St Annes Nursing Center, St Annes Residence INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 213 beds and averages 195.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility's staff neglected to use a mechanical lift to transfer one (Resident #1) of the three sampled residents who required transfers with a mechanical lift. Staff G, a Certified Nursing Assistant, did not use a mechanical lift as ordered to transfer Resident #1 from the bed to the wheelchair. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #1 sustaining multiple fractures to the right lower extremity. Ninety-three residents in the facility required transfer using a mechanical lift.The findings include: Observation on 10/22/2025 at 10:22 AM, revealed Resident #1 receiving a bed bath without any apparent distress. The right leg was completely covered with a bandage wrap dressing. Record review revealed documentation indicating that on 10/9/2025 at 6:00 AM, Staff G, a Certified Nursing Assistant, informed Staff J, a Registered Nurse (RN) that Resident #1 had complained of leg pain after being transferred from bed to wheelchair. Review of the Nurses Notes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed ensure one (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents received higher level of care and treatment in a timely manner, as evidenced by Resident # 1 who has bilateral contracted upper extremities was noted on 10/24/2025 with swelling to her left arm that progressively got worst with swelling and discoloration throughout the inner portion of the left arm and was no longer contracted. Resident #1 was eventually transferred to a local hospital on [DATE] (two days after changes were noted). Hospital Xray of Resident #1's left arm revealed an acute mid humerus spiral fracture with displacement. There were 197 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include. Observation on 11/13/2025 at 09:52 AM, revealed Resident #1 in bed awake and alert in in no apparent distress and stated she was okay, a sling was noted on the left arm. Record review of Resident #1 clinical records revealed an admission date of 06/19/2023…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to create comprehensive, resident-centered individualized care plans for two (Resident #1 and Resident #4) out of two sampled residents as evidenced by their care plans containing generic interventions not tailored to their specific health needs and functional status. The findings include: Review of the facility document_ Subject: Care PlanningEffective: 12/3/2004Revised: 2/22/2006Reviewed: 10/16/2024POLICY:Care, treatment and services are planned to ensure that they are appropriate to the residents' needs. Therefore, it is the policy of this Facility to provide an individualized, interdisciplinary plan of care for all residents that is appropriate to the resident's needs, strengths, limitations and goals. Care planning will be implemented through the integration of assessment findings, consideration of the prescribed treatment plan and development of goals for the resident that are reasonable and measurable.PROCEDURE: Item 3- The plan of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and safety measures for two (Resident #1 and Resident #4) out of four sampled residents as evidence by Resident #1 has severe cognitive impairment experienced a fall out of bed due to lack of supervision during personal care, resulting in a head injury. 2)During Resident #4's personal care, staff failed to use fall prevention devices properly, leaving the resident at risk of falling. There were 186 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include:Review of the facility's organization's policy titled, Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices revised February 2025 documented: Policy Statement: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1) Identifying hazards and risks, 2) Evaluating and analyzing hazards and risks, 3) Implementing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately the code Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #200) out of five sampled residents; as evidenced by the resident was discharged to an Assisted Living Facility, and the MDS was coded to indicate that the resident was discharged to a Short-Term General Hospital. The findings included. Review of Resident #200's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a Short-Term General Hospital (acute hospital) Medical diagnosis included but not limited to: Other specified injuries of head, subsequent encounter. Review of orders dated 01/17/2024 noted Resident #1 to be discharged to the St. [NAME] Residence. Assisted Living Facility (ALF. The discharge/transfer was scheduled for January 18, 2025. Review of Resident # 200's discharge Assessment MDS reference dated 01/18/2025 indicated in the section for cognitive pattern that the resident is cognitively intact. The entry/discharge reporting section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one (Resident #166) out of 5 residents investigated for Level I PASRR. There were 190 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included. Record review of a demographic sheet for Resident #166 revealed an admission date of 3/12/25 with diagnosis that included: Depression, unspecified. Further review revealed Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) reference dated 3/18/25 Section A1500. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? - No. Section I revealed anxiety disorder, and Depressive Disorder. Section N revealed Resident#166 was taking antipsychotic and antianxiety medications and Section O revealed Resident#166 received no Psychological Therapy. Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a fall care plan for two (Resident #25 and Resident #52) out of 13 residents who have orders for floor mats. record review revealed no interventions for floor mats for Resident#25, observations revealed one floor mat in place for Resident#52; and failed to implement a respiratory care plan for one (Resident #95) out of two sampled residents receiving oxygen, as evidenced by Resident #95 oxygen flow rate note in progress at 1.25 Liters Per Minute (LPM) instead of the ordered rate of 2 LPM. The findings included: Resident#25 Observation on 4/07/25 at 10:00 AM, Resident #25 was in bed; one floor mat was noted on the floor at the left side of the bed. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor revealed: This Resident need two floor mats. Staff A, RN Supervisor, was unable to find another floor mat in the room. Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) approached the surveyor and was interviewed about floor mats and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for one (Resident #182) out of one resident reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter, a evidenced by inappropriate placement of the urinary drainage bag anchored on the side rail above the resident's head increasing the risk for UTI and dislodgement. The findings included: On 4/07/25 at 9:46 AM Resident#184 observed lying in bed. An indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was observed anchored to the side rail above near the resident's head. The surveyor requested to speak with the supervisor in the room. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor entered the room and was asked if the indwelling urinary device drainage bag was positioned correctly. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor stated, The drainage bag should be lower than the bladder. Staff A, RN Supervisor then performed hand hygiene and donned gloves, adjusted the indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, for one ( Resident #95) out of two sampled residents receiving oxygen as evidenced by observations of oxygen in progress at 1.25 liters per minute despite a physician's order for 2 liters per minute for Resident #95. The findings included: On 4/08/25 9:40 am Resident #95 was observed in bed with eyes closed, oxygen in progress at 1.25 Liters per minute via nasal cannula. (Photographic evidence). On 04/08/25 at 11:40 AM Resident #95 was observed in bed with no apparent distress, oxygen was in progress at 1.25 Liters per minute via nasal cannula (photo). Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) was asked what the prescribed rate for oxygen delivery for Resident #95 and stated, It should be at 2 Liters per minute as needed. Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) entered the room with surveyor, visualized the oxygen level and adjusted to the prescribed rate. Staff C,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to demonstrate an effective plan of action was implemented to correct an identified quality deficiency in the problem area related to repeated deficient practice for F 880-Infection Prevention & Control. As evidenced by: F 880 was cited during a Recertification survey ending 11/09/23 when the facility failed to implement infection control procedures for one (Resident #430) as evidenced by Respiratory equipment (Nebulizer and tubing) stored uncovered on bedside table next to a live plant. There were 190 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification conducted on November 06, 2023, through November 09, 2023, at the facility. F 880 Infection Prevention & Control was cited as the facility failed to implement infection control procedures for one (Resident #430) as evidenced by Respiratory equipment (Nebulizer and tubing) stored uncovered on bedside table…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices and standards for three (Resident #84, Resident #41 and Resident #73) out of seven sampled residents as evidenced by Incentive Spirometer was observed on Resident #84's nightstand bedside with no protective covering. Staff failed to clean the cuff on the vital signs machine between residents. There were 190 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Resident #84 On 4/07/25 at 8:19 AM Resident #84 was observed in bed. An incentive Spirometer that was not in use at that time with no protective covering was observed on the nightstand next to the resident. (photographic evidence). Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) was asked if Resident #84 uses an incentive Spirometer; Staff B stated: Yes, this resident (Resident #84) uses the Spirometer for respiratory issues since she came from the hospital. Staff B, RN was asked about the protocol for storing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide maintenance/ repair services for wheelchair arm trays for one resident (#88) out of 35 sampled residents as evidenced by Resident(#88) reported armrest in disrepair for two weeks. The findings included: On 11/08/23 at 12:28 PM, in an observation and interview with Resident #88. The resident stated, My arm tray needs a screw. This has been going on for two weeks. I've told nurses and certified nursing assistants (CNA's). It was observed that Resident #88's left arm was wrapped in a towel and resting on the arm tray. When Resident #88 moved her arm, the tray fell loosely from the hinge. One out of two screws were missing from the arm tray that was attached to the wheelchair. On 11/09/23 at 08:46 A, in an interview with Resident #88. When asked, Have you told anyone about your arm tray to be fixed? Resident #88 stated, There was an administrator that called maintenance before, and it was fixed. Now, it's broken again. (See…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,141 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-11-09
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-11-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL