9:41 AM, Resident #31 was seated in a wheelchair next to the bed. Feeding via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube (Peg-tube)was in progress at a rate of 50 milliliters per hour (ml/hr.). On 03/06/25 at 8:59 AM Resident#31 was seated in a wheelchair; Peg Tube feeding was in progress at a rate of 50 milliliters per hour (ml/hr.). Record review of Resident #31's demographic sheet revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include: Attention to Gastrostomy and Dysphagia. Record review of a Significant Change / Medicare - 5 Day Minimum Data Set reference dated 12/22/2024 indicated Resident # 31 is severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have daily nurse staffing posted prior to the beginning of shifts on 2 of 2 nursing stations. This had the potential to affect the 115 residents who resided in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: During an observation on the second and third floor nurse's station, on 09/18/23 at 6:42 AM, it was noted that the staffing information was not posted, and both boards were blank. (Photo Evidence) On 09/21/23 at 08:38 AM Staff C, the Certified Nursing Assistant (C N A) Coordinator reported, she has been working in the facility for over 30 years and she oversees the CNA's schedule. They have a minimum 8 CNA's in the morning, in the afternoon 6, and at night 5 on each floor. The facility always has one CNA extra in case its needed. The secretary of each floor oversees writing on the board the schedule for every day. During the weekends there are always secretaries who oversee doing that. If there is only one, she must write on the board for the two floors. On 09/21/23 at 09:38 AM Staff D,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary oxygen therapy according to the physician's order for one resident (#54) out of 30 sampled residents as evidenced by resident #54 receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula at a rate above the physician orders. This had the potential to affect the 21 residents receiving oxygen therapy at time of survey. The findings included: On 09/18/2023 at 07:37 AM, entered the room of resident #54. The resident was in bed with eyes closed and oxygen running via nasal cannula at a rate of 4.5 Liters per minute (L/min) from an oxygen concentrator located next to resident's bed. A plastic bag to hold tubing was attached to the concentrator and dated 9/17/2023. The resident showed no signs of pain or distress. A call light was within reach. On 09/19/2023 at 09:42 AM, resident #54 was observed in the activities room, sitting in a wheelchair at a table surrounded by four other residents. The resident's eyes were closed, oxygen was in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $447K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL