Pr SNF Operations LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 47.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent neglect through lack of adequate assessments and supervision for a confused resident to prevent elopement from the facility for 2 (Resident #5 and #6) of 3 residents reviewed. The lack of supervision contributed to the elopement of Resident #5 and the incorrect assessment of Resident #6 who was confused and mobile via wheelchair. The findings included: Facility policy provided by the DON (Director of Nursing) for Elopement Risk with effective date of 03/2008 and last revision date of 10/2022 was defined as a situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the community's knowledge and supervision which may represent a risk to the resident's health and safety. Evaluating for elopement risk prior to admission. admission associate should identify potential risk for elopement and notify the Director of Clinical Services/designee of the following: The resident has a pertinent diagnosis of dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed ensure to obtain physician ordered medications in a timely manner for newly admitted residents for 2 (#1 and #2) of 3 residents reviewed. The findings included: Review of the policy titled admission Data Collection and Orders last revised on 10/24 stated that the Nursing department is responsible for recording specific clinical data in the medical record upon a resident's admission to the community . The charge nurse who admits the resident is responsible for completing the Nursing admission Data Collection, verifying orders are present for admission, additional corresponding data collection, and reviewing the information sent by the discharging community, hospital and/or attending physician . The charge nurse should contact the attending physician after the resident has been admitted to the community and resident data is collected including orders should be reviewed with the physician and verified. The designated pharmacy should be notified of the new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, staff and residents interviews, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse by willfully administering unauthorized over the counter medications with known effect of drowsiness during the night shift to 2 (Residents #800, and #825) of 5 residents reviewed.The findings included:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation with an effective date of 7/20/2016 and last revised date of 10/22 revealed the facility, is committed to maintaining a safe environment for residents . Residents have the right to be free from abuse . and any physical or chemical restraint imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms .Review of the facility provided incidents investigations revealed on 7/10/25 the facility initiated an abuse investigation related to an allegation that a Licensed Nurse was administering everyone medications to make them sleep.The investigation noted:On 7/8/25 Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident receives pain management services based on the resident's goals and preferences for 1 resident (#1). The findings include: Review of the policy titled admission Data Collection and Orders last revised on 10/24 stated that the Nursing department is responsible for recording specific clinical data in the medical record upon a resident's admission to the community. The charge nurse should contact the attending physician after the resident has been admitted to the community and resident data is collected including orders should be reviewed with the physician and verified. The designated pharmacy should be notified of the new admission and order confirmation of pharmacy supplied items. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:30 p.m. from an acute care hospital following joint replacement surgery. Resident #1 had right knee replacement surgery and admission diagnosis of Heart Failure, Cardiomyopathy and Type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 of 3 (#1 and #2) residents reviewed. The findings included: The facility policy admission Data Collection and Orders dated 12/08 last revised 10/24 stated that the nursing department is responsible for recording specific clinical data in the medical record upon the residents admission to the community. The charge nurse who admits the resident is responsible for completing the nursing admission data collection, verifying orders are present for admission, additional data collection and reviewing information sent by the discharging community, hospital or attending physician. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:30 p.m. for aftercare following joint replacement surgery. The hospital discharge records include physician orders for pain medication, insulin, aftercare of incision instructions, proper positioning while in bed, weight baring status, activity orders, and equipment. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety and ensure food was handled in a sanitary manner that prevented cross contamination. The findings included: Cross-contamination means the transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils which are not cleaned after touching raw food, and then touch ready-to-eat foods. Cross-contamination can also occur when raw food touches or drips onto cooked or ready-to-eat foods. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents who reside in the facility and receive food from the kitchen. Facility policy titled, Storage of Perishable Food-DS-04.014; effective 2005 stated: Perishable food must be refrigerated in a manner that optimizes food safety, nutrient retentions, and aesthetic quality. Perishable foods include fruits, vegetables, meats, daily etc. All pre-dished items must be covered, labeled, and dated to prevent off-flavors, drying,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a newly inserted pacemaker for 1 (Resident #204) of 3 residents reviewed for pacemakers. The findings included: Review of Resident #204's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/26/23. Diagnoses included cardiac dysrhythmia (abnormal heart activity). Review of the hospital documentation revealed on 4/6/23 Resident #204 underwent a surgical insertion of a cardiac pacemaker (Device to help control the heartbeat). On 5/10/23 at 3:45 p.m., Resident #204 said he recently had a pacemaker implanted in his chest. The resident said no one told him about any special precautions for the pacemaker. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] listed the code for the presence of a Pacemaker in the diagnoses. The physician's orders as of 5/10/23 did not include instructions on care of the cardiac pacemaker. The care plans initiated on 4/26/23 did not address the recently inserted pacemaker with appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #37, and #38) of 26 sampled residents. The findings included: Facility policy PL.6-011, revised 12/2020, titled following physician orders stated, a physician order is required for, changes in plan of care, treatment changes and discontinuation of treatments. Facility Policy titled Referrals, Social Services, Revised December 2008 stated Social services personnel shall coordinate most resident referrals with outside agencies. Social Services will collaborate with the nursing staff or other pertinent disciplines to arrange for services that have been ordered by the physician. 1. Resident #38 was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Acute Disseminated Demyelination, Drug Induced Dyskinesia, (Tardive Dyskinesia), Dysphagia, Muscle Weakness, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to maintain highest level of range of motion for 1 (Resident #37) of 3 residents reviewed for limited range of motion and activities of daily living. The findings included: A review of the Clinical Services Policy, Support Activities of Daily living (ADL), effective 4/2022 stated residents should be provided with care, treatment, and services such that their activities of daily living do not diminish unless the circumstances of their clinical condition(s) demonstrate that diminishing ADLS are unavoidable. A review of the clinical record for Resident #37 revealed a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 2/15/23 noted Resident #37 had functional limitation in Range of Motion (ROM) on one side of the upper extremities. The resident's cognition was severely impaired. The resident was rarely or never understood. Resident #37's diagnoses included Dementia, Contracture (deformity, rigidity of joint) of the right hand. The physician's orders dated 11/18/22 included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed with an indwelling foley catheter had a valid medical justification for continued use of an indwelling foley catheter (catheter placed in the bladder to drain urine). The facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to 2 (Resident #13 and #203) of 5 sampled residents with a urinary catheter to prevent urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. On 5/8/23 at 10:18 a.m. Resident #1 was observed connected to an indwelling foley catheter. A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1's initial admission was 5/3/22 with a readmission date of 4/27/23. Initial admission diagnoses were acute cystitis with hematuria, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, syncope, and nonrheumatic aortic stenosis. The comprehensive nursing progress note dated 2/7/23 noted Resident #1 as continent of bowel and bladder. A hospital transfer form dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled or stored in a locked compartment for 2 (Residents #32 and #39) of 2 residents reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: Facility Policy and Procedure for Resident Self-Administration of Medications-MED-4, revised on 3/19 states It is the policy of Brookdale that those residents who desire to self-administer medications may do so if the review determines the resident is capable: 1) If the resident desires to self-administer medications, the charge nurse will review the resident's mental and physical abilities in conjunction with a Self-Administration of Medication Data Collection; 2) This skills review is conducted as part of the care plan process including (but not limited to) the resident's: ability to read and understand medication labels, comprehension of the purpose and proper dosage and administration times of the medications, ability to remove medications from the package and, in case of nonsolid dosage forms such as an inhaler, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, staff and resident interview the facility failed to provide timely dental care services to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for dental services. The findings included: The facility policy titled Oral Health Care and Dental Services-CS-110-2, revised 11/2017, stated Oral health care and dental services will be provided to each resident. The nursing associates will conduct oral health evaluations on admission and at least quarterly (through the MDS) process. The charge nurse or designee will request a consultation if needed. Social Services or designee will be responsible for making necessary dental appointments. Review of the clinical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 7/21/22. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an ARD of 2/26/23 indicated the resident's cognition was intact. No oral concern were noted. Clinical record review noted resident #38 had an order for a dental consult for dentures related to eating/diet on 1/6/2023. On 5/8/23 at 3:27 p.m., Resident #38 was observed in his room. He…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$59,696 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $59,696 — penalty dated 2025-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $176K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL