No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vivo Healthcare Laurellwood

3127 57th Ave N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33714 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (727) 527-2171 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (727) 527-2171 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20261 actual-harm citation$37,316 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,316 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-13)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4711 34th St N · (727) 344-7602 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5944 34th St N Ste 1 · (727) 623-9854 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5944 34th St N · (727) 527-7511 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5634 Crissman Dr N · (727) 239-3211

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.8%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.9%10.5%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%94.7%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
51.3%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 49.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-21)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-09-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (#7) out of 14 residents on a pain management program. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 9/11/23 at 11:07 a.m. with Resident #7. Resident #7 was in her bed and stated she was new to the facility, and she will most likely be a permanent resident. Resident #7 was formerly living in an assisted living facility (ALF) prior to multiple surgeries on her right hip secondary to a fall sustained at her former ALF. Resident #7 stated she had her final surgery in August (2023) and was transferred four days later from the hospital to the current facility for physical therapy. Resident #7 said she was unable to fully cooperate with her therapy because her pain is too bad. The resident said because the pain is so bad she felt she would never leave this facility and go to another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility neglected to adequately supervise residents to prevent sexual abuse for two residents (#2 and #3) out of two residents reviewed, resulting in resident-to-resident sexual abuse.Findings included: An interview was conducted on 03/16/2026 at 10:15 AM with Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Staff A stated on 03/08/2026 she was a witness to abuse in the facility. Staff A, CNA stated during breakfast tray pass, she walked into the room of Resident #3, after noticing that the resident's door was closed which was unusual for that resident. She stated the room was dark and Resident #2 was in their wheelchair at the bedside of Resident #3. Staff A revealed they immediately noticed Resident #3 was lying on their side in a fetal position with their brief pulled down and Resident #2 had their hand in a clenched fist against Resident #3's vagina. Staff A immediately separated the residents. Staff A, CNA noticed Resident #2 had their other hand on their penis which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to hypersexual behaviors for one resident (#2) of two residents reviewed.Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance and mood disturbance. Resident #2 was diagnosed with high-risk heterosexual behavior on 09/09/2017.A review of Resident #2 care plan showed a focus of potential for behaviors related to depression, dementia and hypersexual behaviors; date initiated: 01/05/2026. The goal showed Resident #2 will have no evidence of behavior problems by review date. Interventions included: Anticipate and meet the residents needs. Assist the resident to develop more appropriate methods of coping and interacting. Encourage the resident to express feelings appropriately. Can you give us to provide opportunity for positive interaction attention stop and talk with him/he as passing by. Intervene as necessary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure food service safety standards were followed in the kitchen and in one of one nourishment rooms.Findings included: On 8/18/25 at 10:04 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager. An observation of the window, above the three-compartment sink, revealed kitchen items were hanging to include pans, pots, and a long grater with a handle. Further observations of the top part of the window, where the kitchen items were hanging, had multiple black particles and debris throughout the surfaces. Another observation of that area revealed a circular kitchen item that had sharp, metal pieces inside and appeared to be for chopping food, which had dust particles throughout the surface. The CDM said it had never been used. The CDM was observed telling Staff G, Dietary Assistant (DA) to clean that area. On 8/18/25 at 10:06 a.m., an observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a 20-ounce Gatorade bottle, on the top shelf, behind a box of bananas. The CDM confirmed the bottle should not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete/update the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnoses for one resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for PASARRs. Findings included: A review of Resident #4's admission Record revealed an original admission date of 9/13/2018, and a re-admission date of 8/10/2025 with diagnoses to include psychoactive substance abuse, primary insomnia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - 2/7/2024, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #4's Active Orders revealed the following: Antianxiety Medication-every shift. Start date 3/13/2025. Antidepressant Medication-every shift. Start date 3/13/2025. Sedative/Hypnotic Medication-every shift. Start date 3/13/2025. Zolpidem Tartrate Tablet 10 mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for difficulty sleeping. Start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to falls/accidents for one resident (#14) of three residents sampled.Findings included: On 08/18/2025 at 09:47 A. M., an interview was conducted with Resident #14. During the interview, the resident explained having experienced a fall in the cafeteria on 08/16/2025. The resident reported going out for a smoke break and fell backwards on their walker.Review of a progress note dated 08/18/2025 with a time stamp of 08:20 A. M., showed: staff observed resident sitting on the floor on buttock in front of the sink. [NAME] was behind Resident unlocked. Resident had on slide on thong sandal shoes.A progress note dated 08/16/2025 with a time stamp of 06:50 P. M., revealed: staff heard a noise. Upon checking, Resident was sitting on the floor in the dining room on buttock between a dining table & the wall. Resident's back was against the wall. [NAME] was about two feet away, unlocked. Slide on thong sandals on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received Activities of Daily living (ADL) care related to showers for one resident (#16) of three residents sampled.On 08/18/2025 at 09:48 A. M., an interview was conducted with Resident #16. The resident stated showers were not being provided by the facility staff. The resident stated showers were desired and requested from facility staff and the resident stated the facility staff refused to provide the showers.Review of a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Kardex (a care documentation sheet showing individual resident's care needs), showed question 3 asked the type of bathing preferred. The response to type of bathing, revealed the resident was not provided preferred showers on 07/30, 08/06, 08/10, and 08/13 of 2025.Review of the admission record for Resident #16, revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, contracture right hand,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment on two units (Unit 1 and Unit 2) out of two units related to cleanliness of resident areas, cluttered halls and dining room, linen supply, and an unkempt courtyard for three days (9/11/23, 9/12/23 and 9/13/23) of three days of the survey. Findings included: An observation was made on 9/11/23 at 6:37 a.m. of the Unit 2 resident hallway and revealed it to be cluttered with medical equipment to include mechanical lifts, wheelchairs, and shower chairs. An observation was made on 9/11/23 at 7:09 a.m. of the linen closest on Unit 1 and Unit 2 having no supply of linen. An observation was made on 9/11/23 at 7:15 a.m. of floors being dirty in Resident Rooms 6, 11, 15, 18, 17, and 20. The floors in these rooms were observed to remain in this condition during the survey from 9/11/23 to 9/13/23. An observation was made on 9/11/23 at 7:10 a.m. in the dining room of weight scales in the corner, boxes and a bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards related to: 1. hot water temperatures were not maintained at a safe temperature in two community shower sinks (located near room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) and two resident bathroom sinks (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]), 2. a storage room and supply room being unlocked with multiple housekeeping and nursing supplies, 3. emergency cords missing or unable to be used in three resident bathrooms (Rooms15/16, room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]), 4. a bathroom light not working in one resident shared bathroom (Rooms 15/16) and 5. an air conditioning unit in disrepair and leaking in one resident room (20) for a period of three days (9/11/23, 9/12/23 and 9/13/23) of a three day survey. Findings included: On 9/11/23 at 7:45 a.m., during the initial tour it was revealed the temperature of the water in the shower room sink near Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was hot. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure storage and labeling of drugs and biologicals in accordance with professional standards, and failed to ensure medications were secured and not accessible to residents, visitors and/or unauthorized staff for one medication cart (Station Two) of two medication carts, and for one of one treatment carts located in an unlocked medical supply room for two days ([DATE] and [DATE]) out of three days of the survey. Findings included: An observation was made upon entering the facility on [DATE] at 7:10 a.m. of an unlocked medical supply room opened to a resident hallway. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) There were no staff around this area at this time. Inside the medical supply room was an unlocked treatment cart. The first drawer of this treatment cart contained a pair of sharp scissors and a pair of blunted trauma shears (Photographic Evidence Obtained.) The second drawer contained residents' prescription medication. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature for six residents (#12, #16, #38, #40, #41 and #343) of 17 residents reviewed for food services. Findings included: During an interview on 09/11/23 at 8:43 a.m., Resident #41 stated the food was cold. Resident #41 stated she talked to the lady in the kitchen about the cold food but nothing changed. Review of Resident #41's admission Record showed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses to include type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident #41 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact). During an interview on 09/11/23 at 8:45 a.m. Resident #40 stated being unhappy about the breakfast this morning and stated the eggs, sausage and toast was always served cold. Review of Resident #40's admission Record showed Resident #40 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. An observation on 09/11/23 at 7:47 a.m., showed blue underwear hanging on a towel rack in the shared bathroom between Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) During an interview on 09/11/23 at 7:47 a.m., Resident #344 stated the underwear belonged to Resident #8. Resident #344 stated, Resident #8 washed them in the sink and was letting the underwear hang dry. During an interview on 09/11/23 at 8:50 a.m., Resident #8 stated the blue underwear was hers and she washed them out in the sink and left them to dry. Resident #8 stated she was being discharged tomorrow and wanted them clean for when she got discharged tomorrow. An observation on 09/11/23 at 9:17 a.m., showed a pair of used gloves on the corner of bed B in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed on two of two units, in the dining room, and in the laundry room, related to used medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide equal access to quality care related to a dignified meal service for two (#2 and #3) of four residents sampled for dependence on staff during dining. Findings included: On 11/02/23 at approximately 11:50 a.m., Resident #2 and #3 were observed in the dining room. Resident #2 was in his wheelchair sharing a table with another resident. Resident #2's tray was observed in front of him. The resident was observed not able to feed himself. Resident #3 was observed in specialized chair sharing a table with two other residents. All the residents had trays in front of them. The other two residents were observed being assisted with their meals. Resident #3 was observed not eating or drinking while the other residents ate. Review of record showed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include encephalopathy, other specified disorders of the brain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to request a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for one resident (#16) with a newly diagnosed mental illness out of 14 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #16's admission Record showed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy and paraplegia. Resident #16 was diagnosed with schizophrenia, unspecified on 01/16/23. A review of a psychiatric note dated 01/16/23 showed, Reason for today's evaluation: Consult for psychiatric evaluation for schizophrenia disorder. Results: Patient has schizophrenia start Risperdal 1 mg (milligram) PO (by mouth) BID (two times a day) for schizophrenia. A review of the physician orders for September 2023 showed: Risperidone Oral Tablet 1 MG (Risperidone) Give one tablet by mouth two times a day for Schizophrenia. A review of the care plan showed Resident #16 had a Focus Area for Antipsychotic Care Plan, initiated on 1/16/23, that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to monitor and record temperatures for the one nourishment refrigerator used for residents located at one nurses station (Nurses Station Two) of two nurses stations. Findings included: An observation on 09/13/23 at 1:30 p.m., showed a RESIDENTS ONLY refrigerator located at Nurses Station Two. The refrigerator contained food and drink for multiple residents. On the refrigerator was a temperature log for September 2023 that showed missing temperatures. The dates missing temperature checks for the month of September 2023 were as follows: (Photographic Evidence Obtained) - 09/01/23 - 09/03/23 - 09/04/23. Behind the September 2023 refrigerator temperature log was the August 2023 refrigerator temperature log. The dates missing temperature checks for the month of August 2023 were as follows: (Photographic Evidence Obtained) -08/18/23 -08/19/23 -08/20/23 -08/21/23 -08/22/23 -08/23/23 -08/24/23 -08/25/23 -08/26/23 -08/27/23 -08/28/23. During an interview on 09/13/23 at 1:36 p.m. the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement was understood by two residents (#13 and #34) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. On 9/11/2023 at 10:36 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA stated all residents review and sign arbitration agreements upon admission. The NHA stated no one has declined to sign the arbitration agreement. The NHA provided a facility document titled, Facility admission Agreement, State: FLORIDA printed in the middle of the page and on the bottom left corner, admission Agreement, August 2022 version. Review of Resident #13's admission Record revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE]., with diagnoses that included sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension encephalopathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Section C - Cognitive Patterns revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 03 out of 15,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, policy review, and the Plan of Correction review, the facility failed to ensure that it had a functioning Quality Assurance Committee. The facility was actively involved in the creation, implementation and monitoring of the plan of correction for deficient practice identified during a recertification survey that was conducted 9/11/23 to 9/13/23 and was cited F761 and F880. On 11/2/23 a revisit survey was conducted, and the facility was recited F761 and F880. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date of 10/13/23. Findings included: 1. The facility developed a plan of correction that included: Quality review was conducted on 9/14/23, by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) of medication carts and supply rooms to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately. The facility developed a plan of correction that identified measures to be put into place or made systemic changes to ensure the practice did not recur included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety regarding not dating pre-made sandwiches on one of one tray observed in the walk-in refrigerator, not documenting food temperatures prior to serving for one out of eleven meals on the temperature log, and not ensuring food from an outside source was stored with a use-by date and labeled with the owners name in one of one nursing station refrigerator. Findings included: On 7/27/21 at 9:15 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Kitchen Manager (KM). A three-quarter filled tray of pre- made turkey and cheese half sandwiches was observed in the walk-in refrigerator. The observation identified that none of the sandwiches or the tray was dated as to when they were assembled. The KM confirmed that the sandwiches were undated, he picked up the tray, looked at it and stated there isn't a sticker. The KM left the walk-in refrigerator and placed a sticker with a date on the tray. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed related to behaviors for one resident (Resident #41) out of the sampled twenty-five residents. Findings included: On 07/27/21 at 10:55 a.m., Resident #41 was observed sitting at the table in the main dining room. The resident appeared calm. He was dressed for the day. Resident #41 replied yes when asked if he was ok. Resident #26 was observed in the main dining room sitting at a table during this time also. When asked was everything ok, he stated yes except for that nasty man while pointing at Resident #41 and he proceeded to use profanity related to the behaviors of Resident #41. Resident #26 stated Resident #41 was nasty and was always messing with his private parts in the front of everyone. A review of the admission Record for Resident #26 revealed that he was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Section C Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was below 5.00%. A total of twenty-five medications were observed administered and four errors were identified for three (3) (Resident #10, #23 and #46) of six (6) residents observed. These errors constituted a medication error rate of 16 percent. Findings included: A facility provided policy titled, Administering Medications, revision date April 2019, Policy and Procedure, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 10. The individual administering medication checks the label three (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) before giving the medication. On 07/28/21 at 09:25 a.m., and observation was conducted of Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) administering medication to Resident #10. During the observation Staff A, (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,316 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $37,316 — penalty dated 2023-09-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-15.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 5%Other / private 16%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,610per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105228. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next