No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Serenity Bay Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

16650 W Dixie Hwy, North Miami Beach, FL 33160 · For profit - Individual · 143 certified beds · (305) 945-7447 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (305) 945-7447 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 29 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2040 NE 163rd St Ste #204 · (305) 720-4004 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2061 NE 163rd St · (305) 974-4510 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Mi Tierra<0.1 mi
16461 W Dixie Hwy · (305) 947-1935 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.5%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.5%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.4%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.592.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.301.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
85.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 85.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.6%CMS range 23.7–47.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge85.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge83.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.5–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
19.7%
Total nursing turnover
37.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 137.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner in the kitchen as evidenced by milk box temperature measured at 50 degrees Fahrenheit, a refrigerated serving of nectar thick milk temperature measured at 51 degrees Fahrenheit, a personal item on top of dishwasher, and a kitchen staff member with a beard not wearing a beard covering. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food borne illness for all residents who consume food prepared in the facility's kitchen. There were 129 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: During the initial kitchen tour on 12/01/2025 at 10:10 AM in the presence of the Kitchen Manager; the Milk Box Refrigerator temperature was measured at 50-degree Fahrenheit ( degrees F). A serving of nectar thick milk observed in the Milk Box, temperature was measured at 51 degrees F. Refrigerator #2 temperature measured at 42 degrees F. (The required temperature range for refrigerators and cold foods is at or below 41 degrees F). The Kitchen Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate and implement effective plan of actions to correct identified quality deficiency in the problem areas related to repeated deficient practice for F656-Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan; F690- Bowel/Bladder; F761- Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals.; F812- Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve Sanitary; there were 129 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include. Record Review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification conducted on June 17, 2024, through June 20, 2024, F656-Develop/Implement Comprehensive Plan. F690-Bowel/Bladder Incontinence, Catheter, UTI F761-Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals F812- Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve Sanitary was cited as the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food services safety during observations. Review of the facility Policy and Procedure titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 05/01/2023 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential information for residents on one (Unit 1) out of 3 units as evidenced by paperwork with residents' medical information left visible and unattended at the Unit 1 nursing station and an open, unattended computer screen with resident information visible on The Unit 1 medication cart 1. There were 129 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: 1. Observation on 12/01/25 at 12:58 PM revealed unattended medical information with residents' names at the Unit 1 nursing station. Interview on 12/01/25 at 1:05 PM, the Unit 1 Registered Nurse Manager was apprised of the identified concern. The Registered Nurse Manager stated: No information should be viewable to people as they walk by. Even on computers all information should be kept private. 2. Observation on 12/04/25 at 10:38 AM revealed an open unattended computer screen on the Unit 1 medication cart 1 with residents' information visible. Staff H, Registered Nurse acknowledged the identified concern and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to implement the care plans for two (Resident #139 and Resident #142) out of two sampled as evidenced by: 1) The facility's staff positioned Resident #139's indwelling urinary catheter drainage collection bag above the bladder on the bed's side rail, causing backflow of urine in the tubing. 2) Facility staff failed to administer oxygen at the correct delivery flow rate setting for Resident # 139. 3) Facility's staff failed to follow infection control protocol related to Enhanced Barrier Precaution for Resident #142. The findings included:Resident #1391) During an observation on 12/02/25 at 4:50 PM, Staff C, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was noted in Resident 139's room providing assistance. After Staff C, CNA exited Resident #139's room it was noted that the indwelling urinary drainage collection bag was anchored to the bed's side rail above the level of the bladder, and a back flow of urine was observed in the tubing. (photo…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility created an unsafe environment with potential accidents and hazards for one resident (Resident #64) out of 2 residents sampled. An electrical cord extended from a wall to behind Resident #64's bed, causing a tripping hazard. This deficient practice increased the risk of accidents and hazards that could have caused serious harm or injuries. The facility had 129 residents at the time of the survey. The findings include. Observation on 12/02/2025 at 11:07 AM, in Resident's #64's room revealed the resident was not in the room. An electrical cord was observed extending from the wall to behind the resident's bed. (Photo Evidence) Observation on 12/02/2025 at 12:34 PM, in Resident #64's room revealed an electrical cord still extending from the wall to behind resident's bed (Photo Evidence). On 12/02/2024 at 12:56 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the identified concern and stated: Oh, that is not supposed to be there.this is an old building…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility's staff position an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing in accordance with professional standards of care for one (Resident#139) out of three sampled residents, who had an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility's staff positioned Resident#139's indwelling urinary catheter drainage collection bag above the bladder on the bed's side rail, causing backflow of urine in the tubing. This increased the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other serious medical issues. Ten residents with indwelling urinary catheters resided in the facility at the time of the survey.The findings include: During an observation on 12/02/25 at 4:50 PM, Staff C, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was noted in Resident 139's room providing assistance. After Staff C, CNA exited Resident #139's room it was noted that the indwelling urinary drainage collection bag was anchored to the bed's side rail above the level of the bladder, and a back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for one (Resident#139) out of two sampled residents receiving oxygen therapy, as evidence by inaccurate oxygen delivery flow rate setting for Resident # 139. This deficient practice increases the risk for worsening respiratory conditions with the potential of an adverse effect. There were 129 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey.The findings included: Observation on 12/02/25 at 4:50 PM revealed Resident#139 in bed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 5 Liters Per Minute (LPM) (photo evidence).Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident#139 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Pleural Effusion.Record review of a physician's order sheet revealed an order dated 11/19/25 directions: Oxygen at 4 LPM via nasal canula continuously every shift for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations reviewed and interview the facility's staff failed to maintain the medication refrigerator temperature within the required range of 36 degrees Fahrenheit to 46 degrees Fahrenheit in one out of three medication room refrigerators. The refrigerator thermometer in Unit 3's medication room displayed a reading of 55 degrees Fahrenheit. There were 129 residents that resided in the facility at the time of survey. The findings include.Observation on 12/03/2025 at 10:48 AM, of the Unit 3 medication room with Staff F, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed the temperature log outside the refrigerator was last signed on 12/03/2025 with a documented temperature reading of 39 degrees Fahrenheit. However, the thermometer inside the refrigerator indicated a reading of 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff F, LPN stated I do not know what the proper temperature for the refrigerator should be.Interview on 12/03/2025 at 2:24 PM, the Pharmacist stated The medication room refrigerator temperature should be between 36-46 degrees Fahrenheit.Record Review of the facility policy on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility's staff failed to follow infection control protocol related to Enhanced Barrier Precaution for one resident (Resident #142) out of two sampled residents. The staff member did not wear the required Personal Protective Equipment during tracheostomy care, which increases the risk of transmitting Multidrug-Resistant Organisms. At the time of the survey, 129 residents resided in the facility.The findings included: Observation on 12/04/25 at 10:11 AM revealed Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) provided Resident #142's tracheostomy care and was not wearing a disposable gown throughout the procedure.Record review of a demographic sheet revealed Resident#142 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Tracheostomy status.Record review of a physician's order sheet revealed an order dated 11/21/25 directions: Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) to prevent transmission of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for Unit #1 (13 resident rooms, 1 community shower room, and beauty salon/dialysis storage room), Unit #2 (13 resident rooms and 1 soiled utility room, and Unit #3 (23 resident rooms, 1 community shower and dining room). The findings included: During the resident screenings conducted by the surveyors on 06/16/2024 to 06/17/2024 and the Environmental Tour conducted on 06/17/2024 at 1:00 PM accompanied with the Administrator and Director of Maintenance, the following were noted, 1) Unit #1: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room walls damaged and in disrepair, over-bed light cord too short for resident use (W-bed), privacy curtain too short to provide resident with visual privacy (D-bed), bathroom water faucet had a large accumulation of yellow matter, and one of two-bathroom lights not working. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Privacy curtain too…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included. 1) During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 06/17/2024 at 9:00 AM accompanied with the facility's Foods Service Director (FSD) and Registered Dietitian (RD), the following were noted: a) There was a large leak in the ceiling area located in front of the steam table and milk cooler. Further noted that there was an accumulation of water on the floor beneath the leak area. It was revealed by the Registered Dietitian that the leak occurred a few days ago. It was discussed that there was the potential for the contamination of food, equipment, and staff from the dripping of contaminated water. It was requested that the floor area underneath the leak be repaired immediately and to stop any food, staff and equipment from going under the leak area. b) Observation noted a ceiling mounted air-conditioning vent located over the steam table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The findings included: Observation of the garbage/dumpster area located outside at the rear of the facility on 06/17/2024 at 9 :15 AM and accompanied with the facility's Registered Dietitian, the following were noted: (a) The dumpster was noted to be overflowing and that resulted in the lids (2) being unable to be closed. Broken bags of garbage/trash were noted to be within the open dumpster cavity and falling down onto the ground area in front of the dumpster. (b) Due to the overflowing dumpster addition bags (30) of trash /garbage and nursing waste was noted to be stored on the ground area approximately 10 feet from the dumpster. Numerous bags were noted to be ripped open resulting in trash, garbage, and soiled PPE supplies (gloves, gowns, etc.) to be strewn around the ground area in front of the bags. c) Interview with the Administrator following the 06/17/24 tour noted to state that there was recent flooding in the area resulting in delay of routine trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain orders that accurately reflected code status for one (Resident #39) out of two residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The findings included: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent full assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], Resident #39 did not have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months. Resident #39's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Aphasia, Depression, difficulty in walking, Unsteadiness on feet, Lack of Coordination, Muscle weakness, History of falling, Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis, Personal history of disease of the circulatory system. Review of the resident's electronic health record revealed that there was no determination made regarding a code status for the resident. During an interview, on [DATE] at 9:02 AM, with Staff L, Unit Manager,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure accuracy of medical personnel title for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #32). The findings included: Record review for Resident #32 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including: Disorganized Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorder Not Due to a Substance or Known Physiological Condition and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #32 dated 03/27/2024 revealed in section C for Cognitive Pattern documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 out of indicating a cognitive response. During an interview conducted on 06/20/2024 at 9:45 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she has worked at the facility since beginning of May 2024. When asked when Resident #32 was last seen by a physician, she reported it was 12/28/2023 by Staff G (later discovered to be a Nurse Practitioner). When asked what kind of physician it was that had seen the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for the use of bed rails for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for bed rails, Residents #54, 5, and 120. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for a urinary catheter for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 resident reviewed for catheter. The findings included: The facility's policy, Proper use of Bed Rails, implemented 05/01/2023, documented: Ongoing Monitoring and Supervision. The facility will continue to provide necessary treatment and care to the resident who has bed rails in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's choices. This should be evidenced in the resident's records, including their care plan . During an interview, on 06/20/2024 at 1:50 PM, with Staff N, MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator, when asked about the lack of care plan for Resident #54's bed rails, the MDS Coordinator stated that Restorative was responsible for initiating care plans for bed rails. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to apply splint devices as ordered to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident #39. The findings included: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS documented that Resident #39 had bilateral impairments to upper and lower extremities and was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #39's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Aphasia, Depression, difficulty in walking, Unsteadiness on feet, Lack of Coordination, Muscle weakness, History of falling, Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis, Personal history of disease of the circulatory system. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for an Indwelling urinary catheter and properly document the care for prevention of urinary tract infections for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for bladder incontinence with an Indwelling Catheter (Resident #7). The findings included: During an observation conducted on 06/17/2024 at 10:31 AM, Resident #7 was noted to have an Indwelling Catheter in place. A brief interview was conducted with Resident #7 in which he stated that he has had the catheter for a long time. In addition, he acknowledged that the catheter is medically necessary because otherwise he would be in a lot of pain. Record review for Resident #7 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Review of the Nursing Progress notes revealed that on 03/25/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure timeliness of physician visits for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #32). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 05/01/2023 included in part the following: 2. The Physician should: b. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by State law. h. At the option of the physician, required visits in SNFs (Skilled Nursing Facilities), after the initial visit, may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist that is acting within scope of practice defined by State law and under the supervision of the physician. Record review for Resident #32 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to adequately monitor behaviors for residents receiving psychotropic medications for 5 out of 81 residents receiving psychotropic medications (Resident #32, 34, 96, 5, 116). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled; Use of Psychotropic Medication dated 05/01/2023 included in part the following: Policy: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. 3. The attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record review and interview; the facility failed to secure medications at bedside for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #34). As evidenced by medication (eye drops) observed on the resident's nightstand. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage dated 05/01/2023 included in part the following: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 1. General Guidelines: a. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls. Record review for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food prepared in a pureed form designed to meet the needs of 2 sampled residents (Resident's #1, and #43) out of 12 facility residents with physician ordered pureed diet. The findings included: 1) During the observation of the breakfast meal in the Main Kitchen on 06/18/2024 at 7:30 AM it was noted that the pan of pureed eggs located in the steam table appeared to be lumpy and were not smooth in consistency. The surveyor requested the eggs to be taste tested by the facility's Registered Dietitian at the time of the observation and it was noted that the dietitian revealed the eggs were gritty in consistency and large pieces of eggs were not properly blundered into a smooth consistency. The Dietitian reported the eggs should not be served to residents with a physician ordered pureed diet. It was requested that the eggs not be served until proper pureed consistency was obtained. Interview with the breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was submitted in a timely manner for one (Resident #95) out of one resident who was triggered for late MDS submissions. The MDS record was over 120 days old. There were 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Assessment Frequency and Timeliness of the Minimum Data Service (MDS) Assessment Policy and Procedure (implemented [DATE], revised [DATE]) documented: Policy Statement: The purpose of this policy is to provide a system to complete standardized assessments in a timely manner, according to the current RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual; Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1) The MDS/RAI Coordinator will be responsible for tracking due dates for all MDS assessments; 6) A discharge assessment will be completed within 14 days of the discharge date . Closed record review of the Resident Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (Resident #110) out of one resident reviewed for resident assessments. Resident #110 was coded as being discharged to the hospital, but the resident was discharged home. There were 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Closed record review of the Demographic Face Sheet for Resident #110 documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insomnia and diabetes mellitus. The resident was discharged on 10/21/22. Review of the Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS, dated [DATE] for Resident #110 documented: The discharge-return was not anticipated; It was a planned discharge; Discharge to acute hospital; discharge date was 10/21/22. The MDS was incorrect. The resident was discharged home and not to the hospital. Review of the Physician's Order Sheet dated October 2022 for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interview the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Level I for Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or Intellectual Disability (ID) was accurately completed at the time of admission for one resident (Resident #32) out of one resident whose PASRR was reviewed. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Observation of Resident # 32 on 01/18/2023 at 09:23 AM. Resident was observed having breakfast seated on his bed. with several juice cans on the side table. Resident #32 reported that he did not drink juices that are not good for his health. On 01/19/2023 at 11:05 AM, Resident #32 was not in his room and was out on pass with his wife. Observation of Resident # 32 on 01/20/2023 at 12:07 PM, revealed the resident in bed with eyes closed and no distress noted. Review of Resident #32's admission record revealed the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to implement a written care plan to ensure one (Resident #73) out of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence received adequate incontinence care and ensure incontinent products were readily available for incontinence care. As evidence by Resident # 73 was left soiled for 3 hours by facility staff. 2) the facility failed to ensure care plan was implemented for the accurate provision of oxygen for two residents (Resident #514 and Resident #70) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen treatment. This has the potential to affect 14 residents receiving respiratory treatment. There were 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans Policy and Procedure (implemented 11/28/2017, reviewed 7/07/2022) documented the following: Policy: It is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #73) out of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence received adequate incontinence care. Resident #73 did not receive incontinence care for over three hours. Incontinent products such as adult briefs were not readily available. The facility failed to ensure that residents requiring incontinent care had the needed supplies and were being checked and changed as needed in a timely manner based upon the resident's voiding pattern to meet professional standards of practice. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 73 residents receiving bowel incontinence care out of 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Policy and Procedure (implemented 11/28/2017, reviewed 10/26/2022) documented the following: Policy Statement: The facility will ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to 1) ensure one (Resident #514) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen treatment received continuous oxygen treatments and 2) one resident (Resident #70) received the correct amount of oxygen out of three residents reviewed for oxygen treatment. This has the potential to affect 14 residents receiving respiratory treatment out of 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: 1) Record review of the Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure (implemented 11/28/2017, reviewed 11/28/2020) documented the following: Policy: Oxygen is administered to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans and the residents' goal and preferences. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1) Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician; 3) Staff shall document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain communication with hospice to ensure continuation of care for 1 (Resident #79) out of 2 residents receiving hospice care, as evidenced by no updated hospice communication notes available in Resident #79's medical records. There were 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The Findings Included: During observation on 1/17/23 at 8:50 AM Resident #79 was observed in bed, Tube feeing was running at 70 milliliters per hour (ML per Hr.), flush orders 30 ML per hr., Oxygen concentrator and nebulizer in room. On 01/18/23 at 08:36 AM Resident #79 observed in bed asleep, call light on bed Tube Feeding running at correct rate, no distress noted. During observation on 01/19/23 at 10:08 AM Resident#79 in bed laying down, eyes open, no distress noted, Tube Feeding running at correct rate. Review of the medical records for Resident #79 revealed the most recent documentation from Hospice being on site for Resident #79…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to demonstrate Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) implemented effective plan of actions to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F 645- Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and F 656- Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to increase the risk of negative resident outcomes and to affect all 111 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 08/27/2021 the facility was cited F 645 due to the facility's failure to ensure completion of a level II - Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for two out of three residents. The facility was also cited F 656 for failure to Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plans related to pressure ulcers. During this survey with exit dated 1/20/2023 the facility was cited F 645 and F 656.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SB SNF HOLDO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2023
BRONFELD, ANDREWIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 05/01/2023
BRONFELD, RACHELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 05/01/2023
ZAPATA, JACKLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
ROMERO, SANDORIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$455K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 17%Other / private 14%

This home reported $455K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$342per resident / day
operating cost
$10,403per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$335per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next