Vivo Healthcare West Orange
1556 Maguire Rd, Ocoee, FL 34761 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (407) 877-2272 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $42,931 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.5% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.2% | 4.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.3% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.7% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.2% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.39 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.5%CMS range 46.1–66.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.4–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.5–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's wishes for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) by not ensuring those wishes were completely and accurately documented to promote continuity of care between providers for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for advance directives, (#1). This failure contributed to resident #1 receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts in violation of an explicit wish for a natural and dignified death. There was likelihood resident #1 would have experienced severe pain, and could have suffered broken bones, organ damage and a prolonged dying process. On [DATE] at approximately 5:45 AM, resident #1 was found unresponsive with no pulse and no respirations. Registered Nurse (RN) C verified resident #1's code status as DNR, then called Emergency Medical Services (EMS). RN C provided EMS with an incomplete Florida Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) form. EMS determined the form was invalid due to being incomplete and began CPR. EMS discontinued CPR at 6:40 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-05 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) against his wishes by providing an invalid Florida Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) form to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) during an emergency for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for advance directives, (#1). On [DATE] at approximately 5:45 AM, resident #1 was found unresponsive with no pulse and no respirations. Registered Nurse (RN) C verified resident #1's code status as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and called EMS. RN C provided EMS with an incomplete Florida DNRO form. EMS determined the form was invalid due to missing signatures and began CPR. After three rounds of CPR efforts, EMS discontinued CPR at 6:40 AM and resident #1 was pronounced deceased . The facility's failure to ensure complete and accurate documentation of the resident's DNR wishes placed all residents with a DNR order at risk for serious psychosocial harm, physical trauma, and a prolonged, undignified death from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-10 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to re-admit residents who were transferred to a higher level of care for treatment of acute conditions, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization, out of a total sample of 9 residents, (#2 and #3). The facility's failure to permit residents who required its care and services to return from the hospital resulted in extended stays in acute care settings after medical issues were resolved, and necessitated adjustment to unfamiliar personnel and routines in new skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), actual harm, for residents #2 and #3. Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included weakness, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, history of alcohol abuse, and noncompliance with medical treatments. The resident's medical record was updated on 10/16/23 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and primary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective communication, collaboration, and oversight of changes to the plan of care by members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization, out of a total sample of 9 residents, (#2). The facility's failure to thoroughly review medication orders resulted in administration of an excessive dose of insulin that rendered a resident unresponsive due to a critically low blood glucose level, and required transfer to a higher level of care for treatment, actual harm, for resident #2. Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with long-term insulin use, end-stage kidney disease with hemodialysis, left leg above knee amputation, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare 5-day assessment with assessment reference date of 2/16/24 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate related to special treatments, procedures and programs for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments, of a total sample of 40 residents, (#4, #8 and #46). Findings: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and tracheostomy status. Review of the MDS quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) 2/21/25 revealed resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated resident #4 received tracheostomy (a hole in the throat for breathing) care and dialysis. On 5/06/25 at 11:53 AM, resident #4 was reclined in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Resident #4 stated she did not go to dialysis. Resident #4 clarified she did not receive dialysis and had never received dialysis. 2. Resident #8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by failing to replace a cracked bedside floor mat for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for environmental concerns, of a total of 40 sampled residents, (#70). Findings: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a history of falling, abnormal posture, unspecified lack of coordination. Review of resident #70's care plan with revision date of 7/11/23, indicated he was at risk for falls related to deconditioning, weakness, and having a history of a fracture. Interventions included fall mats at bedside, dated 12/30/24. On 5/05/25 at 3:23 PM, resident #70 was lying in bed, a beside fall mat was on the floor. The surface was cracked and split along its entire length which revealed the layer underneath the surface. On 5/06/25 at 8:40 AM, the beside fall mat was observed on the floor at the side of resident #70's bed. The surface remained cracked and split along its entire length which revealed the layer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote the right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for environmental concerns out of a total sample of 9 residents, (#5, #6, #7, and #9), on 2 of 2 units, (A & B Wings). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, and a skin infection with surgical amputation of her right great toe. Review of a progress note dated 5/07/24 at 9:49 PM revealed resident #6 arrived on the A Wing and was assisted to her room. On 5/08/24 at 11:10 AM, resident #6's granddaughter expressed dissatisfaction with the condition of her grandmother's room and bathroom when she arrived from the hospital the previous night. She stated it was obvious the room had not been properly cleaned and prepared for a new resident. The granddaughter provided photographs that showed stained sheets on the bed, a significant amount of dried,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely and effective pain management, according to professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management out of a total sample of 9 residents, (#6). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes, a skin infection with surgical amputation of her right great toe, peripheral vascular disease, and heart disease. Resident #6 had a care plan for risk for pain related to her right foot wound initiated on 5/08/24. The goal was the resident would not have interruptions in normal activities due to pain. The care plan interventions included administer pain management as ordered, and monitor and record pain characteristics such as quality, severity, anatomical location, onset, and duration. The document instructed nursing staff to monitor, record, and report the resident's complaints of pain or requests for pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record accurately reflected the status of and services provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization, out of a total sample of 9 residents, (#2). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with long-term insulin use. Resident #2 had a care plan for diabetes with use of insulin, initiated on 12/14/23. The goal was the resident would have no complications related to diabetes. The interventions instructed nurses to check his blood glucose levels and administer diabetes medication as ordered by the physician. A nursing progress note dated 2/16/24 revealed at approximately 3:50 AM, resident #2 was discovered unresponsive in bed with a critically low blood glucose level. The resident's physician gave an order to send the resident to the hospital via 911 for further evaluation. Review of a Hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented timely and appropriate plans of action to prevent repeat deficient practices related to medication error rates over 5%. Findings: Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeat deficiencies concerns for medication errors over the past 5 years, and again during the current survey related to a medication error rate of 20.69%. The survey history revealed facility error rates of 6.45% on 2/10/22, 10.71% on 1/16/20 and 6.25% on 10/25/18. This will be the facility's fourth deficiency in 5 years for mediation error rate equal to or greater than 5%. On 7/13/23 at 5:18 PM, 6:23 PM, and 6:26 PM interviews were conducted with the facility's Administrator, Interim Director of Nurses (DON), and Corporate [NAME] Present (VP) of Operations regarding the facility's QAPI program. The Administrator verified they completed a plan of correction for medication errors last year but could no locate current audits for this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and standards of practice for residents who received their nutrition and medications through a gastrostomy tube (GT) for 1 of 2 sampled residents with a gastric tube (GT) out of a total sample of 29 residents, (#298). Findings: Review of resident #298's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type 2, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy tube. A gastrostomy tube (also called a G-tube) is a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach (www.medlineplus.gov retrieved 08/01/23). Resident #298's Nursing Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], revealed he was oriented to self, non-verbal, totally dependent on staff for his activities of daily living and received nutrition via tube feeding. The physician order dated 7/9/23 instructed nurse to flush tube with 30 ml (milliliters)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent medication administration error rate of 5% or greater for 1 of 3 residents sampled for medication administration, (#298). There were 6 medication errors in 29 opportunities for a medication error rate of 20.69%. Findings: Review of resident #298's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hypertension, anemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and gastrostomy tube. A gastrostomy tube (also called a G-tube) is a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach (www.medlineplus.gov retrieved 08/01/23). On 7/11/23 at 9:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A prepared to administer resident #289's scheduled morning medications. LPN A placed 8 different medications into 8 small plastic cups at the medications cart that included, Vitamin C 500 milligrams (mg) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications and biologicals under proper temperature controls as indicated by manufacturer's recommendations in 1 of 2 medications rooms, (A wing). Findings: On 8/24/21 at 4:12 PM, the A wing medication room refrigerator was opened by Registered Nurse (RN) B and the thermometer inside was immediately read at 48 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The door of the refrigerator was closed at the request of State Survey Agency staff and on 8/24/21 at 4:14 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) opened the door and validated the temperature on the thermometer inside the refrigerator still read 48 degrees F. The ADON explained the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift nurse was supposed to check the refrigerator's temperature every night. On 8/24/21 at 4:19 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated if the refrigerator temperature was out of range, the nurse was expected to initiate a maintenance request. She explained the refrigerator was frozen earlier that day and the temperature was raised to defrost it. The ADON again opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to comprehensively asses a significant change for 1 of 1 resident sampled for decline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) of a total sample of 41 residents, (#33). Finding. Review of resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was independent for Bed Mobility, Transfers and Eating. The assessment showed the resident required supervision for Walking, Locomotion and Dressing. The facility assessed the resident as needing Limited Assistance of 1 staff for Toileting and Personal Hygiene. The resident was frequently incontinent of urine and bowels. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident now required extensive assistance of 1 staff for Bed Mobility, Transfers, Toilet use and Personal Hygiene. The assessment showed the resident had declined and was now always incontinent of urine. On 8/26/21 at 4:56 PM, the resident's status was discussed with the Assistant Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy of a total sample of 41 residents, (#67). Findings: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances and morbid obesity. Resident #67's MDS annual assessment with assessment reference date of 7/19/21 revealed he received insulin injections on 7 of 7 days in the look-back period. Review of resident #67's medical record revealed no physician orders for insulin. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not reflect injections administered. On 8/26/21 at 12:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the staff who completed the MDS assessment worked part-time and was not currently present in the facility. During review of the MDS assessment with the DON, she acknowledged the assessment was inaccurate. She stated she reached out to Registered Nurse A, the MDS coordinator, who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-26 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dressing changes for a Midline Catheter according to professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents with Intravenous (IV) catheters of a total sample of 41 residents, (#335). Finding: Resident #335 was admitted to the facility from a specialty hospital on 8/21/21 with diagnoses of respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer. On 8/23/21 at 11:10 AM, resident #335 was observed in bed with a Midline IV Catheter to her left upper arm. The transparent dressing that covered the IV site was dated 8/14/21, and the lower end of the dressing was lifted from her skin. Resident #335 stated the IV was inserted at the hospital, and she was unsure if she was getting medications through it. A Midline Catheter is a small tube used to give treatments and to take blood samples. It is inserted into a vein in your arm . the end of the tube does not go past the top of the armpit . it can stay in place up to 30 days(retrieved on 8/27/21 from www.drugs.com). On 8/24/21 at 9:55 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment to protect the health and safety of residents, staff and the public by not securing bio-medical refuse and debris in the waste containers. Finding: On Monday, 8/23/21 at 10:00 AM, the entrance/exit door of the facility's Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID 19) unit had large, red, bio-medical waste containers overflowing with bio-medical refuse. The containers were filled past capacity with bio-medical waste and the container lids could not be closed. On top of the container lids were several bags of bio-medical waste. Some of these bags were partially open with debris coming out of the bags. The Director of Nursing (DON) arrived in the area and stated she was not aware the waste bins were full. At 10:51 AM, the DON and the B Wing Unit Manger opened a storage shed that contained approximately 12 smaller empty bio-medical waste bins. At the opposite end of the rear parking area, near the maintenance building were 21 large, red, bio-medical waste bins which were full. On 8/23/21 at 11:24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$42,931 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
- $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
- $6,500 — penalty dated 2024-05-10
- $10,301 — penalty dated 2024-05-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105706. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.