Balanced Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

21.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 299 beds and averages 259.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility record review, hospital record review, and policy review the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from physical, verbal, psychological, psychosocial and sexual abuse to one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed, by failing to provide medication and supervision to an unsafe resident. On 1/20/2024 at approximately 3:35 AM Resident #1 was punched repeatedly in the face and sexually assaulted by Resident #2 in Resident #1's room. The facility failed to provide supervision of Resident #2, who was exhibiting poor impulse control, combativeness, erratic behavior, aggressive behavior and was difficult to redirect. Resident #2 required two psychiatric medication changes in the first five days of his stay in the facility and four days later he assaulted Resident #1. Resident #2's admission medication was not correctly transcribed and of the two medication changes made only one was administered, and that one, only once. This failure created a situation that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility record review, hospital record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent physical and psychosocial harm to one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. On 1/20/2024 at approximately 3:35 AM Resident #1 was punched repeatedly in the face and sexually assaulted by Resident #2 in Resident #1's room. The facility failed to provide supervision of Resident #2, who was exhibiting poor impulse control, combativeness, erratic behavior, aggressive behavior and was difficult to redirect. This failure created a situation that resulted in serious injury to Resident #1 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 1/17/2024. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 1/29/2024 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings include: An interview was conducted with Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 2/5/2024 at 1:58 PM. Staff C, CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policies and procedures review, interviews with facility staff, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Assistant Nursing Home Administrator (ANHA), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to provide supervision during meal service to prevent choking for a vulnerable resident (#1), who was on a puree diet and had previously attempted to gain access to foods not on his prescribed diet, out of 12 sampled residents for dietary needs. On 08/13/2023 Resident #1, who was on a puree diet for a diagnosis of dysphagia, accessed a roommate's food tray. On 08/13/2023 during the dinner meal service, Resident #1 was observed attempting to access food trays from the tray cart when the cart was delivered to the floor and was redirected by staff. Resident #1 was witnessed by staff attempting to access trays from the tray cart again after the meal and was redirected back to his room. In his room, Resident #1 accessed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to two (#4 and #5) of two residents which resulted in an physical altercation perpetrated by one resident (#4).Findings included:Review of the facility's reported incident log showed a resident - resident physical abuse incident had occurred on 3/8/26 between Resident #4 and Resident #5.On 3/26/26 at 10:37 a.m. Resident #5 was observed in room lying on bed with eyes closed.Review of Resident #5s progress notes showed a note dated 3/8/26 at 10:11 p.m. The note referred to a linked incident: Resident to Resident 3/8/26 at 4:20 p.m. go to incident. The note revealed Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was sitting at desk charting with staff members then writer looked up and see (Resident #5) get hit on the right side of the face by another resident. CNA and writer got up and redirected resident to room, (Resident #5) stayed in his chair till we came to check on him, (Resident #5) has no complaints of pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for three (1 [NAME] [also known as the secured unit], 1East, and Lifestyle 2) out of six Wings. Findings included: On 11/4/24 at 10:13 a.m., a tour of the 1 East wing was conducted. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the privacy curtains between bed A and B with stains and dirty. Further observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed paint was peeled from the ceiling above the window. An observation of the bathroom shared by rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] revealed a detached shower head, white washcloth, and a light cover fixture on the shower seat. Further observations of the floor of the shower revealed multiple unknown particles and debris that were black and white colored. Further observations of the bathroom revealed multiple brown stains on the seat of the toilet. On 11/4/24 at 10:27 a.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed two dresser knobs were separated from the drawer. An observation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were initiated for three (#163, #138, and #237) of four residents sampled. Findings included: 1. On 11/04/2024 at 9:25 a.m., an observation was made of Residents #237. Resident #237 was in his room with a 1:1 sitter. Resident #237's room had a sign on his door for EBP. The signage was unclear on which resident was on EBP. Staff F, Registered Nurse, stated Resident in bed A was on EBP secondary to a wound. Resident #237 did not have an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. A review of Resident #237's physician orders showed the following: Sacrum: Cleanse with normal saline, apply collagen with calcium alginate to wound bed, cover with border foam gauze daily every day shift for pressure ulcer, dated 10/31/2024. 2. On 11/04/2024 at 10:00 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #163. Resident #163 had an intravenous (IV) medication infusion into a venous access catheter to his left arm. Outside Resident #163's room there was no signage for EBP or any personal protective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility did not implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with resident rights for one resident (#51) out of eight residents sampled. Findings included: On 11/04/2024 at 10:30 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #51 in her room. Resident #51 stated she did not consistently get her bath twice a week and had not had her hair washed in over two months. Resident #51 stated she would like to have a bath consistently at least twice a week and would like to have her hair washed. Resident #51 stated she had asked for this but stated she did not get this offered to her. Resident #51 preferred to stay in bed and have a bed bath and stated she did not know how they would wash her hair. A review of Resident #51's admission Record showed diagnoses: Bipolar disorder Type 2 diabetes mellitus Depression Essential hypertension Post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic Paranoid schizophrenia Muscle weakness, general Morbid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not honor the wishes for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) related to bathing of body and hair for two residents (#51 and #100) out of eight residents sampled. Findings included: 1. On 11/04/2024 at 9:30 a.m., observations and interviews were conducted with Resident #51 and #100. Resident #51 stated she had not consistently received her baths in weeks and her hair had not been washed in over a month. Resident #51 stated she preferred bed baths and stated baths were scheduled three times a week but could not state the days. Resident #100 stated she did not get her baths three times a week and her hair had not been washed in over a month. Resident #100 stated she preferred to have bed baths. A review of the facility's 30-day bathing task showed Resident #51 had three baths in 30 days. Resident #51's bathing schedule on the bathing task showed shower/bath every Monday, Wednesday and Friday during the 3-11 shift. A review of Resident #51's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide quality care and services related to wound care management and treatment for two (#377 and #378) out of three sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #378's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure, dementia with behavioral disturbances, unsteadiness on feet, cellulitis of other sites, mood affective disorder, and anxiety disorder. An observation was conducted on 11/04/24 at 10:30 AM. Resident #378 was observed sitting in the hallway in a recliner chair. He was observed to have bandages on his bilateral upper arms. He said he got the injuries from slipping and falling at home. He said he was not sure how often they changed the bandages. His left upper arm bandage was dated 11/4 and was clean and intact. The right upper arm bandage was intact and clean but dated 10-31. An observation was conducted on 11/4/24 at 3:39 PM. Resident #378 was observed self-propelling in his wheelchair down the hallway. His right upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure smoking adaptive equipment was provided for one (#42) of 11 residents sampled. Findings included: During an observation made on 11/4/2024 at 10:15 a.m. and 11/6/2024 at 2:20 p.m., Resident #42 was observed outside smoking without using a smoking adaptor. Resident #42 said he did not use smoking adaptive equipment while smoking. Review of an admission Record dated 11/ 7/2024, showed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Parkinsonism, unspecified, Type 2 Diabetes, Aute Respiratory Failure, and Paranoid Schizophrenia. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident # 42's care plan revised on 9/13/2024, showed the resident was at risk for smoking injuries to self - related to use of cigarettes. The care plan goals showed Resident #42 will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition according to standards of practice related to expired nutritional formula for one resident (#246) out of one resident sampled. Findings included: On [DATE] at 12:11 p.m., an observation of Resident #246 revealed he was laying down in bed, with a family member at the bedside. On the left side of the bed, there was a pole and enteral feeding pump observed. An observation of the pole and enteral feeding pump revealed there was no tube feeding bag or container hanging. Further observation revealed the pump was off. An observation of the small dresser, to the left of Resident #246's bed, revealed three, 8-ounce bottles of TwoCal HN [high nutrient] 2.0 formula with a date observed at the top which indicated the following, 1 SEP 2024. A review of Resident #246's admission Record revealed an original admission date of [DATE] and a re-admission date of [DATE]. Further review of the admission Record revealed diagnoses to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide written notification of Transfer/Discharge to Resident Representatives and the Ombudsman for five residents (#24, #161, #188, #221, and #95) of five residents sampled for hospitalization. Findings included: On 6/28/22 at 10:44 a.m. Resident #24 was observed lying in the bed in his room. The resident was able to answer simple questions. The resident was observed with a hospital armband on and denied being hospitalized recently. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Malnutrition, and Hypertension. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the nursing progress notes revealed the following entry: 6/4/22 8:47 p.m. At approximately 4 pm staff notified writer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0625 — pattern
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide written notification of Bed Hold Policy to Resident/Resident Representatives for five residents (#188, #24, #221, #161, and #95) of five residents sampled for hospitalization. Findings include: On 6/28/22 at 10:44 a.m. Resident #24 was observed lying in the bed in his room. The resident was able to answer simple questions. The resident was observed with a hospital armband on and denied being hospitalized recently. A review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Malnutrition, and Hypertension. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A review of the nursing progress notes revealed the following entry: 6/4/22 8:47 p.m. At approximately 4 pm staff notified writer that resident had loose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$98,540 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $98,540 — penalty dated 2024-02-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL