Alexander "sandy" Nininger State Veterans Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.78 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner, failed to provide adequate nutritional supplements to prevent further significant weight loss, and failed to have effective communication between the multidisciplinary staff for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #103). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Dietitian, dated 12/30/24, showed the following: The Dietitian will work closely with the Interdisciplinary team, assess the nutritional needs of the residents, and collaborate effectively with other direct care staff and practitioners to assess and address nutritional issues with the facility population. A review of the facility's policy titled Facility Nutrition Program/Resident Nutrition Services dated 01/05/2018 showed the following: the Dietitian will help assess the nutritional needs and risk of all residents and ensure that appropriate meals and other nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was observed during 3 of 3 visits conducted in the Main Kitchen. The findings included: 1. A tour of the Main Kitchen was conducted on 05/18/26 at 08:46 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM). The following items were observed: a. In the walk-in refrigerator, a full 6 inch deep, two third-sized hotel pan located on a shelf to the right of the entrance was observed with loosely wrapped raw white mushrooms. The pan was dated 05/08/26 and the mushrooms were observed to be browned and discolored indicative of spoilage. The DM stated mushrooms can be refrigerated for up to 30 days. b. In the food processing area, the convection oven was observed with a large amount of food residue on mainly the interior top and bottom. The bottom of the oven had a metal sheet tray which also had a large amount of food residue that was burnt onto the pan. c. In the cooking prep area, a knife drawer was noted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow the approved menu for the lunch meal served to the residents on 05/18/26 with the potential to affect 63 residents with orders for regular texture foods. 2. Failed to provide all the menu items for 1 of 1 resident observed during the breakfast meal on 05/19/26. (Resident #65) 3. Failed to provide all the menu items for 1 of 1 resident observed during the lunch meal on 05/19/26. (Resident #43) 4. Failed to serve the correct portion size for residents on 05/20/26 with the potential to affect 7 residents with orders for bite sized consistency. The findings included: 1. The approved lunch menu on 05/18/26 documented the residents with regular texture diet consistency were to receive a 4-ounce (oz) portion of Chicken Marinated. During an observation on 05/18/26 at 11:51 AM, in the Delta Blue Dining Room, the portion of chicken served to the residents with a regular texture diet was observed to be smaller than 4 oz. On 05/18/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pureed foods in a form to meet the needs of a total of 17 residents with orders for pureed foods. The findings included: The facility provided the guidelines from the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative 2.0 (IDDSI) dated July 2019 which were the guidelines used for the consistency of the pureed diets. The standards described pureed consistency as extremely thick and able to retain its shape. It further stated that it cannot be poured. Recipes for Pureed Sauteed Squash and Pureed Garlic Mashed Cauliflower provided by the facility described the consistency as able to hold its shape on a plate, does not flow easily, and cannot be poured. 1. Record review for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The following diagnoses were included: Dementia, Depression, and Chronic Gingivitis. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #9 dated 02/25/26 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for the use of Psychoactive medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Dementia Care, Resident #98. The findings included:On 05/21/26 at 11:51 AM, a record review was conducted for the Dementia Care investigation for Resident #98. Resident #98 was determined to have been prescribed the following Psychoactive medications:Quetiapine 25 mg (Seroquel) 25 mg 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hallucinations. Duloxetine (Cymbalta) 30 mg 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for depressionDuloxetine (Cymbalta) 30 mg 2 capsule (60mg) by mouth once a day at 9:00 AM for depression. Psychoactive medications require informed consent prior when ordered by the Physician, Nurse Practitioner, or Physician's Assistant. Resident #98's records only have Informed Consent for Duloxetine (Cymbalta) 30 mg 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for depression. On 05/21/26 at 3:43 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator regarding Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) initiatives for the facility. During the meeting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of diagnoses included on the PASARR (Preadmission screening and record review) for individuals with a mental disorder, for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #33, #34, and #7). The findings include: 1.) On 05/19/26 at 2:59 PM, during record review for Resident #33 a determination was made that the primary diagnosis for Resident #33 was identified on the PASARR as Dementia. The Admitting Diagnoses listed for Resident #33 included Chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure.Resident #33 had a Psychiatric evaluation after admission which identified the following psychiatric diagnoses:Major Depressive Disorder recurrent moderate;Post Traumatic Stress Disorder unspecified;Insomnia unspecified.None of these diagnoses were identified as a primary admitting diagnosis. On 05/20/26 at 10:41 AM, an interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD) who is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LSCW).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan with measurable goals and interventions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Behavior, Resident #7; and failed to follow care plan interventions for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls, Resident #65. The findings included: 1). Record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/20/23. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 03/18/26, Resident #7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS documented that the resident displayed behaviors that included little interest in doing things 2-6 times during the 14-day look back period, feeling down, depressed, or hopeless 2-6 days of the 14-day look back period, and feelings of loneliness or isolations 'sometimes'. The assessment documented Resident #7 had psychiatric mood disorders at the time of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to investigate and update interventions to care plans to prevent additional falls for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Residents #65). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk Managing, last revised on 09/05/24, stated the staff will identify interventions and implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling. Record review for Resident #65 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The following diagnoses were included: Dementia, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Colon and Prostate Cancer. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #65 dated 04/07/26 revealed the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent with toileting and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the needs and prevent re-traumatizing of 2 of 5 residents reviewed for Behavior, (Residents #7, and #9). The findings included:1.) The Facility Assessment, most recently reviewed and revised on 03/27/26, documented:Services and care we offer based on our residents' needs:Mental health and behavior - Manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals with depression, trauma/PTSD, other psychiatric diagnoses, intellectual or developmental disabilities. During an interview, on 05/21/2026 at 9:14 AM, with Staff C, Unit Clerk, when asked about training provided related to providing care to a resident with PTSD Staff C replied, We have in-services and we learn how to remain calm with them.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to document behavior monitoring for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Dementia Care, (Resident #98).The findings include:On 05/21/26 at 11:51 AM, a record review was conducted for Resident #98 related to antipsychotic medications prescribed for a resident with a diagnosis of Dementia. The following medications were ordered for the reason provided:Quetiapine 25 mg (Seroquel) 25 mg 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hallucinations. Duloxetine (Cymbalta) 30 mg 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for depression.Duloxetine (Cymbalta) 30 mg 2 capsule (60mg) by mouth once a day at 9:00 AM for depression.A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2026 revealed monitoring for the antipsychotic medication Quetiapine (Seroquel) but no monitoring was found for the Duloxetine (Cymbalta) an antidepressant. A review of progress notes revealed there were no notes found that identified behavior and/or mood changes related to depression or the use of the antidepressant Duloxetine.On 05/21/26 at 2:17 PM, an interview was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) accurately document, assess and report a resident's change in skin condition and; 2) ensure appropriate notification of the resident's representative of a change in the resident's condition for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #1.The findings included: 1) Review of the facility policy titled Skin Management provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed effective 04/23/12 documented .Ongoing Skin Checks Daily C.N.A. and/or other direct care giver skin checks: 1. The Certified Nursing Assistant (C.N.A.)/other direct care giver will conduct an inspection of the resident's skin daily when providing care, assisting with or providing bath/shower. 2. The Certified Nursing Assistant (C.N.A.)/other direct care giver will report to the Licensed Nurse any findings/concerns daily. Weekly Licensed Nurse skin checks: 1. The Licensed Nurse will complete full body inspection of the resident, and either: a. document on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,659 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $38,659 — penalty dated 2025-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL