No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Childrens Comprehensive Care Center INC

200 SE 19th Avenue, Pompano Beach, FL 33060 · Non profit - Corporation · 36 certified beds · (954) 943-7638 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (954) 943-7638 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Nov 2023Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$12,360 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,360 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
660 S Federal Hwy · (954) 951-6080 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Cvs0.1 mi
2036 E Atlantic Blvd · (954) 781-6876 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix0.4 mi
2511 E Atlantic Blvd · (954) 786-7964 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2250 E Atlantic Blvd · (954) 786-4020 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
222 N Federal Hwy · (954) 698-9771

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.0%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained26.7%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.7%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.0%99.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.2%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.7%8.6%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
42.5%
Total nursing turnover
55.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 30.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.88 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.48 to 2.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with feeding in a manner to promote dignity for 1 of 3 sampled residents that eat by mouth (Resident #20).The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident's Rights, dated 01/2026, included the following: Employees shall treat all residents/clients with kindness, respect and dignity.Policy Interpretation and Implementation:3. Our company will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her/rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. Record review for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, C1-C4 Complete; Tracheostomy Status; Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator] Status; Gastrostomy Status; Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 has bilateral impairment of upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to obtain informed consent for resident receiving psychotropic medication for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #25 and #13). The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #13 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Anoxic Brain Damage, Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator], Tracheostomy Status, Gastrostomy Status. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted due to Resident #13 being rarely/never understood and was on the following medication: antianxiety (psychotropic). Review of the Physician's Orders showed that Resident #13 had orders for the following medication: 11/12/25 for Diazepam (antianxiety) 10 milligram (mg) tablet to give 10 mg via G-Tube four times a day for Seizure. Record review of Resident #13's electronic and paper medical chart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide funds in a timely manner after receiving a request for personal funds. This affected 1 of 1 sampled Resident (Resident #26), who was reviewed for personal funds. The findings included:Record review of the Policy on Individual Accounting Records of Resident Funds last reviewed October 2017 stated that all resident's requests for expenditures were to be prepared and signed by the Social Worker and approved by the Administrator. The expenditure invoices were to be sent to the Accountant for verification and approval. After that, the Accounting Manager would issue a check to be signed by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Medical Operations Officer. Record review revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #26 had a diagnosis of Quadriplegia. The assessment also documented that Resident #26 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives (code status) are clearly documented in the medical record for 2 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #25 and Resident #20). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives with a revised date of 03/2026 included in part the following: Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. The Interdisciplinary Team will review annually with the resident his or her advanced directives to ensure that such directives are still the wishes of the resident. Such reviews will be made during the annual assessment process and recorded on the resident assessment instrument (MDS). 1. Record review for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, C1-C4 Complete; Tracheostomy Status; Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform physician/family of change in condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for change in condition (Resident #7). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled. Change in a Resident's Condition or Status with a revised date of 10/2025 included in part, the following: Our facility will promptly notify the resident, attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). The Director of Nursing (DON)/designated Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician when there has been: A need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center. Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four (24) hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical /mental condition status. If a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition occurs, a comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for 1 of 13 sampled residents, (Resident #2) reviewed for Baseline Care Plans. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Gastrostomy Status (a surgical opening in stomach for a feeding tube), and Failure to Thrive. Record review of the electronic medical records for Resident #2 was conducted on 04/16/26 at approximately 10:45 AM. A search for a baseline care plan that should have been completed within the first 48 of admission to the facility was conducted. No baseline care plan was found. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing on 04/16/26 at approximately 10:55 AM. The DON was asked if she could show the surveyor the baseline care plan for Resident #2. The DON said she would call the MDS coordinator and ask her if she could locate a baseline care plan for Resident #2 (the Minimum Date Set coordinator worked remotely). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included advanced directives for 6 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #7 Resident #25, Resident #28 and Resident #20) and failed to develop an implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included psychotropic medications for 2 of 28 sampled residents receiving psychotropic medications (Residents #13 and #25). The findings included:1. Record review for Resident #20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, C1-C4 Complete; Tracheostomy Status; Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator] Status; Gastrostomy Status; Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 has bilateral impairment of upper and lower extremities. The MDS documented that Resident #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to document medications administration or document why med not administered for 5 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #2, Resident #28, Resident #5, Resident #25, Resident #13). The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, Documentation, & Storage, dated 07/01/25, included the following: To ensure the safe and appropriate administration, documentation, and storage of medications. Medication Administration:1. Medications must be charted by the person administering the drugs immediately following the administration. Documentation:2. The licensed staff administering medication will document this information on the resident's eMAR (electronic Medication Administration Record), by initiating his/her name in the appropriate box on the specified date and time. 3. If a medication is not administered, the licensed staff will initial the eMAR and the reason why the medication was not administered will be documented. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement wound care orders in a timely manner, affecting the daily treatment of a pressure wound for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for facility acquired wounds (Resident #13). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Treatment Guidelines, dated 01/2025, included the following: Wound Treatment Guidelines: A medical staff approved wound treatment guideline will be used care for patients with current practice utilizing moist wound healing techniques. Procedure:4. The [NAME] wound treatment guidelines may be used to determine or guide a treatment plan.5. Upon receipt of physician's orders, the clinician will implement the treatment/therapy. During the initial tour of the facility conducted on 04/13/26 at 9:15 AM, observed Resident #13 was observed in bed. Resident #13 has contractures of the upper extremity and right had was noted to be completely contracted inward, knuckles laying flat on the bed sheets. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders in a timely manner for application of bilateral orthotic boots for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for range of motion, Resident #20. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Orthoses, dated 12/24, included the following: Orthoses will be ordered and applied to clients to prevent and/or alleviate contractures, to promote optimal alignment, and to increase functional participation in activities. Procedure:6. Documentation to be placed in the physical management plan should include: a) Name of clientb) Date orthotic is issuedc) Wearing scheduled) Picture/illustratione) Specific instruction for orthotic application. Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Quadriplegia, C1-C4 Complete; Tracheostomy Status; Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator] Status; Gastrostomy Status; Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to provide enteral feedings per physicians' orders for 2 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #10 and Resident #2, reviewed for enteral feeding (tube feeding). This has the potential to affect 26 residents who had orders for enteral feedings. The findings included: Review of The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition Therapy (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Volume 41, Number 1, January 2017 15-103. DOI: 10.1177/0148607116673053) was conducted. ASPEN recommends the inclusion of critical elements in tube feeding orders. The critical elements include the patient's name, the name of the formula, the delivery site, the administration method and rate, and the volume per feeding or total volume per day. The development of nurse-driven protocols for volume-based feeding was recommended.1. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders for respiratory care including suctioning and trach care for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory, Residents #4, and #28. The findings included:According to the website: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593189/#:~:text=In%20emergent%20situations%2C%20a%20provider,used%20for%20suctioning%20mouth%20secretions the following in part was included: In emergent situations, a provider order is not necessary for suctioning to maintain a patient's airway. However, routine suctioning does require a provider order. 1. Record review for Resident #4 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Cerebral Palsy, Dependence on Respirator (Ventilator) Status, Tracheostomy Status, Cleft Palate, Other Apnea of Newborns, and Myotonic Muscular Dystrophy. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors and side effects for residents receiving psychotropic medications for 3 of 28 sampled residents receiving psychotropic medications, Residents #25, #13, and #5. The finding included:1. Record review revealed Resident #25 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Tracheostomy Status, Dependence on Respiratory (Ventilator) Status, and Other Epilepsy and Recurrent Seizures. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status was not conducted due to the resident is rarely/never understood. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #25 revealed an order dated 03/23/26 for Diazepam (a psychotropic medication) oral solution 5 MG\/5ML Give 3 ml via J-Tube three times a day. Review of the record for Resident #25 for the month of April 2026, including the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control protocol as evidenced by not properly wearing Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) during tracheotomy care for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for tracheotomy, Resident #13; and failed to ensure that it practiced appropriate hand hygiene while dispensing medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed during medication administration observation, Resident #1. The findings included:1. Record review for Resident #13 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Anoxic Brain Damage, Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator], Tracheostomy Status, Gastrostomy Status, Sepsis due to Serratia (bacteria), Lobar Pneumonia, Unspecified Organism, and Pulmonary Mycobacterial Infection. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 is dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).During an afternoon tour of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their own policy for labeling an insulin vial with an open date and administering insulin without an open date label for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents #3). Findings included:A record review of a facility's policy titled, Insulin Administration, dated 06/15/20, and reviewed on 07/20/25, it documented under procedure that opened insulin must be labeled with the date.Records review documented Resident # 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (Defibrination Syndrome), Personal History of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Peritoneal Abscess and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Acute Exacerbation.A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/21/26, under Section C of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), revealed the score was disabled. Section N documented yes responses to hypoglycemic and anticonvulsant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide food to residents in a safe and sanitary method. This had the potential to affect 4 residents on oral diets. The facility had 4 residents on the date of the survey who ate food orally. The findings included:An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted at 9:25 AM accompanied by the cook.When asked how many people she cooked for, she said she cooked for 4 residents at the Children's Comprehensive Care Center.The following was observed inside the True brand reach-in refrigerator:1. The [NAME] Chicken Broth had no date written on the box to show the date that the broth was opened. When the cook was asked for how long the item was safe to serve, she showed the surveyor the expiration date on the box. She was not aware that there was printed information on the side of the box that stated the broth must be used within 14 days after the carton had been opened.2. The Fruit Salad and container of Turkey Bacon had spilled dark yellow liquid on top of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative regarding a change in skin condition, for 1 of 3 sampled residents observed (Resident #1). The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, which was not dated, and provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), included: Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative (or sponsor) of changes in the resident's condition and/or status. The nurse supervisor will record in the resident's medical record any changes in the resident's medical condition or status. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Trach Care, dated 02/2025, included: Prevention is the best medicine for the care of the skin around the trach and the neck. Meticulous care should be taken to assess the skin each shift and document findings. Skin care management plans should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to: -develop a care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident # 7, and #19) ; -develop a care plan related to skin impairment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injury (Resident #19); and -follow the care plan for residents with seizure precautions and pad placement on the bed rails for 1 of 3 reviewed for bed rails (Resident #130). The findings included: 1) Review of Resident #7's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and most recent readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included Cerebral Palsy, Restlessness and Agitation, Seizures, Feeding Difficulties, Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy, Tracheostomy Status, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Candidiasis of Skin and Nail, and Sepsis due to Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus. Review of Resident #7 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments documented a discharge-return anticipated assessment dated [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure that it utilized and practiced appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions during high contact resident care activities for 6 of 29 sampled residents observed, (Residents #24, #28, #8, #4, and #10); And, 2) failed to ensure that it practiced appropriate hand hygiene while administering eye drops during a Medication Administration Observation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #27). The findings included: 1) Record review of the un-dated facility policy and procedure titled Routine Practices and Transmission Based Precautions provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed documented in the Policy Statement: Introduction and purpose: There are two (2) tiers of recommended precautions to prevent the spread of infections in healthcare settings: Standard Precautions and Transmission-Based Precautions. 1. Routine Practices (RP) - Routine practices are based on the premise that all clients/patients/residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assist a resident with feeding in a manner to promote dignity for 1 of 3 residents that eat by mouth, Resident #17. The findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #17 was not assessed for cognition due to 'Resident is rarely/never understood'. The MDS documented that Resident #17 was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), including eating. Resident #17's care plan for nutrition, initiated on 07/31/23, documented, Feeding tube present due to dysphagia with H20 flush only for hydration, patency of tube and medication administration. Additional risk factors include: chewing/swallowing difficulty, mechanically altered diet, decreased ability to feed self, abnormal labs. The goal of the care plan was documented as, Resident will have no further weight gain through next review date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail grooming to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident #7, #8, #12 and #19). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) titled ADLs/Hygiene reviewed on 01/2024 documented .every resident will receive a bath daily .according to their needs .personal hygiene: i.e. face and hands washing .nails cutting .will be done as needed . Review of the facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) job description revised on 08/22/19 provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented under essential functions .adheres to schedule and performs bathing .and hygiene of residents .ensure residents are ready for school, that they are neat and clean . Review of the facility's Registered Nurse job description revised on 09/21/20 provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented under essential functions .provides physical hygiene measures, assures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility: - failed to notify and obtain a physician order prior to provide pressure injury care for 1 of 2 reviewed for pressure injury (Resident #19) and - failed to administer medications within the medications time frames identified during medication administration observation task (Resident #18, #24, #28 and #29). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) titled Physician' Medication Orders dated on 03/20/24 documented .no drugs or biologicals shall be administered except upon the order of a person duly licensed .all drug and biological orders shall be written . Review of the facility's policy provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) titled Medication Administration and Documentation revised on 03/20/24 documented .medications must be administered in a timely manner and in accordance with the Attending Physician's written/verbal orders .medications .must be administered within one (1)hour of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, facility failed to ensure that the administration of enteral nutrition was consistent with the practitioner's orders for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #7 and #15). The findings included: 1 ) Review of Resident #7's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included Cerebral Palsy, Restlessness and Agitation, Seizures, Feeding Difficulties, Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy, Tracheostomy Status, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Candidiasis of Skin and Nail, and Sepsis due to Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus. Review of Resident #7 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments documented a discharge-return anticipated assessment dated [DATE]. The assessment documented that the resident was dependent on the staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #7's care plan titled resident name .relies on enteral feeding for all nutrition and hydration needs due to Short Bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to 1. Assess residents for the use of bed rails and 2. Obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for bed rails, Residents #10 and 130. The findings included: The facility's policy, 'Safety Measures and Equipment in the Pediatric Unit' most recently revised February 2024, documented: An appropriate size bed or crib will be selected for each resident according to their age and needs. Side rails on all cribs/beds of all residents will be in the up position and securely fastened at all times, unless someone is actually with the resident. 1). Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), date 10/17/24, Resident #10 was not assessed for cognition due to 'Resident is rarely/never understood'. The MDS documented that the resident was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the medication error rate was 14 percent. Four (4) medication errors were identified while observing a total of 28 opportunities, affecting Resident #27. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) titled Medication Administration and Documentation revised on 03/20/24 documented .medications must be administered in a timely manner and in accordance with the Attending Physician's written/verbal orders .medications .must be administered within one (1)hour of their prescribed time .the individual administering the medication must initial the resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) .after administering the next resident's medication . Review of Resident #27's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. The resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was dependent on the staff for all the activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to: 1) ensure that it secured Medication cart #1 (south unit). 2) ensure that it secured the Respiratory Therapy Cart in the north unit. 3) ensure that expired biologicals were removed from the medication room and the crash cart located in the south unit. 4) ensure opened medications bottle were label properly . 5) ensure resident's medications temperature were keep at appropriate temperature. 6) ensure that resident's medications were properly disposed of in the south unit and in the nursery. The findings included: Review of the facility's provided Medication Storage and Labeling Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 20089 dated 06/2023 by the Director of Nursing (DON) documented medications and biologicals in medication rooms, carts .were maintained within: secured (locked) locations, accessible only to designated staff . Review of the facility's policy provided by the DON titled Destruction of Medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the day to day kitchen operations were overseen by a qualified nutrition professional. This has the potential to affect all residents that eat foods prepared in the kitchen. The census at the time of the survey was 29 residents, with 3 that eat from the kitchen. The findings included: The Facility Assessment, dated June 2024, documented: Additional References to the Facility Assessment: Food and Nutrition Services - Staffing. The facility must employ sufficient staff members with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #17's diet orders included: GIVE PUREED DIET WITH THIN LIQUIDS FOR BREAKFAST, LUNCH AND…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide meals consistent with orders for pureed consistency for 1 of 3 residents observed for dining, Resident #17. The findings included: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #17's diet orders included: GIVE PUREED DIET WITH THIN LIQUIDS FOR BREAKFAST, LUNCH AND DINNER. NURSING TO RECORD % CONSUMED - three times a day - 08/25/24. During an observation of lunch being served in the classroom, on 11/18/24 at 12:15 PM, Resident #17 was served pureed broccoli, pureed chicken and puree pasta. It was noted that all three food items pooled on the plate, all three food items were sitting in water from being pureed and the chicken and the broccoli were 'chunky' and not smooth. It was noted that all three pureed food items did not hold the shape of the scoop that was used to portion the food items. During an observation of Resident #17 having breakfast, on 11/20/24 at 8:46 AM, it was noted that Resident #17 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Facility Assessment. The findings included: Review of the Facility Assessment revealed the following: In Part 3: Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our Resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies, the Facility Assessment, dated June 2024, it documented, for Food and Nutrition Services: Dietician, Cooks, Dietary Aides. In Section 3.2, Staffing Plan, under Other, it documented: Dietician: 1 Consultant approximately 12 hours per week Cooks: (1) Dietary Aides: (1) The Workforce Profile, documented the Education level/Professional requirement for a Dietician as 'High School Diploma'. There was no indication that there would be a Director of Food and Nutrition Services, or what are the qualifications. During an interview, on 11/21/24 at 4:24 PM with the Administrator, the Staff Coordinator, and the Medical Operations Director, when the inaccuracies in the Facility Assessment were brought to their attention, the Administrator acknowledged that Facility Assessment did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to make efforts to correct deficiencies that were cited during the most recent annual recertification survey, with an exit date of 11/22/24 and a correction date of 12/31/24. The findings included: 1.) During the annual recertification survey, with an exit date of 11/22/24, the facility was cited for not developing a care plan for Activities of Daily Living for Resident #7 and Resident #19, and for not implementing interventions to care plans related to Seizure precautions for Resident #130. During the revisit to the recertification survey, on 01/09/25, it was determined by the Survey team that the deficiencies had not been corrected. During an interview, on 01/09/25 at 2:28 PM, with the Case Manager, Administrator, and Nurse Practitioner/Operations Manager (NP), when asked about the care plans not being initiated, the Case Manager confirmed that she was responsible for developing the care plans and that the care plans had not been developed. When asked about not having the care plans developed, the Case…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence an event was thoroughly investigated in a timely manner, when oxygen tubing was found dislodged from the resident, for 1 of 1 resident investigated for respiratory care (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history significant for Respiratory Failure, Tracheostomy and Ventilator Dependent, Spina Bifida, Scoliosis, and Failure to Thrive. A Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed on 10/17/23. A Quarterly MDS was done on 07/31/23. This MDS documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicates he was cognitively intact. This MDS documented Resident #1 was verbal and able to make himself understood. This MDS documented he was totally dependent on staff for his activities of daily living. Review of Care Plans revealed a care plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) in a timely manner for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for assessments (Resident #12 and Resident #31). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled MDS, Electronic Transmission, revised on 05/2023, showed that all MDS assessment and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded in the facility's computer MDS informational system. It will further be transmitted to the state database in accordance with regulations. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 05/18/23. An entry MDS was done on 03/28/23, and an admission MDS was completed on 04/10/23. No discharge MDS was noted on Resident #31. A review of the Social Services Discharge summary dated [DATE], showed that Resident #31 transitioned home with the mother. 2. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Range of Motion (ROM) devices and therapy to prevent deformities for 1 of 2 sampled residents for ROM (Resident #19). The findings included: Resident #19 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Brain Damage, Respiratory Failure, and Drowning. The care plan initiated on 05/30/20 showed that he will maintain the current range of motion in all extremity stimulation. He will be provided with 2-4 times a week for physical management, and all his positioning needs will be addressed. It further showed that the physical therapy will follow the prescribed plan. In an observation conducted on 09/06/23 at 7:20 AM, Resident #19 was noted in bed. Closer observation showed no ankle foot orthosis (AFO) in place. In an observation conducted on 09/06/23 at 8:30 AM, Resident #19 was noted in bed. Closer observation showed no ankle foot orthosis (AFO) in place. In an observation conducted on 09/06/23 at 9:00 AM, Resident #19 was noted in bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents for nutrition (Resident #19). The findings included: A review of the facility ' s policy titled Weights, Heights, and Head Circumference, revised on 01/2021, showed that it is the policy of the facility to obtain and monitor weights. In an observation conducted on 09/05/23 at 10:37 AM, Resident #19 was noted in his bed. Closer observation showed a tube feeding with formulary (Pediasure Peptide) running at 45 milliliters (ml) an hour. Resident #19 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Brain Damage, Respiratory Failure, and Drowning. The care plan initiated on 05/27/20 showed that Resident #19 requires tube feeding to maintain nutritional status. This was related to brain injury and tracheostomy dependence. The doctor's orders showed an order for weekly weights for a weight loss plan dated 07/05/23. Another order was noted for Pediasure Peptide 1.0 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, facility failed to: (1) ensure that the administration of enteral nutrition was consistent with the practitioner's orders for 5 of 8 sampled reisdents (Resident #5, #18, #23, #137 and #237); (2) ensure that water ordered for flushes was administered per orders for 3 of 8 sampled residents; and (3) ensure the use of mixed enteral nutrition was consistent with the facility's policy for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #23). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Nasogastric/Gastrostomy Tube Feeding reviewed on 03/2022 documents .administration bag and tubing must be marked with the date and changed every twenty-four (24) hours .feeding preparations which involve blending, reconstitution .may hang for up to eight (8) hours .prepared feeding solutions must be refrigerated if held before used . 1.) Review of Resident #5's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and latest readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to follow up with pharmacy recommendations for 3 of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident #1, #6 and #30). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Consultant Pharmacists Monthly Drug Regimen Review dated 9/2018 and reviewed 4/2020 revealed Physicians/prescribers are to act on recommendations by their NEXT visit date to the facility. If they do not act on recommendations by their next visit, the D.O.N. will promptly forward those recommendations to the Medical Director for follow up .The D.O.N. will be responsible to ensure that documentation is completed to verify the Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations are acted on with a target completion timeframe of TWO weeks from the report date. D.O.N. is Director of Nursing. 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dependence on Respirator, Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita and Epilepsy. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an antipsychotic medication to treat specific conditions is documented in the clinical record. It failed to provide a clinically written reason for the refusal of a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident #15). The findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Tapering Medications, revised on 03/20, showed the following: Medications will be reviewed by pharmacy and attending physician/subspecialists monthly for consideration of gradual dosage reductions. Tapering a medication is to find an optimal dose or determine whether continued use of the medication benefits the resident. Reductions are titrated slowly unless clinically contraindicated with the goal of drug discontinuation. Dosages are then monitored regularly with consideration of adverse reactions while examining the resident's response and level of functioning. Resident #15 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that garbage was disposed of properly. The findings included: In an observation conducted on 09/06/23 at 7:00 AM, the main dumpster outside the facility was noted to be uncovered with large bags of garbage on the bottom of the dumpster. The area around the dumpster was noted with debris and dirty gloves. In an interview conducted on 09/07/23 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator stated that everyone is responsible for taking out the garbage when needed. The city will come twice a week to empty the primary dumpster outside. The dumpster is supposed to be covered with a lid, and the fenced area around the dumpster is closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident #1). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Physicians' Medication Orders dated 04/2009, reviewed 02/10/19 and revised 05/21 revealed Medications shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medication in this state. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dependence on Respirator, Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita and Epilepsy. Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita is a term used to describe a variety of conditions involving multiple joint contractures. On February 14, 2023 the consultant pharmacist made a recommendation under the category Administration error, Priority High. Resident has order to give Atenolol 25mg (milligrams) Q 24 HR PRN (every 24 hours as needed) for SBP (systolic blood pressure)>140 or HR(heart rate) >100; Hold for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility needed to monitor the effectiveness of its performance improvement activities to ensure that improvements are sustained for 2 of 2 repeated deficiencies from prior surveys. The findings included: A review of the facility ' s Quality Improvement Plan for 2023 to 2024 showed the following: identify indicators that reflect the quality of care for residents when monitored. Identified from the review and established priorities. Monitor areas of concern and develop a plan of action as indicated. A plan of action is needed to reduce, modify, or resolve the concern and plan of action by repeated monitoring as needed. A review of the [NAME] report showed that the facility had multiple repeated deficiencies at F692 (Quality of Care) and F814 (Food and Nutrition) from previous surveys. In an interview conducted on 09/07/23 at 3:20 PM with the facility ' s new Administrator, she reported that before she came, they were doing QAPI and safety meetings combined. QAPI was not done monthly but on a quarterly basis. She decided to start a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were composed of the required committee members in their quarterly meetings. The findings included: A review of the facility ' s Quality Improvement Plan for 2023 to 2024 showed the following: The quality improvement team meets monthly to address quality improvement activities and consists of the Administrator, Medical Director, Director of Medical Operations, Director of Nursing, Resident Care Manager, Risk Manager, Dietary Consultant, Pharmacy Consultant, and the Maintenance Director. A record review of the Quarterly QAPI/Safety Meeting, conducted on April 18, 2023 (3rd quarter), did not show that the facility ' s Administrator participated in the meeting. A record review of the Quarterly QAPI/Safety Meeting, conducted on January 25, 2023 (2nd quarter), did not show that the facility ' s Administrator participated in the meeting. In an interview conducted on 09/07/23 at 3:20 PM, the facility ' s Administrator stated that she only started working…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,360 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $6,180 — penalty dated 2024-11-22
  • $6,180 — penalty dated 2024-11-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106110. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next