No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Olive Branch Health And Rehabilitation Center

8325 University Parkway, Pensacola, FL 32514 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (850) 898-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (850) 898-8000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 10 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8333 N Davis Hwy · (850) 969-7979 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8333 N Davis Hwy · (850) 494-2432 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8325 Country Walk Dr
Park
Pensacola Beach Floor · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.6%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%9.1%12.0%typical

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 840 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

69.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.75hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.59hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 443 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF69.3%CMS range 65.4–72.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 10.8–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.4–8.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
1.23
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.86
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
54.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-09)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely for 10 of 15 residents observed. (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11)On 2/23/2026 at approximately 10:00 am, during a tour of the facility, medications were observed located on the bedside table in the rooms of Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11. No staff were present in the rooms at the times observed.On 2/23/2026 at approximately 10:00 am, upon entering the room of Resident #8, the resident was observed seated in the room. A medication cup containing oral medication was noted on the bedside table. During the observation, Resident #7 picked up the medication cup and began taking the medications independently. No licensed nurse or staff member was present in the room at this time. Record review revealed no physician order authorizing self-administration of medication and no documented assessment of the resident's ability to safely self-administer medications for Resident #7.On 2/24/2026 at approximately 7:30 am, during a tour of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain posting of the daily staffing requirements at the beginning of the shift in a prominent place visible to residents and visitors for 2 of 4 days observed. The findings include: Upon tour of the facility on 4/6/25 and 4/7/25, there was no daily posting of the staff names in a prominent place for visitors and residents. On 4/7/25 at approximately 9:15 AM, an interview was conducted with the Staffing Coordinator, who indicated that she prints the staffing data to post daily on the counter behind the receptionist desk in the front lobby. The Staffing Coordinator further indicated that she lays it face up on the counter. When asked if the placement of the staffing posting is visible to residents and visitors, the staffing coordinator confirmed that placement would not be visible. She also stated that they used to keep it in a stand but they had stopped doing that for an unknown reason, but going forward it will be placed in the stand at the desk and will also place them at the nursing stations. On 4/7/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe injection practices of intravenous medications by swabbing the rubber septum of the vial prior to accessing the medication for 1 of 12 residents sampled for medication administration. (Resident #71) The findings include: During a medication administration observation on 04/06/2025 at 1:03 pm, Staff A, a Registered Nurse (RN), administered Ertapenem (an antibiotic), 1 gram in 100 milliliters of normal saline, to Resident #71. The Ertapenam was contained in a glass vial with a rubber septum covered by a plastic cap. Staff A performed hand hygiene and popped the plastic cap off the vial using her bare hand. She then attached the vial to the 100 milliliter bag of normal saline without swabbing the rubber septum of the vial first. Staff A then administered the medication to Resident #71. In an interview afterwards, she acknowledged did not swab the top of the medication vial with alcohol before mixing with the bag of normal saline. In an interview on 4/06/25 at 3:16 PM, the Director of Nursing said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0920 — isolated
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a dining room to dine in for 1 out of 4 days observed. The findings include: A tour of the facility's dining area was conducted on Sunday, 4/06/25 at approximately 10:40AM. During this tour, the dining area was observed clean with dim lighting, and the tables were not set up to accommodate residents for lunch. An interview was conducted on 4/6/25 at approximately 12:15 PM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) concerning the fact that no one was eating in the dining room on Sunday during lunch. She stated that they were waiting for the facility to increase staffing for the weekend and that a plan is in the works. On 04/08/25 at approximately 11:25 AM, an interview was performed with Resident # 227 who was sitting at a dining room table reviewing the lunch menu to place an order. The resident stated, I have more options available here in the dining room then I do in my room. On Tuesday 04/08/25 at approximately 11:45AM, the dining area with was being used by about 15 residents throughout…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to establish/maintain ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services. (Residents #35 and #131). The findings include: Resident #35 A review of Resident #35 medical record was conducted which revealed an order for hemodialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 9:30 AM. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 received dialysis services. A review was conducted of Resident #35 paper chart, which failed to reveal dialysis communication forms, or dialysis treatment run sheets. An interview was conducted with Staff F, LPN, Supervisor on 8/23/22 at approximately 1:59 PM who stated the facility does not get the dialysis communication form back from the dialysis unit and stated she must call the dialysis facility to get the records faxed. Staff F, LPN stated the nurses should fill out the top of the dialysis communication form and send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to review the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for accuracy and update the form for 1 of 1 resident sampled for PASARR. (Resident #50). The findings include: On 8/22/22 at approximately 3:30 PM, an observation was made of Resident #50. She was noted to have limited cognitive, hearing, and verbal communication capabilities. A review of the admission record for Resident #50 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had been diagnosed with an intellectual disability, developmental disorder of speech and language, a disorder of psychological development, anxiety disorder, and a mood disorder. The preadmission history completed at the hospital revealed that the resident had been residing at a group home for individuals with intellectual disabilities. A review of the PASARR form dated 5/26/22 was conducted. The form had a check in the box that indicated no diagnosis or suspicion of Serious Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to obtain and document weekly weights as ordered by the physician for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident #44) The findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed a physician order dated 8/4/22. The order stated, monitor weekly weights on Tuesdays prior to dialysis; every night shift on Mondays for weight loss. Weigh prior to dialysis, with a start date of 8/8/22. Review of the documented weights in the electronic medical record, (EMR), under the weights/vitals section was conducted on 8/23/22 which revealed the last weight documented was on 8/3/22. The documented weight was 85 pounds. There were no further weights documented. A review of the MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed a check mark and staff initials on the scheduled days for weight, but no weights were documented. On 8/23/22 at approximately 1:40 PM an interview was conducted with Staff B, LPN, (Licensed Practical Nurse), who stated she does not know much about the nursing unit and was not sure when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care by failing to change oxygen tubing at least weekly, failing to store respiratory equipment utilized for aerosol treatments in a clean container between uses, and failing to clean the filter on the oxygen concentrator for 1 of 2 sampled residents. (Resident #228) The findings include: On 8/22/22 at approximately 11:45 AM, Resident #228 was observed, she was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minute by way of an oxygen concentrator. The filter on the back of the concentrator was covered with a thick layer of a dusty substance. (Photographic evidence obtained). The nasal cannula did not have a date and there was no storage bag for the oxygen tubing at the bedside. Resident #228 also had a nebulizer machine at her bedside. The nebulizer tubing and the attached aerosol mouthpiece were stored in the top drawer of the bedside table uncovered. The nebulizer tubing was not dated, and no storage bag was available for the nebulizer mouthpiece or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to appropriately manage post-surgical pain for 1 of 1 resident sampled for pain management. (Resident #235) The findings include: On 8/24/22 at approximately 8:40 AM, an observation of Resident #235, during which he was grimacing in pain, restless, and tightly guarding his lower abdomen. He had difficulty moving up in the bed when Nurse H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) tried to assist him up in the bed to take his medication. He complained of pain 10 on a 1-10 pain rating scale. Resident #235 said that the last dose of pain medication was given was about 1:00 AM, earlier that morning. He explained that he asked for pain mediation at about 4:00 AM and the nurse told him that he was out of the pain medication, and he has not had any medication since. At this time Nurse H, LPN explained that Resident #235 had run out of Oxycodone on night shift. The Controlled Medication Utilization Record showed that the last dose of Oxycodone 10 milligrams (MG) with Acetaminophen 325 MG had been signed out for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's recommendations were acknowledged with action to be taken to address the recommendation for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for drug regimen. (Resident #35) The findings include: A review of Resident #35 record revealed a diagnosis of end stage renal disease with dependence on hemodialysis. A review of Resident #35 medication orders was conducted. The facility provided ordered medication Sevelamer and Cinacalcet, both are phosphate binders and Megestrol for appetite stimulation. A review of the consultant pharmacy recommendation dated 8/19/22 was conducted. The recommendation was related to Sevelamer and Cinacalcet, the recommendation was to monitor labs every six months. The recommendation was signed by the Advanced Practice Register Nurse, (APRN), however, the APRN did not acknowledge whether to accept or decline the recommendation. A review of the recommendation dated 7/28/22 was conducted. The recommendation was related to Megestrol with a notation the medication has minimal effect on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OLIVE BRANCH OPERATING HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2022
DAWN OGC PANHANDLE PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
DN OGC PANHANDLE VENTURA JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
J & R OGC PANHANDLE FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
J & R OGC PANHANDLE FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
L FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
L FRIEDMAN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
M FRIEDMAN 2018 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
VENTURA P2 OPCO HOLDCO LCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2022
BENGIO, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2022
BALLAY, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
DENAPOLES, CHRISTOPHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 67%Other / private 28%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$540per resident / day
operating cost
$16,429per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$545per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106117. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next