Delaney Park Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 372 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 81.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-07-18 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure the facility had an Infection Preventionist responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) with qualifications and current specialized training to ensure implementation, monitoring and managing the IPCP.Findings:On 7/14/25 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was responsible for overseeing the IPCP. She said the position had been vacant for 3 weeks and she was designated by the Administrator as the Infection Preventionist required to work at least part-time in addition to working full-time as the DON.Review of the Job Description for the ADON included the summary of position as responsible for assisting with developing, organizing, evaluating, and administering of the patient care programs and services of the center; provides staff development education, training, and completes nursing competencies; oversees the IPCP and the Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Essential duties and responsibilities included must maintain Infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in 30 resident rooms on one of two floors, (100 wing) by failing to maintain ceiling vent covers with a clean and sanitary surface.Findings:Observations of resident rooms on the first floor on 7/14/25 at 2:10 PM, revealed ceiling vent covers with a variance in color over the entire surface area from black to white. The surface also had rust-colored substance around the edges. (photographic evidence obtained)In an interview with the resident representative for resident # 85, she stated she has asked staff to address the unsanitary appearance of the vents because they did not look clean and appeared as if they have a mold-like substance or accumulation of debris on the surface.On 7/15/25 at 10:30 AM, the Maintenance Director stated all the vent covers were the same on the first floor and showed signs of wear and tear from years of use. He stated the vents had been painted black, but the white color and rust color was still visible. Later that same day at 11:07 AM, the Maintenance Director was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies and procedures were followed to implement the infection prevention and control plan by failing to initiate enhanced barrier precautions for 24 residents on one of two floors (100 unit), failed to ensure transmission-based isolation was the least restrictive for one of two residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions, (#30); failed to document process surveillance, including identification of pertinent process surveillance from the infection control risk assessment, and failed to follow transmission-based precautions to help prevent the spread of infection on one of two wings, (100 wing) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions (#82, and #30), of a total sample of 34 residents.Findings: 1. On 7/14/25 at 1:00 PM, observations on the second floor (200 wing) revealed approximately 12 residents on enhanced barrier precautions. Personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in resident condition to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for patient rights, out of a total sample of 34 residents, (#61).Finding:Resident #61 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 6/28/25 for short term rehabilitation. She had diagnoses that included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, displaced condyle fracture of lower end of right femur, shortness of breath, and interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which was cognitively intact. Resident #61's medical record revealed that on 7/06/25 a daily skilled note was entered by the nurse documenting the resident's complaint of pain and warmth to the right leg, which was her surgical leg. The nurse noted that the resident's legs were swollen, especially the right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs did not receive an unnecessary antipsychotic medication with subsequent increase in dose and a diagnosis of schizophrenia without clear documentation to support the indication for use and diagnosis in the medical record, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#68).[NAME], [NAME] (68) Findings:Resident #68 was admitted from an acute care facility on 2/21/25 with diagnoses of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had no potential indicators of psychosis and no behavioral symptoms. The same assessment found the resident did not have any psychotic disorders or schizophrenia. The resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment. The quarterly assessment dated [DATE] also indicated the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to document/investigate residents who discharged Against Medical Advice (AMA) to ensure the residents were not forced to leave the facility and to provide a safe discharge to the extent possible for 1 out 3 residents sampled for discharge, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#96).Findings: Resident #96 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her diagnoses included clavicle fracture, abnormal gait, morbid obesity and malaise. Review of the resident's medical record revealed resident #96 had a daughter but the resident was responsible for herself. Review of discharge summaries for both Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy noted the resident discharged home on 6/16/25. The resident Discharge Summary, nor the Physician's Discharge order was not in the medical record. The medical record did not provide evidence resident #96 safely discharged from the facility. On 7/17/25 at 10:53 AM, the Rehabilitation Director said the resident started therapy on 5/28/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident at risk for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) formation was appropriately monitored and treated in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema care, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#61). Findings:Resident #61 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 6/28/25, for short term rehabilitation. She had diagnoses that included encounter for orthopedic aftercare, right leg fracture, shortness of breath, and interstitial pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which meant she was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated she had a history of hip fracture, a lower extremity impairment on one side, utilized a walker or wheelchair for mobility, and was taking anticoagulants. Resident #61's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice related to limited range of motion and splinting care, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for limited range of motion and positioning, of a total sample of 34 residents, (#90). Findings: Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, abnormality of gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (one sided paralysis/muscle weakness) affecting the right dominant side. Revision of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for resident #90, revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognition. She had no rejection of care behaviors noted and no mood changes. The assessment indicated she had upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for splint care and limited range of motion, of a total of 34 residents, (#90).Findings:Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, abnormality of gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis (one sided paralysis/weakness) affecting the right dominant side. Revision of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for resident #90, revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognition. She had no rejection of care behaviors noted and no mood changes. The assessment indicated the resident had upper extremity impairments bilaterally and lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify an area of systemic non-compliance with the Infection Prevention & Control Program identified by the survey team.Findings: Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeat deficiency concerns for infection prevention and control over the past year. The survey history revealed the facility had a deficiency in infection prevention and control during the 6/05/24 annual survey and again during the current annual survey.On 7/18/25 at 3:14 PM, a joint interview was conducted with the facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) to discuss the facility's QAPI program. The facility could not show documented evidence they had a Process Improvement Plan (PIP) or current audits in effect for infection prevention and control. The Administrator acknowledged the facility completed a plan of correction for infection prevention based on last year's annual survey results but closed out monitoring of it in January of 2025.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $145K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL