Brighton Bay Center for Rehabilitation and Healing
10501 Roosevelt Blvd N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33716 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (727) 577-3800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.7% | 8.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.5% | 9.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.8% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.6% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.1% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.4% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.6% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.66 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.5%CMS range 34.7–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 9.3–17.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.7%CMS range 6.3–15.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure surgical wounds were assessed and measured for three residents (#2, #6, #7) out of three sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to rhabdomyolysis, open wound right hip, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, hypertension, anemia, dementia, chronic kidney disease, generalized muscle weakness, history of falls, intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region with discogenic back pain only. Review of the admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed in Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). Section M, Skin Conditions showed surgical wound. On 06/16/2025 at 11:35 a.m. Resident #2 was observed sitting in his wheelchair at bedside. The resident was dressed and groomed for the day. The resident stated he was told the wound vac was supposed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment was provided in 13 resident rooms (#201, #203, #118, #114, #108, #107, #110, #112, #259, #253, #138, #137, and #146) of 74 resident rooms in the facility. Findings included: 1. During an observation made on 3/24/2025 at 9:14 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a hole in the wall behind the room door. During an observation made on 3/24/2025 at 9:30 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a loose toilet seat attached to the resident's bathroom toilet. 2. During facility tours on 3/24/2025 at 9:40 a.m., 3/25/2025 at 8:10 a.m., and on 3/26/2025 at 7:45 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., the following was observed: a. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was observed with two plastic straight edge razors on the sink counter. Neither were labeled as to who they belonged to. There were two residents residing in the room during all days observed. b. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], in the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were accurate and updated to include current diagnoses for three residents (#29, #28, #77) out of 28 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #29's admission Record showed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified dementia (added 12/23/20), anxiety (added 4/20/20), and major depressive disorder. Review of the Level I PASRR, dated 7/16/20 showed in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, A. MI (Mental Illness) or suspected MI (check all that apply), no MI or suspected MI was selected. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 3:28 p.m. with the Director on Nursing (DON), she stated she knew she had a problem because nobody has been doing PASRRs in the facility. She stated she will have to review all the PASRRs. 2. Review of Resident #28 admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. On 3/26/25 at 9:49 a.m., an observation was made of Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN). Upon entering Resident #38's room, no hand hygiene was performed. Staff C, RN obtained Resident #38's blood pressure using reusable equipment for multiple resident use. Throughout the observation, no had hygiene was performed and the reusable equipment was not observed to be cleaned prior to or after use. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to 1. Implement an effective infection control program related to the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in one resident (#162) room of four transmission-based precaution rooms; 2. Failed to store or dispose an indwelling catheter bag when not used for one resident (#78) of six sampled residents who utilized catheters; and 3. Failed to ensure staff completed appropriate hand hygiene during one of three meal observations, (3/24/2025) and during care for one resident (#38) of 42 sampled residents, and 4. Failed to sanitize shared resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview on 3/25/2025 at 10:00 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated no PASRRs were submitted for a Level II review. Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for one resident (Resident #79) of ten residents sampled for PASARR. Findings included: Review of Resident # 79's admission Record showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, unspecified, dated 1/13/2025; other specified anxiety disorders, dated 1/10/2023; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation, dated 12/12/2022; and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), unspecified, dated 7/28/2022 Review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, signature dated 7/22/2022, revealed in Section 1: PASRR Screen Decision-Making: only Anxiety Disorder was marked as a Mental Illness (MI) or suspected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-six medication administration opportunities were observed, and three errors were identified for three residents (#90, #27, and #38) out of four residents observed. These errors constituted a 8.33% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #90's active orders revealed the following order: Lisinopril Tablet 5 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. On 3/26/25 at 8:39 a.m., an observation was made of Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) during medication administration for Resident #90. Staff A, RN did not administer Lisinopril Tablet 5 mg during the observation. The staff member stated he was holding the medication due to a low blood pressure. Review of Resident #90's March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following order: - Lisinopril Tablet 5 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. The chart code on the MAR was documented as 4 for the dose scheduled to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide food to accommodate preferences for two residents (#39 and #66) out of twenty-two residents sampled for food. Findings included: 1. An observation on 3/24/2025 at 12:40 p.m. revealed Resident #39 sitting up at the bedside for mealtime. She stated she was not supposed to have red meat per her cardiologist and sometimes she felt like she still got it anyway. An observation on her lunch tray revealed a slice of beef covered in sauce. Her meal ticket showed she was supposed to have a Bacon, Lettuce, & Tomato (BLT) sandwich as her entrée. She stated she wasn't ever sure what she was being given until she took a bite of it because she had deteriorating vision and could not see what was on her plate. She stated she doesn't ever order anything and they just give her whatever they have that day. She stated most of the time when she realized they gave her something she wasn't supposed to eat, she would just leave it and eat everything…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to assess and obtain wound care orders for one (#12) of two residents reviewed for wound care. Findings included: On 8/24/24 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #12 was observed sitting in a wheelchair inside the second floor activity room across from the nursing station. The observation revealed a tan-colored 4 x 4 shiny plastic-looking border dressing near the resident's right elbow. The dressing was undated with an approximate quarter-sized area of discoloration staining the near-center of the dressing. The resident's speech was non-sensical. An interview and observation of Resident #12's dressing was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 8/24/24 at 9:57 a.m. Staff A stated when an area of (disrupted) skin integrity was observed, the area was assessed, a head-to-toe assessment was completed, and a physician order was obtained for treatment. The staff member viewed Resident #12's right elbow dressing and reported seeing the area also that morning. Staff A confirmed the dressing should be dated, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was obtained per physician orders for one (#12) of two residents sampled. Findings included: On 8/24/24 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #12 was observed in the second floor activity room with other residents and a television was playing. The resident's speech was non-sensical. On 8/24/24 at 9:57 a.m., Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed the resident's identity. The resident appeared to be a frail elderly resident, clean and appropriately dressed. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and 11/22/22. The record included the diagnoses: Adult failure to thrive, unspecified stage 3 chronic kidney disease, unspecified anemia, unspecified vitamin deficiency, unspecified severity unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #12's active physician orders, dated August 2024, revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a system was being utilized to accurately account for all controlled substances (narcotics) related to Controlled Drugs Shift Audits not being completed on five out of five medication carts in the facility. Findings included: On 8/24/23 the Controlled Drugs Shift Audits on the 2 [NAME] medication cart were observed to be incomplete. The July 2023 Controlled Drugs Shift Audit form showed 44 out of 62 possible shifts were not signed properly by two nurses when counting narcotics at shift change. The August 2023 Controlled Drugs Audit form showed 36 out of 48 possible shifts were not signed properly by two nurses when counting narcotics at shift change. The Controlled Drug Shift Audit are where the off-going and on-coming nurse sign to confirm together they have counted the narcotics in a medication cart to ensure the number of pills are correct before handing off the keys to the medication cart. On 8/24/23 the Controlled Drugs Shift Audits on the 2 East medication cart were reviewed and observed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 19 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to properly store medication in three out of five medication carts, on one of two nursing units, and ensure medication were stored separate from food in one of two medication storage rooms. Findings included: On 8/23/23 at 9:21 a.m. a medication cart on the second floor was observed to be unlocked. There were no staff in sight and a resident was sitting five feet from the cart. At 9:41 a.m. the medication cart remained unlocked. Two staff members, including a nurse, were observed walking past the cart and not locking it. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/23/23 at 9:38 a.m., a white, oval tablet was observed on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] suite A. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/23/23 at 9:40 a.m. an observation was made of an orange tablet inscribed with a letter M on the floor in front of the resident's bed in room [ROOM NUMBER] suite B. Photographic evidence obtained. On 8/23/23 at 10:04 a.m., an observation was made of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with facility staff and residents, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of drug use by staff on facility premises, and allegations of staff reporting to work under the influence of drugs were investigated potentially impacting the health and safety of 114 residents within the facility's care. Findings included: On 08/23/23 at 12:53 p.m. an interview was conducted with a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident stated the Certified Nurse's Assistants (CNAs) come to work smelling like marijuana. The resident said, That is not pleasant at all. I do not like the smell. The staff are impaired while caring for patients. The resident stated it was not just one incident. She stated she could not give names or state when the incidents occurred. The resident said, It is a culture here. Everybody knows about it including the administration. On 8/23/23 at 12:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with the former resident council president. He said, The facility sometimes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to implement control measures to prevent the potential re-infection or transmission of scabies among residents in the facility related to four residents (#4, #10, #11, and #12) out of twelve sampled who were treated or exposed to scabies. Findings included: Review of medical records showed Resident #10 was seen by a dermatology practice on 8/16/23 and treated for scabies on 8/16 and 8/17/23 with oral and topical medications. Review of admission records showed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, dementia, and disorder involving the immune mechanism. Review of Resident #10's August Orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the following: -Ivermectin 3 milligram (mg.) Give 4 tablets at morning medication pass. Start date 8/16/23. End date 8/17/23. The MAR shows medication was administered on 8/17/23. -Permethrin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1) expired supplements and medications were discarded from three of the six medication carts, and 2) medications were stored appropriately for three residents (#50, #10, and #52) out of 43 sampled residents. Findings included: An observation was conducted, on [DATE] at 10:22 a.m., with Staff O, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) of the One Center medication cart. The observation revealed an opened bottle of Prostat Liquid Protein with 11/14 written on it. The staff member turned the bottle over and stated it was not expired until May. Staff O confirmed the manufacturer label instructed to discard the bottle 3 months after opening and it should have been discarded a few days ago. An observation on [DATE] at 10:32 a.m., was conducted with Staff M, LPN, of the One [NAME] medication cart. The observation revealed the following: - Levemir insulin pen, with no pharmacy label. A label was located under the pen on the bottom of the drawer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure an assessment for self-administration of medications was completed for two residents (#44 and #88) out of the 28 residents observed on the west hall of the first floor. Findings included: On 2/20/23 at 11:12 a.m., a bottle of eye drops was observed on the over-the-bed table in front of Resident #44 as the resident lay in bed. The resident stated the family provided them, they (the drops) were over on the counter and were used once a day. A review of Resident #44's physician orders, on 2/20/23 at 11:35 a.m., revealed the resident did not have an order to self-administer eye drops. The review of the assessments completed for the resident did not indicate the resident had been evaluated for the self-administration of medications. An observation on 2/22/23 at 12:08 p.m., was conducted with Staff N, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) of a bottle of eye drops and a tube of deep penetrating pain relief gel on Resident #44's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to do an ongoing re-evaluation of the need for a restraint for one resident (#43) out of one resident with a restraint. Findings included: An observation was made on 02/20/23 at 10:40 a.m. Resident #43 was observed to be in the common room sitting inside a PVC (lightweight plastic tubing) rolling chair, that wraps completely around the resident's waist and between her legs (known as a merry walker). A review of Resident #43's facesheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which include but not limited to unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition, unspecified mood disorder, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, and a history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to 1) develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission; and 2) provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to the resident/resident representative for two residents (#367 and #214) out of 43 sampled residents. Findings included: The facesheet for Resident #367 indicated the resident was admitted for short term rehabilitative care on 10/1/22 and was discharged on 10/7/22. The facesheet included diagnoses not limited to unspecified osteomyelitis, Type 2 Diabetes with foot ulcer, and personal history of unspecified adult abuse. The progress notes for Resident #367 indicated a note on 10/1/22 at 6:59 p.m., that identified the resident arrived via wheelchair transport with an admitting diagnosis of exostectomy of left foot with wound vacuum (vac). The admission Data Collection Tool was completed at 3:12 p.m. on 10/3/22. The baseline care plan for Resident #367 was not available in either the closed record or the electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for three residents (#69, #55, and #103) of forty-three sampled residents. It was determined care plans were not developed and implemented related to dental/oral status for Resident #69, diabetic diagnosis and care for Resident #55, and smoking/ smoking safety for Resident #103. Findings included: On 2/20/2023 at approximately 2:00 p.m. Resident #69's was observed in the room with a family member. An interview with Resident #69's family member revealed she was the resident's Power of Attorney and makes medical decisions, but Resident #69 could make her daily choice decisions. Resident #69 was observed in her bed, and with head of the bed approximately forty-five degrees and the call light placed within her reach. The resident was observed in a private room, her television on, the over the bed table placed over her, with many personal belongings on it and all within her reach. Resident #69 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 1) a discharge care plan was in place, 2) a discharge summary was completed, and 3) post care discharge plans were documented for two residents (#112 and #113) out of three residents sampled for discharge. Findings included: A review of a document titled, Face Sheet, printed on 2/22/23 showed Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/27/22. The document showed under discharge status the resident's return was not anticipated. The document did not indicate where the resident was discharged to. A review of a document titled, Physician Orders List, dated 11/17/22 showed there were no discharge orders for Resident #112. A review of a care plan with a start date of 11/22/22, noted active on discharge, showed Resident #112 did not have discharge planning goals indicated. A review of a document titled, Face Sheet, printed on 2/22/23 showed Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to 1) ensure one resident (#103) smoked in the designated smoking area and was adequately assessed for smoking out of three residents sampled for smoking. Findings included: 1) An interview was conducted with Resident #103 on 02/20/23 at 9:55 a.m. she said, I am a smoker; I sleep with my most important items like my lighters because they keep getting stolen. I keep my important items in my bag and I sleep with it because if you get caught with cigarettes and lighters they will take them away from you. You can get your smoking stuff from the desk if you want. One night I got caught smoking in my room. They're not happy with me because I was smoking in my room but I thought I was at home and they told me I can't smoke in the room. An interview was conducted with Resident #103's roommate on 02/20/23 at 9:57 a.m. She stated Resident #103 smoked in the room with me in it and they caught her and they told her she cannot do that. Neither resident was observed to be on oxygen. A review of Resident #103's facesheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure 1) respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice related to oxygen levels not set per physician orders for one resident (#72), and 2) respiratory equipment was stored appropriately for four residents (#72, #10, #62 and #73) out of five residents sampled during two of four days of survey. Findings included: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include pneumonia unspecified, adult failure to thrive, acute kidney failure and unspecified atrial fibrillation. An undated Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #72 showed the resident is dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) with one-person physical assistance. An observation was conducted on 2/20/23 at 12:15 p.m. of Resident #72 who was observed to be in her watching television. The resident was observed to have a nasal cannula on with her oxygen flow rate set to 5.5 liters per minute (LPM). The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure insulin administration was adequately and appropriately monitored for two residents (#74 and #55) out of 7 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications and insulin administration. Findings included: 1) A review of Resident #74's facesheet identified the resident was admitted on [DATE]. The facesheet included diagnoses not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A review of Resident #74's physician orders for 2/2023 included an order for Insulin Lispro 100 unit/milliliter (mL) pen (interchange). Inject subcutaneously (sub-q) per sliding scale three times daily, 70-140=0 units, 141-180= 1 unit, 181-200= 2 units, 221-260= 3 units, 261-300= 4 units, greater than 400= call MD (Medical Doctor) . The order did not identify how much insulin Resident #74 should be administered for a blood glucose of 201-220 or if the residents blood glucose level was between 301 - 399. A review of Resident #74's Medication Administration Record (MAR) identified the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure behavioral/side effect monitoring was conducted for psychotropic medications for one resident (#74) out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications administration. Findings included: An observation, on 2/22/23 at 11:45 a.m., identified Resident #74 was lying in bed with eyes closed. A review of Resident #74's facesheet indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] for short term skilled nursing and rehabilitative care. The facesheet identified diagnoses that included but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, unspecified anxiety disorder, other seizures, and unspecified single episode major depressive disorder. A review of the active Physician Orders for Resident #74 indicated the resident received the following psychotropic medication: - Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg) orally three times a day. - Venlafaxine extended release 225 mg orally daily - trazodone 50 mg at bedtime - Divalproex 250 mg every morning and bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-eight medication administration opportunities were observed with four errors identified for two residents (#51 and #17) of seven residents observed. These errors constituted a 14.29% medication error rate. Findings Include: 1. On 02/21/23 at 07:27 AM Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed administering Tylenol 650 milligrams (mg) by mouth for pain to Resident #51. A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not show medication was administered. A follow up interview with Staff F was conducted on 02/21/23 at 11:48 AM. Staff F, LPN stated she didn't know why the medication was not documented. Staff F was not able to produce documentation of the medication from the morning but was able to provide a nursing note written at 11:15 AM assessing the effectiveness of the medication. Staff F stated, The original administration time may not show up except as medication follow up assessment. 2. Staff G, LPN prepared the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Thirty-one medication administration opportunities were observed, and twenty-six errors were identified for five (#398, #395, #70, #63, and #31) of five residents observed. These errors constituted an 83.87% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 6/2/21 at 10:11 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff Member T, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #398. Staff T was observed administering the following medications: - Clopidogrel 75 milligram (mg) orally - Glipizide 5 mg orally A review of the Physician Orders for Resident #398 revealed the above medications were scheduled to be administered at 9:00 a.m. and the following medication orders: - Clopidogrel 75 mg orally once a day - Glipizide 5 mg orally once a day At 10:23 a.m. on 6/2/21, Staff T noted the medications, after the administration, as it was a late administration, then after a computer glitch she reentered the medication comment as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to 1) maintain drugs and biologicals used in the facility in a safe, secure, and orderly manner for three medication carts (Second floor East and [NAME] medication carts, and First floor [NAME] cart) of five medication carts as evidenced by insulin pens and insulin vials without documented opened-on dates, and 2) the facility failed to secure the contents of two (first floor west, second floor east) of five medication carts observed during survey. Findings included: 1) On 6/4/21 at 12:18 p.m. an observation of the medication cart for the Second-Floor East hall was conducted. Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was present during the observation. In the top left drawer of the cart, a Levemir FlexTouch pen was observed stored in a bag, with no open or expiration date documented. A Kwikpen of Lispro insulin was stored in a bag without an opened-on date. A Novolin 70/30 Flexpen was observed with no open date documented. An open Levemir multi-dose vial (MDV) was observed with an open date of 3/23/21, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure privacy during personal care for one (#60) resident out of 46 residents sampled. Findings included: Resident #60 was observed from the hallway, on 6/3/21 at 6:11 a.m., standing up between an over-the-bed table and the bed, facing the door and not wearing any undergarments. Staff Member S, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was observed standing to the side of the resident, bent over at the waist, and performing peri-care for the resident. As this writer introduced herself to the nurse who exited the resident room close to Resident #60's room, Staff S looked up, saw the writer standing in the hallway with the nurse, and exclaimed, oh no, reached over and shut the resident's door. Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE]. The Face Sheet included diagnoses not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview of Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-04 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #59) of three residents sampled for accidents had an accurate and current Minimum Data Set related to the use and placement of an elopement prevention alarm. Findings included: A review of Resident #59's Face Sheet, revealed a current admission date of 09/11/2015 with medical diagnoses of viral pneumonia, muscle weakness, unspecified mood affective disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #59's MDS [Minimum Data Set] 3.0 Nursing Home Quarterly . dated 03/15/2021, revealed under Section C: Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for mental Status score of 14; indicating an intact cognition. Under Section G: Functional Status, it was revealed Resident #59 required extensive assistance with one-person for transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #59 has a mobility device of a wheelchair. A review of Resident #59's Physician Order Report, revealed an active general order, dated 11/25/2019-Open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that the behaviors, outcomes, and non-pharmaceutical interventions were monitored for one (#396) out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings included: Resident #396 was admitted on [DATE]. The Face Sheet included diagnoses not limited to mild recurrent Major Depressive Disorder and a history of falling. An observation, on 6/1/21 at 10:52 a.m., Resident #396 was observed sitting in a chair next to the resident's bed. On 6/4/21 at 12:06 p.m., the resident was observed sitting up in bed watching television, and with a walker at the bedside. Resident #396's Medication Administration History for June 2021 indicated the resident was receiving the following psychotropic medications: - Aripiprazole (Abilify) 15 milligram (mg) tablet once a day for depression, started 5/28/21. - Sertraline (Zoloft) 50 mg tablet once a day for depression, started 5/28/21. The Medication History, printed on 6/2/21 at 2:04 p.m., for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105616. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.