Vivo Healthcare Gateway

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and policy review, the facility failed to perform a thorough investigation following an allegation for one resident out of three, (#1). Findings Included: During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 10:18 AM, Resident #1 stated an incident happened two weeks prior while she was being changed by a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Resident #1 stated she was on her bed being pressured by an aide, while being changed. The resident stated the right and left forearms were crossed, both palms facing down and stated having asked the CNA, What are you doing. The resident stated she was on the right side of the bed. The wheelchair was facing a nightstand on the right of the bed. She stated the arms were crossed one over the other and pressed against the surface of the bed and wheelchair. Resident #1 stated having hurt wrists and bruising on her forearms. Resident #1 was observed with two- penny sized dark pink spots on both inside forearms near the wrists. The resident explained being confused about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, and food was prepared and stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety in one out of one facility kitchen and two out of two nourishment rooms. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 12/10/24 at 2:36 p.m. in the north unit nourishment room of: -Cups and trash on the floor under the table. -The shelf above the refrigerator had dirt, dry spilled liquid, and a container with an unknown liquid. -The refrigerator and freezer contained undated, unlabeled food. -There thermometer in the refrigerator was broken and there was no thermometer in the freezer. -The seal around the refrigerator and freezer door was broken and there were icicles hanging from the freezer door and food was spilled on the shelf. -The refrigerator contained an unlabeled container of liquid that had a date of 11/19. -There was a plunger sitting on the floor next to the refrigerator. An observation was conducted on 12/10/24 at 2:45 p.m. in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure a working and properly maintained dish washing machine in the kitchen, during two of four days observed, (3/18/2024, and 3/19/2024). It was determined the low temperature chemical sanitizer dish washing machine either; 1. Was not meeting required wash and rinse temperatures, and 2. The chemical sanitizer was allocated and delivered well over acceptable ranges. Findings included: On 3/18/2024 at 9:10 a.m. an observation of the kitchen was conducted with Staff C, Dietary Manager, Staff C revealed the facility operates a low temperature dish washing machine and the expectations for wash temperatures was 125 degrees Fahrenheit (F)., and rinse temperatures was 125 degrees F. She was asked what the sanitizer level Parts Per Million (PPM) should range, and she replied, over 100 ppm. The dish washing machine was observed and the specification plate posted on the front revealed it was a low temperature chemical sanitizing machine where the wash temperature should reach 120 degrees F., the rinse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate upon admission for ten residents (#7, #13, #14, #20, #50, #53, #65, #80, #88 and #170) of fifteen residents sampled for PASRR review. Findings included: 1. A review of the admission Record showed Resident #65 had an original admission date of 01/19/21 with diagnoses including repeated falls, essential hypertension, and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Review of Resident #65's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/23, revealed under Section C-Cognitive Patterns, Resident #65 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 00 (severe cognitive impairment) and under Section I - Active Diagnoses, Resident #65 had diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Psychotic disorder. A review of Resident #65's Level I PASRR assessment, dated 01/19/21 revealed, under the section titled A. MI (Mental Illness) or suspected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to have activities available and provide adequate space for activities for 52 residents residing on one of one memory care units. Findings included: The initial tour of the memory care unit was conducted on 3/18/24, the observation of the unit and resident rooms did not reveal any posted activity calendar. On 3/18/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m., Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM), took approximately 6-7 memory care residents outside to a patio to play with a football. On 3/18/24 at 10:04 a.m., an observation was made of 12 residents sitting, either in a dining chair or wheelchair, in the day room on the memory care unit. The television was playing a sitcom. Staff M, Patient Care Assistant (PCA) was sitting in the corner of the room without any verbal or physical interaction with the residents. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) directed an ambulatory male resident into the room then left the area. The male…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-seven medication administration opportunities were observed and five errors were identified for five ( #57, #83, #7, #76, and #98) of eleven residents observed. These errors constituted a 18.52% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 3/19/24 at 11:01 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff N, Registered Nurse (RN) was conducted with Resident #57. The observation showed the residents electronic medication profile was colored red, showing the medications were late. The staff member dispensed the following medication: - Venlafaxine 150 milligram (mg) Extended Release (ER) capsule Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM), informed the staff member Resident #57 was in the Main Dining Room. Staff Z, Interim Staff Educator, arrived, stood at the medication cart with Staff N and reported being there to help Staff N. The Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of the facility's policy titled Pest Control Program, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, for two of two units and the kitchen, as evidenced by observation of pests on four (03/18/2024, 03/19/2024, 03/20/2024 and 03/21/2024) of four survey days. Findings included: 1. An observation on 03/18/24 at 10:05 a.m., revealed a corner on the secured unit near the smoking area door that had multiple flying insects on the walls. Photographic evidence obtained. An observation on 03/18/24 at 10:25 a.m., revealed a cockroach crawling around Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom. Photographic evidence obtained. An observation on 03/19/24 at 1:00 p.m. revealed multiple flying insects that flew around the secured unit nurses' station. During an interview on 03/19/24 at 09:40 a.m., Staff H, Pest Management (PM) stated that his company provides pest services to the facility on a weekly basis. Staff H, PM stated the company provided services that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #169's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Fusion of spine, and Torticollis. Review of the residents Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS), dated 3/1/24, revealed a score of 13 (Cognitively intact). Observation on 03/18/24 at 11:17 AM of Resident #169's name posting located on the wall outside of his room door revealed a name normally referred to a female. Observation of the resident at this time revealed the resident had facial hair consisting of a beard and goatee. Interview with Resident #169 at this time revealed that they identify as he/him/they and prefers to be referred to as an alternate name he had provided to staff. The resident reported he prefers to have his provided name posted outside of his room. Interview on 03/20/24 at 09:31 AM with Staff U, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) revealed she had worked with Resident #169 before. During the interview Staff U continuously referred to Resident #169 as his given name and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer three residents (Residents #5, #54 and #70) of fifteen residents reviewed for Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), for a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for a Level II PASARR resident review upon a significant change in status assessment. Findings included: A review of the admission Record showed Resident #5 had an original admission date of 10/06/18 with diagnoses included but limited to anxiety disorder, unspecified, hyperthyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and unspecified convulsions. Resident #5 was later identified with new diagnoses that included: -Other specified anxiety disorders on 08/02/22 -Other specified Depressive Episodes on 08/02/22 -Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance on 10/01/22 -Major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified on 10/10/23 -Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar type on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 2 (#98, #100) residents reviewed for vision and dental services. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans with an implemented date of 9/7/22 revealed the following: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident #98's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus foot ulcer, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Basal Cell Carcinoma of skin. Review of the record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 2/8/24 with a score of 14 (Cognitively intact). Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL