Pinecrest Center for Rehabilitation and Healing
13650 NE 3rd Court, North Miami, FL 33161 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (305) 893-1170 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-12)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.6% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.3% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.2% | 94.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.8% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.3–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 57.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review facility failed to ensure proper storage of medication and biologicals for five residents (Residents #381, #62, #47, #12 and #65) as evidenced by observations of bottled pills inside a plastic bag at Resident 381's bedside, a bottle labeled Zicam (cold remedy) at the Resident # 62's bedside, a tube labeled Zinc Oxide Ointment at the Resident#12's bedside two bottles labeled Acetic Acid Irrigation Solution at Resident # 47's bedside and a bingo card of discontinued medication for Resident#65. There were 83 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 03/10/25 at 7:43 AM Resident #381 was observed in bed . A plastic bag of bottled pills was observed on the nightstand next to the resident. Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was notified. Staff D, LPN entered room and removed the plastic bag of medications and educated Resident#381. During an interview on 03/10/25 at 7:45 AM Staff D, LPN stated, I do rounds each morning to make sure the residents are stable and no items that can harm the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' personal information was kept private as evidenced by observations of paperwork containing residents' information left visible and unattended in a public area. The findings included: Observation on [DATE] at 7:18 AM, while walking through the Northside Nursing station, revealed a demographic sheet with resident's information visible and unattended on top of the counter. (See attached photo) On [DATE] at 7:24 AM, Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), approached the station and was informed about the demographic sheet. When asked about the facility's protocol for keeping residents' information private, Staff I, LPN, replied, No resident information should be visible. A resident expired, and the person who came to pick up the resident left the paperwork on the desk after I handed it to them. I keep all residents' information with me. On [DATE] at 12:43 PM, during a dining observation, revealed unattended paperwork with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate were 5% or lower as evidenced by an error rate of 13.89 % out of 36 opportunities. There were 83 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: On 03/11/25 at 11:07 AM, a medication observation was completed with Staff B, LPN on the North medication cart#4 for Resident#379. Staff B, LPN revealed Resident #379 takes medicine by mouth in a whole form. Staff B, LPN performed hand hygiene and verified each medication according to the physician's order and placed the following medications into a cup: 1) Bumetanide 2 mg (milligram) tablet 2) Calcium Acetate capsule 667 mg 2 capsules 3) Carvedilol 25 mg tablet by mouth (blood pressure 140/70, heart rate 68) 4) Ferrous sulfate tablet 325 mg Staff B, LPN I was asked if this was the prescribed time to administer the medications and Staff B, LPN replied, No. The medications are scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM so the time frame is 8:00 AM to 10:00 AM. I did not administer the medications as yet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a routine breathing medication was reordered and received in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #48) with a diagnosis of Seizure and Asthma, out of three sampled residents as evidenced by an Inhalation medication for Asthma unavailable at prescribed time. The findings included: On 03/12/25, at 9:13 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPM) was asked to verify whether all prescribed medications for Resident #48 were in stock. Staff A, LPN revealed that the inhaler asthma was not available at that time. During an interview, Staff A, LPN stated, I reordered the inhaler on March 10,25. However, upon reviewing Exhibit B (submitted by facility to the office on 3/17/25) it was evident that the reorder occurred on 03/12/25 and the delivery date was 3/13/25. Review of the March Medication Administration Record (MAR) confirmed that the inhaler had not been administered, and the nurse's notes should be referenced for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the timely reporting of abuse and an injury of unknown origin resulting in serious bodily harm for 2 out of 23 sampled residents (Resident #140 and Resident #389) The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's abuse investigative five day report revealed, On March 8, 2023, at approximately 10:30 AM, Resident #140's assigned nurse called the nursing supervisor from Resident #140's room to come immediately. The investigative report indicated that upon the nurse supervisor arrival to the room, Resident #140 told the nursing supervisor that she was verbally abused by one of the certified nurse assistants (CNA) of the night shift (11:00 PM to 07:00 PM). Review of the facility's immediate report showed that the Director of Nursing (DON) initially submitted the report to Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) on 03/08/2023 at 01:20 PM and completed the submission on 03/08/2023 at 01:26 PM. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one of of 23 sampled residents (Resident #87) that was discharged home and coded as discharged to the hospital. This deficiency has the potential to affect 79 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The finding included: Record review of the admission records for resident #87 revealed, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. Record review of the Medical Diagnoses revealed, the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Peripheral vascular disease (PVD), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Major Depressive Disorder, and Alcohol Abuse with Withdrawal. Record review of the Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS ) dated 08/10/2023, Sections A - Identification Information- Discharge Status was documented as - Acute hospital. Section C revealed, the Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary score was left blank. Section G for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan related to skilled services for one out of 23 sampled residents. (Resident #289) The findings included: Observation of resident #289 on 10/09/23 at 11:29 AM revealed, the resident was lying on his bed. The resident stated he is tired, he just got to the room from rehabilitation. He was not so happy with the therapy. Observation of resident #289 on 10/11/23 at 08:14 AM revealed, the resident was sitting on his bed, having breakfast. The resident reportedd the breakfast was very good and he was enjoyed it. Record review revealed resident #289 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include, but were not limited to alcohol dependence with withdrawal delirium; supraventricular tachycardia, unspecified; neuralgia and neuritis, unspecified; poisoning by other opioids, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they were free of a significant medication error for one out of 23 sampled residents as evidenced by during the medication administration observation Registered Nurse (Staff A) drew insulin from the insulin pen with an insulin syringe for administration to resident #16 and demonstrated the incorrect procedure for administering insulin to resident #16. The findings included: In an observation on 10/10/23 at 11:40 AM, Resident #16 blood sugar level was 387. Eight units of insulin were to be given per sliding scale and injected subcutaneously (under the skin). Staff A RN (Registered Nurse) went to the central supply room to retrieve a box of one-milliliter insulin syringes. Staff A, pulled the plunger back to draw air and inserted the needle into the rubber seal of the insulin pen to retrieve the insulin. The nurse prepped her supplies, sanitized hands, and locked the cart. The Surveyor confirmed with Nurse, Is this the dose that you will giving to the resident? Staff A reported, yes and proceeded to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F656, Develop and Implementation of Comprehensive Residents Centered Care Plans related to the development of the resident's Activities of Daily Living care plan for one out of 23 sampled residents (Resident # 289). The finding included: Review of the facility's survey history revealed, the facility was cited at F656 Development and Implementation of Comprehensive Resident-Centered Care Plan during the survey with an exit date of November 3, 2022, related to interventions for one resident whose care plan was reviewed, as evidenced by the facility's staff failed to offload the heels as ordered for Resident # 535. During this survey with an exit date of 10/12/2023 the facility was cited F656 again related to the development and Implementation of Comprehensive Residents Centered Care Plan for a newly admitted resident. On 10/12/2023 at 12:21 PM, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for two residents (Resident #535 and Resident #586) out of two residents whose rooms were observed; as evidenced by discarded items on the floor( disposable mask, enteral tubing caps,medical gloves on floor, plastic and paper items) visible stains on resident's gown, soiled sheets, overflowing garbage bin. This deficient practice has a potential affect the health and well-being of all the residents residing in the facility. The findings included: On 10/31/22 at 09:32 AM observation in Resident #535's room revealed A paper gauze, wipe pack, scraps of paper, a disposable mask was seen on the floor behind the resident's bed. On 10/31/22 at 03:30 PM, the disposable face mask was seen on the floor in the same position as earlier. An enteral feeding line cap was noted on the floor. (Photographic evidence) On 10/31/22 at 03:40 PM Staff B a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was informed of the items observed on the floor of Resident # 535's side of the room. Staff B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #585) out one resident whose Minimum Data Set (MDS) was reviewed, by not completing the required Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) within the required 14-days regulatory time frame. The findings included: Record review on 11/01/22 at 01:07 PM revealed that Resident #585's admission 5-day MDS dated [DATE] was in progress. Section B-Hearing, Speech, and Vision was not completed. The Quarterly Prospective Payment System (PPS) was initiated on 11/01/22 and dated 11/07/22 indicated it was in progress. Record review on 11/03/22 08:07 AM of Resident #585 MDS section B-Hearing, Speech, and Vision was completed, finalized, and dated 11/02/22 at 5:01 PM. Interview with Staff H, a Licensed Practical Nurse/MDS Coordinator Assistant on 11/02/22 at 01:40 PM revealed that the MDS staff usually complete the MDS within 14 days of the resident's admission. Staff H stated, we do the resident's care plan and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed accurately prior to admission and failed to revise the screening following admission for Resident # 485. This deficiency had the potential to affect 85 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Observation of Resident # 485 on 11/02/22 at 08:42 AM. The resident was having breakfast in his room. On 11/03/22 at 9:05 AM, Resident # 485 was observed lying on his bed with eyes closed showing no sign of distress. Record review of Resident # 485's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included but not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side; Schizoaffective Disorder, Depressive Type; Anxiety Disorder, Bipolar Disorder. Record review of Resident # 485's PASARR Level I dated 08/27/2020 revealed identification of a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow and implement nursing care plan intervention for one (Resident #535) out one resident whose care plans were reviewed. As evidence by The facility's staff failed to offload the heels as ordered for Resident #535. The findings included: In an observation conducted on 10/31/22 at 09:18 AM resident #535 was observed lying in bed. Observation revealed the resident had a dressing to the right foot and a dressing on the ankle of the left foot. There was a pillow underneath the resident's left knee and calf. The foot of the bed was elevated but the resident's heels were not offloaded with an offloading device such as the pillows. On 10/31/22 at 03:30 PM, Resident # 535 was observed in bed with eyes closed and laying semi-Fowler_position (lying on back with the head and torso raised). There was a pillow underneath the resident's calf, but his heels were not offloaded. On 11/02/22 at 09:35 AM Resident #535 was awake and observed with right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed ensure appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and or to prevent further decrease in range of motion was provided as ordered for one (Resident #27) out of one resident reviewed. This practice has the potential to increase the risk of negative resident outcome for residents residing in the facility require services related to range of motion. The findings included: Review of Resident #27's face sheet showed the initial admission date 08/06/16, with diagnoses that include but not limited to, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, bed confinement status and contracture. Observation of Resident #27 on 10/31/22 at 11:53 AM revealed, the resident was observed lying in bed, her right hand fingers noted to be contracted. Record review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) dated 08/15/2022 Section C for cognitive status revealed the resident Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was not marked, Section G for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the safety of a vulnerable resident (Resident #185) who was newly admitted to the facility, as evidenced by Resident #185 left the facility through an exit door undetected, approximately four (4) minutes after being admitted to the facility. There were 86 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. The findings included: Review of Resident #185's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Encephalopathy, Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, Anxiety Disorder, history of falling, Essential Primary Hypertension and Mood Affective Disorder. Resident #185 was discharged on 6/16/22 to an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet (POS) for November 2022 revealed Resident #185 had orders that included but not limited to: Order received by Medical Doctor (MD) for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding was administered as ordered for 1 resident (Resident # 535) out of 1 resident reviewed for tube feedings out of the 10 residents residing in the facility receiving nutrition and hydration via tube feeding at the time of this survey. The findings included: In an observation conducted on 10/31/22 at 09:18 AM, Resident # 535 was observed with Glucerna ® 1.2 (formulary type) running at 65 ml(milliliter) and 30 ml water flush per hour via feeding pump. (photographic evidence), On 11/01/22 at 08:19 AM, observation revealed feeding running, with Glucerna ® 1.2 at 65 ml per hour and water flush at 30 ml per hour. On 11/02/22 at 09:35 AM, Resident # 535 was observed awake in bed. The feeding pump was off. On 11/03/22 at 10:03 AM, observation revealed Resident #535 in bed, the feeding pump was on and the Glucerna ® 1.2 formula was running at 65 ml per hour and water flush at 30 ml per hour. Review of Resident # 535's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate storage of medications/Pharmaceuticals and medical supplies. As evidenced by expired medical supplies in one (South Station medication storage room) out of two of the facility's medication storage rooms and unidentified pills found in medication carts. This had the potential to affect 86 residents residing in the at the time of this survey. The findings included: During observation on [DATE] at 2:48 PM of the facility's South Station medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (Staff E) revealed: Four (4) medical specimen collection swab kits found were expired as follows: One (1) kit expired on [DATE], 1kit expired on [DATE], two (2) kits expired on [DATE]. Nine (9) enteral feeding pump spike sets found were expired as follows: Two (2) kits expired on [DATE], Seven (7) kits expired on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 03:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff E stated that the nurses check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. There were 86 residents residing in the facility at the time of this survey. Review of the facility's survey history revealed the facility was cited F689 Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices during the survey with exit date of 03/05/2020 related to a resident having a cigarette lighter in their possession. During this survey with exit date of 11/03/2022 the facility was cited F689 again related to the elopement of a newly admitted resident. The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan provided by the facility revealed: At Pinecrest Rehabilitation Center, we proclaim the value of life and the beauty of dignity of old age and will strive to maintain a leadership role in the shaping and delivery of services and programs of care for the elderly. On 10/20/22 at 3:55 PM, the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control precautions for a resident on contact precaution Resident #59 and Resident #78 whose room was next to Resident #59 and they shared a bathroom while Resident #59 was on Contact Precautions. This affected 2 of 21 sampled residents. The findings included: 1) During the initial tour on 10/31/2022 at 8:57 AM, Resident #59 was observed to have a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) door caddy hanging on the door. The PPE caddy had gowns, gloves and red garbage bags, but there was no isolation sign on the door. On 10/31/22 at 09:02 AM, Staff B a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was asked what type of precautions Resident #59 was on and she reported the resident was on Contact Precautions due to Herpes Zoster (Shingles). Observation on 10/31/22 at 01:00 PM, Resident #59 was visited after putting on PPE, the resident now had a sign on the door for Droplet Precautions. Resident #59 held up his right arm and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,593 — penalty dated 2023-10-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINECREST SNF INTERMEDIARY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| SEAM TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 44% | since 08/04/2025 |
| CH FL2 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| FL2 SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| KLEIN, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| WAHL, EZRIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| FL2 SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| FL2 SNF OPERATIONS MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| SABAL HEALTH CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| STEP UP REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| SUMMIT CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| GOLD, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| MCMANUS, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| NUSSBAUM, MOSHE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| PLUTCHOK, YOEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| RADWAN, NIDAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| AMERICAN PLAN ADMINISTRATORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| FL2 SNF REALTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| FL2 SNF REALTY PARENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| NATIONAL DATACARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| PINECREST SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| RICHARDS MITCHELL & CROSS PA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| SK FL2 HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| STREAMLINE VERIFY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| BRUCKENSTEIN, TZIVIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| BUXBAUM, MIRIAM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
| MARCUCCI, MIRELLE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105153. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.