Healthcare And Rehab Of Sanford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 108.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive system to monitor antibiotic use, failed to effectively document and maintain infection surveillance during a Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, and failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were implemented to prevent the spread of infection in 2 of 2 units. Findings: Review of an Infection Control Assessment and Response Report (ICAR) conducted on 10/20/25 by the Florida Department of Health (DOH) revealed the visit was initiated due to a COVID-19 outbreak affecting residents and staff. The ICAR included recommendations related to transmission-based precautions (TBP) and environmental services (EVS), including limited access to hand sanitizer pumps and the requirement to use Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved disinfectants for Candida auris in appropriate rooms. The ICAR further identified frontline staff had not received adequate training on which isolation precautions required the use of Viresept disinfectant versus Virex disinfectant,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document administered medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications, of total sample of 5 residents, (#1).Findings: Review of resident #1's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included pneumonia, resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs, Escheria coli infection, quadriplegia, and dementia. Review of resident #1's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/30/25 for Cefiderocol 2 grams intravenously every 8 hours for the treatment of pneumonia, through 12/08/25. Review of resident #1's MAR for December 2025 revealed blank entries for Cefiderocol doses scheduled on 12/03/25 at 2:00 PM and 12/08/25 at 6:00 AM. The MAR also reflected an X for the scheduled dose on 12/01/25 at 2:00 PM; however, there was no documentation in the medical record indicating the reason the medication was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity when administering injectable medications to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity, out of a total sample of 5 residents, (#4). Findings: Review of resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, type 2 diabetes, infection of an amputation stump, and heart failure. Review of resident #4's Minimum Data Set admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/19/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment noted the resident did not reject evaluation or care necessary to achieve his goals for health and well-being. During a tour of the facility on 12/10/25 at 9:57 AM, a nurse was observed administering an injection to resident #5's abdomen while the resident sat in a wheelchair in a common area near rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. There were five additional residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide splints for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM), of a total sample of 36 residents, (#75). Finding: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following an intracranial hemorrhage affecting his left non-dominant side, atrophy and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Resdient #75 was able to express simple needs and answer questions appropriately. On 4/27/25 at 12:30 PM, resident #75 was observed in bed, his left arm and hand were contracted. The resident stated he had a stroke and was supposed to wear a splint everyday. He stated no one helped him with the splint, and added, I can't put them on myself. Review of the of the Occupational Therapist Discharge summary dated [DATE], noted resident #75 met the goal of wearing a left upper extremity elbow extension splint and a resting hand splint. The discharge instructions noted resident #75 would remain in the facility as a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and monitor the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) developed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee to ensure continued accuracy with all resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and Development/Implementation of Comprehensive Resident Care Plans. Findings: Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeat deficiency concerns for MDS assessment accuracy over the past 2 surveys, and during the current survey. The survey history revealed the facility had inaccurate MDS assessments on 3/2020, and 12/15/21. This is the facility's third deficiency in 4 years for inaccurate MDS assessments. On 10/12/23 at 2:48 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Administrator, and Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the facility's QAPI program. The Administrator acknowledged the facility had a PIP for MDS from the last survey. He confirmed there were audits in place through September 2022. The Administrator acknowledged he could not locate current audits for this year for MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment in 4 rooms on 1 of 2 units (Unit 2: rooms #226, #230, #232, and #238). Findings: On 10/09/23 at 10:29 AM, 10/10/23 at 10:29 AM, and 10/12/23 at 10:12 AM, one of the closet doors in room [ROOM NUMBER] was resting on the side of the closet closest to the exit door. On 10/09/23 at 10:58 AM, resident #32 stated she had shared her cleanliness concerns in room [ROOM NUMBER] to staff. She explained, in the past, she had requested housekeeping to clean the bathroom but they did not do it. She indicated housekeeping did not always clean the toilet or mopped the floor. Review of the Grievance Log revealed two grievances were filed by resident #32 on 4/13/23 and 6/2/23 with concerns regarding room [ROOM NUMBER]'s environment and cleanliness. On 10/09/23 at 4:16 PM, resident #55 in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated she requested a toilet paper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected health conditions regarding falls for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for accidents (#9, #74), and for a hearing device for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hearing/vision (#94) and failed to accurately assess the prognosis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Hospice and end of life care (#3) of a total sample of 49 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include tibia fracture, type 2 diabetes, and anxiety. Review of the medical record noted the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 6/09/23 at 6:20 PM. A nursing progress note dated 6/10/23 at 2:00 AM, read resident #9's left ankle was swollen. An x-ray result indicated a fracture to the left distal tibia. Resident #9 was sent to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section J indicated resident #9 had two or more falls with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for hearing aid devices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hearing and vision of a total sample of 49 residents, (#94). Findings: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, hypertension and anxiety disorder. Review of the Agency for Healthcare Administration 5000-3008 Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form dated 8/22/23 revealed resident #94 was alert and oriented but had impaired sight and used hearing aids. Review of the Admission/readmit: Data Collection and Baseline Care Plan dated 8/25/23 revealed under the Sensory section his ability to hear was not assessed, but left and right hearing aids were indicated for devices that were used or needed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Section B dated 8/31/23 revealed he had adequate hearing, but the assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to the use of splints for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for position and mobility of a total sample of 49 residents, (#48). Findings: Review of resident #48's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included lack of coordination, stroke, contractures of left hand, left elbow, right elbow and abnormal posture. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 9/20/23 revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status was not conducted because resident #48 was rarely or never understood. The MDS assessment showed resident #48's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The assessment showed resident #48 was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The assessment noted no rejection of care necessary to obtain goals for her health and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and monitor the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) developed by the Quality Assurance & Assessment (QA&A) committee to ensure continued accuracy with all resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and Development/Implementation of Comprehensive Resident Care Plans. Findings: On 12/15/21 at 12:27 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated that all MDS assessments are required to be accurate, reflect the resident's medical care needs and completed in a timely manner In order to complete an accurate MDS assessment, she needed to conduct an observation and interview the resident, interview the nursing staff providing care to the resident, interview the resident's family/responsible party, review the nursing progress notes, physician orders and progress notes, hospital information and all consultations completed. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that current resident MDSs were not correct for their oxygen use, a resident MDS had not correctly identified her dialysis treatments, a resident discharge MDS had not been completed in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $151K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL