Aviata At Oldsmar
3865 Tampa Rd, Oldsmar, FL 34677 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (813) 855-4661 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $36,659 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-21)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 94.7% | 79.4% | typical |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.3%CMS range 24.5–51.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.3–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were from significant medication errors for 14 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14) of 32 residents who evacuated from Facility A to Facility B, for four of four days reviewed (10/18/24, 10/19/24, 10/20/24 and 10/21/24). Findings included: 1. During a post storm assessment tour conducted on 10/21/24 at 3:10 p.m., Resident #1 was heard from the hallway screaming and yelling. An observation revealed the resident lying on her bed making twisting and turning movements on the bed. The resident did not respond to the interview. An immediate interview was conducted with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) assigned to Resident #1 on 10/21/24 at 3:10 p.m. She stated she was not familiar with the resident because she was one of the evacuees from Facility A. Staff A stated the resident had been loud and agitated all day. Staff A said, The only problem I have is that she does not have her medications. She is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage appropriately for two of two (In front of kitchen door, to the right of kitchen door) outside dumpster areas. Findings included: Observations on 02/05/24 at 10:11 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, an inspection of the dumpster area was conducted and the following was noted. -A green dumpster was noted in the rear parking area directly in front of the kitchen door. The dumpster lip was noted to be partially open and exposing the garbage inside, additionally there were crates and debris noted to be stored on the side and back of the dumpster wall. (Photographic evidence obtained) -A blue dumpster was noted in the far right corner of the rear parking lot. It was noted that there were two mattresses stored next to the dumpster. Additionally debris was noted on the ground in front of the dumpster. At this time, an interview with the Staff N, Interim Dietary Manager revealed these dumpster areas were used by the entire building and the area should be kept clean. (Photographic evidence obtained)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility did not ensure proper infection control practices for two out of two units related to staff not using personal protective equipment (PPE), staff not knowing isolation precaution procedures, and uncovered oxygen equipment. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 2/5/24 at 9:55 a.m. of multiple rooms on the 400 unit with Enhanced Barrier Precaution signs. Some rooms had contact and enhanced barrier signs. At that time, an interview was conducted with Staff Q, Registered Nurse (RN.) Staff Q said she did not know why some rooms had both signs. She said with enhanced barrier precautions, staff should wear a gown at all times, but no mask and with contact precautions, staff should wear gown, gloves, and mask. An observation was conducted on 2/5/24 at 9:58 a.m. of Staff S, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA.) entering room [ROOM NUMBER], which had an enhanced barrier precaution sign on the door. Staff S had gloves on but no gown. She pulled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored as required for two (Residents #247 and #70) of two residents, two of two units, three of four medication carts, one of one treatment cart, and one of two medication storage rooms. Finding included: 1. An observation was conducted on 2/5/24 at 10:07 a.m. of a treatment cart on the South unit being unlocked with a resident sitting directly beside the cart. There were no nurses in view of the cart. (Photographic evidence obtained.) An observation was conducted on 2/5/24 at 10:16 a.m. of two bottles of Immune Support Supplements sitting on the bedside tray table of Resident #247. An interview was conducted with Resident #247 at that time. He said he bought the immune supplements and no staff member had ever said anything to him about them being in his room and he had not been offered somewhere to lock them up. (Photographic evidence obtained.) An observation was conducted on 2/5/24 at 10:45 a.m. of Resident #70 lying in bed. The over the bed table was half over the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff appropriately utilized hair restraints when preparing, distributing resident food. for 2 of 4 (Staff K, Staff M) staff working on the food tray-line. Findings included: On 02/07/24 at 11:20 AM at the time of the Comprehensive Tour of the kitchen and Tray line observations Staff N, Interim Dietary Manager approached Staff K, cook and whispered to him. The cook was observed to have facial hair around his mouth and chin with no hair restraint in place. The cook left the tray-line and returned after 3 minutes with a hair restraint covering his mouth and chin. Interview at this time with Staff K, [NAME] revealed that his face was uncovered and that he was directed by the dietary manager to cover the hair on his face. The staff person reported that he was not aware that he was supposed to keep his facial hair covered. Observations on 02/07/24 at 11:28 AM revealed that Staff M, Dietary Aide entered the kitchen and was noted with a hair net covering her head. Closer observations revealed that Staff M…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility did not ensure there was a communication plan between hospice providers and the facility for two (Residents #50 and #247) of three reviewed for hospice services. Finding included: A review of admission records showed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, chronic pulmonary edema, brief psychotic disorder, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #50's physician orders showed an order, dated 1/29/24, for Hospice Order: [Company] admitting diagnosis Senial [sic] Degeneration of brain. An interview was conducted on 2/7/24 with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated Resident #50 was currently receiving hospice services. An interview was conducted on 2/7/24 at 4:20 p.m. with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) after not being able to locate a hospice communication book for Resident #50. Staff B said she was the nurse assigned to Resident #50 and he was not on hospice services. The Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide residents who had Medicare days remaining with appropriate notice for 2 of 3 (#15, #59) residents sampled for beneficiary notification. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (Cognitively Intact) dated 12/28/23. The residents last covered day for Part A service was 1/18/24. The resident elected to remain in the facility for Long Term Care (LTC). Review of the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form and the notice given revealed that the resident only received the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN CMS-10055) but did not receive the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC CMS-10123). Review of Resident #59's record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (Cognitively Intact) dated 1/3/24. The residents last covered day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for Resident Council for six of six months reviewed and one (Resident #65) of three residents sampled. Findings included: A review of the Grievance Logs from August 2023 to January 2024, revealed an absence of grievance issue concern. Eight grievances were randomly chosen for review from September 2023 to January 2024. Review of a grievances dated 1/16/2024, 1/28/2024, and 1/31/2024, for Resident #65, revealed the grievance was filed by the resident related to not receiving medications as ordered and staff assistance. The investigative section and the date the grievance was resolved was blank. Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated September 2023, revealed Old Business concern relating to staff being on their phones and wearing ear buds while providing care. Under the section New Business: ongoing issues of cell phone/ear bud usage. Review of the Resident Council Minutes dated October 2023 revealed Old Business concern relating to staff hiding out in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the admission Procedure was implemented for five (Residents #247, #245, #343, #143, and #144) of five residents who were reviewed for admission paperwork. Findings included: During an interview on 2/6/2024 at 10:30 AM, the Admissions Director (AD) stated no residents had been signed in since 1/1/2024. The AD stated she had not had time to get the paperwork completed by the resident or the resident representative. The AD continued to state there had been 32 admissions to date. admission documentation for Residents #247, #245, #343, #143, and #144 were requested from the AD. The AD stated she did not have the admission Packet completed for any of those residents. An interview was conducted with the Administrator (NHA) on 2/8/2024 at 12:55 PM. The NHA stated the AD had not mentioned the paperwork not being completed until after the AD met with the surveyor. The NHA confirmed the AD was the same as the Business Development Coordinator (BDC). Review of the facility's policies and procedures with the subject of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 3 (#1) sampled residents were revised for accuracy to include diagnoses recognized at the time of admission and later identified. Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Major Depressive Disorder . Review of Resident #1's PASARR Level I assessment dated [DATE] revealed a qualifying diagnosis of Depressive Disorder and that no PASARR Level II was required. Review of Resident #1's Diagnosis Report revealed additional qualifying diagnosis as follows: -Bipolar Disorder with date of onset 12/31/21 -Major Depressive Disorder with date of onset 12/31/21 -Dx Unspecified Dementia with date of onset 4/12/22 -Schizoaffective disorder with date of onset 1/12/23 -Generalized anxiety disorder with date of onset 1/12/23 -Parkinson's disease with date of onset 10/1/23 Review of the residents medical record revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate upon admission for two (Residents #41 and #50) of nineteen residents sampled for PASRR. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #41 had an original admission date on 09/13/22 with diagnoses that included but was not limited to unspecified Dementia, other specified anxiety orders, Major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, other specified persistent mood disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of Resident #41's PASRR assessment, dated 09/13/22 revealed, under the section titled A. MI (Mental Illness) or suspected MI (check all that apply), none of the checkboxes were checked. Review of Resident #41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section I-Active Diagnoses showed Resident #41 had diagnoses of Anxiety Disorder, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed to address identified needs for five (Residents #50, #67, #69, #71, #247) of 31 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (Cognitively intact) dated 11/17/23. In an interview with Resident #71 on 02/05/24 at 12:30 p.m., she revealed she was having difficulty hearing and verbalized she needed hearing aids and had been waiting for them since before Christmas. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed under the heading of Hearing the following was documented: -Moderate difficulty -Hearing aid Yes A review of the resident's record revealed no documentation related to the resident having difficulty with hearing aids and no documentation that would indicate there had been communication with a vendor related to Resident #71's hearing aids. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to reflect two (Residents #10 and #41) out of 19 sampled residents current needs, preferences and changing goals. Findings included: 1. A review of the facility's current smokers list showed Resident #41 was a current smoker in the facility. A review of the admission Record showed Resident #41 had an original admission date on 09/13/22 with diagnoses that included but was not limited to unspecified Dementia, other specified anxiety orders, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Atrial Fibrillation and anxiety disorder. A review of the Order Summary Report 02/07/24 showed no current physician order for smoking. A review of Resident #41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Section C- Cognitive Patterns showed Resident #41 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (cognitively intact). A review of a Smoking Evaluation dated 06/27/23 showed Resident #41 was not a current smoker in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and assistive device to maintain residents hearing abilities for 1 of 31 (#71) total sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (Cognitively intact) dated 11/17/23. Interview with Resident #71 on 02/05/24 at 12:30 PM the resident revealed that she was having difficulty hearing and verbalized that she needs hearing aids and has been waiting for them since before Christmas. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that under the heading of Hearing the following was documented: -Moderate difficulty -Hearing aid Yes Review of the residents record revealed no documentation related to the resident having difficulty with hearing aids and no documentation that would indicate that there had been communication with a vendor related to Resident #71's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate services and equipment related to splint application for one (Resident #64) of two sampled residents. Findings included: Multiple observations were conducted of Resident #64, from 2/5/2024 at 9:58 a.m. to 2/8/2024 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #64 was observed in bed, with the head of the bed slightly raised without any splints or braces on the upper body or hands. Both of the hands of Resident #64 were closed, fingers bent touching the palms, wrists were curved under toward the forearms. A review of the medical record for Resident #64 was conducted. The admission Record revealed Resident #64 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Tracheostomy status, Gastrostomy Status, Contracture of Right Hand, Contracture of Left Hand, Persistent Vegetative State and other co-morbidities. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed in Section G…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing in order to provide care and services for two (Residents #245 and #45) of five residents reviewed for timely medication administration. They also failed to ensure sufficient staffing to provide call light assistance for residents based on Resident Council Meeting Minutes for two of six months reviewed. Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted on 2/6/24 at 10:57 a.m. with Resident #245. The resident stated he had not yet received his 9:00 a.m. medication. An interview was conducted on 2/6/24 at 10:58 a.m. with Staff G, LPN. Staff G confirmed 9:00 a.m. medications had not been administered to all residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]-111, including Resident #245. Staff G said she was doing her best, but she was assigned 30 residents; two of which had a wound vacuum, 3 or 4 were on IV medications, some with fall risks, some new admissions, and some residents with aphasia. She said staffing is not done based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for three (Residents #79, #48, #45) out of five sampled residents who were administered medications. This resulted in seven errors from 27 medication administration opportunities for a medication error rate of 25.93%. Findings Included: An observation was conducted on 2/6/24 at 9:05 a.m. of Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) preparing and administering medication for Resident #79. The nurse administered the following medications: -Midodrine 2.5 mg x 1 tablet -Folic acid x 1 tablet -Glipizide XL Extended Release (ER) 5 mg x 2 tablets -Loratadine 10 mg x 1 tablet -Metoprolol 25 mg x 1 tablet Staff F, LPN did not take Resident #79's blood pressure before administering these medications. Review of Resident #79's physician orders showed an order for a multivitamin-minerals tablet to be administered at 9:00 a.m. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the medication was signed off but was not observed to be administered. There was a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper diet, free of allergens, was served to one (Resident #42) of three reviewed for dietary restrictions. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 2/5/24 at 11:35 a.m. with a family member of Resident #42. The family member said Resident #42 was lactose intolerant and could not have dairy products and the facility continued to serve them to the resident. They said the resident had diarrhea when she consumed lactose products. The resident was observed to have a lunch tray with a grilled cheese sandwich. The family said they notified staff and asked them to send a different lunch for the resident. The family said they do not feel like dietary staff know what lactose is. (Photographic evidence obtained.) An observation was conducted on 2/5/24 at 11:50 a.m. of Resident #42's replacement lunch tray. The resident was sitting in a chair at her bedside eating her new lunch tray. The lunch consisted of chicken, broccoli,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility policy review, and plan of correction review, the facility failed to ensure it had a functioning Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee. The facility was actively involved in the effective creation, implementation and monitoring of the plan of correction for deficient practice during a recertification and complaint survey conducted on 2/5/24 through 2/21/2024 and was cited F761. On 4/2/2024 the facility was recited F761. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date 3/21/2024. Findings included: Review of the facility's plan of correction revealed: On 3-12-24 the Director of Nursing and/or Designee in-serviced licensed nursing staff on storage of medications and biologicals in medication carts, treatment carts, & medication rooms Any newly hired licensed nursing staff and/or any agency licensed nursing staff will be in-serviced on storage of medications and biologicals in medication carts, treatment carts, &medication rooms. The Director of nursing and/ or designee will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to ensure two residents (#79 and #65) out of three residents reviewed for blood pressure medication were free from significant medication errors related to blood pressure medication. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 2/6/24 at 9:05 a.m. of Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) preparing and administering medication for Resident #79. The nurse administered the following medications: -Midodrine 2.5 mg x 1 tablet -Folic acid x 1 tablet -Glipizide XL Extended Release (ER) 5 mg x 2 tablets -Loratadine 10 mg x 1 tablet -Metoprolol 25 mg x 1 tablet Staff F, LPN did not take Resident #79's blood pressure before administering these medications. Review of Resident #79's physician orders showed an order for a multivitamin-minerals tablet to be administered at 9:00 a.m. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the medication was signed off but was not observed to be administered. There was a physician order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #5) out of three residents reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, had an immediate report submitted no later than 2 hours after an allegation that resulted in serious bodily injury. Findings included: A review of Resident #5's admission record showed Resident #5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a re-admission date on 10/11/23. Resident #5's diagnoses included Malignant neoplasm of head, face and neck, Malignant neoplasm of unspecified kidney, except renal pelvis and Secondary malignant neoplasm of left lung. Review of Resident #5's comprehensive care plan showed, Focus-Risk for Harm: Self Directed or Other-Directed Behavior Potentially Causing Harm (Episodic). [Resident #5] has a history of suicide attempt. He will be monitored on a 1:1. dated 10/11/23 The interventions included: 1:1 Supervision, administer medications as prescribed, monitor of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement provider orders for one diabetic ulcer and document the presence of a developed wound whose etiology was to be determined for one (#1) out of one resident sampled for diabetic foot ulcers resulting in a delay of treatment. Findings included: The admission Record for Resident #1 identified the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, dependence of renal dialysis, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], for Resident #1 identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 9, indicating a moderate impaired cognition. The MDS revealed the resident did not have a pressure ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer(s), infection of the foot, or other open lesion(s) on the foot. The review of Resident #1's Admit/Readmit Screener, dated 7/14/23, identified the resident had no areas of skin breakdown and the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-one medication administration opportunities were observed and seventeen (17) errors were identified for three (#6, #7, and #8) of three residents observed. These errors constituted a 77.27% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 10/24/23 at 9:31 am, an observation of medication administration with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #6. Staff A was observed dispensing the following medications: - Amlodipine 5 milligram (mg) tablet - Iron 325 mg over-the counter (otc) tablet The staff member placed a blood pressure wrist cuff on Resident #6's left wrist while it lie in the residents lap and obtained a blood pressure of 138/80 and pulse of 62. - Zyprexa 2.5 mg tablet - Briviact 50 mg tablet - Clonazepam 0.5 mg tablet Staff A confirmed 5 tablets had been dispensed for Resident #6 and administered the medications to the resident while in the hallway. A review of Resident #6's Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written Notice of Transfer and/or Discharge was issued in a timely manner for 5 residents (#7, #8, #12, #13, #14) out of 6 residents who were reviewed for transfer/discharge notification. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #7's clinical record revealed an Administration progress note on 7/31/2023: sent to ED [Emergency Department] for trt [treatment] and evaluation. A Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice was not able to be found nor was documentation found stating this notice was provided to the resident/resident representative within the medical record. Continued review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. A review of the facility's admission/transfer log revealed Resident #8 was sent to the hospital on 8/23/2023 and had not returned to the facility as of 8/31/2023. The Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice was not able to be found nor was documentation found stating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record and policy review the facility failed to ensure a written bed hold notice was issued in a timely manner for 5 residents (#7, #8, #12, #13, and #14,) out of 6 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge process. Findings included: 1. A review of the progress notes for Resident #7 revealed an administration note on 7/31/2023: sent to Emergency Department for treatment and evaluation. The Bed Hold Policy was not able to be found nor was documentation found to show the Bed Hold Notice was provided to the resident/resident representative within the medical record. Resident #7 was readmitted on [DATE] with the same diagnosis and transferred to the hospital on 8/20/2023. The record contained a Bed Hold Policy form with the date 8/18/2023 on the bottom (two days prior to the hospital transfer). The form documented: information was provided to: Resident #7, no resident or resident representative signatures were observed on the form. The form was signed by a staff member, with Copy sent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents/resident representatives (#1 and #2) had grievances resolved in a timely manner out of seventeen residents sampled for grievances. Findings included: 1) On 8/28/2023 at 9:40 a.m., during a tour of the facility and review of the list of current admissions, it was determined Resident #1 was no longer residing at the facility and had since been discharged home. Multiple phone communication attempts were made to contact Resident #1, but contact was unsuccessful. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 7/31/2023. Resident #1 was her own responsible party and made her own medical and financial decisions during her admission. Resident #1 had diagnoses to include but not limited to: anxiety, and a need for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 7/19/2023, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview with a resident, facility staff, and hospital staff, and record review, to include the admission/discharge log, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to permit readmission for one resident (Resident #8) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge to the hospital. Findings included: A review of the facility's admission/discharge log revealed Resident #8 was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and had not returned to the facility as of 8/31/2023. A review of Resident #8's admission Record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility in March of 2022, with diagnosis to include but not limited to, paraplegia and history of assault by other bodily force (gunshot to the spine). A review of the complete medical record revealed no documentation of a transfer or discharge notice on or after the 8/23/2023 hospitalization, and no facility documentation to include a rationale for not readmitting Resident #8. On 8/31/2023 at 11:30 AM a telephone interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement fall care planning interventions related to the placement of floor fall mats for one resident (#2) of seventeen sampled residents. Findings included: On 8/28/2023 at 9:32 a.m. Resident #2's room door was observed closed all the way and had a sign posted that read in marker handwriting DO NOT COME IN THIS ROOM. The sheet listed the specific times of not coming in the room. The sheet of paper was listed in both English and Spanish. The room was very dark, and the window blinds were closed making the room pitch dark. A visitor was observed in the room, who was identified as Resident #2's in house sitter, Staff G. Staff G stated she was hired by Resident #2's family to work thirteen-hour days at the facility, three days a week and on call as per the need for services. Resident #2 was observed lying in bed, under the covers, with the call light placed within his reach. He was observed resting with his eyes closed. A fall floor mat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to treat four (Residents #30, #31, #37, and #57) of thirty sampled residents with dignity and respect. Findings included: 1. During a facility tour on 10/26/21 at 10:06 a.m., Staff I, RN (Registered Nurse) was observed entering Resident #31's room without knocking on the door. Staff I walked into the room, interacted with Resident #31, and walked out a couple minutes later. On 10/26/21 12:14 p.m., Staff L, CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) dropped off a lunch tray into Resident #31's room and left it without initiating meal prep or assistance. On 10/26/21 at 12:39 p.m., Resident #31 was observed in her room in bed, her lunch tray noted by bedside. Resident #31 was not being assisted with her meal. An immediate interview was conducted with Staff I, RN. Staff I stated that Resident #31 received tube feeding from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. but ate regular meals during the day. Staff I looked inside Resident #31's room, saw the tray, and walked away.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care and maintenance was conducted for one (Resident #46) of two sampled residents. Findings Included: An observation of Resident #46 on 10/26/21 at 9:53 a.m., revealed that the resident's catheter was draining dark amber urine with sediment. An observation of Resident #46's catheter on 10/27/21 at 12:10 p.m., revealed the urine that was draining was thick, cloudy, and pink in color. During an observation on 10/27/21 at 12:12 p.m., of the indwelling catheter with Staff G, RN, she said, He does not have an order to flush the catheter but I will check and left the room. Observation of Resident #46's catheter on 10/27/21 at 2:27 p.m., revealed cloudy, pink in color urine with thick white chunks in the catheter tubing. (photographic evidence obtained) Observation and interview was conducted on 10/27/21 at 2:29 p.m. with the Nurse Practitioner. She confirmed that the resident did get sediment in his urine and needed to increase his fluids. She looked at the catheter and stated she would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure that treatment with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine was delivered properly and hygienically for one (Resident #59) out of two residents in the facility receiving treatment from a CPAP machine. Findings included: An observation of Resident #59's room was conducted on 10/26/21 at 10:50 a.m. The resident was not present. A CPAP machine was observed on top of the bedside table next to the resident's bed and the CPAP mask was observed hanging by its straps from the mobilizer bar of the bed, the mask was not contained in a bag. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 10/27/21 at 8:20 a.m. Resident #59 was observed in his room. The CPAP machine was observed on top of the bedside table next to the resident's bed and the CPAP mask was observed hanging by its straps from the mobilizer bar of the bed. The resident was interviewed and confirmed that he used the CPAP machine at night, and it was his practice to hang the mask on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-six medication administration opportunities were observed, and four errors were identified for one (Resident #1) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 15.38% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 10/26/21 at 5:09 p.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #1. Staff member F was observed administering the following medications: Admelog Solostar sliding scale 4 units for blood sugar of 263. Sliding scale from 251-300 = 4 units. Staff F gave the insulin in the right arm. Staff F did not prime the insulin pen. Semglee (Lantus) 15 units. Staff F gave the insulin in the left arm. Staff F did not prime the insulin pen. Brimonidine eye drops 2, one drop in the right eye and one drop in the left eye. After confirming the drops were for right eye. Staff F gave one more drop in the right eye. During an interview with Staff F on 10/26/21 at 5:15 p.m. he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure four staff members knocked, announced themselves, and requested permission to enter resident occupied rooms during two of four days (02/09/20 and 2/11/20) of the survey. Findings included: On 02/09/20 at 11:09 a.m. Staff K, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA), was observed walking into resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff K did not knock or announce himself before walking in the room. On 02/11/20 at 7:57 a.m. Staff I, CNA, was observed walking into resident room [ROOM NUMBER] without knocking or announcing name. On 02/11/20 at 3:03 p.m., Staff L, CNA, and the Director of Nursing were observed walking into a resident room [ROOM NUMBER] without knocking or introduction. Review of Resident Council minutes, dated 10/17/2019, labeled Discussion of old business, revealed Council concerned staff don't wait for their permission when knocked upon entering resident's room-Resolved and council agreed. During the Resident Council on 2/11/2020 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment of the resident's capacity for one (#30) of 37 sampled residents. Findings included: On 02/10/20 at 11:50 a.m., Resident #30 was alert and oriented in a wheelchair in the hallway area next to the nurse's station. Upon greeting Resident #30, she stated, I am having a hard time hearing you. Resident asked staff to step to left side, stating I can hear better on this side. On 02/11/20 at 8:04 a.m., Resident #30 was observed in bed and awake. She stated she was waiting on the hairdresser. Resident #30 stated she was unable to hear and asked if the surveyor could come to the left side of bed. The resident was not observed to have hearing aids in at that time. On 02/11/20 at 3:11 p.m., Resident #30's husband was observed in the room visiting with the resident. He said he bought the first pair of hearing aids when she was at another facility, and they were stolen. He stated, She needs severe hearing aids and I can't afford them right now. They use the standard ones here and sometimes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented for one (#38) out of 39 sampled residents after a fall with a major injury. Findings included: Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to: subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing unspecified fracture of right femur; onset 11/28/19, and subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing unspecified fracture of left femur; onset 12/6/19. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. An observation on 2/10/20 at 9:41 a.m., revealed Resident #38 lying in bed with a trapeze overhead. The call light was observed tied around the raised bed rail, hanging down the side of the bed. The resident attempted and was unable to reach the call light. Staff Member I, Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#113) out of seven residents with a nothing by mouth diet did not receive oral intake. Findings included: Resident #113 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified cerebral infarction and dysphagia following cerebral infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified the Brief Interview of Mental Score (BIMS) of 9, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The Swallowing/Nutritional status portion of the MDS indicated the resident had a feeding tube, received more than 51% of intake and 501 cc (cubic centimeters) per day or more from an artificial route. An interview was attempted and an observation of Resident #113 was made at 9:52 a.m. on 2/10/20. The observation revealed there was no enteral nutrition infusing into the resident. The resident stated he did not know if he got nutrition through a feeding tube. On 2/11/20 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure that psychoactive medications for four (#113,# 74, #80, and # 83) out of five residents were being monitored for target behaviors and side effects. Findings Included: 1. Resident #113 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified schizophrenia and other recurrent depressive disorders. The residents' physician orders included an order for Fluoxetine 20 milligram - give 2 capsules via Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube at bedtime related to other recurrent depressive disorders, start date 10/29/19. The February 2010 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the resident had received Fluoxetine daily at bedtime. According to medlineplus.gov, Fluoxetine was used to treat depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, some eating disorders, and panic attacks. The side effects may cause nervousness, anxiety, difficulty falling asleep or staying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-five medication administration opportunities were observed, and two errors were identified for two (#94 and #58) of four residents observed. These errors constituted an 8.00% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 2/11/20 at 10:08 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff Member D, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #94. Staff Member D was observed administering the following medications: - Losartan Potassium 100 milligrams (mg) orally - Duloxetine 60 mg orally - Furosemide 40 mg orally - Metformin 500 mg orally - Hydralazine 50 mg orally - Cetirizine Hydrochloride (HCl) 10 mg orally - Senna Plus 8.6-50 mg orally - Guaifenesin Extended Release (ER) 600 mg orally - Polyethylene Glycol 17 gram (gm) orally - Fluticasone Propionate 50 microgram (mcg) nasal spray - Gabapentin 100 mg - 6 capsules (600 mg) orally - Oxycodone Immediate Release (IR) 10 mg orally A review of the physician orders and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to store medications safely, per manufacturer recommendations, and inaccessible to unauthorized persons in two (North 400 back & North 400 front) out of three observed medication carts and one out of one observed treatment carts (400 hall). Findings included: On [DATE] at 9:39 a.m., a treatment cart was observed on the 400-hall, unlocked and unattended by licensed personnel. The treatment cart contained multiple containers of medicated topical creams/ointments. Photographic evidence was obtained. At the time of the observation, Staff Member O, Registered Nurse (RN), was overheard exclaiming, Oh snap, then began yelling for Staff Member B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). At 9:41 a.m., Staff Member B arrived to the treatment cart and confirmed the cart had been left unlocked. On [DATE] at 5:07 p.m., an observation was conducted with Staff Member M, Registered Nurse (RN), of the North 400-back medication cart. The observation revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and menu items were changed according to season. On 2/11/20 at 11:00 a.m., a Comprehensive Tour was done of the kitchen with Staff E, Dietary Manager. Six staff members were observed present and assisting with meal preparation. Staff E stated she would be checking the temperature of each food item, and that the temperature for the items had not been taken prior. Staff E stated, All of the puree food items were served hot because that's the way the residents like it. Staff E stated, It's been that way since I've been here. Findings included: Milk at 41 degrees Fahrenheit Regular Buttermilk Coleslaw at 40 degrees Fahrenheit Buttermilk Coleslaw Puree at 200 degrees Fahrenheit Deluxe Mac and Cheese Regular at 200 degrees Fahrenheit Mac and Cheese Puree at 190 degrees Fahrenheit Stewed Tomatoes Regular at 170 degrees Fahrenheit Alternative veggie at 180 degrees Fahrenheit Cheese sauce at 180…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and medical record & policy review, the facility failed to ensure that applied infection control practices for four (# 58, 94, 166, and 84) of thirty-nine sampled residents were consistent with facility policy and/or current standards of practice including: 1. An invasive device was cleaned and sanitized in between use for one (#58) resident; 2. That a non-invasive device was cleaned and sanitized after use for one (#94) resident; 3. That appropriate hand hygiene was utilized for one (#166) resident with Clostridioides Difficile; 4. And that personal care equipment was not removed from the room after being used for one (#84) resident with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to a wound. Findings Included: 1. During the observation of medication administration, which began at 10:08 a.m. on 2/11/20, Staff Member D, Registered Nurse (RN), was observed obtaining a blood pressure of Resident #94. The staff member removed a purple blood pressure cuff and stethoscope from the bottom of drawer of the medication cart. Staff Member D placed the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$36,659 in federal fines across 6 penalties.
- $8,385 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
- $7,098 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- $7,361 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- $3,946 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
- $3,946 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
- $5,923 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105419. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.