Edgewater At Waterman Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 406 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 170 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.78 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 104.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility (Resident #19), 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #3), and 1 of 6 residents reviewed for behavior/mood (Resident #1). Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/10/2026 at 10:23 AM, there was a mechanical lift pad underneath Resident #19, who was sitting in her wheelchair. During an interview on 3/10/2026 at 10:23 AM, Resident #19 stated that she needed two-person assist for transfer from mechanical lift to wheelchair, but she could self-propel wheelchair when needed. During an interview on 3/12/2026 at 9:32 AM, Resident #19 stated, I haven't been able to walk since my stroke, and I am weak on my left side. I can eat independently, but I must use wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #19's MDS assessment dated [DATE] showed Section GG0115- Functional Limitation in Range of Motion was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #3).Findings include:Review of Resident #3's progress note dated 2/2/2026 read, Insulin Glargine Solostar Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 unit/ml [milliliter], Inject 15 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM [Diabetes Mellitus]. bg [blood glucose] 160 pt [patient] refused med stated if bg below she is not taking it.Review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2026 for administration of Insulin Glargine showed code 2 (Drug Refused) was documented on 2/3/2026, 2/6/2026, 2/8/2026, 2/12/2026, 2/13/2026, 2/16/2026, 2/20/2026, 2/22/2026, 2/25/2026, 2/26/2026, and 2/27/2026 at 9:00 PM. Further review of the MAR showed the blood sugar value of 120 and staff initials for administration of the medication on 2/18/2026 at 9:00 PM.Review of Resident #3's MAR for January 2026 for administration of Insulin Glargine showed code 9 was documented on 3/3/2026, and code 2 was documented on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician/prescriber documented the rationale for declining the pharmacist's recommendation and failed to ensure physician's order was implemented upon pharmacist's recommendations for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for medication management (Residents #3 and #6).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #6's consultation report with the recommendation date of 10/14/2025 read, Comment: [Resident #6's name] has a PRN [as needed] order for an anxiolytic, without a stop date: Lorazepam. Recommendation: Please discontinue PRN Lorazepam, tapering as necessary (e.g. decreasing the dose by no more than 25%, or 10-12% in high-risk residents, every 2 weeks). If the medication cannot be discontinued at this time, please document the indication for use, the intended duration of therapy, and the rationale for the extended time period. Physician's Response: [checked box] I decline the recommendation(s) above and do not wish to implement any changes due to the reasons below: PRN only. The form was signed by Physician #1 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for medication management (Residents #3 and #77).Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #77's physician order dated 2/25/2026 read, Midodrine HCl [Hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 10 mg [milligram] (Midodrine HCl), Give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours for Hypotension, Hold for SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] of > [higher than] 100. Review of Resident #77's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 for administration of Midodrine HCl showed the medication was administered on 3/1/2026 at 2:00 PM for BP (Blood Pressure) of 105/63, 3/4/2026 at 10:00 PM for BP of 127/78, 3/5/2026 at 6:00 AM for BP of 116/72, 3/6/2026 at 6:00 AM for BP of 123/64, 3/7/2026 at 6:00 AM for BP of 108/63, 3/8/2026 at 6:00 AM for BP of 109/68, and 3/10/2026 at 6:00 AM for BP of 110/62. During an interview on 3/11/2026 at 10:29 AM, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), stated that she administered Midodrine and was not aware of the parameters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #123).Findings include:Review of Resident #123's physician order dated 3/7/2026 read, NovoLog FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 unit/ml [milliliter] (Insulin Asparat), Inject as per sliding scale if 1-150= 2 units; 200-249= 4 units; 250-299= 6 units; 300-349= 8 units; 350-400= 10 units, subcutaneously three times a day for DM II [type II diabetes mellitus].Review of Resident #123's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 for administration of Insulin Asparat showed 2 units of insulin were administered on 3/9/2026 at 9:00 AM for a blood glucose reading of 62 and 1:00 PM for a blood glucose reading of 122.During an interview on 3/9/2026 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing reviewed the sliding scale insulin order for Resident #123 and stated that the sliding scale was not the typical sliding scale utilized at the facility and that she would contact the physician to verify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with accepted professional principles in 1 of 2 halls.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/9/2026 at 10:19 AM, there was one box of Alka Seltzer on top of Resident #64's bedside table. Resident #64 was not in her room (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 3/9/2026 at 11:35 AM, when asked if Resident #64 was able to self-administer medications, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, Not to my knowledge.During an observation on 3/9/2026 at 11:35 AM, Staff F, LPN, entered Resident #64's room and removed the box of Alka Seltzer.2) During an observation on 3/9/2026 at 10:48 AM, Resident #62 was sitting in her room. There was one bottle of nasal decongestant Oxymetazoline HCl [hydrochloride] on top of her bedside table (Photographic evidence obtained).During an interview on 3/9/2026 at 10:48 AM, Resident #62 stated, I will administer the nasal mist myself. The doctor said I can have it.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medication management (Resident #95).Findings include:Review of Resident #95's physician order dated 11/29/2025 read, Midodrine HCl [Hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 5 MG [milligram] (Midodrine HCl), Give 5 mg by mouth three times a day for hypotension hold if systolic BP [Blood Pressure] above 130.Review of Resident #95's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for administration of Midodrine HCl for December 2025 showed the medication was administered with no blood pressure documented from 12/1/2025 through 12/8/2025, and from 12/10/52025 through 12/31/2025 at 9:00 AM; from 12/1/2025 through 12/8/2025, from 12/10/2025 through 12/11/2025, and from 12/12/2025 through 12/31/2025 at 1:00 PM; and from 12/1/2025 through 12/6/2025, from 12/8/2025 through 12/11/2025, and from 12/13/2025 through 12/31/2025 at 5:00 PM.Review of Resident #95's MAR for administration of Midodrine HCl for January 2026 showed the medication was administered with no blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing high-contact care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (Resident #111) and failed to ensure staff followed infection control procedures during medication administration for 1 of 5 residents observed (Resident #79) and during handling laundry in the laundry unit to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/10/2026 at 2:00 PM, Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager, entered Resident #111's room, performed hand hygiene, and donned gloves. Staff H did not wear a gown. Staff J, Occupational Therapy Assistant, was in the room assisting resident reposition in the bed. Staff J was wearing gloves and no gown. Staff J called for assistance to position the resident in bed. Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNS), entered Resident #111's room and donned gloves and no gown. Staff J and Staff I pulled Resident #111 up in the bed. Staff I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received medication as ordered in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's clinical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 9/19/2024 read, Bisacodyl Rectal Suppository 10 MG [milligrams] (Bisacodyl), Insert 1 suppository rectally at bedtime for constipation. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 revealed no documentation on 10/2/2024 and 10/7/2024 for administration of Bisacodyl rectal suppository. During a telephonic interview on 11/6/2024 at 2:03 PM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, I did not give the suppository because he had a bowel movement. I should have given the suppository routinely like the orders are written. I did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's clinical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Stage 3 chronic kidney disease, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 10/4/2024 read, CBC [Complete Blood Count]; CMP [Complete Metabolic Panel]; UA C&S [Urinalysis Culture and Sensitivity]. Review of Resident #1's UA C&S results read, Collection Date: 10/05/2024 00:00 [12:00 AM], Received date: 10/05/2024 10:05 [10:05 AM], Reported Date: 10/07/2024 13:15 [1:15 PM] . Source: Urine. Organism 1 > [more than] 100,000 CFU/ML [Colony Forming Units per Milliliter] Enterococcus faecalis. Sensitivity MIC ORG [microorganism] #5. Ampicillin <= [less than equals to] 2 S [Susceptible], Ciprofloxacin <=1 S, Nitrofurantoin <=32 S, Penicillin 2 S, Tetracycline >8 R [Resistant], Vancomycin 2 S. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL