Broward Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation
7751 W Broward Blvd, Plantation, FL 33324 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (954) 473-8040 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $33,891 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-08)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.8% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.5% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.0% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.3% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.9% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.1% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.72 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.5%CMS range 25.8–46.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.1–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 49.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 5.7–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 106.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify a significant weight loss in a timely manner and failed to prevent further significant weight loss for 1 of 4 residents sampled for nutrition (Resident #35). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Interventions revised in September 2008 showed the following: The nursing staff will measure Resident weights on admission, the next day, and weekly for two weeks thereafter. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the Dietitian, and verbal notification must be confirmed in writing. The Dietitian will respond within 24 hours of receipt of written notification. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards for the care and management of pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #1). The findings included: According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), avoidable pressure ulcer injury means the resident developed a pressure ulcer/injury, and the staff failed to do one or more of the following : Evaluate the resident's clinical condition and risk factors. Define and implement interventions that are consistent with resident needs and goals and follow professional standards of practice. Monitor and evaluate the impact of the interventions. Revise interventions as appropriate. A record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred to a hospital on 9/26/25. The admitting diagnoses included in part, Cerebral Aneurysm, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris, Reflux Uropathy, Essential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the professional standards of practice for the care and management of an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to follow their own policy for catheter care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary care (Resident #1 and Resident #3). The findings included:According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in the non-acute care setting. Properly secure indwelling catheters after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. (p.12). Education and performance feedback regarding appropriate use, hand hygiene, and catheter care (p.15). https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/media/pdfs/Guideline-CAUTI-H.pdf According to the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, implemented on 12/17/17, it documented that it is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheter receive appropriate care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. Catheter care will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately document the Comprehensive Assessments for 4 of 30 sampled residents (Residents #13, #49, #76, and #26), related to diagnoses, vision, and oxygen use. The Findings included: 1) Record review for Resident #13 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Mood Disorder Due To Known Physiological Condition; Major Depressive Disorder; Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety and Dementia. The order summary report showed orders for 3 psychotropic medications, Buspirone HCl 15 milligrams (mg) tablet two times daily for Anxiety, Clonazepam 0.5 mg tablet every 8 hours for anxiety, and Depakote Delayed Release 125 mg, give 3 tablets three times daily for Mood Disorder. Review of Section I of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #13 had diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review for Resident #70 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Cerebral Infarction, Glaucoma, Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Seizures, Other Lack of Coordination, Anxiety Disorder, Contracture Left Elbow, Contracture Left Wrist, and Contracture Left Ankle. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of facility incident log revealed Resident #70 had an unwitnessed fall on 04/13/25. The Fall Risk Evaluation for Resident #70 completed 09/29/24 documented a score of 12 indicating at risk. The Fall Evaluation Morse for Resident #70 completed 04/14/25 documented a score of 75 indicating a high risk for falling. The Health Status Note for Resident #70 dated 04/13/25 at 2:00 AM documented, during midnight round at 12:53 AM, writer observed resident laying down on the floor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for urinary catheter care and failed to follow care plan interventions for catheter care, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #26). The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Aphasia, Contracture of the Right Hand, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Neurogenic Bladder. A review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/17/25, under Section C, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the Nurse Practitioner progress notes dated 04/22/25, revealed Resident #26 had an indwelling urinary catheter draining clear light-yellow urine under genitourinary examination; right hemiplegia, non-ambulatory, and decreased upper and lower extremity strength under neurologic examination; alert, oriented x 2, with poor eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow the Physician orders regarding oxygen therapy for 8 of 8 sampled residents (Residents #25, #49, #50, #99, #20, #29, #22, and #44). The facility also failed to correctly document oxygen therapy on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Residents #49, #50, and #99). The Findings included: 1) Resident # 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Heart Failure, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Acute Kidney Failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/06/25, under Section C, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #25 had good mental cognition. Section O revealed no oxygen therapy . An additional review of records revealed Resident #25 recently received oxygen via nasal cannula on these dates and times: on 04/30/25; on 05/02/25; on 05/05/25 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving and dispensing and administering of all medications as well as drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled to include removing discontinued medications timely for 4 of 9 residents reviewed for controlled medications (Residents #56, #13, #68, and #308). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Reconciliation with an implemented date of 11/28/17 included in part the following: Obtain and transcribe any new orders in accordance with facility procedures. Obtain clarification as needed. Verify medications received match the medications orders. Provide pharmacy consultant access to all medication areas and records for completion of pharmacy services activities. Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Storage, dated May 2022, included the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and side effects accurately for Residents on Psychotropic medications (Residents #29, #48, #63, and #10), and failed to monitor side effects for a resident on anticoagulant (Resident #29) for 5 of 5 residents sampled for Unnecessary Medications. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Use of Psychotropic Drugs, dated 12/17/2017, showed the following: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). The attending Physician will assume leadership in medication management by developing, monitoring, and modifying the medication regime in collaboration with residents, their families and/or representatives, other professionals, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication error related to expired insulin, for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident #68). The findings included: Review of facility's policy titled, Insulin Pen Policy, with an implementation date of [DATE], revealed that insulin pens should be disposed of after 28 days or according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Record review for Resident #68 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #68 revealed an order dated [DATE] for Novolog Flex Pen 100 Units (U) per ml (Milliliter) solution per sliding scale: If 0 - 149 = 0 U; 150-200=2 U; 201-250=4 U; 251-300=6 U; 301-350=8 U; 351-400=10 U, subcutaneously before meals for Diabetes Mellitus (DM). During a medication administration observation on [DATE] at 4:43 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to secure medications at the bedside for 2 of 30 sampled residents (Residents #19 and #68). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage with an implemented date of 11/28/17 included in part the following: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy offsite and/or medications rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation , moisture control, seclusion, and safekeeping. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls. During medication pass, medication must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage cart. 1 Record review for Resident #19 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review and record review, the facility failed to provide food in a form designed to meet individual needs for the Pureed diet observed during 1 of 2 visits to the main kitchen. This has the potential to affect the 20 out of 98 residents on a Pureed diet. The findings included: The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative, dated January 2019, showed the following: Pureed food should have a smooth texture with no lumps, and it should not be formed or sticky. In an observation conducted on 5/5/25 at 7:55 AM in the central kitchen during the breakfast tray line, the following was noted: A half-size 6-inch deep stainless steel steam table container with pureed pancakes. Staff G, Cook, was getting ready to start the tray line for the breakfast meal. Closer observation showed that the pureed pancakes did not have a smooth consistency and were noted to be lumpy and grainy. This Surveyor tested the pureed food consistency using a spoon, which showed that it was firm and sticky on the spoon. In an interview conducted on 5/5/25 at 8:00 AM with Staff G, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food according to professional standards for food service safety and sanitary conditions and to prevent foodborne illnesses for 2 of 2 visits to the main kitchen. The findings included: In an observation conducted on 5/5/25 at 7:30 AM during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the following were noted: The Dietary Service Manager was noted to have no facial hairnet protection while walking around the food production area. Staff F, Diet Aide, was noted to have no facial hairnet protection while walking around the food production area. Three rolls of raw ground beef, 5 pounds each, were noted inside the sink with no running water flow. In this observation, Staff G [NAME] stated that the raw ground beef was thawing for lunch today. The reach-in refrigerator was noted to have a metal container of cooked vegetables that was partially opened and exposed. A dirty, used rag was noted in a red bucket with no sanitizing solution. Empty food boxes and dirty used gloves were noted on top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review for Resident #93 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Dysphagia, Expressive Language Disorder, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status was not attempted due to the resident is rarely/never understood. On 05/05/25 at 10:10 AM observation of Resident #93 receiving tube feeding. There was no Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign posted in room or on door. During an interview conducted on 05/05/25 at 10:34 AM with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), who stated he has worked at the facility for just over 1 year. When asked about Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) he said he does not have any residents on EBP on his assignment today. When asked what the criteria for someone to have EBP is he said he would have to check on that. The RN never got back to the surveyor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) directives were signed by the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) agent for 1 of 27 sampled residents reviewed for Advances Directives, Resident #67. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Resident Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives implemented on 11/28/17, provided by the administrator, did not address the DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) for procedure. Review of Resident #67's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with no readmissions. The resident's diagnoses included Adult Failure to Thrive Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia. Review of Resident #67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status was not conducted due to the resident is rarely / never understood. The resident had severe cognition impairment and was totally dependent on the staff to complete the activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to develop care plans for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines, Resident #89 and Resident #557; and failed to develop care plans for residents with a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a LVAD, Resident #87. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, implemented 11/28/17, revealed, in part, The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. Record review revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was readmitted on [DATE] with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line to the right upper arm for Osteomyelitis, with other diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failure to administer antibiotic therapy in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #505, as evidenced by not administering the antibiotic on 09/16/23 for two consecutive doses as ordered; and failed to ensure physician orders were followed for residents with a Left Ventricular Assistive Device (LVAD), as evidenced by lack of accurate monitoring, calulating and documentation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) for 1 of 1 sampled residents, Resident #87. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #505's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with a discharge on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, Fracture of Left Patella with subsequent encounter for Closed Fracture with Routine Healing, and Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Unspecified Deep Veins of Unspecified Lower Extremity. Review of Resident #505's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions and assessments in a timely manner for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #15 and Resident #70. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Weight Height Monitoring Policy, with a reviewed date of 11/28/23, included: In accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition suggests otherwise or not aligned with the resident preferences. The facility will obtain heights and measure/monitor weights upon admission, on Day 3 post admission by Restorative, weekly and monthly to assure communication and timely interventions to support or reverse weight gained or lost. Weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. Significant unintended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to maintain Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) lines in a sanitary manner for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PICC lines, Residents' #67, #89, and #557. The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, PICC/Midline/CVAD Dressing Change implemented 11/28/17, revealed It is the policy of this facility to change peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC), midline or central venous access device (CVAD) dressing, weekly or if soiled, in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. 1. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line to the right upper arm for Osteomyelitis. Other documented diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pressure Ulcer of sacral region. Review of the Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to address residents' pain in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Pain, Resident #70. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Pain Management, implemented on 11/28/2017, showed the following: The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. To help a resident attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being and to prevent or manage pain, the facility should recognize when the resident is experiencing pain. Record review showed that Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Colon Cancer, and Lung Cancer. Review of the Physicians' orders revealed the following: -On 12/01/23, an order for Morphine Sulfate (pain medication), 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dialysis services were consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #62), as evidenced by inproper hand hygiene during observation of dialysis services and not providing the correct fluid restriction as per physician orders. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End-Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the physician's orders revealed a diet for regular texture and regular/thin consistency with 1200 fluid restriction diet. Dietary: 240 milliliters (8 ounces) with breakfast, 120 milliliters (4 ounces) with lunch, and 300 milliliters (10 ounces) with dinner. In-house hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. In an observation conducted on 02/05/24 at 12:30 PM, Resident #62 was in his room with the lunch tray. Closer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits were performed as required for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for physician visits, Resident #76. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Physician Visits and Physician Delegation, with a reviewed / revised date of 11/28/23, included the following: It is the policy of this facility to ensure the physician takes an active role in supervising the care of the residents. The Medical Record personnel to track due dated of physician visits. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by a physician or physician delegate as appropriate by law. At the option of the physician, required visits in SNFs (Skilled Nursing Facilities), after the initial visit, may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist that is acting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and policy reviews, the facility failed to initiate care plans with interventions regarding the diagnosis of Trauma/Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Trauma, Resident #86. The findings included: A review of the facility policy, titled, Trauma Informed Care, dated 11/28/2017, revealed that the facility would ensure residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Record review revealed Resident #86 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Trauma/Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Muscle Weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident #86 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating intact cognition. In an interview conducted on 02/07/24 at 10:46 AM, Resident #86 stated that someone came to his house in [another country] and shot his wife to death in front of him. He was then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. The medication error rate was 12% percent, 3 medication errors were identified while observing a total of 25 opportunities, affecting Residents #70 and #77. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Administration, with a reviewed date of 11/28/23, included: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled times unless otherwise ordered by physician. Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications. Review of the Drug label Information at the following website provided by the Consulting Pharmacist: DailyMed - BUDESONIDE AND FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to remove expired over-the-counter (OTC) medications from the Central Supply cabinet; failed to remove expired over-the-counter medications from 1 of 3 medication carts observed (medication cart #2-West Wing); failed to secure medications at the beside for Resident #94; and failed to ensure that 1 of 2 treatment cart was locked when unattended (West Wing treatment cart). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Storage, implemented on 11/28/17, documented, in part: it is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored .medication rooms .and to ensure proper .seclusion and safekeeping .all drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e. medication crats, cabinets, drawers, medication rooms) unused medications: .all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated .medications . 1. On 02/07/24 at 4:01…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an arbitration agreement that explicitly grants the resident or their representative the right to rescind the contract within 30 calendar days of signing it for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration, Residents #76 and #3. The findings included: 1. Record review showed Resident #76 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was later discharged on 04/21/22 and readmitted again on 05/25/22. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #76 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Continued record review showed Resident #76 signed an arbitration agreement on 09/14/21, after September 16, 2019. The arbitration agreement signed by Resident #76 did not show they had the right to rescind the contract within 30 calendar days of signing it. An interview was conducted on 02/08/24 at 8:35 AM with Resident #76, who stated he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain communication with hospice, as it relates to the resident's coordinated plan of care and services, to ensure each entity is aware of their responsibilities for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospice (Resident #70); and failed to accurately identify a resident's services for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Hospice services, Resident #76. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Coordination of Hospice Services and End of Life Care, implemented on 11/28/2017, revealed the following: The facility maintains written agreements with hospice providers that specify the care and services to be provided and the process for hospice and nursing home communication of necessary information regarding the resident's care. The facility and hospice provider will coordinate a care plan and implement interventions per the resident's needs, goals, and recognized standards of practice in consultation with the resident's attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide influenza and pneumococcal immunizations as required for 5 of 5 sampled residents, reviewed for immunizations, Residents #89, #87 #76, #94, and #557. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Influenza Vaccination, with a reviewed date of 10/15/23, included: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers annual immunization against influenza. Influenza vaccinations will be routinely offered annually from October 1st through March 31st unless such immunization is medically contraindicated, the individual has already been immunized during this time period or refuses to receive the vaccine. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Pneumococcal Vaccine Series, with a reviewed date of 10/15/23, included: It is our policy to offer our residents, staff, and volunteer workers immunization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer COVID-19 immunization as required for 4 of 5 sampled residents for immunizations, Residents #89, #87, #94 and #557. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Covid-19 Vaccination, with a reviewed date of 08/04/23 included: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by education and offering our residents and staff the Covid-19 vaccine. Covid-19 vaccinations will be offered to residents and staff, when supplies are available, as per CDC and/or FDA guidelines unless such immunization is medically contraindicated, the individual has already been immunized during this time period or refuses to receive the vaccine. 1. Record review for Resident #89 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation of the Covid vaccine being offered, accepted, or declined in the resident's medical record. 2. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0574 — isolatedThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure residents and staff were informed of their rights to file their complaints with the Ombudsman and where to find the Ombudsman posted information, for 1 of 1 sampled resident and staff reviewed for this conncern. The findings included: During an interview with the Resident Council President on 09/14/22 at 2:18 PM, she reported that she never heard about the word Ombudsman. She also informed that she did not know where the Ombudsman information was posted. She said that they meet every month and that she has been the President of the Resident Council for nearly a year, and they never discussed how to file a complaint with the Ombudsman. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score revealed that the Resident Council President obtained a score of 15 of 15, which is an indication of cognitive ability to provide credible information. On 09/15/22 at11:17 AM, while interviewing the Activity Director, she reported that she has been working at this facility since February 2022. She said that she was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop care plans for 3 of 24 sampled residents reviewed: Resident #102 and Resident #357 related to hemodialysis and impaired vision; and Resident #33 related to revising the dialysis care plan. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, implemented on 11/28/22, documented the following: it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with residents' rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental need that are identified in the residents' comprehensive assessment. 1. Record review for Resident #102 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and Dependence on Dialysis. A review of the Physician's orders documented an order for In-House Hemodialysis with [name] dialysis centers every Monday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure that enteral nutrition had been followed by the practitioners' orders for 3 of 4 sampled residents, Residents #14, #66, and #20, reviewed for tube feeding. The findings included: 1. A review of the facility's policy, titled, Enteral Nutrition Support Feeding Accuracy and Hydration Maintenance, revised on 09/14/22, documented the following: it is a policy of this facility to ensure accurate administration and adequate nutrition and hydration of all enteral nutrition support for all residents. Record review documented Resident #14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Ischemia, Hydrocephalus, Dementia, Gastrostomy Status, and Major Depressive Disorder. The resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score that indicated the resident was severely impaired. Resident #14's care plan of 06/05/22 documented that Resident #14 is at nutritional risk as evidenced by: Enteral nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide medication as scheduled on dialysis days for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident # 33). The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Hemodialysis, implemented 11/28/17, revealed Timely medication administration (initiated, held, or discontinued) by the nursing home and/or dialysis facility. Resident #33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Dependence of Renal Dialysis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) without Complications. The resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 13 according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) 06/28/22, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was receiving dialysis in the facility. On 09/13/22 at 10:36 AM, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food items that accommodated the preferences of 2 of 3 sampled residents during dining observations, Resident #102, and Resident #46. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #102 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses to include End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and dependence on Dialysis. A review of the physician's orders showed an order for In-House hemodialysis with [name] dialysis centers every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, dated 04/27/22. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that Resident #102 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which is cognitively intact. Reivew of the physician orders documented a diet order for regular texture, thin consistency, for diet liberal renal; 1200 cc fluid restriction: 360 milliliters (ml) with breakfast, 240 ml with lunch and dinner dated 05/02/22. In an interview conducted on 09/13/22 at 8:11 AM, Resident #102 stated that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$33,891 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $33,891 — penalty dated 2025-05-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBCC HOLDING LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 05/31/2024 |
| BASHC LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 05/31/2024 |
| ZSSS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 05/31/2024 |
| SHAULSON, BENJAMIN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 05/01/2024 |
| SHEMESH, ZEV | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/31/2024 |
| DE FERIA, ARMANDO | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/31/2024 |
| ORALA LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/31/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $625K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105237. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.