Legacy Pointe At Ucf

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 199 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.41 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect by not ensuring the staff maintained a secure environment and implemented measures to mitigate the risks to prevent elopement for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk for serious injury/impairment/death. While resident #1 was outside the unit unsupervised, there was reasonable likelihood he could have gone up to the roof and fallen off, fallen down the stairs with his walker or been hit by a car. On 9/16/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, the facility failed to prevent a resident with severe cognitive impairment from exiting the facility unsupervised. The facility was unaware of resident #1's whereabouts until he was observed outside on the sidewalk by a maintenance staff member at approximately 2:15 PM and returned to the unit at approximately 2:30 PM. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to maintain a secure environment to ensure vulnerable residents did not exit the facility without supervision for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for elopement, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). These failures contributed to the elopement of resident #1 and placed him at risk of serious injury, impairment or death. While resident #1 was outside the unit unsupervised, there was reasonable likelihood he could have gone to the roof and fallen off, fallen down the stairs with his walker or been hit by a car. On 9/16/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, the facility failed to prevent a resident with severe cognitive impairment from exiting the facility unsupervised. The facility was unaware of resident #1's whereabouts until he was observed outside on the sidewalk by a maintenance staff member at approximately 2:15 PM and returned to the unit at approximately 2:30 PM. The facility failed to ensure resident #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan related to urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care plans, of a total sample of 28 residents, (#47).Findings: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lower back pain with left side sciatica, spinal stenosis, epigastric mass, heart disease, diverticulosis and bacteria in the urine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 3/09/26 revealed resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Her active diagnosis included urinary tract infection in the past 30 days. Review of resident #47's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an advanced practice nurse progress note dated 3/13/26 which indicated resident #47 had complained of lower abdominal pain and pain during urination and a urine culture was ordered. laboratory results…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to proper infection control practices related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care, of a total sample of 48 residents, (#7). Findings:Review of resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, history of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, glaucoma, cognitive communication deficit, history of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission. Review of current physician orders on 3/16/26 revealed resident #7 had multiple wounds with active orders for wound care to the coccyx, left heel, and spine wounds. Orders included daily wound care treatments, offloading interventions, and topical treatments. The resident had active orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions related to a wound infection. Review of the February 2026 Medication Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-24 · tag F0847 — widespread
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement explicitly granted the resident or their representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it. Findings: Review of the facility's Nursing admission and Care Agreement revealed an Arbitration Provision in Section I of the agreement. The document contained language stating that agreeing to resolve disputes as set forth herein was not a precondition for receiving medical treatment or for admission. The document language further revealed, (the resident) did also acknowledge that he or she has had the right and opportunity to consult with an attorney prior to signing the admission and Care Agreement and to seek any explanation or clarification desired. The signature line followed a statement which read, The undersigned acknowledge that each of them has read this entire admission and care agreement and understands that by signing this agreement each has waived his/her right to a trial, before a judge or jury, and that each of them voluntarily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-24 · tag F0848 — widespread
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and provided for the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. Findings: Review of the facility's Nursing admission and Care Agreement revealed an Arbitration Provision in Section I of the agreement. The document contained language stating the arbitration would be referred to, conducted by and resolved in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules and parameters at a formal arbitration hearing. The provision did not contain a statement which provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties or the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. On 1/24/25 at 11:32 AM, the Skilled Nursing Facility admission Coordinator stated she was responsible for meeting with residents or their representatives to get the admission agreement signed. The admission Coordinator stated she informed the resident or representative that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide written Notification of Transfer or Discharge forms to the residents or their representative and the Ombudsman for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations, of a total sample of 26 residents, (#10, #25, #31 and #38). Findings: 1. Review of resident #25's medical record revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her diagnoses included myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, and fracture of right ileum. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/12/24 revealed resident #25 had an unplanned transfer to a short-term acute care hospital. The record showed additional MDS discharge assessments were completed for unplanned transfers to the hospital on 9/11/24, 11/12/24 and 12/11/24. Review of resident #25's medical record revealed she was transferred to the hospital on 9/11/24 due to low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets required to meet residents' needs for medication administration and storage per nursing standards of care for 3 of 3 nurses reviewed for medication administration and storage. Findings: 1. Review of resident #443's medical record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included sepsis due to enterococcus (bacteria), type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Sepsis is the body's extreme response to an infection. It is a life-threatening medical emergency, (retrieved from www.cdc.gov on 1/29/25). On 1/21/25 at 12:08 PM, resident #443's wife shared the night he was admitted was a disaster. She indicated the only reason her husband was here was for the Intravenous (IV) antibiotics and the facility did not have them. She stated the weekend…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure implementation of policies to the extent of including thorough monitoring of previously identified areas of concern and adequately tracking performance to ensure the facility had competent nursing staff and infection prevention control measures implemented. Findings: Review of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) policy not dated revealed the objective was, To provide an ongoing program to monitor quality of care and quality of life for the residents. The document disclosed the responsibility was the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Medical Director and Designee. The document included the QAA committee would meet at least quarterly or more frequent as necessary, to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) program . The committee will develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility had deficiencies of F726-Competent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance process for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances, of a total sample of 26 residents, (#21 and #443). Findings: 1. Review of resident #21's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/14/24 revealed resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. On 1/21/25 at 1:48 PM, resident #21 shared she could not find some lotion and a gait belt she had in her room. She stated staff helped her look for the items, but no one had found them. Resident #21 stated while getting care from her aide about a day or two ago, a healed wound had reopened. She said she wished to no longer have that aide provide care to her. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were inaccessible to non-authorized staff and residents in 1 of 1 medication carts on the Blue Unit. Findings: During a tour of the Blue Unit on 1/22/25 at 8:40 AM, a medication cup with seven pills was left unattended on top of a medication cart. The medication cart was locked. On 1/22/25 at 8:41 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) A stated she left to attend an emergency. She explained a staff member asked her to go to a resident's room and she thought she placed the cup in the medication cart's drawer before stepping away. She indicated the medication cart itself was locked. She stated she knew this was not safe because, any patient or family can grab it, it is a hazard, definitely not supposed to leave [the medicine] outside, unlocked. On 1/22/25 at 10:43 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) explained nurses received computer and hands-on training during orientation, but competencies were not completed. She indicated if a nurse was called away due to an emergency while preparing medications, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to proper infection control practices related to hand hygiene and disinfection of equipment during medication administration on 1 of 2 units, (Orange Wing). Findings: During a medication administration pass observation on 1/22/25 at 2:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C retrieved a mobile vital signs device from the hallway across from her assigned residents and brought into resident #495's room but did not disinfect the device before using it. Outside resident #495's room a sign was on the door which indicated the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions. Prior to entering the room, she donned a gown and gloves but did not perform hand hygiene. After LPN C obtained resident #495's vital signs, she removed the gown and gloves and exited the room with the mobile vital signs device, which she placed next to the medication cart. She did not perform hand hygiene. LPN C unlocked the medication cart, pulled 2 blister packs which contained medications for resident #495 and poured them in a medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,342 — penalty dated 2025-11-19
• $13,343 — penalty dated 2025-11-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in FL